Wrong. He almost certainly lied. Trying to play tough guy veteran.
That wasn't hard. At all.
Now, you go.
Maybe start with an easy one, that Donny can't manage, say, "Putin is a dictator." Or, shoot, the biggest one, "Trump lost in 2020."
We won't hold our breath.
No, he didn't lie.
From the article, "In the clip, Walz said, 'We can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at.' "
In that statement, where "is the only place where those weapons are at"?
You are a new breed of idiot. He never carried a f$cking weapon in war. He bailed before his deployment. You have the IQ of a retarded wombat.
Did you just make that up because the cordial tastes nice, or can't you read? Perhaps both, so I'll help you here.
And I'm supposed to be thunderstruck by your idiotic news?
Go try to be president. Are you a U.S. citizen?
Highlighted above is funny. For just about every president (and maybe ALL of them) before Trump, this would be a legitimate comment to make to most people. A heck of a lot of people COULDN'T handle being president. But this reminds me of Trump and COVID. I sincerely believe that somewhere WAY over 50% of the population could have handled COVID way, way better than Trump.
Advisor: "Sir/Ma'am, the adult experts are going to talk about the virus to the public, and we'd just ask that you not say anything contradictory, stupid, or dangerous."
From the article, "In the clip, Walz said, 'We can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at.' "
In that statement, where "is the only place where those weapons are at"?
You are a new breed of idiot. He never carried a f$cking weapon in war. He bailed before his deployment. You have the IQ of a retarded wombat.
In that statement, where "is the only place where those weapons are at"?
Wrong. He almost certainly lied. Trying to play tough guy veteran.
That wasn't hard. At all.
Now, you go.
Maybe start with an easy one, that Donny can't manage, say, "Putin is a dictator." Or, shoot, the biggest one, "Trump lost in 2020."
We won't hold our breath.
No, he didn't lie.
From the article, "In the clip, Walz said, 'We can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at.' "
In that statement, where "is the only place where those weapons are at"?
I haven't paid much attention to this argument in the past, but I'm confused by your question. How do you get around him saying, "...weapons of war that I carried in war..." ?
And I've seen the video, and came to the same conclusion that he was saying that he had carried weapons in war.
From the article, "In the clip, Walz said, 'We can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at.' "
In that statement, where "is the only place where those weapons are at"?
I haven't paid much attention to this argument in the past, but I'm confused by your question. How do you get around him saying, "...weapons of war that I carried in war..." ?
And I've seen the video, and came to the same conclusion that he was saying that he had carried weapons in war.
And I'm supposed to be thunderstruck by your idiotic news?
Go try to be president. Are you a U.S. citizen?
Highlighted above is funny. For just about every president (and maybe ALL of them) before Trump, this would be a legitimate comment to make to most people. A heck of a lot of people COULDN'T handle being president. But this reminds me of Trump and COVID. I sincerely believe that somewhere WAY over 50% of the population could have handled COVID way, way better than Trump.
Advisor: "Sir/Ma'am, the adult experts are going to talk about the virus to the public, and we'd just ask that you not say anything contradictory, stupid, or dangerous."
I haven't paid much attention to this argument in the past, but I'm confused by your question. How do you get around him saying, "...weapons of war that I carried in war..." ?
And I've seen the video, and came to the same conclusion that he was saying that he had carried weapons in war.
Hey, one thing we can agree on.
Yep. Now, just try the following, very slowly at first:
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pf...
From the article, "In the clip, Walz said, 'We can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at.' "
In that statement, where "is the only place where those weapons are at"?
I haven't paid much attention to this argument in the past, but I'm confused by your question. How do you get around him saying, "...weapons of war that I carried in war..." ?
And I've seen the video, and came to the same conclusion that he was saying that he had carried weapons in war.
Fair question.
I think that you'll answer your own question simply by answering my question; "in that statement, where "is the only place where those weapons are at"?
Once you answer that question, you will realize that what has been represented as one sentence is actually, and unavoidably, two sentences. And the dividing "." comes immediately after the word, "carried".
