Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Nonsense! wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I am a moderate. You okay killing babies who survive botched abortions or are you not so radical? Please answer that if you have the balls.

You "pro-life" wackadoodles are really nuts! You cry about unborn babies but have no problem strapping a living, breathing human being to a gurney and injecting them with potassium chloride or some other lethal drug. You are a joke and every word out of your mouth is a comical contradiction. Go away!

The difference between you and me is quite stark. While you condemn me for supporting the death penalty what you support if FAR FAR worse.

Read about this and let me know if the perpetrators should be put to death.

What they did was beyond heinous and I think they deserve the death penalty while you oppose it.

YET you support the death penalty for babies who survive botched abortions. I would call you sick.

Flybang musher wrote:

johnny99 wrote:

Momentum has been stopped.

The SC slapped the lawsuit back to Austin. A waste of time, energy and money. Possibly, the AG will get the pardon that he's after.

The President is not without recourse, John. He still controls the military, and has the loyalty of most National Guard and law enforcement units around the country. As we have seen, many patriotic States are on his side. And he has 75 million patriotic voters ready to do what he says is necessary to defend the American republic. The President has some difficult and weighty choices to make in the coming weeks regarding how best to utilize his impressive resources.

He doesn't control the military. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has pointedly stated that their oath is to the Constitution, not to a man. If the Electoral College votes in Biden and Congress confirms it in the manner provided in the Constitution, I do not believe the military will back an attempt by Trump to remain in power.

Sally Vix wrote:

Nonsense! wrote:

You "pro-life" wackadoodles are really nuts! You cry about unborn babies but have no problem strapping a living, breathing human being to a gurney and injecting them with potassium chloride or some other lethal drug. You are a joke and every word out of your mouth is a comical contradiction. Go away!

The difference between you and me is quite stark. While you condemn me for supporting the death penalty what you support if FAR FAR worse.

Read about this and let me know if the perpetrators should be put to death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom

What they did was beyond heinous and I think they deserve the death penalty while you oppose it.

YET you support the death penalty for babies who survive botched abortions. I would call you sick.

You are a hypocrite, I'm not the one that calls myself "pro-life." How can you be pro death penalty and pro life? And for the record, no one is for the things you morons say they are for. You watch may too much Fox News for your own good. No one is sticking anything in the brains of babies you f**king mindless sheep.

Dan Kahneman wrote:

Flybang musher wrote:

The President is not without recourse, John. He still controls the military, and has the loyalty of most National Guard and law enforcement units around the country. As we have seen, many patriotic States are on his side. And he has 75 million patriotic voters ready to do what he says is necessary to defend the American republic. The President has some difficult and weighty choices to make in the coming weeks regarding how best to utilize his impressive resources.

I do hope you are a troll and not discussing sedition as an option.

You do believe in democracy don't you? If this is not a troll, its pathetic.

Just accept the loss. The people have decided. Once you accept it you won't have to keep losing over and over again.

Sedition, sedition, sedition, come on, Dan. If we've learned nothing this year, it's that one man's sedition is another man's quest for justice. Was it sedition at Harper's Ferry? Appomattox? Snowden? Cassius Clay? Eugene Dennis? Paul Revere and his Raiders? The bottom line is the President still has chits in the rack. The hand needs to be played out.

Sally, the problem is that being up at some point in time on election night is meaningless, especially with an unusually high percentage of votes coming in via mail. You don't get credit for winning at 8:30pm, 11pm, or 1:30 in the morning. Certain rural areas and big cities have always been late counters. And given the poor quality of the so-called evidence put on by the Trump attorneys in the many state and federal courts, and the universal rejection of such evidence by judges, including judges appointed by Trump, you are not stating a fact when you assert that the election was stolen. If that is your belief, well, then go ahead and believe it. But if you can't convince judges, it isn't a fact.

Flybang musher wrote:

Dan Kahneman wrote:

I do hope you are a troll and not discussing sedition as an option.

You do believe in democracy don't you? If this is not a troll, its pathetic.

Just accept the loss. The people have decided. Once you accept it you won't have to keep losing over and over again.

Sedition, sedition, sedition, come on, Dan. If we've learned nothing this year, it's that one man's sedition is another man's quest for justice. Was it sedition at Harper's Ferry? Appomattox? Snowden? Cassius Clay? Eugene Dennis? Paul Revere and his Raiders? The bottom line is the President still has chits in the rack. The hand needs to be played out.

How would you like to see it play out. Exactly what would you like to see happen?

Flybang musher wrote:

Dan Kahneman wrote:

I do hope you are a troll and not discussing sedition as an option.

You do believe in democracy don't you? If this is not a troll, its pathetic.

Just accept the loss. The people have decided. Once you accept it you won't have to keep losing over and over again.

Sedition, sedition, sedition, come on, Dan. If we've learned nothing this year, it's that one man's sedition is another man's quest for justice. Was it sedition at Harper's Ferry? Appomattox? Snowden? Cassius Clay? Eugene Dennis? Paul Revere and his Raiders? The bottom line is the President still has chits in the rack. The hand needs to be played out.

Musher,

Now I know you are trolling. I guess trolling about trump keeping power with military support is easier than posting about his loss. I get it.

I didn't get this from Fox News.

Partial-birth abortion (PBA) is the term Congress has used to describe a procedure that crosses the line from abortion to infanticide. The doctor delivers a substantial portion of the living child outside his mother's body --- the entire head in a head-first delivery or the trunk past the navel in a feet-first delivery --- then kills the child by crushing his skull or removing his brain by suction. It is INFANTICIDE.

SeattleSilver wrote:

Flybang musher wrote:

The President is not without recourse, John. He still controls the military, and has the loyalty of most National Guard and law enforcement units around the country. As we have seen, many patriotic States are on his side. And he has 75 million patriotic voters ready to do what he says is necessary to defend the American republic. The President has some difficult and weighty choices to make in the coming weeks regarding how best to utilize his impressive resources.

He doesn't control the military. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has pointedly stated that their oath is to the Constitution, not to a man. If the Electoral College votes in Biden and Congress confirms it in the manner provided in the Constitution, I do not believe the military will back an attempt by Trump to remain in power.

Trump don't need no stinkin military:

Seattle S,

Sally knows that you don't declare a winner in football after the 1st quarter.

But this is the phenomenon that I posted about previously, denialism. In just about every post from a Trump supporter you will see denial of reality. I think they follow the lead of Trump here. No matter how many different courts tell them that there is no evidence that Biden stole the election, they will still claim Biden stole it.

It's easier for them to either troll or pretend that there is no reality. No amount of reality can change their belief that Trump really won.

And it's not just a small number of people either.

Flybang musher wrote:

Gina wrote:

The Supreme Court lawsuit by Texas is gaining momentum by the day, if not by the hour.

????????

ENJOY YOUR LATEST LOSS ?

Gloating is not very attractive, Gina. Particularly in women. Its unbecoming and hoydenish.

But you make gloating soooooooo easy with your utter stupidity ?

As predictions go that was a real beaut.

ENJOY YOUR LOSS ??

Dan Kahneman wrote:

Seattle S,

Sally knows that you don't declare a winner in football after the 1st quarter.

But this is the phenomenon that I posted about previously, denialism. In just about every post from a Trump supporter you will see denial of reality. I think they follow the lead of Trump here. No matter how many different courts tell them that there is no evidence that Biden stole the election, they will still claim Biden stole it.

It's easier for them to either troll or pretend that there is no reality. No amount of reality can change their belief that Trump really won.

And it's not just a small number of people either.

You guys considered Trump done with the Mueller investigation. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done with the impeachment hearings. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done when Michael Cohen had to testify. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done when John Bolton turned. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done when STormy Daniels testified. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done when blah blah blah and blah blah blah. Trump is never done. Just wait and see!

Sally, kind of an odd rant. When you say Trump is never done do you mean he'll win in 2024?

Whoever is winning in prime time is the winner. Late night don't count and the next day is for re-runs. The thought of changing the channel - unthinkable.

Reality tv shaped that feeble brain.

Sally, let’s just say Biden is inaugurated in January. Will Trump be done(regarding being current president) until 2025? Do you see him supplanting the president between 2021 and 2025? If so, how?

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

You guys considered Trump done with the Mueller investigation. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done with the impeachment hearings. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done when Michael Cohen had to testify. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done when John Bolton turned. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done when STormy Daniels testified. FALSE. You guys considered Trump done when blah blah blah and blah blah blah. Trump is never done. Just wait and see!

Sally, kind of an odd rant. When you say Trump is never done do you mean he'll win in 2024?

Honestly Aztec I have no idea if he has any staying power to be around in 4 years. He is old and fat and sure to have health problems eventually. There are many Repubs who think Biden stole the election so we shall see. What intrigues me the most is how Biden will act with AOC and the rest of the far left radical groups demanding stuff and breathing down his neck with Kamala just off the stage waiting for a starting role. I am not going to bash Biden but he has to read from a teleprompter ALWAYS. I never see him ad libbing. How long is that going to fly? Most of his cabinet picks have been fairly moderate. If a SC justice position that is when the sh#t is going to hit the fan.

trashcan wrote:

Sally, let’s just say Biden is inaugurated in January. Will Trump be done(regarding being current president) until 2025? Do you see him supplanting the president between 2021 and 2025? If so, how?

Of course not. Once Biden gives the State of the Union and doing all his other presidential duties Trump will be an afterthought though MSNBC and Morning Joe et. Al will continue to focus on him. For better or worse Biden will preside until Kamala takes over.

I really don't understand some people's thought process. Trump was up say 800,000 votes but with say 1.5 million left to count from votes that would go 80/20 to Biden. So can people simply not do math and see how this was going to tilt to Biden once the mail-in and big city results finalized?

Trump even telegraphed this WEEKS ago by trying to cast doubt in or impede mail-in vote counting. He said all along for his voters to vote on Election Day, not to mail-in. His whole ploy was to get the mail-ins thrown out.

Are people really this stupid?

Alan

If Biden can make it through a State of the Union address without sitting down to catch his breath or completely losing his train of thought I will be legitimately surprised. He is frail & exhausted, they had to shut down his campaign before noon on a daily basis and his interviews were all read from teleprompters. It doesn't take a keen eye to see dementia has an iron grip on him already. Nancy will invoke the 25th within days of inauguration unless he croaks before she has a chance to