Nancy Pelosi's husband "violently assaulted" in their San Francisco home

Kobbs Hessler · 2022-10-28T09:30:31-04:00

Here's hoping they catch the person who did this.

Non-Running Politics

Reply New New Thread

Moderation Moderation Information Moderation Information & Rules

Page 58 of 85

1 57 58 59 85

Next Last

3 years ago 11/02/2022 2:34pm EDT

re: Another coincidence

Another coincidence wrote:
As I’ve said…
Tweet:twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/15875...

Hold on, "Another Coincidence" (aka AdultintheRoom). It's not time to appeal to Tucker Carlson yet. You still have not explained your multiple lies in this thread. You need to finish that line of questioning before you move on to Tucker Carlson.

Post No. 1008 (page 51) set forth below, has not been answered:

I was just asking why you lie constantly. Maybe just give a short summary of why you enjoy lying and why you don't feel any hesitancy at all to engage in lies.

Like these three statements by you in the last hour or two are all easily demonstrable lies. I'm just interested in why you do that.

1. "No statements from DePape lawyers"

2. "No residence search at DePape’s"

3. "Google street view only comes every 5-10 years"

There's many more, but maybe just comment a little on why you felt compelled to type those lies. Just like 2-3 sentences explaining how you felt and what you were thinking you would get from the lying experience.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 2:37pm EDT

re: Just checking

Just checking wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
For the same reason that the left is responsible for 99.999% of the riots and political violence in the country.
The left is much more immoral than the right.
The "ends justify the means" is a left wing concept.
Democrats make decision based off of their feelings.
Republicans make decisions based off logic.
#notall
So the GOP voters believe Herschel is a quality candidate because of his character and knowledge of the problems and policies? He continues to receive support from his GOP colleagues because they believe he represents the party well?
Not because they know what he will be told to vote for ? Not because that will be 1 less Dem in government ? No ends justifying a means here.

Walker's not a smart man but his opinions are his own and they are more sound than Warnock's opinions.

You're seriously going to complain about Walker while the Democrats support a candidate in PA with literal brain damage?

3 years ago 11/02/2022 2:42pm EDT

re: Pol Quamy

Pol Quamy wrote:
Samantha Spade wrote:
All this idiotic discussion and digression will end ** IF ** there's any evidence than DePape actually broke in.
At present, none has been offered, nor is the "attempted murder" charge anything but prosecutorial overreach and propaganda.
"Weird" how the fraud "liberals" are totally cool with an alleged confession given without DePape having a lawyer.
Those statements are internally inconsistent, Sallyamantha. You contradicted yourself in the space of three sentences, which is hard to do.
Some of the evidence of (1) DePopi's break in and (2) attempted murder of Paul Pelosi IS Depopi's confession where he (1) said he broke in and that (2) he hit Paul Pelosi with a hammer. So that confessional evidence -- which is often the most compelling evidence you will ever get in a criminal case -- has been "offered," along with a bunch of other evidence.
Let me know if you don't understand this, and I can try to explain it again. It's you and me, baby. We can rock it out.

A "confession" without a lawyer present is now acceptable "evidence" to "liberals" (sic)? Since when?

And why wasn't a lawyer present?

Your ignorance and arrogance, already well "evident," are astounding...

Thankfully, for the moment, DePape plead not guilty, despite all the "evidence" against him.

So "odd" how there's not a single image yet of DePape "breaking" in despite all the OTHER leaks from law enforcement.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 2:44pm EDT

re: TheAdultInTheRoom

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
The majority of Democrats may be in the middle but the Democratic party today is no where near the middle.
The Democrats are out of step with normal Americans on almost every issue despite controlling the narrative in 99% of the media.
Democrats have extreme positions on abortion, immigration, policing, taxation, education, and on and on.
Dehumanizing the opposition is leftism 101. Biden doesn't go on TV and give a speech declaring half the country to be "enemies of the state" for no reason.

Again, this is opinion. One could make a case that Republicans are nowhere in the middle. Do you know how many republicans voted to ban contraception? How about abortion? How about gay marriage? One could argue these are extreme policies. If someone claims to be about freedom, how is it free to ban these? How is it free to ban books?

See what happens when you assume a few idiot politicians fairly represent the people? They do not. I understand not every republican is Clarence Thomas. Most are not.

I think both parties need to take control of their own parties. Both parties have significant problems they need to address. Namely, they are pushing their agenda instead of listening to their own constituents. Instead, we have the extreme ends of both parties creating culture wars and the media fans the flames.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 2:48pm EDT

re: TheAdultInTheRoom

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Just checking wrote:
So the GOP voters believe Herschel is a quality candidate because of his character and knowledge of the problems and policies? He continues to receive support from his GOP colleagues because they believe he represents the party well?
Not because they know what he will be told to vote for ? Not because that will be 1 less Dem in government ? No ends justifying a means here.
Walker's not a smart man but his opinions are his own and they are more sound than Warnock's opinions.
You're seriously going to complain about Walker while the Democrats support a candidate in PA with literal brain damage?

You are all over the place with your political takes.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 2:58pm EDT

re: BhaktaDon

BhaktaDon wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
The majority of Democrats may be in the middle but the Democratic party today is no where near the middle.
The Democrats are out of step with normal Americans on almost every issue despite controlling the narrative in 99% of the media.
Democrats have extreme positions on abortion, immigration, policing, taxation, education, and on and on.
Dehumanizing the opposition is leftism 101. Biden doesn't go on TV and give a speech declaring half the country to be "enemies of the state" for no reason.
Again, this is opinion. One could make a case that Republicans are nowhere in the middle. Do you know how many republicans voted to ban contraception? How about abortion? How about gay marriage? One could argue these are extreme policies. If someone claims to be about freedom, how is it free to ban these? How is it free to ban books?
See what happens when you assume a few idiot politicians fairly represent the people? They do not. I understand not every republican is Clarence Thomas. Most are not.
I think both parties need to take control of their own parties. Both parties have significant problems they need to address. Namely, they are pushing their agenda instead of listening to their own constituents. Instead, we have the extreme ends of both parties creating culture wars and the media fans the flames.

It's not opinion. Everyone who's bothered to look knows the Democrats have moved to the left.

fivethirtyeight.com

Why The Democrats Have Shifted Left Over The Last 30 Years

Sarah Frostenson

Graphics by Yutong Yuan The 2020 Democratic primary field has been touted as far more liberal than that of previous years. Candidates have proposed a number of …

Open link

The Republicans aren't in the middle but they aren't any further from the middle than they were 30 years ago. If anything they are closer to the middle as the religious zealots have lost sway in the party.

Banning contraception is extreme politically but it's a very rare position for a Republican to promote. I can't think of any. Democrats in the mainstream all support the opposite extreme which is abortion right up until birth.

The objections to gay marriage are religious. Anyone who takes their religion seriously would be opposed to redefining marriage in a manner which conflicts with their religious texts. Personally, I don't see why any gay person would insist on being included in a religious ceremony from religions that declare them damned by birth. Civil unions serve the same purpose.

Republicans ban books that strangers use to sexualize other people's children. Democrats ban Mark Twain and To Kill a Mockingbird. This isn't a feather in your cap.

The Republicans advocate for smaller government because government is inherently wasteful and corrupt. Democrats think the government is the answer to every problem.

It's an easy choice.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:17pm EDT

re: Samantha Spade

Samantha Spade wrote:
A "confession" without a lawyer present is now acceptable "evidence" to "liberals" (sic)? Since when?

You seriously didn't know this? It's right there in the Miranda warning given to suspects:

You have the right to remain silent; Anything you say can and will be used against you; You have the right to an attorney

If a suspect chooses to talk without a lawyer it's 100% admissible.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:20pm EDT

re: where's my lawyer

where's my lawyer wrote:
Samantha Spade wrote:
A "confession" without a lawyer present is now acceptable "evidence" to "liberals" (sic)? Since when?
You seriously didn't know this? It's right there in the Miranda warning given to suspects:
You have the right to remain silent; Anything you say can and will be used against you; You have the right to an attorney
If a suspect chooses to talk without a lawyer it's 100% admissible.

Not if they're crazy or stupid and clearly don't understand their rights it isn't.

You seriously don't know this?

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:22pm EDT

re: Samantha Spade

Samantha Spade wrote:
Pol Quamy wrote:
Those statements are internally inconsistent, Sallyamantha. You contradicted yourself in the space of three sentences, which is hard to do.
Some of the evidence of (1) DePopi's break in and (2) attempted murder of Paul Pelosi IS Depopi's confession where he (1) said he broke in and that (2) he hit Paul Pelosi with a hammer. So that confessional evidence -- which is often the most compelling evidence you will ever get in a criminal case -- has been "offered," along with a bunch of other evidence.
Let me know if you don't understand this, and I can try to explain it again. It's you and me, baby. We can rock it out.
A "confession" without a lawyer present is now acceptable "evidence" to "liberals" (sic)? Since when?
And why wasn't a lawyer present?
Your ignorance and arrogance, already well "evident," are astounding...
Thankfully, for the moment, DePape plead not guilty, despite all the "evidence" against him.
So "odd" how there's not a single image yet of DePape "breaking" in despite all the OTHER leaks from law enforcement.

I'm not a liberal. You know that from when we romped.

If a suspect in custody has been informed of what are called his or her "Miranda rights," a confession with, or without, a lawyer present is acceptable evidence to liberals, conservatives and everyone in between. In fact, it is golden evidence. Prized evidence. Slam bang badonka donka evidence.

DiPape's lawyer wasn't present because when DiPape was asked by police if he wanted a lawyer present when he was interviewed, he declined. He then confessed to (1) breaking into the Pelosi house using a hammer and (2) swinging his hammer at Paul Pelosi.

It's not odd in the slightest that there is "not a single image yet of DePape "breaking" in" for reasons that have been explained to you multiple times in this thread.

There's a bail hearing coming up For DiPape on Friday. We shall see what is revealed then. Developing . . . . .

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:31pm EDT

re: downvote farmer

downvote farmer wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Well 40 pages of this thread are angry Trumpers claiming it's a false flag. This kind of dissociative paranoia (aka 'butthurt') tends to increase post counts.
The media has never been wrong about a story, Harambe. Just ask Kyle Rittenhouse and Nick Sandmann.

I mean, if your response is 'yes, I am super butthurt but hey, there's a small % chance that I am being butthurt and the media is wrong!' Then uh, sure. Neither of those examples were false flags. Carry on.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:33pm EDT

re: TheAdultInTheRoom

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
where's my lawyer wrote:
You seriously didn't know this? It's right there in the Miranda warning given to suspects:
You have the right to remain silent; Anything you say can and will be used against you; You have the right to an attorney
If a suspect chooses to talk without a lawyer it's 100% admissible.
Not if they're crazy or stupid and clearly don't understand their rights it isn't.
You seriously don't know this?

Trotting out the insanity defense already? I guess that rules out the 'cunningly planned false flag' excuse.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:34pm EDT

re: Harambe

Harambe wrote:
downvote farmer wrote:
The media has never been wrong about a story, Harambe. Just ask Kyle Rittenhouse and Nick Sandmann.
I mean, if your response is 'yes, I am super butthurt but hey, there's a small % chance that I am being butthurt and the media is wrong!' Then uh, sure. Neither of those examples were false flags. Carry on.

An apolitical teenager defended himself against felons and a pedophile trying to kill him and to this day there are moron who think Rittenhouse drove across the country to murder black people because he was a white power m@ga militia member.

The media lied through their fake teeth about Rittenhouse.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:37pm EDT

re: TheAdultInTheRoom

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
It's not opinion. Everyone who's bothered to look knows the Democrats have moved to the left.
Link:fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-the-d...

Written by Maddie Sach, a former was a politics intern.

Meanwhile, Republicans are races a lot faster to the far right, and have had the gas on that pedal a lot longer.

rollcall.com

Four decades and counting — the GOP’s shift to the right is bigger than the Democrats’ shift left - Roll Call

@rollcall

Over the course of four decades, since 1980, the GOP shift to the right has been greater than the Democrats' shift to the left.

Open link

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:38pm EDT

re: TheAdultInTheRoom

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

As far as I read.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:47pm EDT

re: TheAdultInTheRoom

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
The Republicans aren't in the middle but they aren't any further from the middle than they were 30 years ago. If anything they are closer to the middle as the religious zealots have lost sway in the party.
Banning contraception is extreme politically but it's a very rare position for a Republican to promote. I can't think of any. Democrats in the mainstream all support the opposite extreme which is abortion right up until birth.

One could make the case that religious zealots have taken over the republican party. They didn't ban abortion before. This is what religious zealots want.

As for banning contraception:
"ONE-HUNDRED AND NINETY five Republicans have voted against a House bill codifying the right to contraceptives into federal law."

rollingstone.com

All But 10 House Republicans Voted Against Ensuring the Right to Contraception

Ryan Bort

GOP lawmakers insist they’re not coming for contraception or marriage rights — yet the vast majority of them have voted against codifying them into law

Open link

I agree it's a rare position for a republican citizen but it's not rare for republican politicians.

It's the same with the left. Most of us aren't super woke like the extremist idiot policitians. This is my point. You are wrong if you think most democrats support abortion right up until the point of birth. That's the same as assuming all republicans want to ban contraception.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:47pm EDT

re: TheAdultInTheRoom

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Joe Manchin is from Kentucky. He will not win re-election. He's done as a Democrat.

I was sure he was from West Virginia, but since you're an expert on everything, sure.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Bill Clinton could not win a primary anywhere in America today. Why you think this is evidence that Democrats are diverse is beyond me.

Bill Clinton is a Democrat. AOC is a Democrat. Joe Manchin is a Democrat. These three are not all the same. Just like the 81 million Americans who voted Democrat in 2020 don't all agree on the same things. You struggle to understand that.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
People in nursing homes with no vote guardianships should not be voting.

I agree on people who have been documented to have decaying mental states, many of whom are in nursing homes. These cases were few in number and did not determine the winner of Wisconsin.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Ballots could not be rejected for signatures.

Do you know why? Because Pennsylvania wasn't employing forensic handwriting experts to analyze signatures.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Every name on the voter rolls got a ballot mailed to them whether they were still eligible to vote or not.

From your own link:

TheAdultInTheRoom's link says:
Rep. Boyle's bill would send a pre-paid mail-in ballot APPLICATION automatically to every registered voter in Pennsylvania.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Trump is an egomaniac. He wants to be loved and he wants to be remembered as a great president. It's in his interest to do what's best for the country.

Trump wants approval but he doesn't care if he's actually helping anyone besides himself.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Biden is a corrupt AF. If the Biden DoJ and FBI weren't corrupt AF his kid would already be in prison and he'd be under indictment.
I don't like Trump but he is head and shoulders better than a career politician with zero accomplishments in 50 years other than stealing a ton of money.

Facts are beyond you. Trump doesn't care about rules, laws or decorum. Biden's a run of the mill career politician. Trump's a crook who would sell out his family and his country to benefit himself.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:49pm EDT

re: TheAdultInTheRoom

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Harambe wrote:
I mean, if your response is 'yes, I am super butthurt but hey, there's a small % chance that I am being butthurt and the media is wrong!' Then uh, sure. Neither of those examples were false flags. Carry on.
An apolitical teenager defended himself against felons and a pedophile trying to kill him and to this day there are moron who think Rittenhouse drove across the country to murder black people because he was a white power m@ga militia member.
The media lied through their fake teeth about Rittenhouse.

You are right on about the media and Rittenhouse.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 3:58pm EDT

re: 40 v 30

40 v 30 wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
It's not opinion. Everyone who's bothered to look knows the Democrats have moved to the left.
Link:fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-the-d...
Written by Maddie Sach, a former was a politics intern.
Meanwhile, Republicans are races a lot faster to the far right, and have had the gas on that pedal a lot longer.
Link:rollcall.com/2020/12/16/four-decades-a...

So you did read further.

You're wrong.

investors.com

Pew Research Center Study Shows That Democrats Have Shifted To The Extreme Left | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

JOHN MERLINE

Partisanship: Everyone knows that the country is more politically polarized than ever, but most don't know why. Data from the highly respected Pew Research Center provides a definitive answer. It's... Read More

Open link

I'll take Pew's opinion over a leftist dinosaur's opinion thanks.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 4:01pm EDT

re: BhaktaDon

BhaktaDon wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
The Republicans aren't in the middle but they aren't any further from the middle than they were 30 years ago. If anything they are closer to the middle as the religious zealots have lost sway in the party.
Banning contraception is extreme politically but it's a very rare position for a Republican to promote. I can't think of any. Democrats in the mainstream all support the opposite extreme which is abortion right up until birth.
One could make the case that religious zealots have taken over the republican party. They didn't ban abortion before. This is what religious zealots want.
As for banning contraception:
"ONE-HUNDRED AND NINETY five Republicans have voted against a House bill codifying the right to contraceptives into federal law."
Link:www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics...
I agree it's a rare position for a republican citizen but it's not rare for republican politicians.
It's the same with the left. Most of us aren't super woke like the extremist idiot policitians. This is my point. You are wrong if you think most democrats support abortion right up until the point of birth. That's the same as assuming all republicans want to ban contraception.

It is so dishonest to play this game...

Democrats put together a pork laden bill and then declare that any vote against it is a vote against something like this.

It's disgusting and it's emblematic of everything that's wrong with politics today.

Which of the major candidates in this election cycle support restrictions on abortion?

Fetterman? No. Warnock? No. Whitmer? No. Murray? No. Kelly? No.

3 years ago 11/02/2022 4:02pm EDT

re: BhaktaDon

BhaktaDon wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
An apolitical teenager defended himself against felons and a pedophile trying to kill him and to this day there are moron who think Rittenhouse drove across the country to murder black people because he was a white power m@ga militia member.
The media lied through their fake teeth about Rittenhouse.
You are right on about the media and Rittenhouse.

And none of this excludes the 40 pages of butthurt from Trumpers in this thread.

'Coping and seething' is the technical term.

Page 58 of 85

1 57 58 59 85

Next Last

What People Are Talking About On LetsRun

No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

Real Runners, Real Reviews

Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt. Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.

What shoe are you reviewing?

Rate your shoe

Overall Rating

Appearance

Comfort

Cushioning

Durability

Value

I would buy this shoe again

Yes No

Would you buy this shoe again?

One-line review. Optional. Your written review provides information to readers that numbers can't.

Email Optional. Required for t-shirt drawing.

Real runner reviews • Community-powered rankings

Nancy Pelosi's husband "violently assaulted" in their San Francisco home

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.

Nancy Pelosi's husband "violently assaulted" in their San Francisco home

Jump To A Page

Follow TheAdultInTheRoom

Block TheAdultInTheRoom

Follow BhaktaDon

Block BhaktaDon

Follow Rick Cheney

Block Rick Cheney

Follow TheAdultInTheRoom

Block TheAdultInTheRoom

Follow TheAdultInTheRoom

Block TheAdultInTheRoom

Follow Harambe

Block Harambe

Follow Harambe

Block Harambe

Follow TheAdultInTheRoom

Block TheAdultInTheRoom

Follow BhaktaDon

Block BhaktaDon

Follow Jeff Wigand

Block Jeff Wigand

Follow BhaktaDon

Block BhaktaDon

Follow TheAdultInTheRoom

Block TheAdultInTheRoom

Follow TheAdultInTheRoom

Block TheAdultInTheRoom

Follow Harambe

Block Harambe

Jump To A Page

This thread has already been deleted.

Reply Replying to

You have been subscribed.

Real Runners, Real Reviews