Anybody want to bet what the outcome of an investigation into this would be?
https://twitter.com/KenTremendous/status/1308914707315789825?s=20
Anybody want to bet what the outcome of an investigation into this would be?
https://twitter.com/KenTremendous/status/1308914707315789825?s=20
Trollminator wrote:
L L wrote:
He is no longer trying to win the election.
He is trying to fire up his base to not believe the results.
He will get louder and louder as the election approaches.
It's about creating chaos and doubt.
On Nov, 4th, most major media outlets will project Biden as the winner.
I don't know if Fox News, but they may.
Then Trump will use very trick in the book to entice his people to riot and he will never concede.
The courts will hold up the results.
If it goes to the Supreme Court, I believe Roberts and Gorsuch will hold up the result along with Breyer, Kagan and Sotomayor.
That's all you need to have Biden win.
If they get states like North Carolina and Florida to split their electoral votes, while Texas gives all of their electoral votes to their popular vote winner, you could have a real crooked result.
You are right about him priming the base... but whether Biden appears to be the winner early on depends on how many votes are mailed in and counted by Nov 4. No one should for a second doubt that trump minions would actually prevent counting of ballots to help him with the early results. As far as FOX - if Biden is leading they will immediately bring in the "experts" that will be claiming all night that there is reported fraud.. if Trump is leading they will announce him the clear winner and say the Dems are trying to steal it if the results flip later.
yeah expect right wing media to start reporting electoral fraud in mid-October, to warm up the crowd and to see how it us received. And they'll probably find some fraud. 330 million is a big number and lots of weird stuff happens when you have that many variables.
But the point is that the accusations of fraud won't appear out of nowhere - it will be a several-week rampup to a giant hurricane of accusations election week.
Trollminator wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
This is another reason to vote for Biden, not that anyone should need anymore reasons.
Trump can't keep peace in the streets and has failed to be the "law and order" President.
Trump, when Obama was President: "Our country is totally fractured and, with our weak leadership in Washington, you can expect Ferguson type riots and looting in other places."
Biff doesn't care about what is actually happening... if america is totally divided, burning to the ground, and even in a civil war, he will be happy as long as those libs keep getting owned.
Your side can't stop rioting. This is why Dementia Joe is going to lose.
Lol right Mitch - we will take your word for it... never felt the urge to doubt you before
https://twitter.com/senatemajldr/status/1309126971058794499?s=20
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Biff doesn't care about what is actually happening... if america is totally divided, burning to the ground, and even in a civil war, he will be happy as long as those libs keep getting owned.
Your side can't stop rioting. This is why Dementia Joe is going to lose.
Last time I checked the police were misbehaving under Obama as well, and yet barely any riots... why is your god failing to be a law and order anything? The buck stops with him regardless of your peanut brain.
Calamity Joe wrote:
Come on Joe ... get it together!
https://www.chron.com/news/article/FACT-CHECK-Joe-Biden-s-false-and-exaggerated-15587948.php
Dementia Joe has called called a lid for the day. Laziest campaigner ever.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EirxKJGXsAITo2J?format=jpg&name=smallHe's too old, too senile and too weak to be POTUS.
Good news from Nate - new recent highs for Biden in 538's model
WH: Biden 78%
Senate: Dems 62%
agip wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
You are right about him priming the base... but whether Biden appears to be the winner early on depends on how many votes are mailed in and counted by Nov 4. No one should for a second doubt that trump minions would actually prevent counting of ballots to help him with the early results. As far as FOX - if Biden is leading they will immediately bring in the "experts" that will be claiming all night that there is reported fraud.. if Trump is leading they will announce him the clear winner and say the Dems are trying to steal it if the results flip later.
yeah expect right wing media to start reporting electoral fraud in mid-October, to warm up the crowd and to see how it us received. And they'll probably find some fraud. 330 million is a big number and lots of weird stuff happens when you have that many variables.
But the point is that the accusations of fraud won't appear out of nowhere - it will be a several-week rampup to a giant hurricane of accusations election week.
Yeah I think when it became clear that he couldn't control COVID he started priming the base. The only question is just how brazen will be his and GOPers actions to claim illegitimate victory? That's one of the few weapons Dems have, make sure their actions are as exposed as possible in real time. Dems don't have any room to fail on that. The game is bigly rigged against Biden - he has to win in the wacky EC competition and then assuming he does Dems have to prevent trump and his minions from tossing votes and covering their tracks. My guess is trump will request the nuclear option of certain state simply handing him the votes. Then Barr can come in and try to take physical control of the protests by arresting trump's political enemies. As for the SC - ha! - don't count on them since we have an elected R Senate majority that is colluding with the POTUS. SC is not going to get political... they may however weigh in on whether the constitution was breached in specific cases... it will take way too long IMO... trump has a huge advantage.
LOL - Graham saying SCJ seat needs to be filled to have a full court for the upcoming election battle... he must have forgotten that we had 8 SCJ during the 2016 election.
Bone spurs the fraud.
When your elected leader says he won't commit to accepting the election result if he loses, you no longer have a democracy. That is where America is now. A vote for Trump is a vote for someone who does not accept the principles of a democracy. For him, an election can only have one outcome - regardless of what the people say. Not even that great champion of democratic freedom, Vladimir Putin, has had the nerve to come out with what Trump has.
Trollminator wrote:
Lol right Mitch - we will take your word for it... never felt the urge to doubt you before
https://twitter.com/senatemajldr/status/1309126971058794499?s=20
Interesting wording by Mitch.
There wouldn't be any transition if Trump wins.
Saying "There will be an orderly transition" is saying that Biden will win.
Jeff Wigand wrote:
PresidentTrump wrote:Trump should have said "Are YOU going to accept the results when I win? You certainly didn't last time despite making a big deal of saying I wouldn't accept the results."
You're mistaking "extreme disappointment and dissatisfaction" with "refusing to accept the results and deny the certified winner as per our tradition of democracy."
Trump's team is exploring options to direct loyal electors to ignore election results that don't suit him to secure him a win in the Electoral College. The head of Pennsylvania's GOP has confirmed this on the record.
How would you feel if Obama had done that for HRC?
I cannot believe people are actually buying into this nonsense. Why can't you see it's another in a long line of nonsensical crazy trump theories like Russian collusion. Each state controls it's college votes, it's making up crap to undermine him.
If Trump is so bad why does the left have to keep making up crap about him? They are actually helping him get re-elected because people are fed up with the fairy tales.
Obama did all he could for Clinton, put her in front of the seal of the President on a podium with hours of the announcement there would be no charges against her. Only now are they figuring out the more shady things he did to help her.
Cool story bro.
L L wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Lol right Mitch - we will take your word for it... never felt the urge to doubt you before
https://twitter.com/senatemajldr/status/1309126971058794499?s=20Interesting wording by Mitch.
There wouldn't be any transition if Trump wins.
Saying "There will be an orderly transition" is saying that Biden will win.
He also said "every four years" so obviously he was talking the election outcome in general.
PresidentTrump wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
You're mistaking "extreme disappointment and dissatisfaction" with "refusing to accept the results and deny the certified winner as per our tradition of democracy."
Trump's team is exploring options to direct loyal electors to ignore election results that don't suit him to secure him a win in the Electoral College. The head of Pennsylvania's GOP has confirmed this on the record.
How would you feel if Obama had done that for HRC?
I cannot believe people are actually buying into this nonsense. Why can't you see it's another in a long line of nonsensical crazy trump theories like Russian collusion. Each state controls it's college votes, it's making up crap to undermine him.
If Trump is so bad why does the left have to keep making up crap about him? They are actually helping him get re-elected because people are fed up with the fairy tales.
Obama did all he could for Clinton, put her in front of the seal of the President on a podium with hours of the announcement there would be no charges against her. Only now are they figuring out the more shady things he did to help her.
reminder that the head of the trump campaign met with a russian intelligence officer hand handed over confidential election data. And that the trump campaign coordinated with wikileaks to release info russia stole. And the son of the president met with people to get info russia stole.
Collusion is not a hoax.
Has the swamp been drained yet?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mitch-mcconnell-election-campaign-slapped-143605136.html
Ohio is now a tossup in the 538 model. 52/48.
Lordy would be such a great solution to the Trump problem if Biden gets 400 votes in the EC. Would be a complete and utter rejection of Trumpism.
Like churchill said, Americans will usually do the right thing...but only after doing the wrong thing over and over again.
agip wrote:
Ohio is now a tossup in the 538 model. 52/48.
Lordy would be such a great solution to the Trump problem if Biden gets 400 votes in the EC. Would be a complete and utter rejection of Trumpism.
Like churchill said, Americans will usually do the right thing...but only after doing the wrong thing over and over again.
Can’t recall off hand but I assume Trump won Ohio four years ago?