https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-8OVRR_HXYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4B0GHQWRAohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfOQBY5BrUAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE9BXkQ-SRchighhoppingworm wrote:
Santa Klauz wrote:
At least Trump doesn't wear a diaper and doesn't sound crazy and incoherent when he talks.
Yikes...
No. Not crazy at all.
agip wrote:
December 2 was the highest daily death toll yet in the US: 2.833.
9/11: 2,977
It occurred to me maybe that's what this is all about. This farcical election fraud charade may be simply to divert attention from the scandalous lack of a coordinated national response to the pandemic. And it is working, sadly.
I wouldn't dismiss this as his tactic.
To what end though? The election is already over. Genuinely curious, it is an interesting thought but it isn't really connecting with me.
You think the next ex-president will be in any group photos like this?
seattle prattle wrote:
agip wrote:
December 2 was the highest daily death toll yet in the US: 2.833.
9/11: 2,977
It occurred to me maybe that's what this is all about. This farcical election fraud charade may be simply to divert attention from the scandalous lack of a coordinated national response to the pandemic. And it is working, sadly.
I wouldn't dismiss this as his tactic.
There has been a lack of national coordinated response to the pandemic from the beginning so this is not a new tactic. The one thing Trump needs more than anything is to keep his base fully engaged. Everything he does revolves around that goal.
He needs that especially now because they are his source of power and revenue when he leaves office. The "stolen" election will still be motivating to his base even after the pandemic wanes.
sykt wrote:
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
1) Let me ask you this, since noone wants to audit any software since software is never able to be fraudulent sheeesh.
2) Do the machines match the voter roles?
3) Do the people on the ballets match people who live there?
4) Do the signatures match the ballets?
1) Shouldn't "noone" be capitalized? And what part does s/he play in this, anyway?
2) Speaking of playing parts: Aren't the voter roles all just walk-ons?
3) Surely not everyone who votes is on ballets. Most don't even own a decent pair of toe shoes.
4) And, realistically, how often can signatures be expected to match ballets? How many people are named Giselle or Coppélia? And even if we allow nicknames and are deeply misogynistic, there really aren't *that* many Nutcrackers in the electorate. Stop dancing around the main point!--which is that Donald Trump lost by several million in the popular voting and by several dozen electoral votes.
Henry the 8th he is, he is . . .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_NooneTrollminator wrote:
If you can stomach it...
https://factba.se/transcript/donald-trump-speech-elections-unannounced-december-2-2020
I watched that out of duty as an American, and it is just batsh!t crazy. He is such a dangerous person.
Trollminator wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I wonder if this is a serious movement or just online blather. Have we seen any of these "boycott the runoff" rallies in Georgia yet? If so, how many showed up?
It’s serious. So serious that even trump had to make a statement and is flying there for a rally after being MIA since losing. The Parler crowds are organizing events every weekend, even in Atlanta. When people are running low on hope it can easily lead to desperation. I think several thousand will sabotage the vote and many will not show up. Dems are well positioned but no question GA is a red state and runoffs tend to go in their favor.
https://twitter.com/mmpadellan/status/1334240600258994178?s=21https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/26/trump-conspiracies-georgia-senate-440776https://saraacarter.com/no-boycott-president-trump-calls-on-gop-to-fight-for-georgia-senate-race/
Thanks and keep up the good work.
This is pretty awesome. Lin Wood rocks!
gets old wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
It occurred to me maybe that's what this is all about. This farcical election fraud charade may be simply to divert attention from the scandalous lack of a coordinated national response to the pandemic. And it is working, sadly.
I wouldn't dismiss this as his tactic.
There has been a lack of national coordinated response to the pandemic from the beginning so this is not a new tactic. The one thing Trump needs more than anything is to keep his base fully engaged. Everything he does revolves around that goal.
He needs that especially now because they are his source of power and revenue when he leaves office. The "stolen" election will still be motivating to his base even after the pandemic wanes.
Understood and i don't disagree. But i see it in the context of his ongoing strategy (also from the beginning) to control the narrative, proclaim himself as the victim of a biased media and ongoing media coverage, and to divert attention from the more pressing failures of his administration to a public which has a very real limit to its attention span.
Nothing new - it's the schtick we have come to know all too well. This election fraud tactic is just the latest manifestation of a diversion strategy he's used since the beginning.
highhoppingworm wrote:
To what end though? The election is already over. Genuinely curious, it is an interesting thought but it isn't really connecting with me.
The end is to collect more donation. I bet the "Election Defense Fund" will morph into "Trump 2024 Campaign Fund" on Jan. 20.
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
highhoppingworm wrote:
To what end though? The election is already over. Genuinely curious, it is an interesting thought but it isn't really connecting with me.
The end is to collect more donation. I bet the "Election Defense Fund" will morph into "Trump 2024 Campaign Fund" on Jan. 20.
Sorry for not being more articulate. I understand why he is fanning the flames around fraud etc. that said, there doesn't seem to be a need to override big headlines related to COVID. Honestly his cult is already so accustomed to believing it is a ruse the application of draconian (by their standards) public health measures is more likely to rile up his base IMHO.
L L wrote:
You think the next ex-president will be in any group photos like this?
https://images.axios.com/Pw2Xmykh0VjpoXpt8UFgCbHZbZ4=/0x145:3086x1881/1024x576/2020/12/03/1606971134613.jpg
Adults. Clinton is the most flawed personally of the three, but they are all adults. Trump is an infant.
Fat hurts wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
It’s serious. So serious that even trump had to make a statement and is flying there for a rally after being MIA since losing. The Parler crowds are organizing events every weekend, even in Atlanta. When people are running low on hope it can easily lead to desperation. I think several thousand will sabotage the vote and many will not show up. Dems are well positioned but no question GA is a red state and runoffs tend to go in their favor.
https://twitter.com/mmpadellan/status/1334240600258994178?s=21https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/26/trump-conspiracies-georgia-senate-440776https://saraacarter.com/no-boycott-president-trump-calls-on-gop-to-fight-for-georgia-senate-race/Thanks and keep up the good work.
This is pretty awesome. Lin Wood rocks!
So ironic that nutbars Powell and Wood might actually make it so the Democrats win those GA Senate seats.
highhoppingworm wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
The end is to collect more donation. I bet the "Election Defense Fund" will morph into "Trump 2024 Campaign Fund" on Jan. 20.
Sorry for not being more articulate. I understand why he is fanning the flames around fraud etc. that said, there doesn't seem to be a need to override big headlines related to COVID. Honestly his cult is already so accustomed to believing it is a ruse the application of draconian (by their standards) public health measures is more likely to rile up his base IMHO.
Yeah, his supporters don't believe the covid numbers any more than they do the election results. Whether the reports are 500 daily deaths or 3,000 it's all background noise to them at this point.
He set up the whole election fraud misinformation scheme way before the election because it works for him regardless of the actual outcome. If he somehow won it would have been against all odds and a great victory "the likes of which has never been seen". If he lost then it was because the election was fraudulent. But the fraudulent election will have staying power long after he as left office and he will need need to revive it if he decides to run again.
L L wrote:
You think the next ex-president will be in any group photos like this?
https://images.axios.com/Pw2Xmykh0VjpoXpt8UFgCbHZbZ4=/0x145:3086x1881/1024x576/2020/12/03/1606971134613.jpg
Trump would never appear in a photo with two neo-socialists and a sexual addict who grew up trailer. Trump loves America. He loves America more than liberals can cogitate. That's why they engage in the mocking and the pseudo-innuendo.
L L wrote:
You think the next ex-president will be in any group photos like this?
https://images.axios.com/Pw2Xmykh0VjpoXpt8UFgCbHZbZ4=/0x145:3086x1881/1024x576/2020/12/03/1606971134613.jpg
Look at the evidence that the Democratic and the Republican establishment are colluding against the People's President!
Seriously, are they going to visit Individual-1 at the correctional facility?
Flybang masher wrote:
L L wrote:
You think the next ex-president will be in any group photos like this?
https://images.axios.com/Pw2Xmykh0VjpoXpt8UFgCbHZbZ4=/0x145:3086x1881/1024x576/2020/12/03/1606971134613.jpgTrump would never appear in a photo with two neo-socialists and a sexual addict who grew up trailer. Trump loves America. He loves America more than liberals can cogitate. That's why they engage in the mocking and the pseudo-innuendo.
Someone else can post a photo of Trump with Jeffrey Epstein.
But I like the use of the word "cogitate" here.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/07/11/us/politics/09dc-trumpspstein1/09dc-trumpspstein1-superJumbo-v2.jpghttps://d.newsweek.com/en/full/1655486/donald-trump-melania-trump-jeffrey-epstein.jpghttps://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/d3e/815/6f4f90ae1d2f1e9978b08af8f82e8998d7-17-trump-epstein-color.rsquare.w1200.jpgjohnny99 wrote:
Someone else can post a photo of Trump with Jeffrey Epstein.
Done.
Flagpole wrote:
L L wrote:
You think the next ex-president will be in any group photos like this?
https://images.axios.com/Pw2Xmykh0VjpoXpt8UFgCbHZbZ4=/0x145:3086x1881/1024x576/2020/12/03/1606971134613.jpgAdults. Clinton is the most flawed personally of the three, but they are all adults. Trump is an infant.
INCORRECT! Bush is the most flawed of the three. Then Clinton close behind.
I voted Republican for president from Ford* (1976) through Dole (1996).
I chose not to vote for president in 2000 or 2004. George Shrub was over-privileged POS, and Gore was not to my liking. Shrub was the one who turned me completely off to ever voting for another republican for president.
When Obama came along I started voting Democrat for president and have done so each time, now since 2008.
Post-Reagan, who I voted for twice, and liked, Republicans have allowed someone like Shrub to run for president. Shrub is a clueless, and failed individual, worse than womanizer Clinton, in my opinion.
The Fool Shrub is the one who opened the door for biglier Fool named Trump. Republicans lost their way with Shrub, and started on that path during Reagan's 2nd term.
* Interesting side note: In 1976 Ford won All of the Western Coast States (CA, OR, WA). But he lost all of the now "red" southern states to Carter, including TX and FL.
vvvvt wrote:
highhoppingworm wrote:
Sorry for not being more articulate. I understand why he is fanning the flames around fraud etc. that said, there doesn't seem to be a need to override big headlines related to COVID. Honestly his cult is already so accustomed to believing it is a ruse the application of draconian (by their standards) public health measures is more likely to rile up his base IMHO.
Yeah, his supporters don't believe the covid numbers any more than they do the election results. Whether the reports are 500 daily deaths or 3,000 it's all background noise to them at this point.
He set up the whole election fraud misinformation scheme way before the election because it works for him regardless of the actual outcome. If he somehow won it would have been against all odds and a great victory "the likes of which has never been seen". If he lost then it was because the election was fraudulent. But the fraudulent election will have staying power long after he as left office and he will need need to revive it if he decides to run again.
I buy that. We all saw it coming. So did the stock market and it sold off leading into the election knowing the sh!tstorm that would ensue. Cogitate that, all you calculus over-achievers.
