agip wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
If these thugs refuse to obey the law, we should just lock them up.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/america-largest-militia-says-refuse-192813396.htmlthe press needs to start calling them armed gangs, not 'militias'
Very true, although militia is a nice buzz word for the liberal audience, calling them what they are, terrorists and armed gangs, would be much more honest and effective.
Hi Biff - did that migraine finally go away or has it gotten worse? In what stage of denial are you in now? LOLz. Been trying to bargain with god? I promise it won’t help. ?????????????
You had to figure this was coming. By almost immediately announcing he is running in 2024 he’ll spark a competition on the right to both protect him and copy him. Will be fun to watch what happens to those who try to compete with anti-trumpism. I just hope Twitter throws a curtain on this guy and filters out most of his drivel after he’s out of the WH. Strap yourselves in gents.
https://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1328255005422305280?s=21
Flagpole wrote:
Just Wundrin wrote:
Like I said, there are two kinds of people in the world; those who have some idea of what is going on and those who don't.
Ok...well, I know enough about Hope Hicks' hole stuffing to last a lifetime, so you can keep any more knowledge you have about that to yourself. I don't need to know.
Quit with the misogyny. I called you out about it before but you're never able to take criticism. You repeatedly make negative comments about women, when it's not relevant to the argument. You are clearly a misogynist.
Your offensive, combative nature doesn't help anyone.
Predictions for 2020-2024:
1. Trump will leave the WH in Jan, either voluntarily or in zip ties
2. He will announce he's running in 2024 by then - nothing to lose by doing this
3. FOX and social media will keep him relevant, left wing media will keep highlighting the ridiculous stunts since they too make money from it
4. He will hold rallies and organize protests. His idiot children will help him.
5. The GOP will be walking on egg shells privately but publicly they will continue to fully comply with trumpism. Many will still consider trump the legit president and will capitalize on the fake accusations of election fraud.
6. Biden is going to have a lot of difficulty getting anything done and of course the GOP will never take responsibility for the mess left by trump. I think they will retake the house in 2022.
7. NYS will go after trump. The legal issues will play out over several years though. The IRS may also go after him.
8. Trump will run into massive financial trouble when the loan repayment dam breaks. He will step up his criminality to live another day.
9. He will not be eligible to run in 2024. The GOP nomination will come down to Tucker Carlson, Ted Cruz, and Don Jr.
10. Biden will not seek re election, it will be Harris and she will win.
This is all subject to change :)
Trollminator wrote:
Predictions for 2020-2024:
1. Trump will leave the WH in Jan, either voluntarily or in zip ties
2. He will announce he's running in 2024 by then - nothing to lose by doing this
3. FOX and social media will keep him relevant, left wing media will keep highlighting the ridiculous stunts since they too make money from it
4. He will hold rallies and organize protests. His idiot children will help him.
5. The GOP will be walking on egg shells privately but publicly they will continue to fully comply with trumpism. Many will still consider trump the legit president and will capitalize on the fake accusations of election fraud.
6. Biden is going to have a lot of difficulty getting anything done and of course the GOP will never take responsibility for the mess left by trump. I think they will retake the house in 2022.
7. NYS will go after trump. The legal issues will play out over several years though. The IRS may also go after him.
8. Trump will run into massive financial trouble when the loan repayment dam breaks. He will step up his criminality to live another day.
9. He will not be eligible to run in 2024. The GOP nomination will come down to Tucker Carlson, Ted Cruz, and Don Jr.
10. Biden will not seek re election, it will be Harris and she will win.
This is all subject to change :)
Your list is very telling. You have one line about Biden and the rest is all about Trump. You reveal how little you think about Biden and your awareness of Biden's incompetence. And you reveal your obsession with Trump.
Your post doesn’t make a lot of sense Sally. I think the inference is that that Biden presidency will not be particularly dramatic. He will not get much done due to Republican obstructionism (no claim here that Dems are any different in a Republican administration). On the flip side Trump is wildly unpredictable and his path could end literally anywhere between jail or the presidency hence why it makes more sense to cast a “prediction”. I guess the fat fuc@ could also keel over but that is a bit too random to hypothesize.
Do you really want to see a list of policy actions the Biden administration might undertake? They are pretty “predictable”.
zephito wrote:
agip wrote:
How can democracy survive with the Republican Party?
The governor of Florida recommending Americans urge their legislators to throw out election results and install Trump as president.
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/elections/fl-ne-florida-gop-reaction-20201106-pjqk73ln3jcojggkp2rhezz7ay-story.htmlIt's amazing how awful these people are. Even if the GOP doesn't really want to do this, that they're only saying it to curry favor with Trump, it sets a terrible precedent. After all, the Republicans who actually have a say in this (the state legislators) are running away as fast as they can from the idea, rightly fearing voter repercussions (and possibly standing on principle). But they're going to get hit the next cycle by the Trump partisans, who may vote them out of office anyway in a primary campaign. Then we might have loyal Trumpists in state legislatures deciding things next go around. Say Trump runs again in 2024 (possible) and the race is close (likely). The Trumpists might go along that time. And what's to stop the Dem legislators from doing the same thing in states they control? What a disaster...
These people are either morons, fascists or cowards, possibly all 3.
This is an attack on American democracy. There is no "nice way" to explain what is going on. Trump's encouragement of his cult members (including a number of sad posters on this site) not to accept the results of this election is simply a pathetic attempt to subvert our democracy.
Trump and his followers (including posters here) should be ashamed.
Trump's refusal to allow Biden transition knowledge to help deal with our medical crisis is beneath contempt.
Here, from a South Dakota nurse... I'm not surprised at all to see there are endless covidiot trumpers rolling into their hospitals to die. But as their governor says, they are happy because they are free. Freedumb!
https://twitter.com/JodiDoering/status/1327771331920883714?s=20
The Trump sycophant demanded to know why Republicans don’t “just say we’re not going to accept the results of this election.”
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Predictions for 2020-2024:
1. Trump will leave the WH in Jan, either voluntarily or in zip ties
2. He will announce he's running in 2024 by then - nothing to lose by doing this
3. FOX and social media will keep him relevant, left wing media will keep highlighting the ridiculous stunts since they too make money from it
4. He will hold rallies and organize protests. His idiot children will help him.
5. The GOP will be walking on egg shells privately but publicly they will continue to fully comply with trumpism. Many will still consider trump the legit president and will capitalize on the fake accusations of election fraud.
6. Biden is going to have a lot of difficulty getting anything done and of course the GOP will never take responsibility for the mess left by trump. I think they will retake the house in 2022.
7. NYS will go after trump. The legal issues will play out over several years though. The IRS may also go after him.
8. Trump will run into massive financial trouble when the loan repayment dam breaks. He will step up his criminality to live another day.
9. He will not be eligible to run in 2024. The GOP nomination will come down to Tucker Carlson, Ted Cruz, and Don Jr.
10. Biden will not seek re election, it will be Harris and she will win.
This is all subject to change :)
Your list is very telling. You have one line about Biden and the rest is all about Trump. You reveal how little you think about Biden and your awareness of Biden's incompetence. And you reveal your obsession with Trump.
Did you think this was the Biden thread?
Dan Kahneman wrote:
zephito wrote:
It's amazing how awful these people are. Even if the GOP doesn't really want to do this, that they're only saying it to curry favor with Trump, it sets a terrible precedent. After all, the Republicans who actually have a say in this (the state legislators) are running away as fast as they can from the idea, rightly fearing voter repercussions (and possibly standing on principle). But they're going to get hit the next cycle by the Trump partisans, who may vote them out of office anyway in a primary campaign. Then we might have loyal Trumpists in state legislatures deciding things next go around. Say Trump runs again in 2024 (possible) and the race is close (likely). The Trumpists might go along that time. And what's to stop the Dem legislators from doing the same thing in states they control? What a disaster...
These people are either morons, fascists or cowards, possibly all 3.
This is an attack on American democracy. There is no "nice way" to explain what is going on. Trump's encouragement of his cult members (including a number of sad posters on this site) not to accept the results of this election is simply a pathetic attempt to subvert our democracy.
Trump and his followers (including posters here) should be ashamed.
Trump's refusal to allow Biden transition knowledge to help deal with our medical crisis is beneath contempt.
Legally, it's 100% game over. But they have to keep feeding the mouth breathers.
agip wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
If these thugs refuse to obey the law, we should just lock them up.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/america-largest-militia-says-refuse-192813396.htmlthe press needs to start calling them armed gangs, not 'militias'
Good point.
All of this talk about Republicans not accepting the results and saying the states should make their own calls on who to commit their electoral votes to regardless of how the people of those states voted is comical.
Four years ago, enough Democrat lead states whose people voted for Trump could have made their electors choose Hillary.
They could simply assign their electors to match the popular vote. Republicans would have gone nuts if they did that.
But they want that in their favor now that they lost?
Trump won in North Carolina, Kentucky and Louisiana.
They all have Democrat governors.
Do you really want some states selectively changing their results based on previous local election results and not how they voted for president?
These are some desperate sore losers.
agip wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
If these thugs refuse to obey the law, we should just lock them up.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/america-largest-militia-says-refuse-192813396.htmlthe press needs to start calling them armed gangs, not 'militias'
Agreed! "Thugs" and "White Supremacist Gang Members" should be the new nomenclature. News stories should refer to them as part of a larger gang problem and group them in with MS-13, Bloods, Crips, etc.
L L wrote:
All of this talk about Republicans not accepting the results and saying the states should make their own calls on who to commit their electoral votes to regardless of how the people of those states voted is comical.
Four years ago, enough Democrat lead states whose people voted for Trump could have made their electors choose Hillary.
Democrats did the same thing. Every week there was an article in Vox or Huff Post pleading with electors to do their constitutional duty and vote against the mad man. People marched in the streets for a solid week after Trump got elected - I remember because I was there, and people chanted the exact same thing : Not My President. Then Russian interference stories and innuendo started rolling out and people began to instantly de-legitimize the election result. Just look at Flagpole - 4 years later and he still thinks Trump actually lost.
It was literally nothing but desperation talk for about a month until the electoral college confirmed Trump and the despair set in. At the end of the day it's just desperation. I know how all those people in the streets feel because we all felt the same 4 years. Maybe we should empathize with them and let them know that it's gonna be alright
Portland Hobby Jogger wrote:
agip wrote:
the press needs to start calling them armed gangs, not 'militias'
Agreed! "Thugs" and "White Supremacist Gang Members" should be the new nomenclature. News stories should refer to them as part of a larger gang problem and group them in with MS-13, Bloods, Crips, etc.
This is hilarious because I swear to God I saw this exact same comment from Republicans in 2016 when young kids marched all over cities - well, maybe except the "White Supremacist Gang Members" part.
We should at least put pre-headers on our posts that are like:
[I realize the immense irony in this and the fact that I'm an enormous tool]
<Body of message board post goes here>
Trollminator wrote:
You had to figure this was coming. By almost immediately announcing he is running in 2024 he’ll spark a competition on the right to both protect him and copy him. Will be fun to watch what happens to those who try to compete with anti-trumpism. I just hope Twitter throws a curtain on this guy and filters out most of his drivel after he’s out of the WH. Strap yourselves in gents.
https://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1328255005422305280?s=21
This is why no one should hold back on charging that MFer with all things he has done. We need to put some laws in place that would not allow someone with the kind of foreign debt he has to become President. Not just to block him, but to protect against any future candidate.
asdfasdf wrote:
Quit with the misogyny. I called you out about it before but you're never able to take criticism. You repeatedly make negative comments about women, when it's not relevant to the argument. You are clearly a misogynist.
INCORRECT! Whoever you are.
No misogyny.
Hope Hicks has had more Dicks inside her than a Richard convention, and to my count, at least half of them were married. Not misogyny. Truth. I like women who DON'T sleep with married men.
You, again, whoever you are, want to protect her because you are a protective paternalist, which probably means you are Sally posting under a fake name.