Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557576587665408FRAUD.
Ah yes, unverified right wing twitter account posts a blatant lie to rile up right wing sheep like you!
ENJOY YOUR LOSS
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557576587665408FRAUD.
Ah yes, unverified right wing twitter account posts a blatant lie to rile up right wing sheep like you!
ENJOY YOUR LOSS
I call Rigged out long before election day and asked if he would keep his word to go away with a Trump loss or would he just claim the election was rigged and say Trump really won.
We have our answer.
And it was so predictable.
This Trump cult never lived in reality.
Trump and the GOP has become the equivalent of a once popular 70s or 80s rock band reduced to playing the county fair circuit. A bunch of grey hairs and a few curious youngsters come out to hear their decades old hits. Some tired looking old guys saunter onto the stage along with a new guitar player you have never seen before and the lead man with diminished vocal skills starts in...
"Hello Valdosta!!! Are you ready to rock? I said...ARE YOU READY TO ROCK?!!! Let's get this party started! I'm sure you remember this one. Here's "Communist Boogeyman"! 1-2-3..."
They play for an hour clearly demonstrating that they are not the band they used to be 40 years ago. The singer forgets half the lyrics and implores the crowd to join in when he does. They need to take a crowd interaction/lame story break every third song because the original members need to catch their breath, sip some water, and towel off. They try some new arrangements of classic hits that seem to disappoint all but the most rabid fans. New guitar guy's solos don't quite sound like the originals. They play a few songs from the upcoming new album and no one really digs them. People start walking out halfway through the set.
At the end of the show, a visibly tired former rock star half heartedly shouts, "Goodnight Valdosta! We love you and we love Georgia? Keep on rockin'." No encores. Straight to the waiting tour bus (AF 1) to get out of town as quickly as possible.
Any connection to the farts?
agip wrote:
Flybang masher wrote:
You sure? I had never heard of either the Justice for Black Farmers proposal by Booker/Warren or the South Africa tweet (which you, by the way, never mentioned in your original post). Unlike you, I checked around on the Josh Marshall Twitter link you posted, clicked a few links, and quite a few people - I'd say more than half of the links I followed - were saying Trump was referencing the Justice for Black Farmers Act. They all seemed otherwise liked-minded with you, so when you say "absolutely nothing to do with the Justice for Black Farmers Act" and "no reasonable way to deny it," you seem to be wrong on both counts.
And it makes sense he was referencing the Justice for Black Farmers proposal - closer temporally and geographically to the people he was speaking too. It's way more immediate than a tweet about South Africa from two years ago. So it's quite reasonable to deny Trump was playing the race card and quite reasonable to believe he was referencing a pretty significant and controversial piece of farm legislation proposed by Booker and Warren, who are not well liked by Trump supporters.
Are you sure you even know what's reasonable when it comes to issues of race and Trump any more? I don't think you do.
ok man, trump was making a subtle reference to an obscure piece of legislation maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of. Because Trump is super knowledgeable about proposed legislation and his fans are careful readers of the news.
And you are also correct to ignore that Trump has specifically ordered his admin to investigate how white farmers have suffered land confiscation and has been talking about that for years.
Kudos man, you see the world as it is.
Now you are exaggerating and contradicting your own exaggerations within the same post (which is referred to as being "internally inconsistent").
Since when does Trump or any other politician have to be "super knowledgeable" about proposed legislation they comment on? They comment on and exaggerate about proposed legislation that they have clearly never read and know little about, all the time. All Trump would have to know is two or three highlights of the Justice for Black Farmers proposal to understand his base will be enraged about it.
Where do you get "maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of"? Again, if you had even bothered to research the very Josh Marshall Twitter link that you posted, you would have quickly learned that Tucker Carlson - the guy that everyone in Trump's audience gets their world view from - was talking about the Justice for Black Farmers proposal on November 24, 2020. It's reported on NewsMax too, where Trump supporters get their talking points. And you can find articles on ABC and CNN, as well.
So, Trump doesn't have to have read a single word of the Justice for Black Farmers act to have referenced it - he just has to have watched Tucker Carlson two weeks ago. And his fans don't have to be "careful readers of the news" as you say - they just have to hit their go-to sources. Your whole first paragraph is a loaded exaggeration.
And it's internally inconsistent because you don't apply the same standards and loaded language ("subtle reference" "obscure" "maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of" "super knowledgeable" "fans are careful readers of the news") to the South Africa tweet. Why can Trump have been "subtly referencing" South African white farmers yesterday, but not subtly referencing farm legislation that is actually in America? Isn't whatever is going on with white farmers in South Africa in 2018 more "obscure" to Trump fans in the US than farm legislation in the US from 3 weeks ago? Did Trump have to be "super knowledgeable" about white farmers in South Africa before Tweeting about them? (Hint: he was not). Did his fans have to "careful readers of the news" to get excited about white South African farmers, or is a single 140 word reference enough to get them jacked up?
Again, it was your fellow anti-Trumpers on Twitter who were suggesting it was the Justice for Black Farmers legislation that Trump was referencing. And that makes more sense - both temporally (2020) and geographically (actually in the US). You are out of tune with your own cult's messaging on this.
By the way, when you made that original post, I'm betting you didn't even know about the 2018 South Africa post, or you would have mentioned it. You appear to grab facts after you form opinions, which is why you make idiotic, unequivocal statements like "absolutely nothing to do with the Justice for Black Farmers Act" and "no reasonable way to deny it," and then have to deflect from them with further exaggerations (see the list above).
Portland Hobby Jogger wrote:
Trump and the GOP has become the equivalent of a once popular 70s or 80s rock band reduced to playing the county fair circuit. A bunch of grey hairs and a few curious youngsters come out to hear their decades old hits. Some tired looking old guys saunter onto the stage along with a new guitar player you have never seen before and the lead man with diminished vocal skills starts in...
I think they are more like boy bands. But instead of singing songs that got girls to thrown their panties on stage, Trump whistles and the Maggas throw their money to him.
That is Trump's way of benching Rudy, same result as firing Sydney Powell. You see, the lawsuits failing having nothing to do with Trump being a failure.
Trollminator wrote:
Any connection to the farts?
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1335683814987870215?s=21
The standard mega-long, multi-quote, response from Sally.
Flybang masher wrote:
agip wrote:
ok man, trump was making a subtle reference to an obscure piece of legislation maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of. Because Trump is super knowledgeable about proposed legislation and his fans are careful readers of the news.
And you are also correct to ignore that Trump has specifically ordered his admin to investigate how white farmers have suffered land confiscation and has been talking about that for years.
Kudos man, you see the world as it is.
Now you are exaggerating and contradicting your own exaggerations within the same post (which is referred to as being "internally inconsistent").
Since when does Trump or any other politician have to be "super knowledgeable" about proposed legislation they comment on? They comment on and exaggerate about proposed legislation that they have clearly never read and know little about, all the time. All Trump would have to know is two or three highlights of the Justice for Black Farmers proposal to understand his base will be enraged about it.
Where do you get "maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of"? Again, if you had even bothered to research the very Josh Marshall Twitter link that you posted, you would have quickly learned that Tucker Carlson - the guy that everyone in Trump's audience gets their world view from - was talking about the Justice for Black Farmers proposal on November 24, 2020. It's reported on NewsMax too, where Trump supporters get their talking points. And you can find articles on ABC and CNN, as well.
So, Trump doesn't have to have read a single word of the Justice for Black Farmers act to have referenced it - he just has to have watched Tucker Carlson two weeks ago. And his fans don't have to be "careful readers of the news" as you say - they just have to hit their go-to sources. Your whole first paragraph is a loaded exaggeration.
And it's internally inconsistent because you don't apply the same standards and loaded language ("subtle reference" "obscure" "maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of" "super knowledgeable" "fans are careful readers of the news") to the South Africa tweet. Why can Trump have been "subtly referencing" South African white farmers yesterday, but not subtly referencing farm legislation that is actually in America? Isn't whatever is going on with white farmers in South Africa in 2018 more "obscure" to Trump fans in the US than farm legislation in the US from 3 weeks ago? Did Trump have to be "super knowledgeable" about white farmers in South Africa before Tweeting about them? (Hint: he was not). Did his fans have to "careful readers of the news" to get excited about white South African farmers, or is a single 140 word reference enough to get them jacked up?
Again, it was your fellow anti-Trumpers on Twitter who were suggesting it was the Justice for Black Farmers legislation that Trump was referencing. And that makes more sense - both temporally (2020) and geographically (actually in the US). You are out of tune with your own cult's messaging on this.
By the way, when you made that original post, I'm betting you didn't even know about the 2018 South Africa post, or you would have mentioned it. You appear to grab facts after you form opinions, which is why you make idiotic, unequivocal statements like "absolutely nothing to do with the Justice for Black Farmers Act" and "no reasonable way to deny it," and then have to deflect from them with further exaggerations (see the list above).
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557576587665408FRAUD.
You keep posting "evidence" here that none of the 42 court cases lost so far haven't had access to? You should be talking to Rudy about these serious issues you keep discovering on your own. LOL
Trollminator wrote:
Any connection to the farts?
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1335683814987870215?s=21
The WHO has added "farting during state hearings on TV" to the list of covid symptoms, apparently as common as loss of taste.
Portland Hobby Jogger wrote:
Trump and the GOP has become the equivalent of a once popular 70s or 80s rock band reduced to playing the county fair circuit. A bunch of grey hairs and a few curious youngsters come out to hear their decades old hits. Some tired looking old guys saunter onto the stage along with a new guitar player you have never seen before and the lead man with diminished vocal skills starts in...
"Hello Valdosta!!! Are you ready to rock? I said...ARE YOU READY TO ROCK?!!! Let's get this party started! I'm sure you remember this one. Here's "Communist Boogeyman"! 1-2-3..."
They play for an hour clearly demonstrating that they are not the band they used to be 40 years ago. The singer forgets half the lyrics and implores the crowd to join in when he does. They need to take a crowd interaction/lame story break every third song because the original members need to catch their breath, sip some water, and towel off. They try some new arrangements of classic hits that seem to disappoint all but the most rabid fans. New guitar guy's solos don't quite sound like the originals. They play a few songs from the upcoming new album and no one really digs them. People start walking out halfway through the set.
At the end of the show, a visibly tired former rock star half heartedly shouts, "Goodnight Valdosta! We love you and we love Georgia? Keep on rockin'." No encores. Straight to the waiting tour bus (AF 1) to get out of town as quickly as possible.
Did you say sip some water?
https://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Video/201711/2017-11-15T210941Z_1688454126_HP1EDBF1MS4SI_RTRMADP_3_USA-TRUMP.focal-760x428.jpgFlybang masher wrote:
agip wrote:
ok man, trump was making a subtle reference to an obscure piece of legislation maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of. Because Trump is super knowledgeable about proposed legislation and his fans are careful readers of the news.
And you are also correct to ignore that Trump has specifically ordered his admin to investigate how white farmers have suffered land confiscation and has been talking about that for years.
Kudos man, you see the world as it is.
Now you are exaggerating and contradicting your own exaggerations within the same post (which is referred to as being "internally inconsistent").
Since when does Trump or any other politician have to be "super knowledgeable" about proposed legislation they comment on? They comment on and exaggerate about proposed legislation that they have clearly never read and know little about, all the time. All Trump would have to know is two or three highlights of the Justice for Black Farmers proposal to understand his base will be enraged about it.
Where do you get "maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of"? Again, if you had even bothered to research the very Josh Marshall Twitter link that you posted, you would have quickly learned that Tucker Carlson - the guy that everyone in Trump's audience gets their world view from - was talking about the Justice for Black Farmers proposal on November 24, 2020. It's reported on NewsMax too, where Trump supporters get their talking points. And you can find articles on ABC and CNN, as well.
So, Trump doesn't have to have read a single word of the Justice for Black Farmers act to have referenced it - he just has to have watched Tucker Carlson two weeks ago. And his fans don't have to be "careful readers of the news" as you say - they just have to hit their go-to sources. Your whole first paragraph is a loaded exaggeration.
And it's internally inconsistent because you don't apply the same standards and loaded language ("subtle reference" "obscure" "maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of" "super knowledgeable" "fans are careful readers of the news") to the South Africa tweet. Why can Trump have been "subtly referencing" South African white farmers yesterday, but not subtly referencing farm legislation that is actually in America? Isn't whatever is going on with white farmers in South Africa in 2018 more "obscure" to Trump fans in the US than farm legislation in the US from 3 weeks ago? Did Trump have to be "super knowledgeable" about white farmers in South Africa before Tweeting about them? (Hint: he was not). Did his fans have to "careful readers of the news" to get excited about white South African farmers, or is a single 140 word reference enough to get them jacked up?
Again, it was your fellow anti-Trumpers on Twitter who were suggesting it was the Justice for Black Farmers legislation that Trump was referencing. And that makes more sense - both temporally (2020) and geographically (actually in the US). You are out of tune with your own cult's messaging on this.
By the way, when you made that original post, I'm betting you didn't even know about the 2018 South Africa post, or you would have mentioned it. You appear to grab facts after you form opinions, which is why you make idiotic, unequivocal statements like "absolutely nothing to do with the Justice for Black Farmers Act" and "no reasonable way to deny it," and then have to deflect from them with further exaggerations (see the list above).
^ sally self trolling LOLz
NameStolenAgain wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557576587665408FRAUD.
You keep posting "evidence" here that none of the 42 court cases lost so far haven't had access to? You should be talking to Rudy about these serious issues you keep discovering on your own. LOL
46
NameStolenAgain wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557576587665408FRAUD.
You keep posting "evidence" here that none of the 42 court cases lost so far haven't had access to? You should be talking to Rudy about these serious issues you keep discovering on your own. LOL
Rest assured in their little right wing circle jerks they have convinced each other trump is just waiting for the right time to drop the hammer and then the states will fall like dominoes. After Dec 14 they will shift to blaming the judges and deep state Rs for folding under the pressure and betraying trump. It will never be that he simply lost and democracy won.
NameStolenAgain wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Any connection to the farts?
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1335683814987870215?s=21The WHO has added "farting during state hearings on TV" to the list of covid symptoms, apparently as common as loss of taste.
Actually, those with COVID could pass along their infection in their gassy farts. Aussie Dr Tagg made this claim. A thermal image video below shows how deadly a fart can be. Pants and underwear cannot deflect a fart from causing wide-spread devastation.
https://twitter.com/andrewjtagg/status/1247087554781831168https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0wu-1OaFJ8Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Gina wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/bolton-allegedly-tried-share-details-135444565.htmlCriminal President.
I cannot wait for Trump to hammer Dementia Joe about Hunter receiving cash from corrupt Russians during their debates.
It's going to be glorious.
LOLz ?? how did hunter’s laptop work out for you Biff?
Trollminator wrote:
NameStolenAgain wrote:
You keep posting "evidence" here that none of the 42 court cases lost so far haven't had access to? You should be talking to Rudy about these serious issues you keep discovering on your own. LOL
Rest assured in their little right wing circle jerks they have convinced each other trump is just waiting for the right time to drop the hammer and then the states will fall like dominoes. After Dec 14 they will shift to blaming the judges and deep state Rs for folding under the pressure and betraying trump. It will never be that he simply lost and democracy won.
Meanwhile, it is being reported that the Trump residences at Mar-a-Lago are being renovated and that Melania is shopping for a new school for Barron in Florida. That doesn't sound to me like people ready to spring a brilliant trap. More like people fleecing losers of their hard earned cash before surrendering and moving out of town.
Trollminator wrote:
Flybang masher wrote:
Now you are exaggerating and contradicting your own exaggerations within the same post (which is referred to as being "internally inconsistent").
Since when does Trump or any other politician have to be "super knowledgeable" about proposed legislation they comment on? They comment on and exaggerate about proposed legislation that they have clearly never read and know little about, all the time. All Trump would have to know is two or three highlights of the Justice for Black Farmers proposal to understand his base will be enraged about it.
Where do you get "maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of"? Again, if you had even bothered to research the very Josh Marshall Twitter link that you posted, you would have quickly learned that Tucker Carlson - the guy that everyone in Trump's audience gets their world view from - was talking about the Justice for Black Farmers proposal on November 24, 2020. It's reported on NewsMax too, where Trump supporters get their talking points. And you can find articles on ABC and CNN, as well.
So, Trump doesn't have to have read a single word of the Justice for Black Farmers act to have referenced it - he just has to have watched Tucker Carlson two weeks ago. And his fans don't have to be "careful readers of the news" as you say - they just have to hit their go-to sources. Your whole first paragraph is a loaded exaggeration.
And it's internally inconsistent because you don't apply the same standards and loaded language ("subtle reference" "obscure" "maybe 1% of the people in the nation has heard of" "super knowledgeable" "fans are careful readers of the news") to the South Africa tweet. Why can Trump have been "subtly referencing" South African white farmers yesterday, but not subtly referencing farm legislation that is actually in America? Isn't whatever is going on with white farmers in South Africa in 2018 more "obscure" to Trump fans in the US than farm legislation in the US from 3 weeks ago? Did Trump have to be "super knowledgeable" about white farmers in South Africa before Tweeting about them? (Hint: he was not). Did his fans have to "careful readers of the news" to get excited about white South African farmers, or is a single 140 word reference enough to get them jacked up?
Again, it was your fellow anti-Trumpers on Twitter who were suggesting it was the Justice for Black Farmers legislation that Trump was referencing. And that makes more sense - both temporally (2020) and geographically (actually in the US). You are out of tune with your own cult's messaging on this.
By the way, when you made that original post, I'm betting you didn't even know about the 2018 South Africa post, or you would have mentioned it. You appear to grab facts after you form opinions, which is why you make idiotic, unequivocal statements like "absolutely nothing to do with the Justice for Black Farmers Act" and "no reasonable way to deny it," and then have to deflect from them with further exaggerations (see the list above).
^ sally self trolling LOLz
Sure thing, Brenda.
Is that the thing to do on this thread? If you disagree with someone, and are incapable of responding, just resort to calling them a female name and a "troll"? I'm going to borrow that and use it constantly. And I won't even credit you as a source. I'll even use it against you, then type "LOL!!!" I'm going to be so good at this.
Sally Vix wrote:
Lifelong DEMOCRAT and State Rep. Vernon Jones asserts that Democratic wins in the Senate runoffs would bring "chaos and communism."
He, again a lifelong Democrat, contends that Democratic wins would be nothing short of a disaster. He wants Repubs Perdue and Loeffler to be re-elected. "If that doesn't happen, it's going to be chaos, its going to be communism. Black Lives Matter, Antifa are going to run over Joe Biden."
He goes on to say that Pelosi and Schumer "have really taken the country in the wrong direction. They (Pelosi and Schumer) want Marxism. We can't have that."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/vernon-jones-georgia-senate-races-communism
People have opinions. But I don't find Jones' opinion any more valid than the many Republicans that actively promote voting against Trump and his GOP apologists.
Rudy (age 76) has been hospitalized with the Trump Virus.* * Caused by a Trumper’s refusal to wear a mask. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-attorney-rudy-giuliani-hospitalized-after-testing-positive-for-covid-19-reports-say/ar-BB1bGykn
smashed potatoes wrote:
That is Trump's way of benching Rudy, same result as firing Sydney Powell. You see, the lawsuits failing having nothing to do with Trump being a failure.
Trollminator wrote:
Any connection to the farts?
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1335683814987870215?s=21