the crunch wrote:
Just like liberal lawmakers (and supporters like you) are responsible for the murder of millions of innocent babies. I'll take him any day over any lib
Just an FYI, here is the Oxford English definition of infanticide (aka murder of a “baby” to use your term)...
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/infanticideAn infant / baby is defined as a child from the point of live birth - 1 year old. Medical definition of fetus and infant here...
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/5/e20160551It should be noted, in medical textbooks there is often a distinction made between neonates (birth to 2 months—ever heard of a NICU?) and an infant (2 months post birth to 1 year) but that may be splitting hairs too much for some of you.
I am not aware of any lib or lib politics allowing babies/ infants to be killed (properly defined as either a child from live birth to 1 year old or, more correctly, 2 months post live birth and 1 year old).
... but here is Trump saying we should specifically target our enemies families which presumably includes innocent children in the age range of an infant.
http://time.com/4132368/donald-trump-isis-bombing/And here is Jeb Bush saying he’d kill a baby under certain circumstances. Admittedly, he doesn’t specifically say he’d kill a baby if it was an infant or if he’d wait until after its first birthday.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oFZoVIDx5dgOf course, there is also the fact that the majority of conservatives frequently call for increasing the number of infants born to poor women by restricting access to appropriate family planning options while simultaneously calling for slashing funding to programs that help poor children get adequate access to healthcare, good nutrition, and housing which, of course, all contribute to increased infant mortality in the US—i.e. they contribute to killing actual babies.
Also, if abortion is such a big issue to you—as your post implies—I assume you consider yourself “pro-life”, no? If so, why don’t you seem to care that the president has repeatedly, publicly shamed people (Biden at the recent “debate” for example) for wearing masks in public (which is known to reduce Covid transmission by 60-90% depending on the study you look at) which has contributed to > 200,000 of your fellow citizens death from this disease? Why aren’t you laser focused on preventing those deaths? Are you not “pro-life” for people who are actually walking around alive? Why do you think it is that so many GOP politicians / operatives get Covid and so few dems do? Could it be that dems are actually listening to facts, reason, and data while the GOP continues with their magical thinking?