Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Republicans can't. You are dealing with Sally here who is just outrageously stupid...a simpleton to the nth degree.
You misspelled Traflagar how many times the other day? 7? Does Cleveland State U not teach you how to spell?
Still waiting for you to answer my post Sally.
CircusClowns wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You misspelled Traflagar how many times the other day? 7? Does Cleveland State U not teach you how to spell?
Still waiting for you to answer my post Sally.
You are correct that the Repubs had full control for a couple of years. But I would disagree that the US is in a disastrous position currently. No wars. Stock market at all-time highs DESPITE a pandemic that originated in China and was exacerbated by China's lies and attempts to cover it up. The partisanship in Congress is pitiful but both parties are guilty. Even the partisanship in the SC is pitiful. Just disgusting how partisanship is ripping apart the country. Trump might be a vile person but even more disgusting is how the Dems have tried to undo the 2016 election. The Dems have never considered him a duly elected president even though he was duly elected.
Dems solution to losing the Electoral vote? Do away with the Electoral College!!!
Dems solution to having a minority in the Supreme Court? Pack the Court!!!
The Dems' solution is always to change the rules if the rules don't favor them.
Sally Vix wrote:
CircusClowns wrote:
Still waiting for you to answer my post Sally.
You are correct that the Repubs had full control for a couple of years. But I would disagree that the US is in a disastrous position currently. No wars. Stock market at all-time highs DESPITE a pandemic that originated in China and was exacerbated by China's lies and attempts to cover it up. The partisanship in Congress is pitiful but both parties are guilty. Even the partisanship in the SC is pitiful. Just disgusting how partisanship is ripping apart the country. Trump might be a vile person but even more disgusting is how the Dems have tried to undo the 2016 election. The Dems have never considered him a duly elected president even though he was duly elected.
Dems solution to losing the Electoral vote? Do away with the Electoral College!!!
Dems solution to having a minority in the Supreme Court? Pack the Court!!!
The Dems' solution is always to change the rules if the rules don't favor them.
Oh .... and the Dems wanted to rush through the Merrick Garland confirmation hearings but now with Barrett it is wayyyyyy to close to the election. Let's wait til after the election!
America:
843 deaths on Tuesday
970 deaths on Wednesday
4% of the world's population
20% of the world's deaths.
Incompetent leadership in the White House has brought us to this.
We should have learned from Bush2 not to make stupid people president but here we are in round 2.
Sally Vix wrote:
Oh .... and the Dems wanted to rush through the Merrick Garland confirmation hearings but now with Barrett it is wayyyyyy to close to the election. Let's wait til after the election!
It normally takes about four months to go through the full nomination, hearings, committee voting, and floor voting to get a Supreme Court Justice seated.
There were 10 months between Scalia’s death and the 2016 election. Not exactly “rushed.”
There were about 6 weeks between Ginsburg’s death and this years election. That is rushed. (No scare quotes required)
Add to the equation that Mitch’s “We ought to let the people decide” BS from last time when the vote was months away, while this time people are already voting while the committee hearings are going on.
I'm assuming that Igy and Sally and Rigged and anyone else pushing this Hunter Biden story know that it is almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence.
They know this, right, and they are still pushing it, right?
Because they are traitors to the republic and on the side of Russian intelligence rather than the USA.
Raggedman wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Oh .... and the Dems wanted to rush through the Merrick Garland confirmation hearings but now with Barrett it is wayyyyyy to close to the election. Let's wait til after the election!
It normally takes about four months to go through the full nomination, hearings, committee voting, and floor voting to get a Supreme Court Justice seated.
There were 10 months between Scalia’s death and the 2016 election. Not exactly “rushed.”
There were about 6 weeks between Ginsburg’s death and this years election. That is rushed. (No scare quotes required)
Add to the equation that Mitch’s “We ought to let the people decide” BS from last time when the vote was months away, while this time people are already voting while the committee hearings are going on.
I would say that the hypocrisy lies on both sides. Here is some examples of quickly some confirmations have gone:
Time between nomination and confirmation of some Supreme Court justices:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1993): 42 days
Sandra Day O'Connor (1981): 33 days
John Paul Stevens (1975): 19 days
Lewis Powell (1971): 45 days
Harry Blackmun (1970): 27 days
Warren Burger (1969): 17 days
agip wrote:
I'm assuming that Igy and Sally and Rigged and anyone else pushing this Hunter Biden story know that it is almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence.
They know this, right, and they are still pushing it, right?
Because they are traitors to the republic and on the side of Russian intelligence rather than the USA.
Calling me a traitor? Priceless.
agip wrote:
I'm assuming that Igy and Sally and Rigged and anyone else pushing this Hunter Biden story know that it is almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence.
They know this, right, and they are still pushing it, right?
Because they are traitors to the republic and on the side of Russian intelligence rather than the USA.
You say it is "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." Again, "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." That is YOUR opinion. Not based in fact. Just YOUR opinion. To take YOUR opinion and in one fell swoop leap to calling Rigged and me TRAITORS. Do you have any idea what you just did???
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
I'm assuming that Igy and Sally and Rigged and anyone else pushing this Hunter Biden story know that it is almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence.
They know this, right, and they are still pushing it, right?
Because they are traitors to the republic and on the side of Russian intelligence rather than the USA.
You say it is "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." Again, "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." That is YOUR opinion. Not based in fact. Just YOUR opinion. To take YOUR opinion and in one fell swoop leap to calling Rigged and me TRAITORS. Do you have any idea what you just did???
absolutely.
you and trump have taken the side of russian intelligence over and over again.
You are most likely doing it again right now.
That makes you a traitor.
agip wrote:
I'm assuming that Igy and Sally and Rigged and anyone else pushing this Hunter Biden story know that it is almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence.
They know this, right, and they are still pushing it, right?
Because they are traitors to the republic and on the side of Russian intelligence rather than the USA.
You Dems were rooting for the North Korea talks to fail. Pot calling the kettle black maybe?
agip wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You say it is "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." Again, "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." That is YOUR opinion. Not based in fact. Just YOUR opinion. To take YOUR opinion and in one fell swoop leap to calling Rigged and me TRAITORS. Do you have any idea what you just did???
absolutely.
you and trump have taken the side of russian intelligence over and over again.
You are most likely doing it again right now.
That makes you a traitor.
You Libs were saying that Trump conspired/colluded with the Russians. You STILL say that even though the Mueller investigation concluded that he DID NOT conspire/collude with the Russians. You still saying that, Agip?
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
I'm assuming that Igy and Sally and Rigged and anyone else pushing this Hunter Biden story know that it is almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence.
They know this, right, and they are still pushing it, right?
Because they are traitors to the republic and on the side of Russian intelligence rather than the USA.
You say it is "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." Again, "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." That is YOUR opinion. Not based in fact. Just YOUR opinion. To take YOUR opinion and in one fell swoop leap to calling Rigged and me TRAITORS. Do you have any idea what you just did???
Sally, traitor trolling aside, being able to spot a fake news story is not an opinion just because you’ve taken the bait. Just like if someone presents documents with an obviously forged signature it doesn’t come down to a matter of opinion whether they are valid or not.
Sally Vix wrote:
You say it is "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." Again, "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." That is YOUR opinion. Not based in fact.
Surely you have to admit the alleged chain of custody of the emails strains credulity.
Essentially the story is PC repairman doesn't have contact information for whoever dropped off the laptop, somehow looks at data on the computer, and his first reaction is apparently to call Rudy Giuliani.
The best defense of this is that no one could possibly be so stupid as to make it up and expect it to be believed.
Monkeys typing wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You say it is "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." Again, "almost certainly forged by Russian intelligence." That is YOUR opinion. Not based in fact.
Surely you have to admit the alleged chain of custody of the emails strains credulity.
Essentially the story is PC repairman doesn't have contact information for whoever dropped off the laptop, somehow looks at data on the computer, and his first reaction is apparently to call Rudy Giuliani.
The best defense of this is that no one could possibly be so stupid as to make it up and expect it to be believed.
and the emails are missing metadata, and Rudy has been begging Russian intelligence to give him data, and Russian intelligence hacked Burisma, and why the heck would Hunter Biden drop three laptops and not pick them up and...and...and....
That's an electoral map of the polls showing Biden would win 374-164 if the current polls held up.
asdfasdf wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
INCORRECT!
My comment about her was about her choice of clothing, NOT her attractiveness.
Just let me know what else you don't know so that I can learn you something more.
Hmmm, I said that you made negative comments about a woman's appearance. I'm not incorrect.
Would you have made the same comment about someone on your side of politics? Don't stoop to Trump's tactics of making petty comments about women's appearances to try to belittle them. It doesn't help your cause.
While we're on the same side of politics, you seem like an unpleasant person.
"APPEARANCE" is what YOU said. 'ATTRACTIVENESS" is what I said (see bolded words above for clarity). The reason I criticized Sally for commenting about the "attractiveness" of political women is because that shows misogyny. Commenting about someone's "appearance", especially as it relates to something they have control over like their clothing, is NOT an example of misogyny.
To take your ridiculous criticism of me further, I have actually said in this thread that ACB seems intelligent, and I gave her RESPECT for not having to refer to any notes, AND, I have also not jumped on any bandwagon to criticize her in any way (not for missing one of the freedoms of the First Amendment, nothing)...other than her choice of dowdy dresses.
I have EVEN gone so far as to say the GOP has every right to seat this judge...so no misogyny on my part, no political bias on my part. She just wears dowdy dresses for some reason.
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CYSally to the rescue, lol. You sure you want to jump in the ring after seeing what happened to your friends biff and iggy? But do try please, the Ukraine narrative is working bigly for trump.
Going to have to just talk ABOUT Sally and not discuss directly WITH Sally again for a while, because he is back to his super ignorant ways again. He still doesn't understand that Biden went after that prosecutor for NOT looking into Burisma. That prosecutor was not doing his job, ostensibly because he was taking bribes to not prosecute. Part of being stupid is not having the ability to learn.
Mmf. I see that The Gap continues to rachet upward: now at 10.6%age points.
The Dow is taking a hit, too.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/