Smorbun wrote:
AP reports that Biden is now behind by just 461,158 with 64% reporting.
That's in PA.
Smorbun wrote:
AP reports that Biden is now behind by just 461,158 with 64% reporting.
That's in PA.
to back up fat's point about GA:
Trump is up by 80,000 but:
Of the 200,000 uncounted votes in Georgia, most come from left-leaning areas of metropolitan Atlanta, suggesting they’re likely to skew Democratic. (NYT)
Sally Vix wrote:
We are going to fix Smoburn if it is the last thing we do ...
“Positive thinking will let you do everything better than negative thinking will.”
“Positive anything is better than
negative nothing.”
“Winning is fun, but those moments that you can touch someone’s life in a very positive way
are better.”
Here's some positive thinking. I'm positive that you are an unwashed a**hole.
NameStolenAgain wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
I placed 3 prop bets on Bovada:
1. Trump wins NH
2. Trump wins MI
3. Trump wins WI
KAG2020
The money could have gone to charity, but went to an offshore betting site. Oh well
may I repeat that I won $100 on predictit?
Ds would keep house
biden would win popular vote
easy peasy.
In 2016, Trump carried MI, WI and PA by the barest of margins. Now, you can make an argument about PA and eastern OH and whether Biden hurt his chances vis a vis various fracking comments or non comments. I'll leave PA alone right now (though I suspect Biden will carry that as well). However, in IN and IL, Biden was running ahead of HRC's margins. Peoria county in IL is a case in point (how does it play in Peoria?) - Trump carried by about 5 last time, Biden won by about 5 this time. Other counties throughout Indiana and central and west Ohio tell the same story (look at Delaware county in OH). If you take that into consideration and add to the fact that MN was better for Biden than for Trump, it's hard to see how Trump can possibly expect to win MI and WI. Why would Biden perform better in all those areas but somehow perform worse in WI and MI? He only needed to shift a point or two - Trump had no margin for error. So I don't see any circumstantial evidence for fraud at all. Of course, if real, hard evidence comes up I'll absolutely listen. But numbers flashing on a screen doesn't come anywhere near cutting it. And I think everyone knows that.
Smorbun wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
1. Trump wins NH
2. Trump wins MI
3. Trump wins WI
Ha! Ha! What a loser! A loser at betting. A loser in life. Here's hoping you lost a ton. You just keep confirming that you are the dumbest person I have ever encountered.
LOL, that one aged well. Is bend over Biff still promising us a Trump landslide?
zephito wrote:
... If you take that into consideration and add to the fact that MN was better for Biden than for HRC...
edited
agip wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
If the Republicans didn't even vote on Merrick Garland, they won't vote on anyone.
No SC vacancy will get filled unless the President and the Senate are the same party. This will be Mitch's legacy.
the key will be romney, collins, murkowski. They and they alone will decide who gets to be on SCOTUS. If they vote with the dems, it's enough.
The vote would have to be scheduled by Mitch before that becomes an issue.
In Garland's case, he stood a good chance of getting confirmed even though the Dems were the minority, but no vote was held.
Now, if Mitch relented to pressure from moderate Republicans, I suppose a vote might be held, and someone nominated by Biden could be confirmed. But that would require a degree of bipartisanship that does not exist anymore.
Remember, the Republicans were forced to tell the truth about the Garland thing when Barrett was nominated. It wasn't, and never was, about letting the people decide. It was simply a power play. No vote was held for Garland because the Republicans made the rules, and for the same reason a vote on Barrett was held.
Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
We are going to fix Smoburn if it is the last thing we do ...
“Positive thinking will let you do everything better than negative thinking will.”
“Positive anything is better than
negative nothing.”
“Winning is fun, but those moments that you can touch someone’s life in a very positive way
are better.”
Here's some positive thinking. I'm positive that you are an unwashed a**hole.
Every one of your last 20 posts have included "unwashed a**hole." Are you 5? I am serious. I know of NO ONE who would engage in such juvenile discourse. Are you 5 Smoburn? Am totally serious.
agip wrote:
to back up fat's point about GA:
Trump is up by 80,000 but:
Of the 200,000 uncounted votes in Georgia, most come from left-leaning areas of metropolitan Atlanta, suggesting they’re likely to skew Democratic. (NYT)
1) Mail in ballots coming from heavy Dem stronghold areas;
2) Dems were significantly more likely to vote by mail.
I wouldn't be surprised if we see 70-80% distribution for Biden in those ballots. I also won't be surprised when the industrial conservative retard complex screeches "foul play" all over twitter
Sally Vix wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
Here's some positive thinking. I'm positive that you are an unwashed a**hole.
Every one of your last 20 posts have included "unwashed a**hole." Are you 5? I am serious. I know of NO ONE who would engage in such juvenile discourse. Are you 5 Smoburn? Am totally serious.
It was a test to see if you could recognize patterns. I was thinking you couldn't. Good for you. You are still just the second dumbest person I have ever encountered behind Biff. Had you failed that test, you would have been the dumbest person I have ever encountered. You're No. 2!
Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Every one of your last 20 posts have included "unwashed a**hole." Are you 5? I am serious. I know of NO ONE who would engage in such juvenile discourse. Are you 5 Smoburn? Am totally serious.
It was a test to see if you could recognize patterns. I was thinking you couldn't. Good for you. You are still just the second dumbest person I have ever encountered behind Biff. Had you failed that test, you would have been the dumbest person I have ever encountered. You're No. 2!
Have you never driven through a small hick town like the one in Deliverance? Where they are all missing multiple teeth. You think Rigged might be a bit smarter than those?
Smoburn ... digest these ...
“Virtually nothing is impossible in this world if you just put your mind to it and maintain a
positive attitude.”
“If opportunity doesn’t knock, build a door.”
“Happiness is an attitude. We either make ourselves miserable, or happy and strong. The amount of work is
the same.”
Have a gander at those and I think you might feel better about yourself.
Sally Vix wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
It was a test to see if you could recognize patterns. I was thinking you couldn't. Good for you. You are still just the second dumbest person I have ever encountered behind Biff. Had you failed that test, you would have been the dumbest person I have ever encountered. You're No. 2!
Have you never driven through a small hick town like the one in Deliverance? Where they are all missing multiple teeth. You think Rigged might be a bit smarter than those?
No, he isn't. You aren't either.
longtime thread follower wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
I doubt he waits and takes it like a man, but one can hope.
I thought watching Trumpers imploding would be more fun but it’s just sad.
I'm just glad trumpism is done for at least the next 4 years
Sally Vix wrote:
Smoburn ... digest these ...
“Virtually nothing is impossible in this world if you just put your mind to it and maintain a
positive attitude.”
“If opportunity doesn’t knock, build a door.”
“Happiness is an attitude. We either make ourselves miserable, or happy and strong. The amount of work is
the same.”
Have a gander at those and I think you might feel better about yourself.
Will they make me feel better about you? Let's see. No!
Biden wins WI!
zephito wrote:
In 2016, Trump carried MI, WI and PA by the barest of margins. Now, you can make an argument about PA and eastern OH and whether Biden hurt his chances vis a vis various fracking comments or non comments. I'll leave PA alone right now (though I suspect Biden will carry that as well). However, in IN and IL, Biden was running ahead of HRC's margins. Peoria county in IL is a case in point (how does it play in Peoria?) - Trump carried by about 5 last time, Biden won by about 5 this time. Other counties throughout Indiana and central and west Ohio tell the same story (look at Delaware county in OH). If you take that into consideration and add to the fact that MN was better for Biden than for Trump, it's hard to see how Trump can possibly expect to win MI and WI. Why would Biden perform better in all those areas but somehow perform worse in WI and MI? He only needed to shift a point or two - Trump had no margin for error. So I don't see any circumstantial evidence for fraud at all. Of course, if real, hard evidence comes up I'll absolutely listen. But numbers flashing on a screen doesn't come anywhere near cutting it. And I think everyone knows that.
This is exactly the argument that should be made. With exception of AZ (rapidly turning blue even since 2016- see the 2018 senate election there), the only states that flipped are WI, MI, and maybe PA. Trump won those 3 by a combined 70,000 votes I believe. Not at all unreasonable that they would flip back to the other side of that thin line. It's not like Biden got 70% in these states or something.
(And yes I realize GA could flip for the same reason as AZ)
Smorbun wrote:
Biden wins WI!
Libs in a nutshell ...
https://www.the-sun.com/news/1742978/kathy-griffin-decapitated-trump-head-election/