Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/screen-shot-2016-11-08-at-9-59-47-am.png538 2016 map. LMAO.
So accurate!!!!
So Trump has less than half the chance that he had in 2016.
The smart betters still have Biden as the favorite. Don't believe the liars.
SprintTriathlon wrote:
You know that being nice and truthful is part of the world?
I have not followed this I must admit, and I am sure the discussions have been wise, and many just bull, but as we see all the picture, does anyone with IQ and EQ above 90 still vote for the Donald?
Andrii Derkach wrote:So Trump has less than half the chance that he had in 2016.
The smart betters still have Biden as the favorite. Don't believe the liars.
Your math is not too "smart."
The betting odds prove that Trump is in a MUCH better position than this time in 2016.
October 25th, 2016 (14 days before election):
Hillary Clinton-550
Donald Trump +350
November 7th, 2016 (day prior to election):
Hillary Clinton: -550
Donald Trump: +375
October 19th, 2020 (15 days before election):
Joe Biden -160
Donald Trump +125
Joe Biden is in a MUCH worse position than Hillary Clinton was. Good luck to him. He needs it. Especially with Hunter scandal to answer to now.
SprintTriathlon wrote:
SprintTriathlon wrote:
You know that being nice and truthful is part of the world?
I have not followed this I must admit, and I am sure the discussions have been wise, and many just bull, but as we see all the picture, does anyone with IQ and EQ above 90 still vote for the Donald?
I believe so. Many people have been duped into believing that borderline-republican centrist Biden is a "radical leftist" and apparently having a leftist as president is far worse than having a psychopathic moron like Trump, forgetting the fact that the executive branch is supposed to EXECUTE laws that are passed by the congress, not set their own political agenda.
SprintTriathlon wrote:
You know that being nice and truthful is part of the world?
Wait, you posted this yet are supporting Biden? The guy lies about almost everything....He said he he would ban fracking about a year ago and now totally changes his tune, then calls Trump a liar for calling him out. LMAO typical corrupt politician. You are dumb to fall for it. Do better.
Kippy Woods wrote:
SprintTriathlon wrote:
I have not followed this I must admit, and I am sure the discussions have been wise, and many just bull, but as we see all the picture, does anyone with IQ and EQ above 90 still vote for the Donald?
I believe so. Many people have been duped into believing that borderline-republican centrist Biden is a "radical leftist" and apparently having a leftist as president is far worse than having a psychopathic moron like Trump, forgetting the fact that the executive branch is supposed to EXECUTE laws that are passed by the congress, not set their own political agenda.
I did not understand no nothing, but I guess it was fun to write!
(bah I did understand it, but it is always fun to say something like that, I also havw a problem with fooling people, I always tell even before it is a problem , well, we cannot all be perfect like Donald
Duck.
johnny99 wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The Peoples Pundit (Rich Baris) has Trump winning AZ. Baris' polls have been very accurate in 2016- he correctly called MI, WI, PA, FL & NC.
Trafalgar also has AZ going to Trump.
Nate Plastic will be wrong again.
KAG2020
The People's Pundit must have been sleeping before the 2018 midterms, because he totally missed the beating that the Republicans ended up taking. Do you think we're going to get the 2016 or the 2018 People's Pundit this time around?
"On average, a 10-point advantage for Democrats on the Generic Congressional Ballot yields just a 12-seat swing, while an identical lead for Republicans yields an average 23-seat swing. A margin of 13 points for Democrats results in a net gain of just 17 House seats, still 7 shy of the target. It is possible that the party could outperform their historical average, but it’s not likely considering the polarized state of the country."
https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/news/elections/2017/07/01/2018-midterm-elections-democrats-house-republican-majority/For the record, the Democrats won 41 seats in 2018.
That article was written in July 2017 and over a year before the election- why don't you post his updated analysis for us?
Baris correctly called the governor & Senate races in FL for 2018. Nate Plastic was wrong too.
Peoples Pundit (Rich Baris) > 538
Norpoth > 538
Trafalgar > 538
Barnes Law > 538
Enjoy your loss.
KAG2020
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
SprintTriathlon wrote:
You know that being nice and truthful is part of the world?
Wait, you posted this yet are supporting Biden? The guy lies about almost everything....He said he he would ban fracking about a year ago and now totally changes his tune, then calls Trump a liar for calling him out. LMAO typical corrupt politician. You are dumb to fall for it. Do better.
Eh
No.
Eh then No.
Do you even go outside your twitter/ FB stream ever?
Do you care about real journalism? About the truth?
SprintTriathlon wrote:
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
Wait, you posted this yet are supporting Biden? The guy lies about almost everything....He said he he would ban fracking about a year ago and now totally changes his tune, then calls Trump a liar for calling him out. LMAO typical corrupt politician. You are dumb to fall for it. Do better.
Eh
No.
Eh then No.
Do you even go outside your twitter/ FB stream ever?
Do you care about real journalism? About the truth?
Are you suggesting Biden didn't say he would ban fracking, and now changes his answer? It's literally on video. Multiple times.
I guess I shouldn't believe my lying eyes. LMAO liberals.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
The People's Pundit must have been sleeping before the 2018 midterms, because he totally missed the beating that the Republicans ended up taking. Do you think we're going to get the 2016 or the 2018 People's Pundit this time around?
"On average, a 10-point advantage for Democrats on the Generic Congressional Ballot yields just a 12-seat swing, while an identical lead for Republicans yields an average 23-seat swing. A margin of 13 points for Democrats results in a net gain of just 17 House seats, still 7 shy of the target. It is possible that the party could outperform their historical average, but it’s not likely considering the polarized state of the country."
https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/news/elections/2017/07/01/2018-midterm-elections-democrats-house-republican-majority/For the record, the Democrats won 41 seats in 2018.
That article was written in July 2017 and over a year before the election- why don't you post his updated analysis for us?
Baris correctly called the governor & Senate races in FL for 2018. Nate Plastic was wrong too.
Peoples Pundit (Rich Baris) > 538
Norpoth > 538
Trafalgar > 538
Barnes Law > 538
Enjoy your loss.
KAG2020
Because there was no updated analysis on his website. Unless I missed it, in which case feel free to post it yourself.
Oh yeah! FL is getting redder.
https://twitter.com/RedEaglePatriot/status/1318303452875948033
FL is Trump country!
KAG2020
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
SprintTriathlon wrote:
Eh
No.
Eh then No.
Do you even go outside your twitter/ FB stream ever?
Do you care about real journalism? About the truth?
Are you suggesting Biden didn't say he would ban fracking, and now changes his answer? It's literally on video. Multiple times.
I guess I shouldn't believe my lying eyes. LMAO liberals.
Read up on it and educate yourself about why you're wrong.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-fact-check-joe-biden-donald-trump-pennsylvania-fa798602a357d0f4a765739e36f4f82bjohnny99 wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
That article was written in July 2017 and over a year before the election- why don't you post his updated analysis for us?
Baris correctly called the governor & Senate races in FL for 2018. Nate Plastic was wrong too.
Peoples Pundit (Rich Baris) > 538
Norpoth > 538
Trafalgar > 538
Barnes Law > 538
Enjoy your loss.
KAG2020
Because there was no updated analysis on his website. Unless I missed it, in which case feel free to post it yourself.
Rich Baris posts his election analysis on YouTube 3-4 days/week with Barnes Law. They cover the battleground states in great detail and they both have provided documented proof accurate projections than Nate Plastic.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWubnBV028_4rVoDPt7FpNQEnjoy your loss.
johnny99 wrote:
Read up on it and educate yourself about why you're wrong.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-fact-check-joe-biden-donald-trump-pennsylvania-fa798602a357d0f4a765739e36f4f82b
Come on, man, reading and thinking are hard!
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
SprintTriathlon wrote:
You know that being nice and truthful is part of the world?
Wait, you posted this yet are supporting Biden? The guy lies about almost everything....
I find it almost admirable that someone can (apparently) think lying is a bad thing--and be a supporter of Donald Trump. Now *that* is mastering cognitive dissonance.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
SprintTriathlon wrote:
Eh
No.
Eh then No.
Do you even go outside your twitter/ FB stream ever?
Do you care about real journalism? About the truth?
Are you suggesting Biden didn't say he would ban fracking, and now changes his answer? It's literally on video. Multiple times.
I guess I shouldn't believe my lying eyes. LMAO liberals.
"I did not propose banning frackint
... the future lies in renewable energy "
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/joe-biden-pressed-fracking-73643591*fracking
If your IQ is above 90 and you listen to the Donald for 10 minutes then you switch to the Joe.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
Because there was no updated analysis on his website. Unless I missed it, in which case feel free to post it yourself.
Rich Baris posts his election analysis on YouTube 3-4 days/week with Barnes Law. They cover the battleground states in great detail and they both have provided documented proof accurate projections than Nate Plastic.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWubnBV028_4rVoDPt7FpNQEnjoy your loss.
Well, The People's Pundit may have been accurate in 2016 (I don't know if he was, but I'll take your word for it), but he sure blew it in 2018. Not sure why you're putting so much faith in someone who's been wrong half the time.
johnny99 wrote:
Read up on it and educate yourself about why you're wrong.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-fact-check-joe-biden-donald-trump-pennsylvania-fa798602a357d0f4a765739e36f4f82b
Your "fact checker" is "shockingly" wrong once again.
They forgot to mention the time fake corrupt Biden looked into a supporter's eyes and promised to "end fossil fuel."
You must have "overlooked" that.
#truthoverfacts
