exthrower wrote:
Hey XY....Semenya is more of a Man than you are.....and he doesn't have a dick...
Typical conservative...juvenile insults and no substance...grow up...
exthrower wrote:
Hey XY....Semenya is more of a Man than you are.....and he doesn't have a dick...
Typical conservative...juvenile insults and no substance...grow up...
XY wrote:
Antifa is declaring that they are a non politically affiliated organization. The are saying they do not represent the "left" .
More like employees than representatives.
Anti-fa wrote:
XY wrote:Antifa is declaring that they are a non politically affiliated organization. The are saying they do not represent the "left" .
Antifa has no political affiliation. That is why,
Antifa is definitely a problem for our country. Folks generally don't understand who they are and what they are about. But they are bad news. And their actions in Charlotte and elsewhere definitely make the alt-right stronger. Not good.
For those who want to begin to understand antifa you could do worse than read this from The Atlantic:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/the-rise-of-the-violent-left/534192/DiscoGary wrote:
More like employees than representatives.
Don't tell anyone, but Uncle George pays most of us liberals to post on these boards, too.
exthrower wrote:
Well Butt wrote:Well . . . but . . . the emails?
And liberalism brought us Communism.....Which murdered 70 million of it's OWN people......
It's closer to 120 million, but HEY! It's all just a "statistic" anyway.
DiscoGary wrote:
exthrower wrote:And liberalism brought us Communism.....Which murdered 70 million of it's OWN people......
It's closer to 120 million, but HEY! It's all just a "statistic" anyway.
ya'll really want to go down that route, with Nazism and fascism in your corner of the sandbox?
But you are generally right.
(I'll ignore the misuse of the world "liberal" which back then meant something else. You mean here 'leftist,' not 'liberal.' Liberal in the mid 20c meant free trade, civil rights, laissez faire business, etc.)
Look, it's "Pointing it out!", a handle changing Pu$$y.
Pointing it out! wrote:
Look, it's Disco Gary. Definitely a tough guy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wj3jnBPvo9s
eric a blair wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:It's closer to 120 million, but HEY! It's all just a "statistic" anyway.
ya'll really want to go down that route, with Nazism and fascism in your corner of the sandbox?
But you are generally right.
(I'll ignore the misuse of the world "liberal" which back then meant something else. You mean here 'leftist,' not 'liberal.' Liberal in the mid 20c meant free trade, civil rights, laissez faire business, etc.)
The Antifa fascists are in your sandbox, and they went into the Nazi sandbox to beat them up. Your fascists need to learn how to play nice.
Still no ......
Wall
Muslim ban
Health care ("day one")
Bombing "the hell" out of ISIS
Chinese currency manipulation fix
Locking her up
Says the moron who lies about history. So yeah, it makes all kinds of sense for the Dumbocrats (yeah, I coined that) to take credit for things that they had nothing to do with. ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!
foo wrote:
Pointing it out! wrote:You'd make a pretty good troll if you weren't a true believer.
Just to set the record straight a bit.
1) The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was first proposed by JFK (Democrat)
2) It was ushered through by a majority Democrat Senate and House. In the House the Democrats had over a 2-1 advantage over Republicans
3) More importantly, the split in support for the Act was not along party lines but along geographic lines. The racist South very strongly opposed the Civil Rights Act. About 94% of southern senators and representatives (Dem and Rep) voted against the Act. About 90% of northern senators and representative (Dem and Rep) voted for the Act.
4) The 1965 Voting Rights Act was proposed by Democrat POTUS Lyndon Johnson.
5) Votes in the senate and house of reps followed along the same lines as the '64 act. Southerners voted against, everyone else voted for. Party lines did not play any significant role. Still worth noting that Democrats dominated both the house and senate as the '65 act was passed.
6) This was all before the brilliant Republican southern strategy based entirely on racism which turned the south into a Republican racist stonghold. So, at the time (1964), there were more southern racist Democrats than southern racist Republicans - so, yes, there were more southern racist Democrats to vote against the Act. Of course, you have since corrected that so that the GOP has a stranglehold on the southern racist vote.
Oh yeah, and how and why was the GOP so successful in taking over the racist south? Oh, primarily by playing off of racist resentment over the '64 and '65 Civil Rights Acts. So, yeah, it makes all kinds of sense for the GOP to try to take credit for the Civil Rights Acts. ROFLOL
Thanks for providing the history. It's nice to actually learn something on this forum for once.
Typical Liberal, lies with insults and no facts to back up their subjective rhetoric....grow up loser.
Ol' Drippy wrote:
exthrower wrote:Hey XY....Semenya is more of a Man than you are.....and he doesn't have a dick...
Typical conservative...juvenile insults and no substance...grow up...
There's no comma between boards and too. Even though you'll still look ignorant doing so, do learn to write properly in the future.
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:More like employees than representatives.
Don't tell anyone, but Uncle George pays most of us liberals to post on these boards, too.
He'll always be 100 steps ahead of your goofy corrupt choice for President, so will it really ever matter? Your choice lets them walk on in and the one before that, Barackster, begged them to vote, even illegally (look it up pal). But...you Democrats support and look the other way at stuff like that...but you still loss:):):):):)!!!!!!!!
XY wrote:
Still no ......
Wall
Muslim ban
Health care ("day one")
Bombing "the hell" out of ISIS
Chinese currency manipulation fix
Locking her up
briTTANica wrote:
There's no comma between boards and too. Even though you'll still look ignorant doing so, do learn to write properly in the future.
There is.
Never start a sentence with There's.
Why XY? wrote:
He'll always be 100 steps ahead of your goofy corrupt choice for President, so will it really ever matter? Your choice lets them walk on in and the one before that, Barackster, begged them to vote, even illegally (look it up pal). But...you Democrats support and look the other way at stuff like that...but you still loss:):):):):)!!!!!!!!
XY wrote:Still no ......
Wall
Muslim ban
Health care ("day one")
Bombing "the hell" out of ISIS
Chinese currency manipulation fix
Locking her up
He can't even sell steaks
He is so excited to instantly condemn radical Islamic terror.
That's a one sided issue.
But domestic Nazi gatherings?
All sides have to be looked at.
eric a blair wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:For the record, you are NOT one of the good guys. When you had to make the call to either stand for freedom and the rule of law or side with violent fascists, you chose the fascists hoping that they would leave you alone. History tells us that they never do.
possibly the craziest thing gary has said
the liberals brought us
civil rights for blacks
civil rights for women
civil rights for gays
civil rights for native americans
etcetera
the conservatives were firing water cannons and MLK and beating up gays.
Did more republicans or democrats vote for the civil rights act in the 60s? The answer is republicans. Prove me wrong....
Your wrong wrote:
Prove me ignorant....
The north voted for the civil rights act. The south voted against it. You are WRONG.
PS: HI, HARDLOPER!!!
Your wrong wrote:
eric a blair wrote:possibly the craziest thing gary has said
the liberals brought us
civil rights for blacks
civil rights for women
civil rights for gays
civil rights for native americans
etcetera
the conservatives were firing water cannons and MLK and beating up gays.
Did more republicans or democrats vote for the civil rights act in the 60s? The answer is republicans. Prove me wrong....
You need to remember that you are talking to people who blame the ObamaCare disaster on Republicans even though not one single Republican voted for it. So they are not too good at this kind of thing. They are easily misled.