Flybang mash wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Ha! I'm not influenced by any fear you might insult me. You are clearly Sally, a HUGE moron and bad person.
I will answer though because this is an interesting topic.
I have no idea what Trump will do. He's delusional, criminal, and amoral. I can't predict what a person like that will do.
Here is what WILL happen though, and #1 is really the only important one:
1) Assuming he is alive, Joe Biden WILL be sworn in as the 46th president of the United States on Jan. 20, 2021.
2) IF Trump is in the White House on that day and refuses to leave, he WILL be escorted out, probably in zip ties.
3) IF Trump tries to mobilize these stupid militias or for some SUPER crazy reason tries to mobilize the military or police to stay in power, he will be arrested and charged with Sedition.
4) IF Trump manages to stay out of prison (which I don't think he will) and he attempts a radio and/or television network, it will show initial promise because people will rubberneck a train wreck, but it will fizzle out like all of his other businesses he has tried to start from scratch. He's just not a good businessman (and no I won't entertain any of your like crap responses to the contrary).
5) Best case scenario for Trump is to concede and hope he isn't thrown in prison. Worst case for Trump is that he never concedes and takes illegal action to try to stay in power and is thrown in prison immediately. Most likely case is he won't concede (he doesn't have to), will continue to whine that he won, but he will will eventually go to prison for all kinds of fraud...bank fraud, tax fraud, insurance fraud, and MAYBE even money laundering. His three idiot children (and yes you know which three I'm talking about) are going to prison also, though Eric has the best chance to stay out.
You are clearly a Nancy with Karen frosting, and a horrible, horrible person. You talk too much in meetings, sometimes with your mouth full of donut, in an attempt to shriek your opinions over everyone else. And your appearance is generally slovenly.
1) Wow, that's one bold prediction. Bold.
2) I'll bet the second part never occurs, if the premise is met. Shoot me some odds. Go ahead, shoot me some odds and terms on that.
3) I'll bet the second part never occurs, if the premise is met. Same as (3) above.
4) I'll bet Trump never spend even one hour incarcerated. I'll give you 8:1, Reno variance rules, point escrow costs split, interest to winner, acceptance per UCC, liquidated allowed.
5) See (4) above. And give you 30:1 on the idiot children being incarcerated. 30:1 on each idiot child. If you want to parlay the bet, 150:1 on all three idiot children incarcerated. You're not going to get that deal anywhere else, Nancy.
You are clearly a moron.
1) YOU asked me what would happen. I never said it was a bold prediction to say Biden will be sworn in on Jan. 20. It's not a bold prediction at all. It will simply happen...something you asked about. By the way, a ton of idiots online think Trump is going to still be President then. Um...nope.
2) I never said Trump would refuse to leave and in fact said I couldn't predict what a delusional, criminal, amoral person would do, so why would I put odds on that? I just said what would happed IF he didn't leave. How dumb are you?
3) Same basic answer as I gave in #2. Again, how dumb are you?
4) I have said Trump will be imprisoned. I do not bet, ever. It's low class, and I don't know any person who can bet enough to make it interesting for me anyway. Thanks for showing who you are by wanting to bet money. Very low class indeed.
5) Again, I don't bet money. Only low-class losers do that. Eric is the only one with a real chance to stay out of prison. The other two are going, and PROBABLY Eric too.
You aren't interesting enough to respond to again.
Trollminator wrote:
Serious q - what are your thoughts on why trump has held no rallies since losing? This is actually not making sense to me.
Other than a couple of quick statements such as the one last week when he was praising himself for the vaccines, he's been pretty quiet except on twitter and (I presume) other social media.
I do think if he never concedes which is highly likely, he does hold a rally simultaneously with Biden's inauguration which likely will have either no one or socially distant attendees and Trump will crow that he had more attendees. It's what he does.
Hobby jogging moran wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Serious q - what are your thoughts on why trump has held no rallies since losing? This is actually not making sense to me.
Serious answer: all this "legal battle" is just the advertising part of the donation con, of which 75% (previously 60, but has been upped) goes to either Trump's campaign debt bail out or giving money for his brand new political action comity. It has to stay low cost, as demonstrated by either using the white house press room or a parking lot near a dildo shop. Rallies aren't low cost.
Agreed. Its a fundraising campaign for himself. He'll declare candidacy for 2024 on Jan 20th so the campaign contributions will continue and the rubes don't realize they are giving money directly to Trump.
Flagpole wrote:
Surprise! wrote:
I'll give you 5-1 odds that Trump does not remain as President past Jan 20th when Biden gets sworn in. My $500 against your $100.
Winner picks the charity.
Ok, here's my thought on this...I've made it clear that I do not bet money and that betting is low class, BUT for those of you who DO bet money, this "charity" thing is a crock.
NO charity. Cold hard cash to the winner of the bet. Now, for me, $500 is NOTHING, but for people who bet that much, it is obviously something. If you're gonna bet, money goes to the winner. NO chance to just say you gave it to charity, no chance to get a tax deduction.
Charity schmarity...money goes to the winner. The WINNER can then decide to give it to charity if they want.
There was zero chance that dude was ever going to make that wager. I mentioned charity because that was what was mentioned previously.
Thanks Calamity Joe; From the Founders article, some prescient thoughts:
Perhaps most ominously, one prominent Pennsylvanian identifying himself only as "An Old Whig," wrote about this in Anti-Federalist No. 70, and is worth quoting at length:
"Let us suppose this man to be a favorite with his army, and that they are unwilling to part with their beloved commander in chief ... and we have only to suppose one thing more, that this man is without the virtue, the moderation and love of liberty which possessed the mind of our late general [Washington] - and this country will be involved at once in war and tyranny.
... We may also suppose, without trespassing upon the bounds of probability, that this man may not have the means of supporting, in private life, the dignity of his former station; that like Caesar, he may be at once ambitious and poor, and deeply involved in debt. Such a man would die a thousand deaths rather than sink from the heights of splendor and power, into obscurity and wretchedness."
The second paragraph describes Trump to a T
and this from an historian
So why didn't the founders plan for this particular scenario, of a president simply denying that he had lost an election? Because they couldn't even fathom it, Engel said.
"They couldn't fathom two things: a person who had become president who was so utterly lacking in classical virtue that they would deign or dare to put their own interests above the unity of the country. And the second thing is, I think they couldn't fathom how any president who would so vividly display disdain for the unity of the country, and mock and undermine the legitimacy of American democracy, why that person [wouldn't have] already been impeached and removed from office."
Yes, despite it being clear for all to see what the man was, the Republican sycophants are more concerned with staying in power themselves, than any support for impeachment, which to be honest, may have been in their best interests as a party
He looks like sh!t - old, tired and defeated.
His eyes look puffy and irritated, maybe he’s been crying a lot lately.
ENJOY YOUR LOSS ?
Just been there done it wrote:
Thanks Calamity Joe;
From the Founders article, some prescient thoughts:
Perhaps most ominously, one prominent Pennsylvanian identifying himself only as "An Old Whig," wrote about this in Anti-Federalist No. 70, and is worth quoting at length:
"Let us suppose this man to be a favorite with his army, and that they are unwilling to part with their beloved commander in chief ... and we have only to suppose one thing more, that this man is without the virtue, the moderation and love of liberty which possessed the mind of our late general [Washington] - and this country will be involved at once in war and tyranny.
... We may also suppose, without trespassing upon the bounds of probability, that this man may not have the means of supporting, in private life, the dignity of his former station; that like Caesar, he may be at once ambitious and poor, and deeply involved in debt. Such a man would die a thousand deaths rather than sink from the heights of splendor and power, into obscurity and wretchedness."
The second paragraph describes Trump to a T
and this from an historian
So why didn't the founders plan for this particular scenario, of a president simply denying that he had lost an election? Because they couldn't even fathom it, Engel said.
"They couldn't fathom two things: a person who had become president who was so utterly lacking in classical virtue that they would deign or dare to put their own interests above the unity of the country. And the second thing is, I think they couldn't fathom how any president who would so vividly display disdain for the unity of the country, and mock and undermine the legitimacy of American democracy, why that person [wouldn't have] already been impeached and removed from office."
Yes, despite it being clear for all to see what the man was, the Republican sycophants are more concerned with staying in power themselves, than any support for impeachment, which to be honest, may have been in their best interests as a party
John Meachum is no historian. He was let go for being a partisan. He is no historian. A clown. I know more about presidential politics than he does.
Flagpole wrote:
Flybang mash wrote:
You are clearly a Nancy with Karen frosting, and a horrible, horrible person. You talk too much in meetings, sometimes with your mouth full of donut, in an attempt to shriek your opinions over everyone else. And your appearance is generally slovenly.
1) Wow, that's one bold prediction. Bold.
2) I'll bet the second part never occurs, if the premise is met. Shoot me some odds. Go ahead, shoot me some odds and terms on that.
3) I'll bet the second part never occurs, if the premise is met. Same as (3) above.
4) I'll bet Trump never spend even one hour incarcerated. I'll give you 8:1, Reno variance rules, point escrow costs split, interest to winner, acceptance per UCC, liquidated allowed.
5) See (4) above. And give you 30:1 on the idiot children being incarcerated. 30:1 on each idiot child. If you want to parlay the bet, 150:1 on all three idiot children incarcerated. You're not going to get that deal anywhere else, Nancy.
You are clearly a moron.
1) YOU asked me what would happen. I never said it was a bold prediction to say Biden will be sworn in on Jan. 20. It's not a bold prediction at all. It will simply happen...something you asked about. By the way, a ton of idiots online think Trump is going to still be President then. Um...nope.
2) I never said Trump would refuse to leave and in fact said I couldn't predict what a delusional, criminal, amoral person would do, so why would I put odds on that? I just said what would happed IF he didn't leave. How dumb are you?
3) Same basic answer as I gave in #2. Again, how dumb are you?
4) I have said Trump will be imprisoned. I do not bet, ever. It's low class, and I don't know any person who can bet enough to make it interesting for me anyway. Thanks for showing who you are by wanting to bet money. Very low class indeed.
5) Again, I don't bet money. Only low-class losers do that. Eric is the only one with a real chance to stay out of prison. The other two are going, and PROBABLY Eric too.
Well aren't you just the poncey, living on trust fund, alligator handbag type. Do you know why no one likes you? It's because your high falutin' standards aren't supported by your grunt class mentality. I'm just being honest here, because we're sharing.
Betting is HIGH class behavior. You wouldn't know that, stuck in your red suede parlor room bubble. Chicks DIG guys who bet, and who bet large. I'll bet you 10 large that Trump doesn't go to prison. 10 large is interesting, even to an uptight damsel like yourself. 10 large is fascinating.
Put your dowry where your mouth is, Shelia. Pony up. Pony up like you had a pair. Don't be no run-around Sue on this, like you have in the past.
Troll better Sally you’ve become boring.
spoooooooo wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y68pEknYyCMOh this is going to be sooooooo satisfying to watch the real truth play out as the sissy Bidenettes lose their stolen election. Can't wait:). Amazing the not one of you can see what your lying racist side did to steal it and won't see this coming. Thanks Alan, you are the most unbiased poster on this thread.
Looks like you're not going to get to see "the real truth play out". Sydney's been cut from the team. She may not be too wacky for you, but she's apparently too wacky for Trump and Rudy (which is saying a lot).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-dumps-sydney-powell-lawyer-who-promised-to-blow-up-georgia-as-legal-strategy-unravels/ar-BB1bgetz?li=BBnb7KzGina wrote:
Troll better Sally you’ve become boring.
Not Sally. Someone smarter than Sally.
Surprise! wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Ok, here's my thought on this...I've made it clear that I do not bet money and that betting is low class, BUT for those of you who DO bet money, this "charity" thing is a crock.
NO charity. Cold hard cash to the winner of the bet. Now, for me, $500 is NOTHING, but for people who bet that much, it is obviously something. If you're gonna bet, money goes to the winner. NO chance to just say you gave it to charity, no chance to get a tax deduction.
Charity schmarity...money goes to the winner. The WINNER can then decide to give it to charity if they want.
There was zero chance that dude was ever going to make that wager. I mentioned charity because that was what was mentioned previously.
Yeah, I see he was never going to make that bet. My comment was more about him really. He had a ridiculous stance.
Sally, you are an immoral, dishonest person.
No one care about your opinion.
johnny99 wrote:
spoooooooo wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y68pEknYyCMOh this is going to be sooooooo satisfying to watch the real truth play out as the sissy Bidenettes lose their stolen election. Can't wait:). Amazing the not one of you can see what your lying racist side did to steal it and won't see this coming. Thanks Alan, you are the most unbiased poster on this thread.
Looks like you're not going to get to see "the real truth play out". Sydney's been cut from the team. She may not be too wacky for you, but she's apparently too wacky for Trump and Rudy (which is saying a lot).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-dumps-sydney-powell-lawyer-who-promised-to-blow-up-georgia-as-legal-strategy-unravels/ar-BB1bgetz?li=BBnb7Kz
I would have dumped Rudy. They're equally insane, but she wouldn't give a press conference next to a dildo store. sweat hair dye on national TV or be caught on film with her hand down her pants(skirt).
Sally,. Jon Meacham has written 12 books on American Historical figures. Including the Pulitzer for his Andrew Jackson book. He has the Endowed Chair of the American Presidency at Vanderbilt U. !! Sally, let us all know where we can buy your books !?!
The BEST people.
Just Wundrin wrote:
Gina wrote:
Troll better Sally you’ve become boring.
Not Sally. Someone smarter than Sally.
I was replying to Sally, fvck knows what you’re talking about.
I just heard a somewhat convincing take on the election, a positive for the Republican Party.
The idea is that the Bush R party has been pushed aside because it was the party of endless war and trade deals that cost US jobs.
Trump has saved the R party by keeping the guns, anti-abortion and religion, but excising the wars and trade deals.
In a way, they think this puts the R party in a good place going forward.
They say the downballot success of the Rs means that people hate DJT but they like this new idea of the R party. Get rid of DJT and his excesses, but keep the core new definition of the R party.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
Looks like you're not going to get to see "the real truth play out". Sydney's been cut from the team. She may not be too wacky for you, but she's apparently too wacky for Trump and Rudy (which is saying a lot).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-dumps-sydney-powell-lawyer-who-promised-to-blow-up-georgia-as-legal-strategy-unravels/ar-BB1bgetz?li=BBnb7KzI would have dumped Rudy. They're equally insane, but she wouldn't give a press conference next to a dildo store. sweat hair dye on national TV or be caught on film with her hand down her pants(skirt).
Wrong. She's still on the legal team. Dumocrats like LL just LOVE to lie. I know he's clearly a racist, but are any of you even slightly honest?
Biden and Hillary may be going to jail for what they did to the election, but I assure you Trump is not.
Trump will remain President, just wait and see. Stealing millions of votes is....well, illegal. The left clearly lost the election, but had to cheat in the middle of the night to change the results. How none of you nutjobs can see that is beyond me. Flagpole is a lost cause, lies like the wind, so he's irrelevant. The rest of you that stupid? Trump has owned you for 4 years and will continue to do so for another 4.