Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Thank you Bush the Shrub wrote:

Obama had the steadiest GDP of any president since it was tracked starting in 1930. Now the president before Obama commanded the lowest GDP of any president since the Great Depression.

http://cdn.cnsnews.com/10_straight_years-gdp_growth-chart.jpg

Sure. Obama holding "steadiest" under 3% sucks, pal.

Actually, nope. Shrub's blip over 3% was followed by a massive tanking into negative GDP. A steady average is what grew the markets. Shrub's tank crashed the markets.

Count Chocula wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Nope. Obama never got a 3% GDP rate increase.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2017-01-27/gdp-growth-slows-to-19-percent-in-obama-administrations-final-dayshttp://www.politifact.com/illinois/statements/2017/mar/16/peter-roskam/rep-roskam-gdp-growth-obama/

Trump hasn't had a full year of 3% GDP increase either. If you are comparing quarters, Obama had several above 3%.

Facts are fake news in the world where Trumpkins live.

OLD SMTC SOB wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

maybe you aren't clear on the idea that there's an election next year.

Cheers!

Not for President. And the electorate that elected the Donald will be taking their ire out on the rest of the existing democratic politicians. Of course not to a large extent in the liberal enclaves like NJ, NY, MA, RI, CA and a few more. But the rest, none the less.

we shall see. But historically speaking, midterms ALWAYS are major losses for the presidential party. And a president with approvals in the 30s is a massive drag on his party. Massive. Oh yeah - add in all the Trump corruption scandals and honestly...I would not want to be a GOP candidate in a purple zone.

L L wrote:

There was a thread about the good economic news that was deleted.

Did you cheer when we got the same increase in GDP and decrease in unemployment stats while Obama was in office?

I think it's great that the positive economic trends started under Obama are continuing.

Those numbers might have been phony in the past. But they are real now. Just ask Sean Spicer.

Thank you Bush the Shrub wrote:

Count Chocula wrote:

Trump hasn't had a full year of 3% GDP increase either. If you are comparing quarters, Obama had several above 3%.

Facts are fake news in the world where Trumpkins live.

Obama handed Trump a pathetic 1.9% GDP during his final three months in office (see the USNews link). And Obama still never delivered an annual 3% GDP. Those are the facts.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Thank you Bush the Shrub wrote:

Facts are fake news in the world where Trumpkins live.

Obama handed Trump a pathetic 1.9% GDP during his final three months in office (see the USNews link). And Obama still never delivered an annual 3% GDP. Those are the facts.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-27/barack-obama-now-only-president-history-never-have-year-3-gdp-growth

I think you are responding to several different statements here.

LL said, "did you cheer when we got the same increase in GDP under Obama?" He is referring to one quarter of growth above 3%, which is what Trump just achieved. You then stated "Nope, Obama never got a 3% GDP rate increase" and linked to an article that (pretty accurately) states that Obama never achieved a year of GDP growth above 3%. However, this does nothing to disprove the claim that Obama achieved a quarter of growth above 3%. In fact, if you read the USNews link you posted above, in the second-to-last quarter of the Obama presidency he achieved a 3.5% growth. This was followed by a 1.9% growth, as you stated.

should be noted that this GDP report showed an annual GDP gain of around 2.1%, which is exaclty in line with the obama years.

Trump rolls back regulations offering debt relief to students misled by scam schools.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/07/05/proposals-change-student-loan-rules-could-upend-industry/99594768/

Hey libs, here are your best hopes for 2020: the Larry David impersonator and Pocahontas. Lol!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-30/sanders-warren-tied-2020-democratic-presidential-nomination-zuckerberg-long-shot

Oops, pardon Joe A. seems to have violated the Constitution. Poor Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/08/30/legal-challenge-to-arpaio-pardon-begins/

You are awful.

First you tout a single quarter above 3% GDP growth for Trump.

Then I ask if you cheered any similar outcomes for Obama.

And your response is that Obama never got a 3% GDP increase.

When in fact, the very article you linked showed there was a 3.5% rise in the third quarter of last year for Obama.

The stat you thought you were talking about was for a full year, which Trump has not yet served. (he may not even make it to a year)

So the fact is you can only notice good things about Trump and bad things about Obama regardless of the facts.

I will say it again - this is good economic news right now under Trump.

You only see things through biased eyes.

oops fighter wrote:

Oops, pardon Joe A. seems to have violated the Constitution. Poor Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/08/30/legal-challenge-to-arpaio-pardon-begins/

‪Your boss pardoned a traitor who gave U.S. enemies state secrets, he also pardoned a terrorist who killed Americans. Spare us your hypocrisy.‬ Had Arpaio been convicted by a jury, I might feel different. He was denied a jury trial & convicted by lib activist judges.

L L wrote:

You are awful.

First you tout a single quarter above 3% GDP growth for Trump.

Then I ask if you cheered any similar outcomes for Obama.

And your response is that Obama never got a 3% GDP increase.

When in fact, the very article you linked showed there was a 3.5% rise in the third quarter of last year for Obama.

The stat you thought you were talking about was for a full year, which Trump has not yet served. (he may not even make it to a year)

So the fact is you can only notice good things about Trump and bad things about Obama regardless of the facts.

I will say it again - this is good economic news right now under Trump.

You only see things through biased eyes.

After Trump's first full year, we will revisit the annual GDP. Deal? Until then, Obama is still the only post-Depression president who never delivered a 3% annual GDP.

foo fighter wrote:

oops fighter wrote:

Oops, pardon Joe A. seems to have violated the Constitution. Poor Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/08/30/legal-challenge-to-arpaio-pardon-begins/

‪Your boss pardoned a traitor who gave U.S. enemies state secrets, he also pardoned a terrorist who killed Americans. Spare us your hypocrisy.‬ Had Arpaio been convicted by a jury, I might feel different. He was denied a jury trial & convicted by lib activist judges.

these trumpers really don't like the idea that courts decide what the constitution says. It's been 200+ years of that, but it just isn't for them.

They'd probably rather have joe bob from down south of hattiesburg decide what the Constitution says.

eric a blair wrote:

foo fighter wrote:

‪Your boss pardoned a traitor who gave U.S. enemies state secrets, he also pardoned a terrorist who killed Americans. Spare us your hypocrisy.‬ Had Arpaio been convicted by a jury, I might feel different. He was denied a jury trial & convicted by lib activist judges.

these trumpers really don't like the idea that courts decide what the constitution says. It's been 200+ years of that, but it just isn't for them.

They'd probably rather have joe bob from down south of hattiesburg decide what the Constitution says.

Arpaio asked for a trial by jury and the judge denied his request. She sentenced him personally and violated his constitutional rights. Those are not the kind of judges I want in our courts, you have no problem with this apparently.

foo fighter wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

these trumpers really don't like the idea that courts decide what the constitution says. It's been 200+ years of that, but it just isn't for them.

They'd probably rather have joe bob from down south of hattiesburg decide what the Constitution says.

Arpaio asked for a trial by jury and the judge denied his request. She sentenced him personally and violated his constitutional rights. Those are not the kind of judges I want in our courts, you have no problem with this apparently.

Of course she doesn't. Agip is a libbbtwat👎

Good thing all libbbtwats are dumb fcks and EASILY defeated😆😂😆😂😆😂😆😂😆😂😆😂😆😂😂

Haaahaaa Agip you 💩

foo fighter wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

these trumpers really don't like the idea that courts decide what the constitution says. It's been 200+ years of that, but it just isn't for them.

They'd probably rather have joe bob from down south of hattiesburg decide what the Constitution says.

Arpaio asked for a trial by jury and the judge denied his request. She sentenced him personally and violated his constitutional rights. Those are not the kind of judges I want in our courts, you have no problem with this apparently.

Arpaio violated a court order. He is being charged with criminal contempt. According to 42 U.S. Code § 1995, "the fine to be paid shall not exceed the sum of $1,000, nor shall imprisonment exceed the term of six months". Therefore, Arpaio does not have the right to a trial by jury.

foo fighter wrote:

Hey libs, here are your best hopes for 2020: the Larry David impersonator and Pocahontas. Lol!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-30/sanders-warren-tied-2020-democratic-presidential-nomination-zuckerberg-long-shot

If you had asked Republicans in 2013 who their best hopes for 2016 were, I doubt many would say Trump.

Oh wait, someone did ask Republicans:

I guess trying to predict a specific event 3 years ahead of time can lead to inaccurate results.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Obama handed Trump a pathetic 1.9% GDP during his final three months in office (see the USNews link). And Obama still never delivered an annual 3% GDP. Those are the facts.

No POTUS has ever "delivered an annual 3% GDP (growth)."

POTI do not deliver GDP growth. Workers, executives, engineers . . . do.

BTW - I just trademarked "POTI" as the plural of POTUS.