-
36
-
Do you think there might be a correlation between Trump shuttering SEC offices and cutting staff and Trump deciding US taxpayers must buy crypto and hold it in reserve?
Or are those things unrelated?
83 -
Nah. There are no executive orders on public interest.
26 -
I am not a fan of idiotic theatrics at the SOTU.
But I have to admit, I might enjoy Trumps reaction if all Dems walked in with red trucker caps and white T shirts that said nothing but:
Gulf of Mexico
63 -
Oldrunningguy wrote:
I am not a fan of idiotic theatrics at the SOTU.
But I have to admit, I might enjoy Trumps reaction if all Dems walked in with red trucker caps and white T shirts that said nothing but:
Gulf of Mexico
Dems are stupid enough to believe this is a good idea.
38 -
This should be fun to watch.
The lib meltdowns are coming.
410 -
One might assume that Trump usually sounds at least a little less stupid than his average mouth-breathing supporter. But then you’re reminded that he yelled (more than once, I think) at Zelensky, a guy without nuclear weapons and hanging on by a conventional thread against an aggressor with nuclear weapons, “You’re risking WW3!!!”
Sounding EXACTLY as stupid as his average anonymous online supporter.
Incredible.
It seems unfair that all of Eastern Europe after WW2, Taiwan, and South Korea ( to name a few) never got or get this astute criticism.
103 -
Nnonequalsweek58 wrote:
One might assume that Trump usually sounds at least a little less stupid than his average mouth-breathing supporter. But then you’re reminded that he yelled (more than once, I think) at Zelensky, a guy without nuclear weapons and hanging on by a conventional thread against an aggressor with nuclear weapons, “You’re risking WW3!!!”
Sounding EXACTLY as stupid as his average anonymous online supporter.
Incredible.
It seems unfair that all of Eastern Europe after WW2, Taiwan, and South Korea ( to name a few) never got or get this astute criticism.
Involving more countries beyond just Ukraine and Russia in a wider war isn’t risking world war 3? If zelensky surrendered we would have peace.
214 -
TrumpForever 47 wrote:
Nnonequalsweek58 wrote:
One might assume that Trump usually sounds at least a little less stupid than his average mouth-breathing supporter. But then you’re reminded that he yelled (more than once, I think) at Zelensky, a guy without nuclear weapons and hanging on by a conventional thread against an aggressor with nuclear weapons, “You’re risking WW3!!!”
Sounding EXACTLY as stupid as his average anonymous online supporter.
Incredible.
It seems unfair that all of Eastern Europe after WW2, Taiwan, and South Korea ( to name a few) never got or get this astute criticism.
Involving more countries beyond just Ukraine and Russia in a wider war isn’t risking world war 3? If zelensky surrendered we would have peace.
Does it ever cross your mind why you are asking the invaded country to surrender and not the invading country to stop invading?
Does any of that sort of make sense? At least a little bit?
132 -
TrumpForever 47 wrote:
Nnonequalsweek58 wrote:
One might assume that Trump usually sounds at least a little less stupid than his average mouth-breathing supporter. But then you’re reminded that he yelled (more than once, I think) at Zelensky, a guy without nuclear weapons and hanging on by a conventional thread against an aggressor with nuclear weapons, “You’re risking WW3!!!”
Sounding EXACTLY as stupid as his average anonymous online supporter.
Incredible.
It seems unfair that all of Eastern Europe after WW2, Taiwan, and South Korea ( to name a few) never got or get this astute criticism.
Involving more countries beyond just Ukraine and Russia in a wider war isn’t risking world war 3? If zelensky surrendered we would have peace.
It’s been 3 years, when are these other countries showing up?
And even if they did, and a wider war was started, it STILL wouldn’t be Ukraine’s “fault” for vigorously defending itself.
I wanna think “troll” with comments like yours, but….I saw the election results.
83 -
TrumpForever 47 wrote:
Nnonequalsweek58 wrote:
One might assume that Trump usually sounds at least a little less stupid than his average mouth-breathing supporter. But then you’re reminded that he yelled (more than once, I think) at Zelensky, a guy without nuclear weapons and hanging on by a conventional thread against an aggressor with nuclear weapons, “You’re risking WW3!!!”
Sounding EXACTLY as stupid as his average anonymous online supporter.
Incredible.
It seems unfair that all of Eastern Europe after WW2, Taiwan, and South Korea ( to name a few) never got or get this astute criticism.
Involving more countries beyond just Ukraine and Russia in a wider war isn’t risking world war 3? If zelensky surrendered we would have peace.
You mean involving other countries like directly involving North Korean troops? Who did that again? And which country—hint: it rhymes with “gina”—who Trump supposedly views as our main rival allowed that to happen?
who is risk WWIII? Who invaded whom?
62 -
Oldrunningguy wrote:
TrumpForever 47 wrote:
Involving more countries beyond just Ukraine and Russia in a wider war isn’t risking world war 3? If zelensky surrendered we would have peace.
Does it ever cross your mind why you are asking the invaded country to surrender and not the invading country to stop invading?
Does any of that sort of make sense? At least a little bit?
NATO encroaching on Russia - and in particular, Ukraine possibly joining NATO - caused it. That was Russia’s red line.
115 -
This doesn’t look good.
51 -
TrumpForever 47 wrote:
Oldrunningguy wrote:
Does it ever cross your mind why you are asking the invaded country to surrender and not the invading country to stop invading?
Does any of that sort of make sense? At least a little bit?
NATO encroaching on Russia - and in particular, Ukraine possibly joining NATO - caused it. That was Russia’s red line.
This is total BS. That “red line” garbage argument can / could be used to justify Russia invading Poland and the Baltic states as well. The USSR failed and Putin has never gotten over that fact and has spent the last 20 years trying to essentially resurrect the iron curtain. Ukraine originally inquired about NATO membership in 2008—Putin did not invade then—so why was 2014 and 2022 different?
51 -
Unfortunate Missed Opportunities in Presidential Leadership:
”You don’t have the cards, Winston. With us, you have some cards. Maybe you give us Scotland, and we don’t promise to help you with Hitler. And I know that NEITHER of you have nuclear weapons, but I’m gonna go ahead and claim that you’re risking WW3, too!!”
We were so right not to put FDR on Rushmore. But Trump’s making a great case.
51 -
FAFO wrote:
This doesn’t look good.
To answer the headline: The sack of sh** on top of them ???
30 -
ENRAGED LIBRUHL wrote:
TrumpForever 47 wrote:
NATO encroaching on Russia - and in particular, Ukraine possibly joining NATO - caused it. That was Russia’s red line.
This is total BS. That “red line” garbage argument can / could be used to justify Russia invading Poland and the Baltic states as well. The USSR failed and Putin has never gotten over that fact and has spent the last 20 years trying to essentially resurrect the iron curtain. Ukraine originally inquired about NATO membership in 2008—Putin did not invade then—so why was 2014 and 2022 different?
Nah, I’d prefer to live in a world where a sovereign nation even THINKING about joining an alliance fully justifies a brutal and enduring invasion by a neighbor.
80 -
48
-
Women for Trump \' wrote:
TDS
44
1 post was removed from this page.