johnny99 wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
Or about Trump's 2017 withdrawal of $15 million from his secret Chinese back account?
Or exactly who Trump owes $400 million to which will have to be repaid in the next few years.
cute smokescreen
johnny99 wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
Or about Trump's 2017 withdrawal of $15 million from his secret Chinese back account?
Or exactly who Trump owes $400 million to which will have to be repaid in the next few years.
cute smokescreen
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
critic 100 wrote:
Biden should ask Trump about paying China more taxes than Trump paid in the US.- $750 compared to $200,00 to China.
Trump should ask about the laptop from hell after the moderator asks about his ice cream.
Hunter isn’t relevant but trump’s secret Chinese bank account is
Facts and Logic wrote:
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
Anyone that's looked at the real data knows this is not true.
God these next 2 weeks are going to be amazing to watch unfold...even better than 2016. much better.
May you link to this "real data"? Please enlighten us
And while your at it please tell me who won the popular vote in 2016?
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
Facts and Logic wrote:And while your at it please tell me who won the popular vote in 2016?
The loser of the election. A nobody at this time. Thanks for playing.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
Facts and Logic wrote:
May you please link to your "real data" oh enlightened one?
Also may you please explain why the polling error is guaranteed to go in one direction? You are aware that in 2012 the polling error ended up over representing support for Romney and Obama out performed the average poll, but apparently 2016 is the only election ever.
Who won the 2016 election? You must have overlooked my question.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
Facts and Logic wrote:
Please help me with my therapy by sharing your "real data" with me so I can see the truth.
Who won the 2016 election?
Take 2 twice/daily until you can answer the question.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjvbyucWsAAMz11.jpg
Alright you keep dodging the question and expect me to give you a detailed answer despite your refusal to do so. What do you got to hide? The old white person is the correct answer, the POTUS is indeed in that demographic, is he not? I am learning from your enlightenment, and as I learned from you when one ask for a "who" you don't actually need to give names.
I need some more enlightenment from you about this amazing administration. Since Trump is so tough on China and Xi, and COVID is a democratic hoax that doesn't matter at all, but is also a great scorn China unleashed on us for which they must pay, please tell me why Trump was praising Xi in February?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-marine-one-departure-83/Q Do you think President Xi should be doing something different?
THE PRESIDENT: No, I think President Xi is working very, very hard. I spoke to him. He’s working very hard. I think he’s doing a very good job. It’s a big problem. But President Xi loves his country. He’s working very hard to solve the problem and he will solve the problem. Okay?
Or I guess I can learn from your enlightenment, and figure out that I don't need to provide sources.
So why was Donald Trump singing the praises of Xi Jingping as the Coronavirus across the globe? Was it to protect his pathetic trade deal in which we beg China to buy more American goods with no leverage whatsoever? Please China don't hurt us!
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-conference-2/Q Thanks. Thank you very much, President. I’m just wondering what’s the communication with China look like right now. And does the experience and lessons coming from China will help the U.S. dealing with the current situation?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think our relationship with China is very good. We just did a big trade deal. We’re starting on another trade deal with China — a very big one. And we’ve been working very closely. They’ve been talking to our people, we’ve been talking to their people, having to do with the virus.
No, our relationship with China is very good. Maybe it’s closer because of what’s happened here, because it was — you know, in a certain way, this can bring the world closer, if you want to know. It can really do that
Yeah I think that might be the answer.
Oops I did again I provided a reliable source for my claims? O well I guess I'm not as smart as you... If only I could be enlightened by "real data"
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
He will be reelected in less than 2 weeks. That's gotta hurt.
Have you already told us how much money you are willing to bet on your confident prediction? We can make the winning money go to a charity of our choosing, maybe a running program for kids. $3k or $5k would make a difference. Since Trump is such a favorite we'll make it even money and give you an edge.
Or are you just another "talk is cheap" confident predictor? Maybe too "high class" to place a wager?
Trollminator wrote:
PresidentTrump wrote:
If you define "economy" by combination of GDP growth, unemployment, value of stocks...
Worthless post because stock markets do not relate to the economy. STFU
Yeah, but let's look at the market..
Obama > Trump.
https://www.macrotrends.net/2482/sp500-performance-by-presidentEarly voting in FL is not going the dems way. They were supposed to have a MASSIVE lead heading into election day. Oops.
but, but, but muh 538!
https://mobile.twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/1319359718050074624
Sorry libs, FL will remain Trump country.
NameStolenAgain wrote:
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
He will be reelected in less than 2 weeks. That's gotta hurt.
Have you already told us how much money you are willing to bet on your confident prediction? We can make the winning money go to a charity of our choosing, maybe a running program for kids. $3k or $5k would make a difference. Since Trump is such a favorite we'll make it even money and give you an edge.
Or are you just another "talk is cheap" confident predictor? Maybe too "high class" to place a wager?
Crickets ...
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Early voting in FL is not going the dems way. They were supposed to have a MASSIVE lead heading into election day. Oops.
but, but, but muh 538!
https://mobile.twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/1319359718050074624Sorry libs, FL will remain Trump country.
This is outstanding news for the GOP. This will at least put a bit of a dent in the 500,000 mail-in ballot lead the Dems have at this point.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Early voting in FL is not going the dems way. They were supposed to have a MASSIVE lead heading into election day. Oops.
but, but, but muh 538!
https://mobile.twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/1319359718050074624Sorry libs, FL will remain Trump country.
Dems will spend the next 4 years trying to overturn the election because of the polls that they worshiped.
This is exactly what Nate Plastic does. He's just averaging sh!t polls.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1318997550360195072
Start paying attention to Peoples Pundit, Trafalgar, IBD/TIPP and Barnes Law- they have much more accurate projections.
KAG2020
TTH wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Early voting in FL is not going the dems way. They were supposed to have a MASSIVE lead heading into election day. Oops.
but, but, but muh 538!
https://mobile.twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/1319359718050074624Sorry libs, FL will remain Trump country.
This is outstanding news for the GOP. This will at least put a bit of a dent in the 500,000 mail-in ballot lead the Dems have at this point.
Correct. The dems need at least a 600,000 lead to have a chance. They are not close to that.
agip wrote:
He's not able to defend his policies and actions because they are indefensible. Instead his instinct is to try to 'fire' the journalist who asks the question.
'let's elect a businessman' they said. 'he'll run the nation like a business.'
Bad idea.
Good businessmen don't fire people who challenge the boss. It's a stupid instinct and shows why he's so terrible at business.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
TTH wrote:
This is outstanding news for the GOP. This will at least put a bit of a dent in the 500,000 mail-in ballot lead the Dems have at this point.
Correct. The dems need at least a 600,000 lead to have a chance. They are not close to that.
That's right. All the polling places are repeating the same mantra. It's a statewide chant. "600k!" "600k!" It's on every street corner.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Early voting in FL is not going the dems way. They were supposed to have a MASSIVE lead heading into election day. Oops.
but, but, but muh 538!
https://mobile.twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/1319359718050074624Sorry libs, FL will remain Trump country.
Who is that?
And his source for that data is what?
The best I can find is mail voting dating for a week ago, which shows more democrats had voted, and more democrat ballots that had been requested where yet to be recieved. The 128,000 figure was the number of republican mail votes that had been sent out and hadn't been returned.
https://miami.cbslocal.com/2020/10/15/more-than-2-million-floridians-voted-by-mail-301k-miami-dade-broward/Seriously though where is he getting those numbers from? He's not citing any sources...
NameStolenAgain wrote:
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
He will be reelected in less than 2 weeks. That's gotta hurt.
Have you already told us how much money you are willing to bet on your confident prediction? We can make the winning money go to a charity of our choosing, maybe a running program for kids. $3k or $5k would make a difference. Since Trump is such a favorite we'll make it even money and give you an edge.
Or are you just another "talk is cheap" confident predictor? Maybe too "high class" to place a wager?
No comment 2020?
Joe Biden said he never discussed his son's deals with him. Here is proof that is all a lie.
No wonder he gets so mad when a reporter dare ask him about something other than his ice cream cone.
TTH wrote:
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
Correct. The dems need at least a 600,000 lead to have a chance. They are not close to that.
That's right. All the polling places are repeating the same mantra. It's a statewide chant. "600k!" "600k!" It's on every street corner.
Makes sense. GOP will destroy it on election day.
He is never willing to risk anything (because deep down he knows the truth) talk is cheap.
NameStolenAgain wrote:
NameStolenAgain wrote:
Have you already told us how much money you are willing to bet on your confident prediction? We can make the winning money go to a charity of our choosing, maybe a running program for kids. $3k or $5k would make a difference. Since Trump is such a favorite we'll make it even money and give you an edge.
Or are you just another "talk is cheap" confident predictor? Maybe too "high class" to place a wager?
No comment 2020?
Facts and Logic wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Early voting in FL is not going the dems way. They were supposed to have a MASSIVE lead heading into election day. Oops.
but, but, but muh 538!
https://mobile.twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/1319359718050074624Sorry libs, FL will remain Trump country.
Who is that?
And his source for that data is what?
The best I can find is mail voting dating for a week ago, which shows more democrats had voted, and more democrat ballots that had been requested where yet to be recieved. The 128,000 figure was the number of republican mail votes that had been sent out and hadn't been returned.
https://miami.cbslocal.com/2020/10/15/more-than-2-million-floridians-voted-by-mail-301k-miami-dade-broward/Seriously though where is he getting those numbers from? He's not citing any sources...
Okay I found Florida's early voting data
https://countyballotfiles.floridados.gov/VoteByMailEarlyVotingReports/PublicStatsAnd... where is the 128,000 Republican lead?
979,838 Republicans have voted by mail, 1,533,525 Democrats have voted by mail.
859,011 Republicans have not yet returned their by mail votes. 1,111,612 Democrats are in the same category.
483,443 Republicans have voted in person. 392,530 Democrats have.
So 1,926,055 Democrats have voted so far, and 1,463,281 Republicans have. There's also a large other / no partisan affiliation category there as well.
I don't see how this data is somehow good news for the GOP?
Can someone please explain the mental gymnastics taking place here?
