Portland Hobby Jogger wrote:
Xi congratulates Joe Biden on his victory
Mitch McConnell congratulates Joe Biden on his victory
VLADIMIR PUTIN congratulates Joe Biden on his victory
Will Trumpers now accept their boy's defeat?
Mitch is now persona non grata on parlour....apparently.
Flagpole wrote:
Dr. Racket wrote:
Should I go slower? What kind of level do you need Flagpole, 3rd grade? 1st grade maybe?
LL said "The official electoral vote count in December has never made news like this before." The electoral vote was heavily featured in the news just four years ago, which by the way actually had unfaithful electors.
You're lucky I only went back as far as the last election in 2016.
Listen up, you moron, what happened in 2016 is nothing like what is happening now with you dumb@ss Trumpers. Democrats were NOT clamoring en masse for electors to "do the right thing" as you stated. So-called mainstream media, which idiots like you say are just mouthpieces for Democrats, weren't saying that sh!t. Hillary Clinton wasn't pushing fantasy nonsense. You're a f*cking idiot.
Lol hit quite the nerve there didn't we. Plans to retire to California not work out? :(
SeattleSilver wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Trump will NEVER be committed of tax fraud. Are you Libs too dense not to realize that Trump did not do his tax returns??? Tax attorneys who are partners in the biggest firms in NYC and earn millions annually are the ones who did his tax returns. Are they really going to sacrifice their careers so some slob can save a few hundred thousand? THINK!!!
I suspect the word you wanted was "convicted" rather than "committed". But even with that substitution, your argument is weak. First, his taxes were largely handled by accountants, not lawyers. Second, Trump actually has trouble getting the largest, most respected law firms to work for him. One reason is that he is cheap and tries to stiff service providers, including lawyers, on their bills. Another reason is that he doesn't follow advice.
A third issue with your statement is that Trump still could be convicted even though the forms were filled out by a service provider. It depends on the underlying facts regarding what Trump knew and what instructions he gave.
You are correct. Thanks. I meant "convicted." His net worth is about $3 billion. He is not hiring H & R Block flunkies to do his taxes. He is hiring the best tax attorneys or what you contend tax accountants to do his taxes. Unless their is audio or video of Trump instructing these tax attorneys or accountants to defraud the government of their rightful monies - then HE NEVER COMMITTED TAX FRAUD! Prove that he did and that is going to be a high mountain to climb!
TTH wrote:
Dr. Racket wrote:
Should I go slower? What kind of level do you need Flagpole, 3rd grade? 1st grade maybe?
LL said "The official electoral vote count in December has never made news like this before." The electoral vote was heavily featured in the news just four years ago, which by the way actually had unfaithful electors.
You're lucky I only went back as far as the last election in 2016.
I don't disagree that there was news around the electoral vote in past elections and that we hear "noise" about objections and unfaithful electors but I just think so many more are paying attention to the noise because of the lack of a concession.
Of course it's more salient because of the lack of concession. I'm not trying to down play it, but a) the electoral college was heavily covered in 2016 for obvious reasons and I thought LL's statement of "The official electoral vote count in December has never made news like this before" was pretty odd, b) I'd argue there was even more media coverage in 2000, and c) people have worked themselves up way too much. Just look at Flagpole - the poor guy has raged himself into some sort of permanent epileptic frenzy
welp wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You Libs FOR FOUR YEARS!! have been screaming over and over how Trump has repeatedly committed tax fraud but have never provided any evidence. Is the onus on us to prove he HAS NOT committed tax fraud? Yikes!
I'm not a lib. I'm a moderate. Let's get that straight.
Secondly:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/nyregion/trump-fraud-investigations-taxes.htmlThink that's it for me Sally. You're not worth the time or energy.
I did not even know who you were.
Dr. Racket wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Listen up, you moron, what happened in 2016 is nothing like what is happening now with you dumb@ss Trumpers. Democrats were NOT clamoring en masse for electors to "do the right thing" as you stated. So-called mainstream media, which idiots like you say are just mouthpieces for Democrats, weren't saying that sh!t. Hillary Clinton wasn't pushing fantasy nonsense. You're a f*cking idiot.
Lol hit quite the nerve there didn't we. Plans to retire to California not work out? :(
Flagpole found out the square footage house he can afford in Cleveland would bring the square footage in California of roughly might do for an outhouse.
Sally Vix wrote:
Dr. Racket wrote:
Lol hit quite the nerve there didn't we. Plans to retire to California not work out? :(
Flagpole found out the square footage house he can afford in Cleveland would bring the square footage in California of roughly might do for an outhouse.
What happened is that I think you managed to actually troll him into a hate rage despite the fact that you're the most obvious troll on the face of the Earth. But you've kept it up for like over a year without breaking character, just whittling people's psyches down a little at a time.
I guess that's kinda impressive in a dark twisted way
Dr. Racket wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole found out the square footage house he can afford in Cleveland would bring the square footage in California of roughly might do for an outhouse.
What happened is that I think you managed to actually troll him into a hate rage despite the fact that you're the most obvious troll on the face of the Earth. But you've kept it up for like over a year without breaking character, just whittling people's psyches down a little at a time.
I guess that's kinda impressive in a dark twisted way
The poster who breaks down Sally Vix as a posting troll has it down to an absolute "T" or is Sally the poster himself.
TTH wrote:
Dr. Racket wrote:
What happened is that I think you managed to actually troll him into a hate rage despite the fact that you're the most obvious troll on the face of the Earth. But you've kept it up for like over a year without breaking character, just whittling people's psyches down a little at a time.
I guess that's kinda impressive in a dark twisted way
The poster who breaks down Sally Vix as a posting troll has it down to an absolute "T" or is Sally the poster himself.
[Fake] Dr Racket and [Troll] Sally Vix need to get a room (which they already have). Mutual masturbation; mutually sick.
Flagpole wrote:
liberal echo chamber wrote:
1) They had mail in voting in other states like Florida. The election ended the same day. T still won. In PA, more of those mail in votes should have gone to T, but a statistically impossible number went to B.
2) Co-ordinated stopppage to fix the election. Excuse about fake pipe burst.
Go ahead, post you fake liberal fact checking website. We can debunk your fake fact checking too.
Dig in. You know you lost, but you don't care. Cause T has a harsh way of speaking sometimes. Done nothing wrong, but rubs you the wrong way. So you falsely call him names.
SC needs to hear the cases and your fake news needs to show it.
All crap, brother. Biden won this election fairly, and there is no evidence to the contrary.
If you ignore the video footage, voice recordings, data analysis, statistic impossibilities, whistleblowers, eyewitness testimony, affidavits, vote switching, fractional votes, forensic machine audits, errors ALWAYS going in the same direction, destruction of evidence, emails, etc. then there is NO proof of voter fraud.
?pole, you are a clueless. ?????
Dr. Racket wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole found out the square footage house he can afford in Cleveland would bring the square footage in California of roughly might do for an outhouse.
What happened is that I think you managed to actually troll him into a hate rage despite the fact that you're the most obvious troll on the face of the Earth. But you've kept it up for like over a year without breaking character, just whittling people's psyches down a little at a time.
I guess that's kinda impressive in a dark twisted way
Sadly, the once proud F[]agPole was reduced to SpazzPole. It was an inevitable emotional breakdown. As inevitable as sand through the hourglass, in these days of our lives. He's now just another broken poster, whose shell is figuratively littering the filthy battlefield of the disputed 2020 election.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
If you ignore the video footage, voice recordings, data analysis, statistic impossibilities, whistleblowers, eyewitness testimony, affidavits, vote switching, fractional votes, forensic machine audits, errors ALWAYS going in the same direction, destruction of evidence, emails, etc. then there is NO proof of voter fraud.
I think this is fair.
Amazing, the number of Republican-appointed judges who've "ignored" ALL of that.
Might almost make one think that none of that stuff had actually risen to the level of "evidence."
formerly present wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
If you ignore the video footage, voice recordings, data analysis, statistic impossibilities, whistleblowers, eyewitness testimony, affidavits, vote switching, fractional votes, forensic machine audits, errors ALWAYS going in the same direction, destruction of evidence, emails, etc. then there is NO proof of voter fraud.
I think this is fair.
Amazing, the number of Republican-appointed judges who've "ignored" ALL of that.
Might almost make one think that none of that stuff had actually risen to the level of "evidence."
Must be a good reason why the lawyers didn't present any of that in court too. Could be Deep State, could be because it's all a bunch of made up horsesh!t.
We'll never know!
We have to beat back the electoral college. We can’t afford another terrible Presiden like bush2 or Trump.
Let PR in, have that pact be ratified...
Something.
Biden won by 7 million votes but 65,000 would have flipped the election to a felon.
Bad for america, and fundamentally unfair.
Minority rule will not last long.
https://twitter.com/redistrict/status/1338893507558301696?s=21
agip wrote:
We have to beat back the electoral college. We can’t afford another terrible Presiden like bush2 or Trump.
Let PR in, have that pact be ratified...
Something.
Biden won by 7 million votes but 65,000 would have flipped the election to a felon.
Bad for america, and fundamentally unfair.
Minority rule will not last long.
It is worse than 65,000. Trump tried getting 38 faithless electors to swing the electoral college. That did work out so he get 89 fake electors to vote for him to overturn the electoral votes in six swing states. Trump seems to be planning to try to add his 89 fake votes to his 232 real votes to overcome Biden's 306 votes.
In other news, Trump is currently packing the Pentagon and DOJ with unqualified loyalist. That has soon-to-be-attempted military coup written all over it.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
All crap, brother. Biden won this election fairly, and there is no evidence to the contrary.
If you ignore the video footage, voice recordings, data analysis, statistic impossibilities, whistleblowers, eyewitness testimony, affidavits, vote switching, fractional votes, forensic machine audits, errors ALWAYS going in the same direction, destruction of evidence, emails, etc. then there is NO proof of voter fraud.
?pole, you are a clueless. ?????
So, the "elite strike force" that represented Trump in court was so incompetent that they lost over 50 cases, even with all of this compelling proof?
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
All crap, brother. Biden won this election fairly, and there is no evidence to the contrary.
If you ignore the video footage, voice recordings, data analysis, statistic impossibilities, whistleblowers, eyewitness testimony, affidavits, vote switching, fractional votes, forensic machine audits, errors ALWAYS going in the same direction, destruction of evidence, emails, etc. then there is NO proof of voter fraud.
?pole, you are a clueless. ?????
Right. That's the answer.
The courts found that after all the video footage, voice recordings, data analysis, statistic impossibilities, whistleblowers, eyewitness testimony, affidavits, vote switching, fractional votes, forensic machine audits, errors ALWAYS going in the same direction, destruction of evidence, emails, etc. then there is NO proof of voter fraud.
The courts are clueless.
Just accept it and go away like you promised.
welp wrote:
"Loch Ness Exists" ......."prove that [it] doesn't" UNREAL.
FWIW Loch Ness actually *does* exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_NessRacket wrote:
formerly present wrote:
I think this is fair.
Amazing, the number of Republican-appointed judges who've "ignored" ALL of that.
Might almost make one think that none of that stuff had actually risen to the level of "evidence."
Must be a good reason why the lawyers didn't present any of that in court too. Could be Deep State, could be because it's all a bunch of made up horsesh!t.
We'll never know!
There is no reason to present something in court that is so obvious it is as plain as the nose on your face.
-- Trump Elite Team of True Believer Lawyers
Dan Kahneman wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Give me a break. Biden won the election. You are as half baked as the people you rage against.
I did vent a couple times but I don't think rage is the correct word. It makes me sound like a lunatic. Since 77% of Trump supporters think Trump won, it was a good question. Glad you are not one of those.
Be careful though, this thread is an echo chamber of lunatics.