Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The election was stolen.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Epc1JKjUYAQVvwA?format=png&name=smallhttps://www.scribd.com/document/488495896/Navarro-Report#download

I'm convinced you are a troll. No one is this stupid.

Don't you think if Trump's legal team could prove fraud they would have?

Give me your evidence.

Alan

"Possible Illegal Ballots"

Too bad all these top notch Trump lawyers couldn't present any evidence to the courts in the last month.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The election was stolen.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Epc1JKjUYAQVvwA?format=png&name=smallhttps://www.scribd.com/document/488495896/Navarro-Report#download

I'm convinced you are a troll. No one is this stupid.

Don't you think if Trump's legal team could prove fraud they would have?

Give me your evidence.

Alan

Can't you, and your socialist brethren, at least read the detailed, conclusive Navarro Report before dismissing it? Wouldn't that make sense? Or is it like the Bible, and you just dismiss it out of hand without reading it because you want to live your hedonistic lifestyle and cavort all day? Truth denied is denial of more than a river.

L L wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Would you be willing to sign an affidavit attesting to such.?

I will sign it after David.

SNL joke, but good

Flybang mosher wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

I'm convinced you are a troll. No one is this stupid.

Don't you think if Trump's legal team could prove fraud they would have?

Give me your evidence.

Alan

Can't you, and your socialist brethren, at least read the detailed, conclusive Navarro Report before dismissing it? Wouldn't that make sense? Or is it like the Bible, and you just dismiss it out of hand without reading it because you want to live your hedonistic lifestyle and cavort all day? Truth denied is denial of more than a river.

Republicans are 1-49 in court cases. There is always some great evidence that never pans out, but THIS time we should take it seriously.

There is a loss of credibility.

Dan Kahneman wrote:

Flybang mosher wrote:

Can't you, and your socialist brethren, at least read the detailed, conclusive Navarro Report before dismissing it? Wouldn't that make sense? Or is it like the Bible, and you just dismiss it out of hand without reading it because you want to live your hedonistic lifestyle and cavort all day? Truth denied is denial of more than a river.

Republicans are 1-49 in court cases. There is always some great evidence that never pans out, but THIS time we should take it seriously.

There is a loss of credibility.

Doesn't sound like you are interested in reading the Navarro Report, Daniel. Am I right? You are never going to read it? Don't lie. I know when you are lying. Best to come clean here.

Dan Kahneman wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The election was stolen.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Epc1JKjUYAQVvwA?format=png&name=smallhttps://www.scribd.com/document/488495896/Navarro-Report#download

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-07/trump-adviser-navarro-accused-of-using-post-to-sway-2020-race

Navarro illegally and repeatedly violated the Hatch act due to highly partisan behavior. Is he looking for a pardon?

It's gotten so bad with these trumpers that they don't even feel the need to give any appearance of caring about law and order.

Flybang mosher wrote:

Dan Kahneman wrote:

Republicans are 1-49 in court cases. There is always some great evidence that never pans out, but THIS time we should take it seriously.

There is a loss of credibility.

Doesn't sound like you are interested in reading the Navarro Report, Daniel. Am I right? You are never going to read it? Don't lie. I know when you are lying. Best to come clean here.

Trump is 1-59 in court. Sally, why don't you read the report and summarize it for us?

Flybang mosher wrote:

Dan Kahneman wrote:

Republicans are 1-49 in court cases. There is always some great evidence that never pans out, but THIS time we should take it seriously.

There is a loss of credibility.

Doesn't sound like you are interested in reading the Navarro Report, Daniel. Am I right? You are never going to read it? Don't lie. I know when you are lying. Best to come clean here.

I'll answer. Correct. You and I have been lied to by Trump (and increasingly, his supporters) on an often-hourly basis for 4-5 years. More recently, Trump has been crushed in court dozens of times for producing nothing. If this report has great stuff in it, I'll hear about it in one or more successful court cases. That's a far more efficient use of my/our time than the 99.9% certainty that we'd be wasting our time reading this particular piece of crap. Clear enough?

Question: Why do you support a leader and others who VERY openly lie to you on an hourly basis? COMPLETELY take you for fools. Isn't that embarrassing? Shows a lack of self respect? Other bad things......

L L wrote:

Agip, RunningArt and Trollminator helped me get out the fake votes.

We didn't let Flagpole in on it. We figured he'd blab and ruin it.

My vote was fraudulent anyway because I mailed mine in! Even worse I live in an Asian county......Asia! Come on man!

Alan

Why no one should read the Navarro report: it opens by calling the lawsuits evidence. That's the standard of proof, that they merely sued 60 times and sometimes presented material they knew was never even going to be considered anyway. Affidavits and declarations, lol, none of which carried any weight in proving or even signaling any irregularity. An extremely embarrassing and amateurish legal stunt, but one that resulted in a fortune in tzee donations. Trump was right all along in trusting that the base was much dumber than him.

Flybang mosher wrote:

Dan Kahneman wrote:

Republicans are 1-49 in court cases. There is always some great evidence that never pans out, but THIS time we should take it seriously.

There is a loss of credibility.

Doesn't sound like you are interested in reading the Navarro Report, Daniel. Am I right? You are never going to read it? Don't lie. I know when you are lying. Best to come clean here.

I am not like Trump or one of his sycophants, I very rarely lie. My post was pretty clear about what I think of the latest and newest "evidence".

You are like the boy who constantly called wolf and suddenly is surprised that no one is taking him seriously.

Your ship sail along time ago. Most of us are tired of the nonsense.

Trumpers are killing people every day. Every minute.

They have no plan to distribute vaccine, so it is sitting in Pfizer's warehouses, waiting for instructions.

Every minute that vaccine stays, the Republican Party is killing people and proving that is should not be trusted with any responsibility. They are killing Americans.

https://twitter.com/megtirrell/status/1339620724487675904?s=20

Great story on how irrational the m/gas are. They truly believed Trump could not lose and they bet tens of thousands of dollars on it. It added up to tens of millions or more.

Even now, you can make 8% betting on Biden to win the presidency on PredictIt. The m/ga betters are fanatical and rich.

“It’s the most irrational market I ever saw,” says Collin Sherwin, a Tampa, Florida–based gambling writer who covers the industry for Vox Media’s DraftKings Nation.

“Everybody knows that the Super Bowl is the biggest bet event of the year by far, and this doubled the last two combined,” Mason says. “It was absolutely insane. Not only the amount of people betting it, but the big bets that were coming in. Five figures and even six-figure bets coming in on both sides. We’d never seen anything like it.”

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/12/trump-betting-markets-sportsbooks-offshore-2020-election-gambling.html

Arbitrage based on pure idiot rage and denial. I love it. Efficient market hypothesis indeed.

Anyways - a not stupid WSJ essay

Trollminator wrote:

Flybang mosher wrote:

Doesn't sound like you are interested in reading the Navarro Report, Daniel. Am I right? You are never going to read it? Don't lie. I know when you are lying. Best to come clean here.

Trump is 1-59 in court. Sally, why don't you read the report and summarize it for us?

Tiffany, there would be no point in me summarizing the Navarro Report, when you can easily read it yourself. I can tell you it is not a proxy for the court pleadings you seem to refer to.

Why won't you read it, Brenda? You seem like an open minded gal. Are there troubles in the abode?

Yes! The election was stolen, and we need to give more money to Trump so his lawyers can present evidence to the courts! I already used this months rent money to donate to Trump! Please, if you believe in democracy and fair elections, give as much as you can to Trump!

Will this be the last of whining little babies in politics?