That's your narrative. Say that's how it works. Ignore all the clear evidence of fraud.
"It's all about money". Ah yes, the latest talking point. The Grift.
You can't face that the president, the real sitting one, is a decent man, so you distract.
Wait till they show the evidence of all the votes flipped to B. Hint. He didn't really win the popular vote. Part of the ploy.
center right country wrote:
You can't face that the president, the real sitting one, is a decent man, so you distract.
Fraud or no fraud this just ain't true lol. Trump is a clown
center right country wrote:
That's your narrative. Say that's how it works. Ignore all the clear evidence of fraud.
"It's all about money". Ah yes, the latest talking point. The Grift.
You can't face that the president, the real sitting one, is a decent man, so you distract.
You give your trolling attempt away with this point. Find another handle and come back with better material.
center right country wrote:
"Sam, your dealing with a group that has a very difficult time with the concept of legitimacy., esp. when things don't go their way. So thx for picking up on that."
Oh really? Like there was no evidence of Hunter before the election but suddenly the media admits there was?
You know the election was stolen. "Oh, but but that's how mail in ballots work". Well, 99% of the ballots don't appear for one person. Statistically impossible.
You are parroting the left wing talking points. You are the brain washed one.
HUNTER BIDEN USED HIS LAPTOP TO HACK THE DOMINION VOTING MACHINES
center right country wrote:
Ignore all the clear evidence of fraud.
Just as soon as some clear evidence is presented...
In fact, don't even present it to *me*--just get it to the *courts*. For some reason no one has been doing that.
Very possible Harambe. Remember when Diane hugged her?
No lefty me wrote:
center right country wrote:
Ignore all the clear evidence of fraud.
Just as soon as some clear evidence is presented...
In fact, don't even present it to *me*--just get it to the *courts*. For some reason no one has been doing that.
It only takes one court case.
The lower courts are terrified of the left wing soldiers. It's mob rule.
It has to be presented at the top court. Why waste the best evidence, secret witnesses, until they get a fair hearing. Waldron said they have all the packets going to a foreign server. We have videos of T's totals going down on live TV. They've been caught and they know it.
Plausible deniability only goes so far. Hence why before election no evidence of Hunter to now there is.
Runningart2004 wrote:
I really don't understand some people's thought process. Trump was up say 800,000 votes but with say 1.5 million left to count from votes that would go 80/20 to Biden. So can people simply not do math and see how this was going to tilt to Biden once the mail-in and big city results finalized?
Trump even telegraphed this WEEKS ago by trying to cast doubt in or impede mail-in vote counting. He said all along for his voters to vote on Election Day, not to mail-in. His whole ploy was to get the mail-ins thrown out.
Are people really this stupid?
Alan
Yes.
How is that even a question?
Gina wrote:
Flybang musher wrote:
Gloating is not very attractive, Gina. Particularly in women. Its unbecoming and hoydenish.
But you make gloating soooooooo easy with your utter stupidity ?
As predictions go that was a real beaut.
ENJOY YOUR LOSS ??
Gina be sending that peckerwood back to HOYDENVILLE!
center right country wrote:
No lefty me wrote:
Just as soon as some clear evidence is presented...
In fact, don't even present it to *me*--just get it to the *courts*. For some reason no one has been doing that.
It only takes one court case.
The lower courts are terrified of the left wing soldiers. It's mob rule.
It has to be presented at the top court. Why waste the best evidence, secret witnesses, until they get a fair hearing. Waldron said they have all the packets going to a foreign server. We have videos of T's totals going down on live TV. They've been caught and they know it.
Plausible deniability only goes so far. Hence why before election no evidence of Hunter to now there is.
Here is my take on "evidence" of fraud:
Giuliani's affidavits were mostly stories about not being allowed to closely watch poll workers. For that to be meaningful, the assumption would have to be that any unwatched person was changing Trump votes to votes for Biden. Giuliani butressed his accusations with testimony from probably the most deranged witness in history.
Even assuming a worker was amoral enough to change votes, he/she would know that their actions, alone, would not swing the election. It would involve a conspiracy consisting of many people, yet Giuliani didn't have a single witness stating they had been told by a supervisor to switch votes. There wasn't even a single witness that claimed to have seen someone change a vote.
The rigging of the Dominion machines is nonsense. Giuliani supported it with a theory involving numerous countries trying to have Trump lose the election. If the machines were used to either switch votes or inject Biden votes there would be huge variances compared to Hillary's percentages of the votes, but in all of the counties being targeted, the percentages are within a few points of each other.
There have been accusations of "Dead people voting", but I don't believe there has been a single proven instance of someone using a deceased person's information to cast a vote.
The "suitcases" of votes would have also resulted in a glaring variance compared to 2016. Preparing enough fake ballots to swing a state would be a huge task, would have involved a large group of people and would had have to been started several days in advance of the election. With Biden leading in the polls, what would have been the motivation to take on such a time consuming, risky task? The "suitcase" video is considered to be a smoking gun but of course everyone there would have known there were multiple cameras in the room.
If there is compelling evidence of fraud, why does Trump have biased clowns like Giuliani, Ellis and Powell leading the charge?
As for Hunter, it would have been unacceptable for an announcement of an investigation of a candidate's son right before an election. Nothing has been proven and unless there has been a conviction, it's irrelvant. It's possible the investigation is a result of pressure put on by Trump.
Picard wrote:
Gina wrote:
But you make gloating soooooooo easy with your utter stupidity ?
As predictions go that was a real beaut.
ENJOY YOUR LOSS ??
Gina be sending that peckerwood back to HOYDENVILLE!
Ooooh yeah, go for it, Romeo. Gina be real impressed with fawning Beta males.
Flybang musher wrote:
Picard wrote:
Gina be sending that peckerwood back to HOYDENVILLE!
Ooooh yeah, go for it, Romeo. Gina be real impressed with fawning Beta males.
Your idol is beta AF.
Wears bucket loads of fake tan.
Fixates over his hair do.
Lies about his weight.
His wife deep tongues the Canadian PM as he watches like a beta birch.
Trump fan boys should stay away from beta commentary.
ENJOY YOUR LOSS - is there anything more beta than losing and crying about it?
Gina wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/most-us-voters-dont-want-102221114.html
Quick check of The Gap: Yep, just under nine percentage points.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/Aaaaand the President is on schedule to almost exactly match the number of times that Obama went to golf.
In four years, as opposed to BHO's eight.
All of the Libs here who savagely pilloried Atty. Gen. Bill Barr for being a lackey of Pres. Trump need to post your apologies here. He knew about the Hunter Biden investigation back in April and remained silent possibly costing Trump the presidency. He has done other stuff to undermine Trump. Please post your apologies here:
Gina wrote:
Flybang musher wrote:
Ooooh yeah, go for it, Romeo. Gina be real impressed with fawning Beta males.
Your idol is beta AF.
Wears bucket loads of fake tan.
Fixates over his hair do.
Lies about his weight.
His wife deep tongues the Canadian PM as he watches like a beta birch.
Trump fan boys should stay away from beta commentary.
ENJOY YOUR LOSS - is there anything more beta than losing and crying about it?
Again with the gloatish bombast? Bom o' bast. It's unseemly in women, Gina. Disreputable. I'm offering advice and trying to save you from spinsterhood. You need to help ME to help YOU.
Gina wrote:
Yesssssssss Ghost is back to entertain us.
But but but Hunters lap top ???
That one worked out really well for you.
ENJOY YOUR LOSS ???
Biden’s turn, oh and the laptop’s return:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/12/11/hunter-joe-biden-cefc-office-mates/Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Gina wrote:
Yesssssssss Ghost is back to entertain us.
But but but Hunters lap top ???
That one worked out really well for you.
ENJOY YOUR LOSS ???
Biden’s turn, oh and the laptop’s return:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/12/11/hunter-joe-biden-cefc-office-mates/
"return" where?
Sally Vix wrote:
All of the Libs here who savagely pilloried Atty. Gen. Bill Barr for being a lackey of Pres. Trump need to post your apologies here. He knew about the Hunter Biden investigation back in April and remained silent possibly costing Trump the presidency. He has done other stuff to undermine Trump. Please post your apologies here:
It would have been unethical for Barr to announce an investigation of Hunter right before the election:
"According to The Journal, Barr knew about the Biden tax investigations since at least the spring but tried to keep them under wraps in accordance with Justice Department rules meant to keep prosecutors from taking overt investigative steps that could affect the outcome of an election."
Barr is as loyal to Trump as it gets, but there are limits even for him. Why couldn't Trump have been a decent president that could have won on his own merits?