Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

I have no history of dodging your questions, yet you assert that you doubt that I will. Hardly a good way to indicate that you are interested in a good faith dialog, so I think I can be forgiven for thinking that you are not.

But I'll answer this one time, which given your rude dismissal is more of my time than you deserve. The Gov and SoS are in charge of elections, and they are empowered to decide when enough is enough. I would agree that an inquiry could go beyond where they are willing to go if there was credible evidence that the Gov and SoS were compromised. But despite accusations from Attorneys Powell and Wood, there is no such evidence. So the authorities can shut it down and stop wasting taxpayer money while preparing to conduce another set of statewide elections.

And now I'm done with your churlishness for the evening.

2016:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/12/01/0-000002-percent-of-all-the-ballots-cast-in-the-2016-election-were-fraudulent/

2012:

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2012/02/06/146473653/indianas-top-election-official-convicted-of-voter-fraud

2008:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/oct/13/election-acorn-voter-fraud

There are ALWAYS cries of voter fraud by the losing side. If it happens it's never to the extent that would matter.

Alan

I am being rude? I have been called multiple names and all I am asking for is an answer to simple questions. And then you call me childish. I know it is impossible to have decent dialog here, but man.

I am not asking you if you think the Gov or the SoS should audit, I am asking you if you think they should audit?

I will give you my simple answer.

All software needs to be audited, before and after by independent 3rd parties. Voter roles needs to be audited and reconciled.

NONE of those things happened. The Trump team has shown many many times evidence of this.

But as I said, you are asking the basketball player (Giv and SoS) if he fouled. Of course they will not admit they did a crappy job.

And of course, lots of these politicians are corrupt and may not like Trump or Biden who knows.

But if you don't have an election where you actually reconcile and audit the machines and mail ins, you get lots and lots of fraud.

But of course, if you are not wanting Trump, you will ignore these things, which is what I think is happening all over the place. Good for you until it is against you of course.

I could care less if Trump won, but the fact we have an election that has less auditing than my job back in high school at the grocery store if freaking redonculous.

But thanks for actually being the childish thing you are. I actually expected that.

OK, I'll respond to that as follows:

1. How hard is it to read the post your quoted? You accused me of calling you "childish", which I quite clearly did not do.

2. I hadn't called you names here, and if others did it hardly is my fault. I did say that your behavior was rude and churlish, which I believe is an accurate charge for someone that would preemptively accuse me of poor behavior because you believe that other posters here are guilty of bad behavior. And it certainly isn't childish of me to take offense at your preemptive accusation; it is what a reasonable person does.

3. The following statement from your post is nonsensical: "I am not asking you if you think the Gov or the SoS should audit, I am asking you if you think they should audit?" The appropriate "they" would be the Gov or SoS. If you have another "they" in mind, you are leaving the reader to guess. However, it would be absolutely absurd to allow the party screaming "fraud" to audit and have that audit be the deciding factor. So the "they" is either the Gov/SoS, or some neutral party if the State agrees to it.

4. A reasonable person can draw inferences from the fact that judges, including GOP judges, have been less than impressed with the supposed "evidence" offered by the Trump legal team. Even the judge in Georgia who approved a very limited examination of a few of the voting machines did so reluctantly and explicitly noted that he found the allegations to be very speculative.

4. The rest of us can only wonder what you meant with the last three words of this statement: "... the fact we have an election that has less auditing than my job back in high school at the grocery store if freaking redonculous".

So have fun with the people here who called you names. I'm closing the browser on this waste of time.

So much fun.

Trumpers trying to disassociate from Lin Wood.

In other words, like in the French Revolution, the crazies are taking over and there’s no stopping them.

Good luck GOP. You created a monster - it will destroy you.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/02/records-lin-wood-decades-voted-donated-democrats-including-barack-obama-david-perdues-2014-opponent/

January 20th cannot come soon enough. Good riddance.

All of what you just typed is freaking nonesense.

You just want to argue about BS semantics to pretend like you are smarter, whatever dude, go ahead. That's what people do when they have nothing to say.

The point is very simple.

Any national election should be audited before and after. Period.

The fact that everyone who says there is "no fraud" is just pretending as if that doesn't matter that there is no audit cause their person won. To think there isn't fraud in every dang election is just stupid. And it shouldn't ever happen or even given the chance to happen.

If there isn't an audit, as they do with every company in the US constantly, then this is all a joke.

And good for all you hate Trump or Biden fans. This fraud crap will bite you in the buns unless you have the actual stones to force the people in charge of the elections to create a system that has actual checks and balances.

Go ahead and close your browser, you were a waste of time for sure.

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

I know, right? That's why they've provided a veritable MOUNTAIN of evidence in court proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that this election was stolen by fraud on a truly MASSIVE scale!

Thanks for not answering the question. Typical. But I'll try again.

Why will they not allow the machines to be audited? And are you comfortable with voting machines that can't be audited? Or is anyone for that matter?

Also, how can you present evidence if they don't allow you to have access to the information?

I hope you answer these questions, but I have my doubts.

Looks like somebody already answered your question but called you "Numbnuts" in their response. I am not sure that is appropriate. I would think that Numbskull is a more obvious fit.

Flybang mash wrote:

1101 wrote:

INCORRECT!

Indeed, ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT!

Facts are either true or false. The identity or character of the person stating them in no way impacts which of these applies.

Hundreds of thousands of juries in 200+ years of American jurisprudence would tell you differently. American evidentiary law, developed over hundreds of years from English common law, in tens of thousands of judicial opinions testing the law, say you are wrong as well.

Your steadfast ignorance of all that, and resort to capital letters, makes all of us here start to wonder about your credibility.

Fascinating take on my credibility. Truly fascinating.

Nonetheless, not fascinating enough for me to be interested in making this a discussion about me.

Now, let me ask you a very simple question: Do you think that out of those "hundreds of thousands of juries in 200+ years of American jurisprudence", the jury EVER (oh dear, I must worry about my credibility here!) got it wrong - convicted an innocent man or vice versa?

1101 wrote:

Flybang mash wrote:

Hundreds of thousands of juries in 200+ years of American jurisprudence would tell you differently. American evidentiary law, developed over hundreds of years from English common law, in tens of thousands of judicial opinions testing the law, say you are wrong as well.

Your steadfast ignorance of all that, and resort to capital letters, makes all of us here start to wonder about your credibility.

Fascinating take on my credibility. Truly fascinating.

Nonetheless, not fascinating enough for me to be interested in making this a discussion about me.

Now, let me ask you a very simple question: Do you think that out of those "hundreds of thousands of juries in 200+ years of American jurisprudence", the jury EVER (oh dear, I must worry about my credibility here!) got it wrong - convicted an innocent man or vice versa?

As you should know, you can't discuss two topics, when they are not relevant to each other.

There are two possible topics to discuss:

1) Your lack of credibility

or

2) Whether, under American evidentiary law, the credibility of FACT and expert witnesses is determined by the jury in rendering decisions.

Neither is relevant to the other, so you are compelled to pick one or the other. If you pick (2), you are officially on record as having admitted that you have no credibility. Your choice.

Ah, so I see you have nothing. I am done with you, sir.

Please feel free to carry on with your trolling . . . or lunacy. It is sometimes difficult to tell the difference with the Trumpettes.

Good day.

Pages and pages of sally posting under different handles and writing lengthy paragraphs of nonsense. Sally is nothing but a butthurt loser tzee trying desperately to anger people on the thread. If you are going to keep responding to him, I suggest you give him the proper treatment and call him a butthurt loser, or at best ask him a stupid question and let him spin his wheels. Refer to my next post below.

Sally, why are you such a butthurt loser? ?

Trumper logic: bar owner knowingly breaks the law, gets arrested, and somehow standing up for him in a massive massless crowd makes you a patriot. Suddenly they don’t like the police. These people really are not Americans.

https://twitter.com/abc7ny/status/1334324176749027329?s=21

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Dementia Joe hides in his basement having others write his tweets - because he can’t read or talk without making a complete fool of himself. It should be obvious to anyone with a brain, but then again we are talking about Iibtards with TDS like Sourpole.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EaZuKSwXsAYdUWV?format=jpg&name=small

"Come on, man!"

^ LOLz hey biff, how did it feel after your boy's catastrophic loss to basement biden?

I'm starting to think Sydney Powell and Lin Wood are going to run for office soon. They are stepping up their trumpism to whole new levels. Trump has had to try to contain them on the boycott GA vote idea, how long before they split from him and sell their own brand of crazy? How can anyone look at the GOP today and not think it's pure embarrassment?

https://twitter.com/ReallyAmerican1/status/1334242778969071616?s=20

I think they finally created Frankenstein with Powell and Lin. The perfect ending can get more perfect. Parler is now riddled with calls to boycott GA and the GOP senators are being referred to as #paycheckpurdue and #lyinloeffler. I hope the Dems are using this to their advantage. A little bit of money goes a long way in organizing boycott the vote rallies. These trumpers seem to show up any day any time they are called upon to protest and they are way too stupid to understand they are being conned, regardless of who is doing it. Dems are going to need something extra special to take those two seats but I'm not sure it will ever get as good as this for them in GA.

Sally, you wanted something tangible to investigate, here go after this guy and report your findings back to us.

https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1334356275140964352?s=20

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

I know, right? That's why they've provided a veritable MOUNTAIN of evidence in court proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that this election was stolen by fraud on a truly MASSIVE scale!

Thanks for not answering the question. Typical. But I'll try again.

Why will they not allow the machines to be audited? And are you comfortable with voting machines that can't be audited? Or is anyone for that matter?

Also, how can you present evidence if they don't allow you to have access to the information?

I hope you answer these questions, but I have my doubts.

Audits show no significant errors...