Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

He’s running if not in prison

Senators are shouldering each other to back Trump 2024

https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1334257951440330754?s=21

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

Why will they not allow the machines to be audited? And are you comfortable with voting machines that can't be audited?

Except that voting machines *are* being audited, Numbnuts.

1101 wrote:

Flybang mash wrote:

That's not even close to true. Credibility of an author is a factor in determining whether his arguments or evidence holds mud.

Some additional nonsense.

INCORRECT!

Indeed, ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT!

Facts are either true or false. The identity or character of the person stating them in no way impacts which of these applies.

Hundreds of thousands of juries in 200+ years of American jurisprudence would tell you differently. American evidentiary law, developed over hundreds of years from English common law, in tens of thousands of judicial opinions testing the law, say you are wrong as well.

Your steadfast ignorance of all that, and resort to capital letters, makes all of us here start to wonder about your credibility.

sykt wrote:

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

Why will they not allow the machines to be audited? And are you comfortable with voting machines that can't be audited?

Except that voting machines *are* being audited, Numbnuts.

Thank you for trying to answer. But that isn't what the Trump teams wants.

They don't want the same people who is responsible for the fraud to hire people to audit.

They want to have their own independent audit.

ALSO, they are not auditing the software. They just said the software is the same as the approved software. The same software that allows for the fraud. "According to Pro V&V, all of the software and firmware on the sampled machines was verified to be the Georgia-sanctioned technology."

Why would they reject to have this independent audit done?

Who gives a crap about what the “Trump team wants”. That has zero bearing on anything. Why would anyone sanction an independent audit to further fuel this charade when there is zero evidence to suggest that such an audit has any merit? While we are at it why don’t we audit a bunch of other random stuff for no particular reason to help fuel political fires that generate campaign contributions for that fat $hit currently presiding in the Oval Office.

highhoppingworm wrote:

Who gives a crap about what the “Trump team wants”. That has zero bearing on anything. Why would anyone sanction an independent audit to further fuel this charade when there is zero evidence to suggest that such an audit has any merit? While we are at it why don’t we audit a bunch of other random stuff for no particular reason to help fuel political fires that generate campaign contributions for that fat $hit currently presiding in the Oval Office.

Thank you again for not answering the simple question. I will try again.

Why would they or you reject to have this independent audit done?

Don't you think it is important to make sure the software is independently audited for every candidates sake?

To answer your questions, cause I am good like that.

I care what the Trump team wants and do millions of other people.

There are tons of data experts who have said the data looks fraudulent. But to prove it, they need to do an audit of the software. So if they don't allow them to see the actual code, then it's hard to give actual proof. I hope that isn't too complicated for you.

The paper ballots in GA have already been audited by hand, and Biden's lead was over 12, 000. No audit of the voting machines is going to change that, no matter who does it.

If people want to live in some fantasy land where Hugo Chavez is casting magical spells over voting machines in GA, but not in PA, I suppose that's your business. But don't drag the rest of us there with you.

johnny99 wrote:

The paper ballots in GA have already been audited by hand, and Biden's lead was over 12, 000. No audit of the voting machines is going to change that, no matter who does it.

If people want to live in some fantasy land where Hugo Chavez is casting magical spells over voting machines in GA, but not in PA, I suppose that's your business. But don't drag the rest of us there with you.

Thank you again for not answering my question. Typical again.

Let me ask you this, since noone wants to audit any software since software is never able to be fraudulent sheeesh.

Do the machines match the voter roles?

Do the people on the ballets match people who live there?

Do the signatures match the ballets?

With all due respect, making up unfounded allegations doesn't give you the right to access everything that you want. If I accuse you of stealing money from me, would you turn over your bank statements to me?

It may be hard to come to grips with the fact that Trump was such a bad candidate that he even lost Georgia, but that's what happened.

No, I'm sorry you are a liberal. A liberal who objective classifiers have sub-classified as a "RINO" which is an acronym for Republican In Name Only. It's basically a classification for those who are fair-weathered friends of freedom, the Constitution, America and Trump, and who don't see those words as synonymous.

johnny99 wrote:

With all due respect, making up unfounded allegations doesn't give you the right to access everything that you want. If I accuse you of stealing money from me, would you turn over your bank statements to me?

It may be hard to come to grips with the fact that Trump was such a bad candidate that he even lost Georgia, but that's what happened.

Ok my man...let's examine your analogy.

If I say you stole from me. I would go to the police and charge you with the crime. And yes, they would audit your finances if you stole my money! Happens all the time with white collar crimes.

But this isn't a Trump or Biden isssue.

Again, why would you want software that isn't independently audited before and AFTER the election? Please tell me?

Congratulations to the creator and proprietor of this thread!

You have really done a wonderful job of continually recreating the characters... villains and heroes... to regurgitate the same information and or the same responses to keep the non-trolls interested in posting here.

Fascinating really. I wonder how long you will be able to keep this going...

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

johnny99 wrote:

The paper ballots in GA have already been audited by hand, and Biden's lead was over 12, 000. No audit of the voting machines is going to change that, no matter who does it.

If people want to live in some fantasy land where Hugo Chavez is casting magical spells over voting machines in GA, but not in PA, I suppose that's your business. But don't drag the rest of us there with you.

Thank you again for not answering my question. Typical again.

Let me ask you this, since noone wants to audit any software since software is never able to be fraudulent sheeesh.

Do the machines match the voter roles?

Do the people on the ballets match people who live there?

Do the signatures match the ballets?

Are we talking about dancing now or voting?

Now you're the one not answering the question.

I say you stole money from me. And I demand that you turn over your bank statements, investment portfolios and all W2 and 1099 forms, so I can have my "independent" forensic accountant go over them.

No police involved. Just me and my accusation. You would turn over all of that to me?

I'll help you out here. Of course you wouldn't. Maybe if the police showed up, with a warrant or a subpoena, you might. But you wouldn't turn over all of your financial records based only on my accusation, and with no police or court involvement. And yet, you seem to think that the tin foil hat brigade in GA should be granted access to the voting machines, simply because they're claiming something nefarious may have happened. With no court involvement. Sorry, but that's not how the world works.

If an audit of the voting machines, beyond what has already been done, is justified, go to court and get a court order to that effect. The fact that whoever thinks an "independent" audit is necessary hasn't done that tells you a lot about how legitimate their claim is.

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

johnny99 wrote:

The paper ballots in GA have already been audited by hand, and Biden's lead was over 12, 000. No audit of the voting machines is going to change that, no matter who does it.

If people want to live in some fantasy land where Hugo Chavez is casting magical spells over voting machines in GA, but not in PA, I suppose that's your business. But don't drag the rest of us there with you.

Thank you again for not answering my question. Typical again.

Let me ask you this, since noone wants to audit any software since software is never able to be fraudulent sheeesh.

Do the machines match the voter roles?

Do the people on the ballets match people who live there?

Do the signatures match the ballets?

For Georgia you might consider directing your questions to the Republican who is Governor and the Republican who is SoS. They ran and election using those machines, and they recounted and are satisfied with the vote totals. The liberals and the Democrats aren't stopping further inquiry in Georgia, they have no power to do so. The GOP hierarchy is declining to go further because they believe it to be unnecessary and pointless.

The party of small government wants to keep wasting my tax many on wackier and wackier fraud accusations and chasing down red herrings. Enough is enough, the American taxpayers are done enabling Trump.

You know that is what they are trying to do right? They are asking the state to have it independently audited. The actual software code. The state is the authorities in this case. They are refusing that.

So I did answer your question, but again, you didn't answer mine.

Why do you think it is wrong to have these machines not audited before and after every election?

But I am sure you won't answer me again....cause that's what people do when they have nothing.

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

johnny99 wrote:

With all due respect, making up unfounded allegations doesn't give you the right to access everything that you want. If I accuse you of stealing money from me, would you turn over your bank statements to me?

It may be hard to come to grips with the fact that Trump was such a bad candidate that he even lost Georgia, but that's what happened.

Ok my man...let's examine your analogy.

If I say you stole from me. I would go to the police and charge you with the crime. And yes, they would audit your finances if you stole my money! Happens all the time with white collar crimes.

But this isn't a Trump or Biden isssue.

Again, why would you want software that isn't independently audited before and AFTER the election? Please tell me?

That is a poor example. The police wouldn't audit the accused finances just because you claimed that he/she stole your money. You would have to provide sufficient claim that you had the money, how and when the money disappeared, and why you are pointing a finger at the accused.

In this election, we don't know that Trump has unfairly lost, and his lawyers have been unable to convince a court that he unfairly lost. And while the lack of success in court certainly reflects some of the worst legal work I have seen in high profile matters, it mostly is due to the lack of credible evidence.

The fact that Trump lost isn't credible evidence that he was cheated, it just is credible evidence that his vote total is less than Biden's vote total. Applying that to your example, you would claim that the accused is guilty of stealing your money just because his bank balance is greater than yours. That isn't enough.

Since the initial post on 1/20/2017, this thread has grown and grown. Out of curiosity I looked at the dates for various "milestone" post numbers.

5000th post 5/25/2017 (125 days after 1st)

10000th post 8/4/2017 (71 days after 5K)

15Kth post 12/15/2017 (133 days after 10K)

20Kth post 2/16/2018 (63 days after 15K)

25Kth post 4/20/2018 (63 days after 20K)

30Kth post 6/16/2018 (57 days after 25K)

35Kth post 8/17/2018 (62 days after 30K)

40Kth post 10/14/2018 (58 days after 35K)

45Kth post 1/3/2019 (81 days after 40K)

50Kth post 2/21/2019 (49 days after 45K)

55Kth post 3/30/2019 (37 days after 50K)

60Kth post 5/22/2019 (48 days after 55K)

65Kth post 8/5/2019 (75 days after 60K)

70Kth post 10/3/2019 (59 days after 65K)

75Kth post 11/6/2019 (34 days after 70K)

80Kth post 1/6/2020 (61 days after 75K)

85Kth post 2/21/2020 (46 days after 80K)

90Kth post 3/29/2020 (37 days after 85K)

95Kth post 6/3/2020 (66 days after 90K)

100Kth post 8/7/2020 (65 days after 95K)

105Kth post 10/2/2020 (56 days after 100K)

110Kth post 10/31/2020 (29 days after 105K)

115Kth post 12/2/2020 (32 days after 110K)

NOTE: Due to post deletions, some data may be incorrect now.