Mr. Trump - I DEMAND a statue of King George III be erected on The White Lawn and it be exactly 19 3/4 inches tall. Some people I talk to forget that George III was the King of the 13 colonies prior to War for Independence that created THE United States of America. Please begin this immediately and begin to erect more statues of failed military leaders.
DiscoGary wrote:
You need to remember that you are talking to people who blame the ObamaCare disaster on Republicans...
The PROPER NAME IS ROMNEYCARE, you idiot.
Gary. Again. For a self proclaimed ' independent' you are spewing forth only Republican rhetoric. What not actually be independent? As a registered Republican even I know that Obamacare as based on Mitt Romney's Republican health care plan in Massachusetts. What's the big deal? After 7 years of whining about it my party (and apparently your party) has no plan. Nothing. NADA. That really sucks. Why not? Hold your party accountable! It's not ok! To keep whining about Democrats is really getting old. Actually govern - everything is controlled by our folks now right? So let's get to it!
R1200 wrote:
Gary. Again. For a self proclaimed ' independent' you are spewing forth only Republican rhetoric. What not actually be independent? As a registered Republican even I know that Obamacare as based on Mitt Romney's Republican health care plan in Massachusetts. What's the big deal? After 7 years of whining about it my party (and apparently your party) has no plan. Nothing. NADA. That really sucks. Why not? Hold your party accountable! It's not ok! To keep whining about Democrats is really getting old. Actually govern - everything is controlled by our folks now right? So let's get to it!
Not one Republican voted for it.
Your wrong wrote:
Did more republicans or democrats vote for the civil rights act in the 60s? The answer is republicans. Prove me wrong....
Republicans like Jacob Javitz that were self-described liberals and supported Johnson's Great Society.
The current political alignment of conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats wasn't in place in 1964. There were liberal Republicans like Javitz and conservative Democrats like George Wallace.
DiscoGary wrote:
Not one Republican voted for it.
Joseph Cao R-LA
Jeff Wigand wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:Not one Republican voted for it.
Joseph Cao R-LA
After it had already passed. I suppose that makes the ObamaCare disaster the sole domain of Republicans in the eyes of Democrats.
DiscoGary wrote:
After it had already passed. I suppose that makes the ObamaCare disaster the sole domain of Republicans in the eyes of Democrats.
A "disaster" that more than half the country supports and one that you cannot concede has its origins in the GOP, going back to 1989 with the Heritage Foundation proposed it as an alternative to single-payer.
You also forget that the GOP Senate's alternative to Bill Clinton's health care reform in 1993 included mandating that individuals purchase health insurance.
DiscoGary I generally like your posts, not everything, but most of your stuff. I have identified with the neo-nazis for a long time and finally we are getting our message out there. There is no shame in standing up for the rights of the white man of European descent.
We are a determined but small group. We have president Trump's ear. Most other politicians are too cowardly to say how they feel.
Trump is a brave man.
Go DiscoGary!
foo wrote:
Pointing it out! wrote:[quote]exthrower wrote:
[quote]Jeff Wigand wrote:
[quote]exthrower wrote:
Do you just make up history? Is this what your liberal professors taught you...Learn a little history dude...
Educate us on all the conservatives that led the civil rights movement.
6) This was all before the brilliant Republican southern strategy based entirely on racism which turned the south into a Republican racist stonghold. So, at the time (1964), there were more southern racist Democrats than southern racist Republicans - so, yes, there were more southern racist Democrats to vote against the Act. Of course, you have since corrected that so that the GOP has a stranglehold on the southern racist vote.
Oh yeah, and how and why was the GOP so successful in taking over the racist south? Oh, primarily by playing off of racist resentment over the '64 and '65 Civil Rights Acts. So, yeah, it makes all kinds of sense for the GOP to try to take credit for the Civil Rights Acts. ROFLOL[/quote
Lol wrong again bud. Couple flaws in your southern strategy argument.
1. There were 21 democratic senators in the south before the civil rights act how many of those seats changed to republican after the civil rights act was passed?
The answer is 1
2. Also the south didn't become majority republican in the senate till 1994. Did it take the racists 30 years to figure out what was going on?
Your argument has been debunked
You know if Romney was president and the exact same bill as the ACA was introduced, most Republicans would have voted for it.
briTTANica wrote:
There's no comma between boards and too. Even though you'll still look ignorant doing so, do learn to write properly in the future.
Wow. I'm terribly sorry. Since you're the expert, would you kindly point me to an authority that says this is a hard and fast rule?
DiscoGary wrote:
exthrower wrote:And liberalism brought us Communism.....Which murdered 70 million of it's OWN people......
It's closer to 120 million, but HEY! It's all just a "statistic" anyway.
Actually, that's one of your more noteworthy accomplishments - making some people actually believe that there is somehow some connection between liberalism and communism. So, good job with that.
Good job lying.Honest question - Do you feel proud every time you lie, thinking perhaps that someone out there might actually believe your lies?
Get your facts straight Pacho wrote:
Says the moron who lies about history. So yeah, it makes all kinds of sense for the Dumbocrats (yeah, I coined that) to take credit for things that they had nothing to do with. ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!
foo wrote:Thanks for providing the history. It's nice to actually learn something on this forum for once.
Your wrong wrote:
foo wrote:Educate us on all the conservatives that led the civil rights movement.
6) This was all before the brilliant Republican southern strategy based entirely on racism which turned the south into a Republican racist stonghold. So, at the time (1964), there were more southern racist Democrats than southern racist Republicans - so, yes, there were more southern racist Democrats to vote against the Act. Of course, you have since corrected that so that the GOP has a stranglehold on the southern racist vote.
Oh yeah, and how and why was the GOP so successful in taking over the racist south? Oh, primarily by playing off of racist resentment over the '64 and '65 Civil Rights Acts. So, yeah, it makes all kinds of sense for the GOP to try to take credit for the Civil Rights Acts. ROFLOL[/quote
Lol wrong again bud. Couple flaws in your southern strategy argument.
1. There were 21 democratic senators in the south before the civil rights act how many of those seats changed to republican after the civil rights act was passed?
The answer is 1
2. Also the south didn't become majority republican in the senate till 1994. Did it take the racists 30 years to figure out what was going on?
Your argument has been debunked
Yeah, folks like Nixon and Goldwater had no southern strategy. Good point.
And while you are on such a streak of brilliance you might want to figure out how to format your posts. I know it's tough but someone of such extraordinary intellectual powers should be able to master it with some practice. Keep trying!
exthrower wrote:
ALL LIBERALS.......DO NOT WATCH THE ECLIPSE WITH BINOCULARS OR YOU WILL BE MORE BLIND THAN YOU ARE NOW.....
So SCREAMS the blind man.
Bigfoot Investments wrote:
Your wrong wrote:6) This was all before the brilliant Republican southern strategy based entirely on racism which turned the south into a Republican racist stonghold. So, at the time (1964), there were more southern racist Democrats than southern racist Republicans - so, yes, there were more southern racist Democrats to vote against the Act. Of course, you have since corrected that so that the GOP has a stranglehold on the southern racist vote.
Oh yeah, and how and why was the GOP so successful in taking over the racist south? Oh, primarily by playing off of racist resentment over the '64 and '65 Civil Rights Acts. So, yeah, it makes all kinds of sense for the GOP to try to take credit for the Civil Rights Acts. ROFLOL[/quote
Lol wrong again bud. Couple flaws in your southern strategy argument.
1. There were 21 democratic senators in the south before the civil rights act how many of those seats changed to republican after the civil rights act was passed?
The answer is 1
2. Also the south didn't become majority republican in the senate till 1994. Did it take the racists 30 years to figure out what was going on?
Your argument has been debunked
Yeah, folks like Nixon and Goldwater had no southern strategy. Good point.
And while you are on such a streak of brilliance you might want to figure out how to format your posts. I know it's tough but someone of such extraordinary intellectual powers should be able to master it with some practice. Keep trying!
Classic! The conservative (me) presents facts and basic logic and the liberal (you) responds with an emotional and opinion based response followed by insulting my intelligence.
The rise in republican popularity actually happened in the mid 1950s not the 60s due to a job boom in the south from industrial expansion when younger members in there 20s and 30s joined the republicans.
The Civil Rights bill you libs so fondly talk about was D.O.A. without the Republicans. It was the democrats (including Al Gore's father ) who filibustered the bill. Al is not proud of this fact about his dad.
In the end the Republicans saved the bill by first voting to kill the filibuster then voting for the bill at over 80% to the democrats low 60% or so. something percent. LBJ begged IL GOP senator and minority leader Everret Dirkson to support the bill and he did along with the vast majority of his GOP colleagues.
It's English 101, LEARN IT OLD MAN!
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
briTTANica wrote:There's no comma between boards and too. Even though you'll still look ignorant doing so, do learn to write properly in the future.
Wow. I'm terribly sorry. Since you're the expert, would you kindly point me to an authority that says this is a hard and fast rule?