Expect more and more Republicans to attack those who Trump tells them to attack. Based on lies, of course. Because lies are mother's milk to the former conservatives.
JOHNSTOWN, Pennsylvania — A man at Donald Trump’s rally in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, stormed into the press area as the former president spoke Friday but was surrounded by police and sheriff’s deputies and was eventually subdued with a Taser. The altercation came moments after Trump criticized major media outlets for what he said was unfavorable coverage and dismissed CNN as fawning for its interview Thursday with his Democratic rival Kamala Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz.
If only he could come up some new and interesting material to retake control of the headlines, instead of continuing to act like an unhinged weirdo.
Baloney, I was a campaign worker for McGovern in 1972, voted for Obama in 2008. Voted numerous times Democrat in between.
The Democratic Party is a shadow of its former self. You think there is some virtue in Biden or Harris versus Trump.
Ukraine War and the loss of 100,000s of lives, inflation that will never return to previous levels, these two points alone show how poor your logic is.
Mandating a dangerous, untested gene therapy. Censorship. Genocide in Gaza.
No it's not. They showed up to court with only empty accusations and got rejected.
List a few of those court cases where this happened
Were you living under a rock? Most of the 62 suits filed by trump's team or by others on their behalf were dismissed due to lack of standing or evidence. 30 of them made it to hearings and the judge dismissed them due to no merit. Many of the judges were appointed by Trump. They were all frivolous lawsuits meant to give the appearance to the public that there was something. In some states they had numerous suits dropped in a single day due to pure BS. His team knew what was going to happen but it was all to support the big lie and grift.
No it's not. They showed up to court with only empty accusations and got rejected.
Its a very hard thing to admit that you were so worked up about an election being stolen and that there was NO proof that it was stolen. Its easy just to tell yourself that there was proof.
They were conned. Remember Giuliani in a hearing saying he had all this proof but just didn't bring it but that he would bring it in the future (he never had it). Then all these elected Republican sycophants repeating the lie to the American people then saying the American people have no confidence in the election we can't accept this.
So that someone here posts, absolutely convinced that there was proof when actually there was no proof is not that surprising.
No it's not. They showed up to court with only empty accusations and got rejected.
Its a very hard thing to admit that you were so worked up about an election being stolen and that there was NO proof that it was stolen. Its easy just to tell yourself that there was proof.
They were conned. Remember Giuliani in a hearing saying he had all this proof but just didn't bring it but that he would bring it in the future (he never had it). Then all these elected Republican sycophants repeating the lie to the American people then saying the American people have no confidence in the election we can't accept this.
So that someone here posts, absolutely convinced that there was proof when actually there was no proof is not that surprising.
Statistically impossible for Trump to have lost three key states in which he had massive leads before the "late counted votes" came in at 90% for Biden. Yet for the lesser offices, the Dems got nowhere near 90% of the votes. In PA, e.g., he had a more than 700k vote lead as of the end of election day.
List a few of those court cases where this happened
Were you living under a rock? Most of the 62 suits filed by trump's team or by others on their behalf were dismissed due to lack of standing or evidence. 30 of them made it to hearings and the judge dismissed them due to no merit. Many of the judges were appointed by Trump. They were all frivolous lawsuits meant to give the appearance to the public that there was something. In some states they had numerous suits dropped in a single day due to pure BS. His team knew what was going to happen but it was all to support the big lie and grift.
List any cases where this DIDN'T happen 😆 🤣 😂
So not one case went to court so how does that support your claim that the cases were lost?
Not one made it to trial. Nothing suspicious there.
Bottom line tens of millions of people do not trust this government.
Trump for 8 years. Elections are rigged! Elections are rigged! Elections are rigged!
Election officials across the country: Our elections are the safest and most secure in history. There is NO Widespread voter fraud. We can prove it to you if you are willing to look at the facts. Please come take a look at the facts. We will show you.
Fox News: Trump says elections are rigged. Trump says elections are rigged.
Trump: Elections are rigged! Elections are rigged!
Trumpers: Nobody trusts these elections!
Russia stole 2016 when Hillary lost.
In 2020, when Trump lost, Our elections are the safest and most secure in history
CNBC's Shep Smith reports on today's public hearing on the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, and the testimony of the Georgia election officials who refused to go along with Trump's demand to find votes. And CNBC'...
Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers told the January 6 committee that Rudy Giuliani said he had election fraud theories but "we just don't have the evidence."
U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann wrote in his order that Trump had asked the court to disenfranchise almost 7 million voters. “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” Brann wrote, so much that the court would have no option but to stop the certification even though it would impact so many people. “That has not happened."
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A federal judge issued a scathing order Saturday dismissing the Trump campaign's futile effort to block the certification of votes in Pennsylvania, shooting down claims of widespread irregularities with...
Trump for 8 years. Elections are rigged! Elections are rigged! Elections are rigged!
Election officials across the country: Our elections are the safest and most secure in history. There is NO Widespread voter fraud. We can prove it to you if you are willing to look at the facts. Please come take a look at the facts. We will show you.
Fox News: Trump says elections are rigged. Trump says elections are rigged.
Trump: Elections are rigged! Elections are rigged!
Trumpers: Nobody trusts these elections!
Russia stole 2016 when Hillary lost.
In 2020, when Trump lost, Our elections are the safest and most secure in history
You still don't get it?
This is not worth repeating because to no avail it's been repeated thousands of times:
(1) The change in voting totals was expected because Democrat voting areas were tabulated later, mail in voting was more popular with Democrats.
(2) Court cases were not accepted because of lack of proof and a few because of technical reasons. But even more telling than that, all the recounts showed nothing, the groups hired by Republicans to find cheating came back saying nothing was found, Trump's own people told him it was all bullshiit.
(3) People were actually found guilty (real proof) of lying saying the election was stolen when it wasn't.
(4) Hillary did not say Russia changed votes and rigged the election, her point was that their interference including a mass disinformation campaign and publishing her emails swayed the election
And yet you still are convinced the election was stolen. There are many psychological reasons why you hold on to this irrational belief so strongly.
To admit you were wrong would create much cognitive dissonance.
The same dynamic behind people believing fake rumors is at play here. You hear it repeated from different people and you are bounded with those believing in the fake rumor.
But continue to believe it was stolen because there is nothing thing in this world that would convince you otherwise.
No it's not. They showed up to court with only empty accusations and got rejected.
Its a very hard thing to admit that you were so worked up about an election being stolen and that there was NO proof that it was stolen. Its easy just to tell yourself that there was proof.
They were conned. Remember Giuliani in a hearing saying he had all this proof but just didn't bring it but that he would bring it in the future (he never had it). Then all these elected Republican sycophants repeating the lie to the American people then saying the American people have no confidence in the election we can't accept this.
So that someone here posts, absolutely convinced that there was proof when actually there was no proof is not that surprising.
Rudy is losing everything due to his part in this lie.
U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann wrote in his order that Trump had asked the court to disenfranchise almost 7 million voters. “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” Brann wrote, so much that the court would have no option but to stop the certification even though it would impact so many people. “That has not happened."
Were you living under a rock? Most of the 62 suits filed by trump's team or by others on their behalf were dismissed due to lack of standing or evidence. 30 of them made it to hearings and the judge dismissed them due to no merit. Many of the judges were appointed by Trump. They were all frivolous lawsuits meant to give the appearance to the public that there was something. In some states they had numerous suits dropped in a single day due to pure BS. His team knew what was going to happen but it was all to support the big lie and grift.
List any cases where this DIDN'T happen 😆 🤣 😂
So not one case went to court so how does that support your claim that the cases were lost?
Not one made it to trial. Nothing suspicious there.
You have to have merit, legal standing and be able to demonstrate that you are going to bring evidence. They legally admitted they didn't have that so how can there be a trial? A trial about what? 😆 you need to have actual stuff to deliberate on. There was ZERO meat. You are confirming what we all know already - in over 60 attempts they brought nothing to the table for a judge or courtroom to work with. And the 30 that had hearings shouldn't even have made it that far but the judges still gave them a chance to try to articulate their assertions and still NADA. You are a dupe.
This post was edited 22 seconds after it was posted.
Its a very hard thing to admit that you were so worked up about an election being stolen and that there was NO proof that it was stolen. Its easy just to tell yourself that there was proof.
They were conned. Remember Giuliani in a hearing saying he had all this proof but just didn't bring it but that he would bring it in the future (he never had it). Then all these elected Republican sycophants repeating the lie to the American people then saying the American people have no confidence in the election we can't accept this.
So that someone here posts, absolutely convinced that there was proof when actually there was no proof is not that surprising.
Statistically impossible for Trump to have lost three key states in which he had massive leads before the "late counted votes" came in at 90% for Biden. Yet for the lesser offices, the Dems got nowhere near 90% of the votes. In PA, e.g., he had a more than 700k vote lead as of the end of election day.
The proof is in the math.
😆 🤣 😂 you mean Dan Bongino math??? Tell us what the Cyber Ninjas found. 😆 just because you don't understand how vote collection and counting works and you want so badly to hang on to the lie it doesn't mean you have any argument.
Challenge for you and any other lie loving trumper: Pretend you were one of the lawyers filing an election fraud case for trump. What evidence and legal argument would you present to the judge to support your initial filing or your hearing?
In 2020, when Trump lost, Our elections are the safest and most secure in history
You still don't get it?
This is not worth repeating because to no avail it's been repeated thousands of times:
(1) The change in voting totals was expected because Democrat voting areas were tabulated later, mail in voting was more popular with Democrats.
(
You have evidence of this? Why were Dem areas tabulated later? Why were mail ins counted late? Why did the 90% that went to Biden in these late counted votes not reflected in the vote for the Dems in the lesser races? The change in voting totals was expected becuz the fix was in
This post was edited 5 minutes after it was posted.
In 2020, when Trump lost, Our elections are the safest and most secure in history
You still don't get it?
This is not worth repeating because to no avail it's been repeated thousands of times:
(4) Hillary did not say Russia changed votes and rigged the election, her point was that their interference including a mass disinformation campaign and publishing her emails swayed the election
Did you see mass disinformation campaign by Russia for Trump in 2016? I missed it. Hillary's emails showed they were cheating Bernie. Should we not have seen these? Remember the Hunter laptop is a Russian trick BS?
