Just take the antibiotic wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
Mike Lindell.
Does Peter Thiel still support Trump?
I think Thiel backed away several months ago.
But you could add Ted Nugent and John Voight to the list of "famous" Trumpkins.
Kirstie Alley
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Real Obvi wrote:
So, oh for two?
Well, what about Rudy Giuliani - America's Mayor?
Arnold Schwarzenegger
.../quote]
Arnold Schwarzenegger?!?
I have not seen that.
agip wrote:
Reminder that Florida, NC, AZ, GA are not necessary.
All Biden has to do is hold the 2016 map plus MI, WI, PA.
Per 538, the odds of each:
MI: 92%
Wi: 88%
PA: 87%
Looking pretty good. Hard to imagine one of HRC's 2016 states going to Trump. Maybe NH I guess.
Wrong!!! Trump by taking FL, NC, AZ (GA is a given) forces your candidate to sweep the rust belt. That is not gonna happen. Even if Dementia Joe wins PA, it will not be enough. Trump will take (in my worst case scenario), one of the following: WI or MI or MN and that gives him 270.
Enjoy your loss.
KAG2020
Real Obvi wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Well, what about Rudy Giuliani - America's Mayor?
Arnold Schwarzenegger
.../quote]
Arnold Schwarzenegger?!?
I have not seen that.
Yeah, the only think I could find on Schwarzenegger was about a year ago he said he doubts that he would vote for Trump. So, no, he doesn't belong on this list.
50 Cent is a funny one, said he'd vote for Trump solely because of Biden's tax plan. I guess he makes more than $400K per year. Says Trump doesn't like black people, but he's voting for him anyway.
Here is my worst case scenario map for Trump.
Real Obvi wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Arnold Schwarzenegger
...
Arnold Schwarzenegger?!?
I have not seen that.
Rigged, once again, failed to do any homework.
https://meaww.com/arnold-schwarzenegger-mocks-donald-trump-calls-hiabsolute-moron-veiled-jibe-for-not-wearing-a-maskhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/schwarzenegger-trolls-trump-hes-in-love-with-me/2019/09/10/8102e378-d3de-11e9-9343-40db57cf6abd_story.htmlRigged for Hillary wrote:
Here is my worst case scenario map for Trump.
https://www.270towin.com/
Sure, your map has.
290 for Biden
163 for Trump
and
85 toss-up
Trump loses in your "worst" case map.
balances wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Here is my worst case scenario map for Trump.
https://www.270towin.com/Sure, your map has.
290 for Biden
163 for Trump
and
85 toss-up
Trump loses in your "worst" case map.
You can't expect him to perform elementary math - all he can do is repost insulting memes.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
agip wrote:
Reminder that Florida, NC, AZ, GA are not necessary.
All Biden has to do is hold the 2016 map plus MI, WI, PA.
Per 538, the odds of each:
MI: 92%
Wi: 88%
PA: 87%
Looking pretty good. Hard to imagine one of HRC's 2016 states going to Trump. Maybe NH I guess.
Wrong!!! Trump by taking FL, NC, AZ (GA is a given) forces your candidate to sweep the rust belt. That is not gonna happen. Even if Dementia Joe wins PA, it will not be enough. Trump will take (in my worst case scenario), one of the following: WI or MI or MN and that gives him 270.
Enjoy your loss.
KAG2020
Do you understand percentages?
MI: 92%
Wi: 88%
PA: 87%
Biden is TWICE as likely to take Texas than any Trump any of those, think about that for a moment
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
agip wrote:
Reminder that Florida, NC, AZ, GA are not necessary.
All Biden has to do is hold the 2016 map plus MI, WI, PA.
Per 538, the odds of each:
MI: 92%
Wi: 88%
PA: 87%
Looking pretty good. Hard to imagine one of HRC's 2016 states going to Trump. Maybe NH I guess.
Wrong!!! Trump by taking FL, NC, AZ (GA is a given) forces your candidate to sweep the rust belt. That is not gonna happen. Even if Dementia Joe wins PA, it will not be enough. Trump will take (in my worst case scenario), one of the following: WI or MI or MN and that gives him 270.
Enjoy your loss.
KAG2020
agip is not wrong you f*ckin' moron. If Biden holds the 2016 map and then gains MI, WI, PA, that gives him 278 and victory. For someone who professes to know so much, you know nothing. How could you not know this?
You are the dumbest person I have ever encountered.
334 for Biden.
Enjoy your loss.
Former RNC chair endorses Biden
Come on igy, rigged and sally.
Come on man.
https://twitter.com/projectlincoln/status/1318522358798315522?s=21
Michael Steele helped the Republicans win the House in 2010.
And that lead to a lot of obstruction of Obama's polices.
Obama was president for 8 years, but only had 2 years pass anything on his agenda.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://www.270towin.com/
Here is my absolute worst case scenario for Trump (no flips for NH & MN):
Biden wins PA, MI and MN.
Trump wins ME 2nd district and keeps the remaining states he won in 2016.
270-Trump
268-Dementia Joe
Dementia Joe needs to run the table in the rust belt to win- virtually impossible.
NameStolenAgain wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Wrong!!! Trump by taking FL, NC, AZ (GA is a given) forces your candidate to sweep the rust belt. That is not gonna happen. Even if Dementia Joe wins PA, it will not be enough. Trump will take (in my worst case scenario), one of the following: WI or MI or MN and that gives him 270.
Enjoy your loss.
KAG2020
Do you understand percentages?
MI: 92%
Wi: 88%
PA: 87%
I don't listen to poll reading losers like Nate Plastic because his odds are always wrong & SUCK. Bet the opposite and you will win.
conservative straw man tactic wrote:
balances wrote:
Sure, your map has.
290 for Biden
163 for Trump
and
85 toss-up
Trump loses in your "worst" case map.
You can't expect him to perform elementary math - all he can do is repost insulting memes.
Your post will not age well for you.
Smorbun wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Wrong!!! Trump by taking FL, NC, AZ (GA is a given) forces your candidate to sweep the rust belt. That is not gonna happen. Even if Dementia Joe wins PA, it will not be enough. Trump will take (in my worst case scenario), one of the following: WI or MI or MN and that gives him 270.
Enjoy your loss.
KAG2020
agip is not wrong you f*ckin' moron. If Biden holds the 2016 map and then gains MI, WI, PA, that gives him 278 and victory. For someone who professes to know so much, you know nothing. How could you not know this?
You are the dumbest person I have ever encountered.
334 for Biden.
Enjoy your loss.
OMG, you're an idiot! I said that Biden had to sweep the entire rust belt to win. I have Trump holding WI. Are you really an MD or quack?
balances wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Here is my worst case scenario map for Trump.
https://www.270towin.com/Sure, your map has.
290 for Biden
163 for Trump
and
85 toss-up
Trump loses in your "worst" case map.
That was the wrong map- it did not save my copy/paste.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://www.270towin.com/Here is my absolute worst case scenario for Trump (no flips for NH & MN):
Biden wins PA, MI and MN.
Trump wins ME 2nd district and keeps the remaining states he won in 2016.
270-Trump
268-Dementia Joe
Dementia Joe needs to run the table in the rust belt to win- virtually impossible.
Your maps is the same as before
290 for Biden
163 for Trump
and
85 toss-up
Trump loses. Even if he take all of the toss-up. That is per your map.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
That was the wrong map- it did not save my copy/paste.
Copy/paste is far too difficult for you to manage, man.