Howman, ex WADA leader, says that IAAF has dealt with 12 to 15 cases of corruption in the IAAF.
This would have been significantly concurrent with the IAAF having involvement with the Edwards case.
This would have been the same culture in place when Parliament was telling his MP that IAAF should be referred to.
How can any faith have been placed in the IAAF to have been a fair arbitration in dealing with the gross and manifest failures in the doping case against Edwards.
Letsrun editors , who have a self proclaimed high moral stance against injustice ,are now very interested in the Edwards case.
Esp they are perplexed as to who’s urine was actually tested as according to the labs own declarations it could never have been Edwards.
More news wrote:
Letsrun editors , who have a self proclaimed high moral stance against injustice ,are now very interested in the Edwards case.
Esp they are perplexed as to who’s urine was actually tested as according to the labs own declarations it could never have been Edwards.
Great that the brothers are going to do something, it needs someone to moan about the hidden evidence.
Great stuff wrote:
More news wrote:
Letsrun editors , who have a self proclaimed high moral stance against injustice ,are now very interested in the Edwards case.
Esp they are perplexed as to who’s urine was actually tested as according to the labs own declarations it could never have been Edwards.
Great that the brothers are going to do something, it needs someone to moan about the hidden evidence.
Actually , don’t hold your breath.
Letsrun only cares about its own agenda.
Freedom Fight wrote:
Great stuff wrote:
Great that the brothers are going to do something, it needs someone to moan about the hidden evidence.
Actually , don’t hold your breath.
Letsrun only cares about its own agenda.
I hope that Letsrun care for more than themselves
Hope letsrun acts
Could be it wrote:
Hope letsrun acts
Let’s hope so as the cause is good as fake evidence is bad.
Might be so wrote:
Could be it wrote:
Hope letsrun acts
Let’s hope so as the cause is good as fake evidence is bad.
Fake evidence should be exposed, come on Letsrun.
Fake evidence set out fully on Letsrun.
Support Edwards , Letsrun!
Can the senior figures in the sport be worried about the fake evidence in the Evidence case and UKA’s roll in hiding the truth.
I hope so, but most likely worried at appallingly low numbers of spectators .
Could the costs in the Edwards case bankrupt a dying sport!
Why did the Lab refuse to provide the L: H evidence.
They had it but just would not supply it.
More fake actions by the IOC lab and one funded by the organisation that generated the case against Edwards.Conflict of interest, big style.
No separation of powers or transparency only fake and hidden evidence.
L:H wrote:
Why did the Lab refuse to provide the L: H evidence.
They had it but just would not supply it.
More fake actions by the IOC lab and one funded by the organisation that generated the case against Edwards.Conflict of interest, big style.
No separation of powers or transparency only fake and hidden evidence.
Terrible misjustice based on fake evidence.
What would Trump say?
Why did the three arms of the anti doping authorities work so closely together to hide the true evidence.
What was the name of the key person behind it all?
Is the same person or group of people making all these posts? The last few pages read like a ham handed pr attempt.
Same person? wrote:
Is the same person or group of people making all these posts? The last few pages read like a ham handed pr attempt.
Yes. There are Russian trolls who post various true stories about hotter than Satan's housecat Western athletes and the Western federations pretending they aren't allowing doping.
They occasionally post in other threads complaining about how the West is largely forgiven for their doping and corruption. They aren't wrong.
They are particularly keen about keeping this story on the front page, but it's only more of the same IAAF corruption.
Same person? wrote:
Is the same person or group of people making all these posts? The last few pages read like a ham handed pr attempt.
Would you say this if had have bothered to read the Davis report ?
Hidden evidence , poor science,and the joining together to cover up the fake evidence.
Same person? wrote:
Is the same person or group of people making all these posts? The last few pages read like a ham handed pr attempt.
There are a lot of people who smell a stinking rat within the fake evidence and ,like me ,think that some words of support should be given.
Do people know that amongst the evidence they hid was the fact that that they did not do the calibration work up and thus could correctly identify the compound or the concentration of the compound as required.
Shocking fake evidence.
Davis report wrote:
Do people know that amongst the evidence they hid was the fact that that they did not do the calibration work up and thus could correctly identify the compound or the concentration of the compound as required.
Shocking fake evidence.
Should have said “ could not correctly identify etc”
Any should have been clear as all follows from the fake evidence.
False science uncovered and big money needed to clear him.
Had Edwards had the same lawyer then there would have been no case.