10 bucks says you take a lot though.
10 bucks says you take a lot though.
i love the dick
Dicks wrote:
i love the dick
Made me laugh.
harry
FWIW: Results from Cornell's Reif Memorial meet--looks like DIIIers (Cortland/IC?) mostly stuck to the 5k races. Conditions sucked, apparently.
http://cornellbigred.com/documents/2009/10/23/2009%20Reif%20Results.pdf?id=2346
Looks like SLU ran pretty well on both the men's and women's side and RIT men didn't run their A team. Here's a link to the results: http://www.yentiming.com/. Rochester looks to have run pretty well.
pretty slow times for Genesee Valley Park, especially if you compare them to last weeks meet
The Rochester area has had a steady amount of rain for nearly 2 full days, so I'm sure that contributed to a slower course. Anyone who has ever run on the Genesee Valley Park course knows it's slow when it's wet.
The conditions weren't THAT bad. The course wasn't overly wet. It was marginally softer than last week, but I would say it's a little bit of an overstatement to say the course was SLOW today. Maybe 15-20 seconds slower than last week tops.
I have no idea because I wasn't at either of the races but if you look at the two teams that ran this course the last two weeks you see some awfully slower times today.
Rochester: last week: avg time 25:29.8
this week: avg time 26:34.8 (with no one breaking 25:30, #1 ran 25:41)
Alfred: last week: avg time 27:29.6
this week: avg time 29:14.31 (#1 guy ran 28:33)
Does that mean st lawrence can compete with geneseo right now? probably not but for the first time this year st lawrence showed that they deserve a little bit of the credit they have been getting on the rankings. now they can't blow it, or they will be right back where they have been in years past.
I wasn't at the race today, so I can't comment at all about the conditions or how the race was run. But last week at the UR Invite, conditions were nearly perfect (both weather and course), and the race went out fairly quickly. So I think the combination of those two items led to the fast times all around.
Curt Bell looks good.
Did the Ithaca run their A teams?
There's no way SLU is up there with geneseo now. They still have to prove to us that they can beat NYU before they can compete with Geneseo. I don't think that will happen.
I was little disappointed that RIT didn't run their top group. I think they could have give SLU a hard time. Guess we'll see this next weekend at Saratoga I believe.
run with geneseo? didnt geneseo run the same course last week and run much faster?
i think we all need to chill the dick out
already sub 15 wrote:
run with geneseo? didnt geneseo run the same course last week and run much faster?
You may also notice that there were multiple teams who ran last weekend and this weekend, all were uniformly slower this week.
I was at both races, it was definitely softer today. I don't think it was enough to make the course a whole minute slower as UR's times point to, but certainly 30-40 seconds.
in the know... wrote:
I was at both races, it was definitely softer today. I don't think it was enough to make the course a whole minute slower as UR's times point to, but certainly 30-40 seconds.
you don't know dick
Also does anyone know how it went out today? Slow? That could also help explain the slower times, at least up front.
Saratoga Men's Results (for womens just change the M to a W in the URL)
http://employees.oneonta.edu/lopiccmj/09SaratogaMResults.htm
Plattsburgh beaten badly by Keene, and almost by Oneonta. Clearly a bad day for Yernye.
Results say heavy rain however having run Saratoga in sun, rain and snow it always runs quite fast.
Damn, Keene State is ranked 6th in their region, not ranked at all nationally.