L L wrote:
And this year's lawsuit by Texas telling other states how to determine their electors was beyond bazar.
"bizarre"
L L wrote:
And this year's lawsuit by Texas telling other states how to determine their electors was beyond bazar.
"bizarre"
No Room wrote:
agip wrote:
We have to beat back the electoral college. We can’t afford another terrible Presiden like bush2 or Trump.
Let PR in, have that pact be ratified...
Something.
Biden won by 7 million votes but 65,000 would have flipped the election to a felon.
Bad for america, and fundamentally unfair.
Minority rule will not last long.
In other news, Trump is currently packing the Pentagon and DOJ with unqualified loyalist. That has soon-to-be-attempted military coup written all over it.
That would seem to be a valid theory, NoRoom. To the extent it's discussed here, the reactions to that theory are that it is somehow an absolute impossibility. If you were of the right flavor, you'd be mocked for that post by the usual swarm. But I think you are on to something, NoRoom.
No Room wrote:
In other news, Trump is currently packing the Pentagon and DOJ with unqualified loyalist. That has soon-to-be-attempted military coup written all over it.
Yes all those administrative assistants he's appointing will certainly be a threat in the "paper stationary and water cooler" coup.
I mean I guess that would be in line with Trump's intelligence. Appoint a bunch of low level staffers and expect that to carry sway in the Pentagon
Sally Vix wrote:
SeattleSilver wrote:
I suspect the word you wanted was "convicted" rather than "committed". But even with that substitution, your argument is weak. First, his taxes were largely handled by accountants, not lawyers. Second, Trump actually has trouble getting the largest, most respected law firms to work for him. One reason is that he is cheap and tries to stiff service providers, including lawyers, on their bills. Another reason is that he doesn't follow advice.
A third issue with your statement is that Trump still could be convicted even though the forms were filled out by a service provider. It depends on the underlying facts regarding what Trump knew and what instructions he gave.
You are correct. Thanks. I meant "convicted." His net worth is about $3 billion. He is not hiring H & R Block flunkies to do his taxes. He is hiring the best tax attorneys or what you contend tax accountants to do his taxes. Unless their is audio or video of Trump instructing these tax attorneys or accountants to defraud the government of their rightful monies - then HE NEVER COMMITTED TAX FRAUD! Prove that he did and that is going to be a high mountain to climb!
I suspect that you have never represented a client before the government on tax issues. I have. They may yet ding him on tax fraud, they may just ding him on substantial underpayment, they my ding him on nothing. But you can be sure of one thing, if the government goes after the service providers and Trump jointly, the service providers aren't going to be willing to take a fall for Trump. In my experience such cases often result in disclosure of memos to the file saying the client has been warned that the position he wants to take is disallowed, but he insists that it be taken anyway. Of course, Trump would deny giving that order, and the Court would decide whom to believe. Other times the issue is that the client doesn't give full and accurate information to the people preparing the tax returns.
Racket wrote:
No Room wrote:
In other news, Trump is currently packing the Pentagon and DOJ with unqualified loyalist. That has soon-to-be-attempted military coup written all over it.
Yes all those administrative assistants he's appointing will certainly be a threat in the "paper stationary and water cooler" coup.
I mean I guess that would be in line with Trump's intelligence. Appoint a bunch of low level staffers and expect that to carry sway in the Pentagon
Like this. You just got mocked. Racket thinks any kind of use of the military by Trump is an absolute impossibility. Which doesn't exactly jive with all the massive diabolicalities he is said to have undertaken in the past, but there it is. The liberals purport to not have a care in the world about martial law/CWII type issues.
Flybang mosher wrote:
That would seem to be a valid theory, NoRoom. To the extent it's discussed here, the reactions to that theory are that it is somehow an absolute impossibility.
^ Trump Elite Team Lawyer Wannabe
Racket wrote:
No Room wrote:
In other news, Trump is currently packing the Pentagon and DOJ with unqualified loyalist. That has soon-to-be-attempted military coup written all over it.
Yes all those administrative assistants he's appointing will certainly be a threat in the "paper stationary and water cooler" coup.
I mean I guess that would be in line with Trump's intelligence. Appoint a bunch of low level staffers and expect that to carry sway in the Pentagon
^Another Trump Elite Team Lawyer Wannabe
Flybang mosher wrote:
Like this. You just got mocked. Racket thinks ....
Mocked is not a word you understand. Thinks is another word you do not understand.
agip wrote:
We have to beat back the electoral college. We can’t afford another terrible Presiden like bush2 or Trump.
Let PR in, have that pact be ratified...
Something.
Biden won by 7 million votes but 65,000 would have flipped the election to a felon.
Bad for america, and fundamentally unfair.
Minority rule will not last long.
https://twitter.com/redistrict/status/1338893507558301696?s=21
Agreed, another excellent share and interesting information.
Flybang mosher wrote:
Racket wrote:
Yes all those administrative assistants he's appointing will certainly be a threat in the "paper stationary and water cooler" coup.
I mean I guess that would be in line with Trump's intelligence. Appoint a bunch of low level staffers and expect that to carry sway in the Pentagon
Like this. You just got mocked. Racket thinks any kind of use of the military by Trump is an absolute impossibility. Which doesn't exactly jive with all the massive diabolicalities he is said to have undertaken in the past, but there it is. The liberals purport to not have a care in the world about martial law/CWII type issues.
We talking theoretically impossible or practically impossible?
I guess it's a (complex) solution to certain (many) wave function collapse equations (maybe, idk how that really works) so I guess it's, you know, possible if you have infinite time and energy
No Room wrote:
Flybang mosher wrote:
Like this. You just got mocked. Racket thinks ....
Mocked is not a word you understand. Thinks is another word you do not understand.
Whoah, take it easy there, Jekyll. No need to bring out the big guns against this impartial observer. Half of you got mocked, and then the other half engaged in misdirected animosity.
Racket wrote:
so I guess it's, you know, possible if you have infinite time and energy
Certainly coups and attempted coups have practically never happened.
Racket wrote:
Flybang mosher wrote:
Like this. You just got mocked. Racket thinks any kind of use of the military by Trump is an absolute impossibility. Which doesn't exactly jive with all the massive diabolicalities he is said to have undertaken in the past, but there it is. The liberals purport to not have a care in the world about martial law/CWII type issues.
We talking theoretically impossible or practically impossible?
I guess it's a (complex) solution to certain (many) wave function collapse equations (maybe, idk how that really works) so I guess it's, you know, possible if you have infinite time and energy
I think it was being mentioned in terms of practicality. Practicality, of course, doesn't mean likely.
My point was it appears to be confidently dismissed as a possibility, despite many indications, including the one that schizophrenic NoRoom pointed out, that it's certainly under consideration by Trump and his many supporters.
Flybang mosher wrote:
Whoah, take it easy there, Jekyll. No need to bring out the big guns against this impartial observer. Half of you got mocked, and then the other half engaged in misdirected animosity.
Come on now child. I expect better trolling than your lame attempts.
Flybang mosher wrote:
My point was it appears to be confidently dismissed as a possibilit.
Place your bet.
liberal echo chamber wrote:
You'll love this. Durham is still in play.
Flagpole, I will pardon your rants.
I have one question. You're the save money retire early guy.
Are you willing to trade everything you've worked for for nothing?
Are you willing to give the keys to your house to re-distribute your wealth? Have you signed over your deed yet?
Agenda 2030. You will own nothing and you will be happy (we say so).
Those are ridiculous questions, not based in reality, so you get no answers. Ask reasonable questions that are applicable in this universe and time, and I will answer.
welp wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You Libs FOR FOUR YEARS!! have been screaming over and over how Trump has repeatedly committed tax fraud but have never provided any evidence. Is the onus on us to prove he HAS NOT committed tax fraud? Yikes!
I'm not a lib. I'm a moderate. Let's get that straight.
Secondly:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/nyregion/trump-fraud-investigations-taxes.htmlThink that's it for me Sally. You're not worth the time or energy.
Yep. Sally should be talked about as if he's not here, but never directly responded to. He's a huge dumb@ss, a liar, and a really bad person who who berates his wife because she is Chinese and then brags about that on the internet. Why kind of POS garbage does that? Someone to ignore.
Flybang mosher wrote:
Which doesn't exactly jive with all the massive...
"jibe"
Flagpole wrote:
downward spirit wrote:
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/296/071/c7d.gifThe truth is classy, and the truth is that Trumpers are pieces of human garbage and dumb as sh!t.
I don’t blame you for stroking out giving it to the Trumpers like that. They have been making fun of you and blasting you for four years now. It’s about time you grew a pair and starting giving it back to them.
