Fat hurts wrote:
C bus wrote:
I answered you already.
Go preach to someone else.
No, you didn't answer at all. You have only said that you don't want to judge others who commit adultery. That's very different from taking a position on whether or not adultery is wrong.
So, in your opinion, is adultery wrong or not?
Adultery is neither always wrong nor never wrong. What is much more clearly and consistently wrong is judging the actions of and between other consenting adults.
Dan Kahneman wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
The only people who are actual home wreckers are the husband and/or wife who wreck their own home.
Sf.
I think a man or woman who has an affair with a married person is culpable. (In addition to the married person who is cheating of course)
CORRECT!
Dan Kahneman wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
The only people who are actual home wreckers are the husband and/or wife who wreck their own home.
Sf.
I think a man or woman who has an affair with a married person is culpable. (In addition to the married person who is cheating of course)
You are wrong.
So glad the morality police are here to tell everyone what is right and wrong.
You guys still trying to get heavy metal banned?
Oh no life is soooooo unfair on Ivanka.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ivanka-trump-claims-medias-silent-043529571.html
Fat hurts wrote:
Are you really suggesting that nobody said anything about Clinton's womanizing?
I seem to remember that it got him impeached.
I am suggesting that some people going after Hope Hicks would give Bill Clinton a pass.
And those people would do that purely on sexism.
Flagpole wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Are you enjoying your loss biff!? How did election work out for you? Did we all go home devastated? LOLz, too ashamed to post again huh? Not to worry, we were not expecting you would be able to take it. I'm going to enjoy reminding you of your epic catastrophic loss for many many days to come.
You have been pretty persistent so far. He likely will never post again, so it is perhaps a waste of your time, though I do admit to being amused by your reminders. I knew Rigged was outrageously stupid from the beginning, but I didn't realize he was delusional until he declared that The House didn't have the guts to impeach Trump. I even pointed out to him that it would fit his narrative for the Democrat-led House to do so, and yet he dug in that they wouldn't have the "guts" to do it. Pure delusion.
Oh he's definitely checking. He is too sore to get himself to post again under RFH, but he has posted now and then about Dems being rounded up. Sadly, he's holed up doing voodoo, praying, crossing fingers, but nothing is going to soothe his desperation.. there isn't going to be a reversal of the results. Byedon!
Real Obvi wrote:
You are wrong.
So people get deeply hurt and relationships destroyed because of the cheating and you maintain there is nothing wrong with it. Single people and those in open relationships I fully get, but deceiving and participating in the deceit are messed up. But do amuse us with your logic.
Gina wrote:
Oh no life is soooooo unfair on Ivanka.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ivanka-trump-claims-medias-silent-043529571.html
I think these people genuinely believe they are victims. It must be because they don't see how they've caused so much chaos and destruction due to living in trump's bubble.
Uh oh - freedumb fighters to the rescue!
Trollminator wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
You are wrong.
So people get deeply hurt and relationships destroyed because of the cheating and you maintain there is nothing wrong with it. Single people and those in open relationships I fully get, but deceiving and participating in the deceit are messed up. But do amuse us with your logic.
To you nitwits that say adultery is morally wrong because it breaks a commitment, people get deeply hurt, and relationships are destroyed:
What is your view on divorce?
I know bible-boy is against it. They kick people out of his church for that.
Trollminator wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
You are wrong.
So people get deeply hurt and relationships destroyed because of the cheating and you maintain there is nothing wrong with it. Single people and those in open relationships I fully get, but deceiving and participating in the deceit are messed up. But do amuse us with your logic.
I maintain that the people responsible for whatever vows made are those making those vows. Not really all that complicated.
Real Obvi wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
So people get deeply hurt and relationships destroyed because of the cheating and you maintain there is nothing wrong with it. Single people and those in open relationships I fully get, but deceiving and participating in the deceit are messed up. But do amuse us with your logic.
I maintain that the people responsible for whatever vows made are those making those vows. Not really all that complicated.
You people are missing what is most disconcerting about Hope Hick's choice of conquests. They are conquests and not the same thing as the usual affair. Her choices are guys at the office. That is issue number one. Her choices are guys in higher level ranks (boss types) . That is issue number two. Her choices often married men. That is issue number three. Her choices have all been forced out from their jobs. That is issue number four.
Hicks never gets the blame for her affairs. Her choices get the blame. She is being protected at the highest level. She is playing the big boss, and he gives her no reason to stop her behavior. She will continue the same way because there are no repercussions. She will pick another high-power target, have an affair, and that guy will also end up losing his job. There are just nine weeks left to notch-up another victim.
And make no mistake. Hicks' choice have little to do with a victim's looks, or alpha-level. It is all about claiming another high-ranking victim.
Sigmund Fraud wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
I maintain that the people responsible for whatever vows made are those making those vows. Not really all that complicated.
You people are missing what is most disconcerting about Hope Hick's choice of conquests. They are conquests and not the same thing as the usual affair. Her choices are guys at the office. That is issue number one. Her choices are guys in higher level ranks (boss types) . That is issue number two. Her choices often married men. That is issue number three. Her choices have all been forced out from their jobs. That is issue number four.
Hicks never gets the blame for her affairs. Her choices get the blame. She is being protected at the highest level. She is playing the big boss, and he gives her no reason to stop her behavior. She will continue the same way because there are no repercussions. She will pick another high-power target, have an affair, and that guy will also end up losing his job. There are just nine weeks left to notch-up another victim.
And make no mistake. Hicks' choice have little to do with a victim's looks, or alpha-level. It is all about claiming another high-ranking victim.
Oh boy - this is definitely going to trigger sally... here we go
C bus wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
So people get deeply hurt and relationships destroyed because of the cheating and you maintain there is nothing wrong with it. Single people and those in open relationships I fully get, but deceiving and participating in the deceit are messed up. But do amuse us with your logic.
To you nitwits that say adultery is morally wrong because it breaks a commitment, people get deeply hurt, and relationships are destroyed:
What is your view on divorce?
I know bible-boy is against it. They kick people out of his church for that.
Cheating on someone and breaking up with someone (whether married or not) are very different. Cheating is immoral, breaking up might be hurtful, might be sad, but doesn't have to be immoral.
Sigmund Fraud wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
I maintain that the people responsible for whatever vows made are those making those vows. Not really all that complicated.
You people are missing what is most disconcerting about Hope Hick's choice of conquests. They are conquests and not the same thing as the usual affair. Her choices are guys at the office. That is issue number one. Her choices are guys in higher level ranks (boss types) . That is issue number two. Her choices often married men. That is issue number three. Her choices have all been forced out from their jobs. That is issue number four.
Hicks never gets the blame for her affairs. Her choices get the blame. She is being protected at the highest level. She is playing the big boss, and he gives her no reason to stop her behavior. She will continue the same way because there are no repercussions. She will pick another high-power target, have an affair, and that guy will also end up losing his job. There are just nine weeks left to notch-up another victim.
And make no mistake. Hicks' choice have little to do with a victim's looks, or alpha-level. It is all about claiming another high-ranking victim.
Well chosen Username.
Bravo!
C bus wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
No, you didn't answer at all. You have only said that you don't want to judge others who commit adultery. That's very different from taking a position on whether or not adultery is wrong.
So, in your opinion, is adultery wrong or not?
I answered you already. Move along bible-boy.
It's pretty pathetic that you can't even tell us if you believe adultery is wrong. I doubt that there is anyone else here who can not give a straight answer to that question.
Do you think murder is wrong? Could you even answer that one?
Real Obvi wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
No, you didn't answer at all. You have only said that you don't want to judge others who commit adultery. That's very different from taking a position on whether or not adultery is wrong.
So, in your opinion, is adultery wrong or not?
Adultery is neither always wrong nor never wrong. What is much more clearly and consistently wrong is judging the actions of and between other consenting adults.
In what circumstance is adultery OK?
Fat hurts wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
Adultery is neither always wrong nor never wrong. What is much more clearly and consistently wrong is judging the actions of and between other consenting adults.
In what circumstance is adultery OK?
When those involved decide it is ok. Outsiders (like you, for instance) have no say and no relevance.
Not that complicated really.