Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Humm. You seem both an elitist and vindictive. Agree on college not for everyone. Even Bideners need to learn to be plumbers, quit wasting time in protests and burning stuff. ?

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Humm. You seem both an elitist and vindictive. Agree on college not for everyone. Even Bideners need to learn to be plumbers, quit wasting time in protests and burning stuff. ?

Joe Biden would have much less angst if Hunter had gone the plumber route.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Humm. You seem both an elitist and vindictive. Agree on college not for everyone. Even Bideners need to learn to be plumbers, quit wasting time in protests and burning stuff. ?

Joe Biden would have much less angst if Hunter had gone the plumber route.

Yea, first off Hunter would be too tired to cause trouble, second, his father might learn the meaning of work. ???????

mister 13848 wrote:

Let's re-visit your comments in a few weeks.

Durham.

Christmas is coming.

13848.

Durham must’ve taken tantric sex lessons from Sting because he’s been coming for months now.

Real Obvi wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

So most voters are just clueless sheep. They vote the way they do (GOP or Dem) because that's the way they've always voted. They don't pay attention to the news or the issues.

Of Trumps 47% I would guess 25-30% are your fanatic idealists. The rest are just going along for the ride or the "well at least he will try to turn over Roe v Wade" crowd.

I'm not sure what happened to actual conservatism. The Tea Party is conservative. Rand Paul is conservative to a fault.Financial conservatism is dead.

Alan

(1) Rand Paul supports Trump every step of the way.

(2) No real conservative supports Trump's anti-American nonsense.

(3) Therefore Rand Paul is decidedly NOT a conservative.

Rand Paul has never been a conservative. He’s a whack job libertarian whose views just happen to occasionally converge with conservatives.

agip wrote:

Dan Kahneman wrote:

Does anyone have any doubt that if Trump could get away with declaring marshal law and using the military to keep power, that he wouldn't do it.

And how many Trump supporters would be okay with it?

I don't think he would do it.

He wants money. His money would not do well if he tried to keep power illegally.

I don't know. I think he considers himself against the circle of dictators like that of North Korea, etc,, and thinks that if they can do it, he certainly could. I am convinced he would if he could. Not enough die hard followers for him to pull it off, though, and not by a long shot.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Joe Biden would have much less angst if Hunter had gone the plumber route.

Yea, first off Hunter would be too tired to cause trouble, second, his father might learn the meaning of work. ???????

Maybe if Trump and his father had shown half as much concern for the substance abuse problems Fred Jr. had he might’ve lived long enough to secure a reasonable amount of the family fortune to take care of his disabled son.

Raggedman wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

(1) Rand Paul supports Trump every step of the way.

(2) No real conservative supports Trump's anti-American nonsense.

(3) Therefore Rand Paul is decidedly NOT a conservative.

Rand Paul has never been a conservative. He’s a whack job libertarian whose views just happen to occasionally converge with conservatives.

Donald Trump was in very serious talks with North Korea and it was the LIbs who were hoping the talks failed. The Dems/Libs were anti-America. Shame on them!

seattle prattle wrote:

agip wrote:

I don't think he would do it.

He wants money. His money would not do well if he tried to keep power illegally.

I don't know. I think he considers himself against the circle of dictators like that of North Korea, etc,, and thinks that if they can do it, he certainly could. I am convinced he would if he could. Not enough die hard followers for him to pull it off, though, and not by a long shot.

You need the top brass of the military on your side and you need a large enough portion of the rank and file prepared to fire on their country men. Trump has neither.

Erdogan had the brass on his side awhile back when he tried to violently out down protests but the troops didn’t open fire the way he’d hoped.

Sally Vix wrote:

Raggedman wrote:

Rand Paul has never been a conservative. He’s a whack job libertarian whose views just happen to occasionally converge with conservatives.

Donald Trump was in very serious talks with North Korea and it was the LIbs who were hoping the talks failed. The Dems/Libs were anti-America. Shame on them!

And what exactly doesn’t that have to do with the string of posts you quoted?

But if you want to go that route... tell me how well those talks went? Trump thought he’d made progress and Kim was testing his longest range missiles ever a couple of weeks later.

Raggedman wrote:

seattle prattle wrote:

I don't know. I think he considers himself against the circle of dictators like that of North Korea, etc,, and thinks that if they can do it, he certainly could. I am convinced he would if he could. Not enough die hard followers for him to pull it off, though, and not by a long shot.

You need the top brass of the military on your side and you need a large enough portion of the rank and file prepared to fire on their country men. Trump has neither.

Erdogan had the brass on his side awhile back when he tried to violently out down protests but the troops didn’t open fire the way he’d hoped.

Agreed. We just went through many months of protests in teh streets, and some looting and destruction of public property. None of it done on the side of the current administration, and more likely, the exact opposite. What does that tell you?

Raggedman wrote:

seattle prattle wrote:

I don't know. I think he considers himself against the circle of dictators like that of North Korea, etc,, and thinks that if they can do it, he certainly could. I am convinced he would if he could. Not enough die hard followers for him to pull it off, though, and not by a long shot.

You need the top brass of the military on your side and you need a large enough portion of the rank and file prepared to fire on their country men. Trump has neither.

Erdogan had the brass on his side awhile back when he tried to violently out down protests but the troops didn’t open fire the way he’d hoped.

the thing about leaders who install themselves illegally as tyrants...for 99% of them the allure is power. They love being in charge, they love the decision making. They like governing.

Most of all they truly think the country would be chaos without them.

Money in almost never the motivation.

Trump does enjoy the respect he gets for being in charge, but he hates so much of the job.

And we all know that 90% of his motivation is money.

The thing about tyrants is that they have to give their money away to buy loyalty, and trump would absolutely not do that.

So, no, he would not take power, unless the military acted on its own and installed him. Then, maybe.

Raggedman wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

(1) Rand Paul supports Trump every step of the way.

(2) No real conservative supports Trump's anti-American nonsense.

(3) Therefore Rand Paul is decidedly NOT a conservative.

Rand Paul has never been a conservative. He’s a whack job libertarian whose views just happen to occasionally converge with conservatives.

Yup

Raggedman wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Yea, first off Hunter would be too tired to cause trouble, second, his father might learn the meaning of work. ???????

Maybe if Trump and his father had shown half as much concern for the substance abuse problems Fred Jr. had he might’ve lived long enough to secure a reasonable amount of the family fortune to take care of his disabled son.

I don’t think that is a fair comment. Joe seems the enabler; providing the sleazy connection to high paying influence peddling jobs that supply the millions to support cocaine habit and strip club addiction.

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Hilarious. I love it when he fleeces his own flock.

Fools. Uneducated, dumb@ss fools.

LBJ: “ If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the highest colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him someone to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you”

It was true then and it’s still true today for these idiots. Con artists love these simpletons.

This is some weird sh1t to hear from a trump supporter. Meaning of work and enabling destructive behavior? Do you even know who Donnie and his kids are?

no room wrote:

agip wrote:

are you the same as real Racket? Or some other dude?

"Dr. Racket" f'ed up -- he forget to change his posting name -- in a post I made to "Racket" and replied using the wrong handle.

There are not that many Trumpers posting here. Rackets is posting under several names, as do Sally and Rigged. Their posting style, and forgetfulness, give them away.

Oh no, I've been caught. What ever will I do. I was really trying to hide it too.

I've started posting recently as Dr Racket because of the recent "controversy" over non medical PhDs somehow not being real doctors

That's funny because I actually have a PhD in math and part of my work was (begrudgingly) conducted in graph theory. i can tell you all about it if you want

Racket wrote:

no room wrote:

"Dr. Racket" f'ed up -- he forget to change his posting name -- in a post I made to "Racket" and replied using the wrong handle.

There are not that many Trumpers posting here. Rackets is posting under several names, as do Sally and Rigged. Their posting style, and forgetfulness, give them away.

Oh no, I've been caught. What ever will I do. I was really trying to hide it too.

I've started posting recently as Dr Racket because of the recent "controversy" over non medical PhDs somehow not being real doctors

I got that (without having it explained to me).