The reason he hasn’t overridden the constitution is not because he hasn’t tried. A court has temporarily denied his attempt. And he is appealing.
Are you predicting that Trump will continue to obey court orders? He has some 70 active legal cases as we speak.
Claims that Trump "has tried to override the Constitution" are misleading, as any attempt to alter constitutional principles, like birthright citizenship, would require a constitutional amendment, not an executive order, which he has never successfully issued in defiance of the Constitution. In fact, many of the legal battles stem from political opponents leveraging the courts to challenge his policies, such as the travel ban or DACA termination, which were often blocked by judges with partisan leanings. These cases often serve as a form of political resistance rather than objective justice. As such, Trump's actions in appealing court decisions are within his rights as a litigant in a system that allows for legal redress, and his adherence to court orders reflects the structure of a rule-of-law system that he has, for the most part, respected—challenging overreach but not outright defying the legal framework.
Your post read like AI-generated gibberish.
Why did Trump waste time and money issuing an executive order that’s unconstitutional? I thought we were trying to save money.
Claims that Trump "has tried to override the Constitution" are misleading, as any attempt to alter constitutional principles, like birthright citizenship, would require a constitutional amendment, not an executive order, which he has never successfully issued in defiance of the Constitution. In fact, many of the legal battles stem from political opponents leveraging the courts to challenge his policies, such as the travel ban or DACA termination, which were often blocked by judges with partisan leanings. These cases often serve as a form of political resistance rather than objective justice. As such, Trump's actions in appealing court decisions are within his rights as a litigant in a system that allows for legal redress, and his adherence to court orders reflects the structure of a rule-of-law system that he has, for the most part, respected—challenging overreach but not outright defying the legal framework.
I agree with that. Thus far the court structure has held. I’m highly skeptical it will continue based on who Trump is.
You are optimistic
Are you equally as optimistic about the DOJ holding to it’s long standing policy and principles for prosecution and investigations?
I just don't see the entire country failing into a black hole because of Trump. Sorry.
The DOJ has had some interesting bias in recent years.
Claims that Trump "has tried to override the Constitution" are misleading, as any attempt to alter constitutional principles, like birthright citizenship, would require a constitutional amendment, not an executive order, which he has never successfully issued in defiance of the Constitution. In fact, many of the legal battles stem from political opponents leveraging the courts to challenge his policies, such as the travel ban or DACA termination, which were often blocked by judges with partisan leanings. These cases often serve as a form of political resistance rather than objective justice. As such, Trump's actions in appealing court decisions are within his rights as a litigant in a system that allows for legal redress, and his adherence to court orders reflects the structure of a rule-of-law system that he has, for the most part, respected—challenging overreach but not outright defying the legal framework.
Your post read like AI-generated gibberish.
Why did Trump waste time and money issuing an executive order that’s unconstitutional? I thought we were trying to save money.
And you sound like a troll who needs spelling and grammar lessons.
This post was edited 25 seconds after it was posted.
Why do you guys keep posting the same article about a recent drop in valuation... You do realize over periods of time stocks do not ever continually increase??
Let me ask one question and please answer honestly. Is there anyone on here, a Track and Field board , that for one minute anyone could possibly vote FOR Biological men playing women's sports? How is that possible? 72-81% of all Americans polled do not support that. Yet every Democrat felt the need because this was a GOP sponsered bill to vote that down? This is what the Democrat Party is not to be seriously taken at all, that and their 20 plus follow the goober lemming style with their sing song BS and 5 year old tactics regarding GOP policies, which won the day. If you can support a vote on this the way ALL Dems voted, I am sorry, you cannot be taken seriously on this thread or any other. This was an issue that drove tons of women, to GOP voting that would have voted Dem.
I would've voted for anybody, anybody, over that harris woman. Having that border secure and stopping the invasion of (mostly) Losers it was well worth it. harris? What a joke. She's not qualified to be President of a university. Get better candidates dems.
In related news ICE and border patrol are working hard. They are patriots.
An illegal alien from Guatemala was arrested on a four-count indictment alleging he led one of the largest human smuggling organizations in the United States. The ring allegedly smuggled approximately 20,000 illegal immigrants from Guatemala to destinations nationwide over a five-year span. The defendant held some victims in stash houses as hostages and is responsible for the deaths of seven illegal immigrants — including a 4-year-old child — who were killed in a November 2023 car accident in Oklahoma. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the U.S. Border Patrol and the Inglewood Police Department are investigating the matter.
Let me ask one question and please answer honestly. Is there anyone on here, a Track and Field board , that for one minute anyone could possibly vote FOR Biological men playing women's sports? How is that possible? 72-81% of all Americans polled do not support that. Yet every Democrat felt the need because this was a GOP sponsered bill to vote that down? This is what the Democrat Party is not to be seriously taken at all, that and their 20 plus follow the goober lemming style with their sing song BS and 5 year old tactics regarding GOP policies, which won the day. If you can support a vote on this the way ALL Dems voted, I am sorry, you cannot be taken seriously on this thread or any other. This was an issue that drove tons of women, to GOP voting that would have voted Dem.
let's create a scale of measuring a presidential vote
1 = not critical to the republic
100 = critical to the republic
a dozen men playing on girls teams= 1.
partnering with Russia instead of Europe = 99 loudly saying we should rip up the Constitution = 98
Let me ask one question and please answer honestly. Is there anyone on here, a Track and Field board , that for one minute anyone could possibly vote FOR Biological men playing women's sports? How is that possible? 72-81% of all Americans polled do not support that. Yet every Democrat felt the need because this was a GOP sponsered bill to vote that down? This is what the Democrat Party is not to be seriously taken at all, that and their 20 plus follow the goober lemming style with their sing song BS and 5 year old tactics regarding GOP policies, which won the day. If you can support a vote on this the way ALL Dems voted, I am sorry, you cannot be taken seriously on this thread or any other. This was an issue that drove tons of women, to GOP voting that would have voted Dem.
As I recall, agip called this several pages back.
Loosely quoting agip; "With every single action of Trump being a indefensible combination of the moronic and the catastrophic, look for the Trumpettes to start talking about trans again."
Sorry for the rather loose quoting of you, agip, but you definitely called that one.
Let me ask one question and please answer honestly. Is there anyone on here, a Track and Field board , that for one minute anyone could possibly vote FOR Biological men playing women's sports? How is that possible? 72-81% of all Americans polled do not support that. Yet every Democrat felt the need because this was a GOP sponsered bill to vote that down? This is what the Democrat Party is not to be seriously taken at all, that and their 20 plus follow the goober lemming style with their sing song BS and 5 year old tactics regarding GOP policies, which won the day. If you can support a vote on this the way ALL Dems voted, I am sorry, you cannot be taken seriously on this thread or any other. This was an issue that drove tons of women, to GOP voting that would have voted Dem.
let's create a scale of measuring a presidential vote
1 = not critical to the republic
100 = critical to the republic
a dozen men playing on girls teams= 1.
partnering with Russia instead of Europe = 99 loudly saying we should rip up the Constitution = 98
Are we understanding each other?
Your ratings do seem a bit extreme on the spectrum, wouldn't you admit? In fact, the most extreme allowable on your metric.
See? It was an issue, and you will not even admit it. Your Party had no runnable issue to win on, every single issue they lost on or were well under water. I ask one question, ONE? and you have to create an entire other bull sh-t narrative and not even answer honestly, because that is who you are.
See? It was an issue, and you will not even admit it. Your Party had no runnable issue to win on, every single issue they lost on or were well under water. I ask one question, ONE? and you have to create an entire other bull sh-t narrative and not even answer honestly, because that is who you are.
Does anyone know who or what this guy is blabbering to or about?
See? It was an issue, and you will not even admit it. Your Party had no runnable issue to win on, every single issue they lost on or were well under water. I ask one question, ONE? and you have to create an entire other bull sh-t narrative and not even answer honestly, because that is who you are.
Does anyone know who or what this guy is blabbering to or about?
I was replying to agip...lovely reply on your part.
By the way to Agip, so I am clear to gnarlysheen who has surely seen my posts on here prior? Number 2 Issue at least? Border debacle? Numbers now at historic lows.
How long until we start hearing “A recession is a good thing!” from Musk, Trump, Vance, etc? Of course, this will be quickly parroted by the Fox, Breitbart, Newsmax, and the LRC MAGA cultists once the spin starts.
How long until we start hearing “A recession is a good thing!” from Musk, Trump, Vance, etc? Of course, this will be quickly parroted by the Fox, Breitbart, Newsmax, and the LRC MAGA cultists once the spin starts.
Does anyone know who or what this guy is blabbering to or about?
I was replying to agip...lovely reply on your part.
By the way to Agip, so I am clear to gnarlysheen who has surely seen my posts on here prior? Number 2 Issue at least? Border debacle? Numbers now at historic lows.
Trump cleaned up Harris' border problem pretty quick.
Nancy? Are you serious? Some are not even showing..do they get docked a day? I would not think this is viewed as optional. They are like kids..they are gonna yell, stomp their feet, vote for Transgenders in Sports?
And to gnarly..Amazing work with this speed of clean up after a deliberate policy to make it a nightmare. 40 days to get to these numbers, when all I can hear in my head is that useless Mayorkas saying, THE Border is Secure. And people actually voted again for that shi-t?
How long until we start hearing “A recession is a good thing!” from Musk, Trump, Vance, etc? Of course, this will be quickly parroted by the Fox, Breitbart, Newsmax, and the LRC MAGA cultists once the spin starts.
What is Trump trying to do with these tariffs?
Restore the American economy to brilliance after Biden destroyed it with liberalism.
A lot of these bozos aren't even fit to work. They don't deserve jobs with their attitudes.