Flagpole wrote:
1101 wrote:
Flagpole, help me out here, what's the right word for "a trillion times dumber than unbelievably stupid?"
Answer - It's a trick question though you sly dog, because TWO words are correct - Rigged and Sally.
CORRECT!
Flagpole wrote:
1101 wrote:
Flagpole, help me out here, what's the right word for "a trillion times dumber than unbelievably stupid?"
Answer - It's a trick question though you sly dog, because TWO words are correct - Rigged and Sally.
CORRECT!
Flagpole wrote:
NameStolenAgain wrote:
LOL
Your "remote scenario" is Biden takes NV? Biden is a 6:1 favorite to win Nevada!
Biden also a 2:1 favorite in Arizona and NC, plus a 2.5:1 favorite in FL. An on top of that you need more states going for Trump?
I take it that elementary math is not your strong suit
People keep telling Rigged that this or that is not his strong suit. I'd like to know WHAT his strong suit is? I sure haven't seen one. Maybe it's Polyester?
Not sure, but it's not surprising because he likes going by feel. Being behind 2:1, 2:1, 2.5:1 probably "feels " to him that Trump can win all three, when it's a closer to a 3.3% shot.
Here is the latest on the "Mystery Foreign Bank" case.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/14/politics/trump-campaign-donation-investigation/index.html
Flagpole wrote:
asdfasdf wrote:
Sheez, you make a negative comment about a women's appearance and then a few posts later you have a go at someone for doing the same.
INCORRECT!
My comment about her was about her choice of clothing, NOT her attractiveness.
Just let me know what else you don't know so that I can learn you something more.
Hmmm, I said that you made negative comments about a woman's appearance. I'm not incorrect.
Would you have made the same comment about someone on your side of politics? Don't stoop to Trump's tactics of making petty comments about women's appearances to try to belittle them. It doesn't help your cause.
While we're on the same side of politics, you seem like an unpleasant person.
Gina wrote:
Sharing zero hedge links while labeling others duped.
I suppose self awareness has never been one of your strong points.
Gotta love how Iggy jumps into the ring to try to save his flailing buddy biff, but literally at the moment he’s being KOed. But Biden met some Ukrainians and his son who isn’t running was a drug addict! ?????
But ZeroHedge told us! ??
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
Here is the latest on the "Mystery Foreign Bank" case.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/14/politics/trump-campaign-donation-investigation/index.html
This was covered well in President Woodward’s first book. Basically trump is a stingy b@stard who immediately said there was no way he would put any of his own money in the campaign, but then suddenly produces a $10m check. This right at the lowest point in his campaign when they were running out of money.
“Bannon explained to Mueller's investigators how Trump initially resisted cutting his campaign such a large check, and that Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner doubted that Trump would do so, saying, "that was not going to happen," according to Bannon. But Trump was talked into providing the last-minute money by future Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Kushner, Bannon said. Mnuchin described the money as a "cash advance," Bannon said, and Trump eventually agreed to wire the money. "Trump was convinced the cash would be there," Bannon said, according to the interview summary.“
Flagpole wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Meeting someone is not a business dealing. Didn’t trump meet that Epstein guy? Lol. I’m pretty sure we’ll be hearing much more about how the covidiot is a super spreader in denial. If this Biden thing was supposed to be the October surprise trump is completely toast.
Why is is that the Democrats here are the only ones with good observations? Oh...because we are smart and educated.
Ouch... although I’ll dumb it down for Biff and call us thinking men.
Rudy’s desperation was on full display right through the early hours of the day. He’s not very good at the one thing he was tasked by trump to do. Rudy must be mentally ill.
https://twitter.com/jwillsnh/status/1316608935105826822?s=21
Flagpole wrote:
CircusClowns wrote:
Didn't the republicans have the President, the House and the Senate from 2016 to 2018? Hmmm, so they were in FULL control? Dems took back the house in 2018, but still the republicans had the White House, the Senate, and lets not forget more conservative supreme court judges....
Exactly how can the republicans blame the disastrous direction of the US on anybody but themselves?!
Republicans can't. You are dealing with Sally here who is just outrageously stupid...a simpleton to the nth degree.
You misspelled Traflagar how many times the other day? 7? Does Cleveland State U not teach you how to spell?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CYGina wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
And to slap you down a little further biff
https://twitter.com/stengel/status/1316457706631372809?s=21Bumped for a stupid old man. Even rigged knows this one has been debunked, nothing burger.
Flagpole wrote:
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
Now I won't pull a Flagpole and guarantee anything. But Biden is in WAY better shape than Hilary. Not even close.
Well, you should. You just have to add the qualifier which I did both in 2016 and again in 2020.
Watch:
Trump has ZERO chance to win the election unless he cheats (news flash, he has already cheated in 2020 in an impeachable way and of course did so also in a FELONY way in 2016).
NOTE - People should refrain from telling me that I don't understand probability. I know EXACTLY what I am doing here and what I did in 2016.
Please show where you prefaced your 2016 guarantee with the caveat concerning cheating. Also, your 2020 "guarantee" means NOTHING because you are already saying he has cheated. How can you lose? If Biden wins your guarantee came to fruition. If Biden loses you just resort to your lame "he cheated" refrain. Do you have any idea how idiotic your "guarantee" is?
Sally Vix wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CYGina wrote:
Bumped for a stupid old man. Even rigged knows this one has been debunked, nothing burger.
Sally to the rescue, lol. You sure you want to jump in the ring after seeing what happened to your friends biff and iggy? But do try please, the Ukraine narrative is working bigly for trump.
Flagpole wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Meeting someone is not a business dealing. Didn’t trump meet that Epstein guy? Lol. I’m pretty sure we’ll be hearing much more about how the covidiot is a super spreader in denial. If this Biden thing was supposed to be the October surprise trump is completely toast.
Why is is that the Democrats here are the only ones with good observations? Oh...because we are smart and educated.
Says the clown who misspelled "Traflagar" 7 times the other day.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Answer - It's a trick question though you sly dog, because TWO words are correct - Rigged and Sally.
Need I remind everybody what Mister ZERO Percent Chance kept saying in 2016?????
"I know presidential elections better than anybody!"
"Trump has a ZERO PERCENT CHANCE to win!"
How did that work out for ya?
Mueller never
?pole forever
Not only that but who ended each of his posts with "Mueller is coming ... The clown is done" perhaps 5,000 times? How did that turn out for this clown?
asdfasdf wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
INCORRECT!
My comment about her was about her choice of clothing, NOT her attractiveness.
Just let me know what else you don't know so that I can learn you something more.
Hmmm, I said that you made negative comments about a woman's appearance. I'm not incorrect.
Would you have made the same comment about someone on your side of politics? Don't stoop to Trump's tactics of making petty comments about women's appearances to try to belittle them. It doesn't help your cause.
While we're on the same side of politics, you seem like an unpleasant person.
I am aghast!!! FLAGPOLE SEEMS LIKE AN UNPLEASANT PERSON??!!! You think he might be? He revels in calling women whores - women who are making sacrifices to just make it through life and are forced to make tortured decisions just to improve the life of their children. ALSO, he included every post concerning Rigged and myself with "Outrageously stupid" and "stupid to the nth degree." You THINK he might be an unpleasant person?
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Well, you should. You just have to add the qualifier which I did both in 2016 and again in 2020.
Watch:
Trump has ZERO chance to win the election unless he cheats (news flash, he has already cheated in 2020 in an impeachable way and of course did so also in a FELONY way in 2016).
NOTE - People should refrain from telling me that I don't understand probability. I know EXACTLY what I am doing here and what I did in 2016.
Please show where you prefaced your 2016 guarantee with the caveat concerning cheating. Also, your 2020 "guarantee" means NOTHING because you are already saying he has cheated. How can you lose? If Biden wins your guarantee came to fruition. If Biden loses you just resort to your lame "he cheated" refrain. Do you have any idea how idiotic your "guarantee" is?
Maybe you're finally catching on, but it doesn't matter when you're happily drowning in orange kool aid. Look around you... potus is begging women to like him, promoting a trumper SC nominee to bail him out in November, his squires are looking everywhere for any dirt on his opponent and happily making some up as they go, the GOP is illegally ballot harvesting in the open, removing drop boxes, pledging to give trump EC votes if there is an election dispute, and shutting down as many avenues for citizens to vote as possible. Even if Biden didn't have a +10% national lead and wasn't destroying trump in most polls, you might reach the conclusion that it would be called a dirty win if somehow trump came out with more EC votes than Biden.