CountChocula wrote:
No don't you see? We just need to find someone who is knowledgeable about politics and current events but has no [opinion] of President Trump. It's easy!
Okay, I LOLed.
CountChocula wrote:
No don't you see? We just need to find someone who is knowledgeable about politics and current events but has no [opinion] of President Trump. It's easy!
Okay, I LOLed.
Anyway, while all y'all were beating a dead horse (about gambling) and stomping on the hide a few times, I actually *did* something: wrote some postcards to Ohio voters.
Trump is trying to get a nuclear arms deal signed with Russia before the election.
An obvious desperate political move.
But who in their right mind would sign any deal with the US right before an election where the president could change?
Trump tore up the Iran deal which signified the US breaking its word.
We can't be trusted.
Gina wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Keep believing in Nate Silver.
Keep ignoring Norpoth.
Enjoy your loss.
Show me just one post where I have I said I believe in Nate Silver or am ignoring Norpoth.
You won’t because you can’t. I don’t mention polls at all. You’re an idiot.
If you agree with agip, Trollminator, ?pole, Fat hurts, Runningart, ahem and the rest of the LR lib echo chamber predictions when it comes to 538/polls, then you just lied.
Enjoy your loss.
Fat hurts wrote:
4 sale wrote:
Interesting:
Trump took a COVID experimental drugs derived from aborted fetuses. Trump is a baby killer. Oh, and he has a financial interest in Regeneron as well.
To be a little more accurate, Trump's federal financial disclosure in 2017 listed a capital gain of $50,001 to $100,000 for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. However, we don't know if he still has an interest in the company.
To be even more accurate. The CEO of Regeneron pays Trump an annual fee to be a member of one of Trump's clubs.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8820217/Regeneron-CEO-member-Trumps-golf-club.htmlRigged for Hillary wrote:
If you agree with agip, Trollminator, ?pole, Fat hurts, Runningart, ahem and the rest of the LR lib echo chamber predictions when it comes to 538/polls, then you just lied.
Does *anyone* actually "agree" with agip? S/he's all over the map--part of what makes some of those posts entertaining and/or informative IMO...
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Gina wrote:
Show me just one post where I have I said I believe in Nate Silver or am ignoring Norpoth.
You won’t because you can’t. I don’t mention polls at all. You’re an idiot.
If you agree with agip, Trollminator, ?pole, Fat hurts, Runningart, ahem and the rest of the LR lib echo chamber predictions when it comes to 538/polls, then you just lied.
Enjoy your loss.
Weak deflection. Let’s try this again then.
Show me just once where I have agreed with the 538 polling or other polling data shared by any of the posters you mentioned.
You won’t because you can’t. I have never done that, nor will I. I do not speak for them and they do not speak for me. You started out wrong with this angle and you’re still wrong. You are an idiot.
It is to laugh. wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
If you agree with agip, Trollminator, ?pole, Fat hurts, Runningart, ahem and the rest of the LR lib echo chamber predictions when it comes to 538/polls, then you just lied.
Does *anyone* actually "agree" with agip? S/he's all over the map--part of what makes some of those posts entertaining and/or informative IMO...
nicest thing anyone has ever said to me in these parts.
grazie, from each of my six legs.
It is to laugh. wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
If you agree with agip, Trollminator, ?pole, Fat hurts, Runningart, ahem and the rest of the LR lib echo chamber predictions when it comes to 538/polls, then you just lied.
Does *anyone* actually "agree" with agip? S/he's all over the map--part of what makes some of those posts entertaining and/or informative IMO...
Not really. Agip is 100% predictable (as is almost everyone else on here).
3 days ago:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2020/10/06/trump-kills-stimulus-talks/
“I have instructed my representatives to stop negotiating until after the election when, immediately after I win, we will pass a major Stimulus Bill that focuses on hardworking Americans and Small Business,” Trump wrote.
Today:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/09/politics/stimulus-negotiations-latest/index.html
And of course Republican senators won't sign off on this so it's moot, anyway.
This guy is a fkn moron. To quote Rex Tillerson.
L L wrote:
3 days ago:
st.com/us-policy/2020/10/06/trump-kills-stimulus-talks/“I have instructed my representatives to stop negotiating until after the election when, immediately after I win, we will pass a major Stimulus Bill that focuses on hardworking Americans and Small Business,” Trump wrote.
Today:
h0/09/politics/stimulus-negotiations-latest/index.html
And of course Republican senators won't sign off on this so it's moot, anyway.
This guy is a fkn moron. To quote Rex Tillerson.
yes, he is.
trump has told everyone that his negotiating style is to walk in, bang on the table, curse, and walk out. Then he expects his opponents to fold, under the sheer power of his will.
so that's what he does, over and over.
and he expects people to fall for it each time.
talk about predictable.
L L wrote:
Going by the current polls, Biden would win the electoral vote 375-163
https://www.270towin.com/maps/biden-trump-polling-no-tossups
LOLz!!!!! This map is pure BS. There is no way Dementia is taking OH, GA, IA or NC. But, but, but muh polls.
Enjoy your loss.
A reminder of what can likely happen soon:
“If everyone eligible to vote is allowed to vote, if every vote legally cast is counted—then Trump is doomed. His only hope is to find some way to stop the voting, stop the count, and then rely on the weird mechanics of the U.S. Electoral College to save him, against the people’s vote.
Barton Gellman reported in the Atlantic in September that the Trump team is working with officials in Republican-held states to set aside vote counts altogether—and instead authorize state legislatures to choose the state’s electors. If this scheme proves unfeasible, the Trump team has in mind a series of smaller finagles: arbitrarily stopping vote counts prematurely, rejecting—or outright seizing—mailed ballots, and many other forms of chicanery not seen in U.S. politics since the aftermath of the Civil War.”
“ For all the talk about the solid Trump “base,” it’s important to remember that Trump has been the least popular first-term president in the history of opinion polling, the only first-term president never to reach 50 per cent approval in any reputable poll. Every single day of the Trump presidency since his inauguration in 2017, a documented majority of the American people have disapproved of his administration.”
https://www.macleans.ca/politics/washington/what-if-trump-wins/
L L wrote:
Trump is trying to get a nuclear arms deal signed with Russia before the election.
An obvious desperate political move.
But who in their right mind would sign any deal with the US right before an election where the president could change?
Trump tore up the Iran deal which signified the US breaking its word.
We can't be trusted.
I'd love to know what the deal is really about. You can bet, it's not about nuclear arms.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Gina wrote:
Show me just one post where I have I said I believe in Nate Silver or am ignoring Norpoth.
You won’t because you can’t. I don’t mention polls at all. You’re an idiot.
If you agree with agip, Trollminator, ?pole, Fat hurts, Runningart, ahem and the rest of the LR lib echo chamber predictions when it comes to 538/polls, then you just lied.
Enjoy your loss.
I haven't made any predictions. I have only commented on the relative utility of certain prediction methods.
L L wrote:
Trump is trying to get a nuclear arms deal signed with Russia before the election.
An obvious desperate political move.
But who in their right mind would sign any deal with the US right before an election where the president could change?
Trump tore up the Iran deal which signified the US breaking its word.
We can't be trusted.
Because he’s going to sign a deal that Putin wants.
Fat hurts wrote:
L L wrote:
Trump is trying to get a nuclear arms deal signed with Russia before the election.
An obvious desperate political move.
But who in their right mind would sign any deal with the US right before an election where the president could change?
Trump tore up the Iran deal which signified the US breaking its word.
We can't be trusted.
I'd love to know what the deal is really about. You can bet, it's not about nuclear arms.
The pee tape
Donald Trump has been video recorded while watching prostitutes pee on each other in Moscow.
Putin has the tape.
It is to laugh. wrote:
Anyway, while all y'all were beating a dead horse (about gambling) and stomping on the hide a few times, I actually *did* something: wrote some postcards to Ohio voters.
https://postcardstovoters.org/
Not I. I wrote some too and threw a bunch of money to get your cards delivered!
Have we talked about why several GOP senators are absolutely refusing to get COVID tests?
Graham, in particular, also grassley.
The reason is that if they test positive, the ACB nomination is dead until the lame duck and possibly forever.
Not getting tested in order to jam the court is pretty close to manslaughter.
Trollminator wrote:
A reminder of what can likely happen soon:
“If everyone eligible to vote is allowed to vote, if every vote legally cast is counted—then Trump is doomed. His only hope is to find some way to stop the voting, stop the count, and then rely on the weird mechanics of the U.S. Electoral College to save him, against the people’s vote.
I don't think that will work. The people simply won't accept an outcome based on weird mechanics. It would probably prompt the #4 treatment.
Remember, the only way an autocrat leaves is one of the following:
1. Dies in office
2. Thrown in prison
3. Flees to exile
4. Taken out back and shot