Just asking?? wrote:
Just read the report wrote:
Why did the drug testing lab refuse its’ statutory duty and not release the data?
What were they hiding and why did not the hearing demand it.
And why did UK Sport also refuse access to key evidence they held.
Why ? Why ? Why?
Who provided the funding of UKA and the Doping Lab at KCL ?
Could it be xxx ?
Precursor 2 wrote:
Just asking?? wrote:
Who provided the funding of UKA and the Doping Lab at KCL ?
Could it be xxx ?
Would it be anyone who caused the evidence to be hidden?
Seemingly UKA, Kings College and UKSport were all asked for the hidden evidence and they all refused.
I am still left wondering if there was any one entity that was driving this hiding of evidence.
If there was then is there a case in criminal law for perverting justice?
From what I recall wrote:
Seemingly UKA, Kings College and UKSport were all asked for the hidden evidence and they all refused.
I am still left wondering if there was any one entity that was driving this hiding of evidence.
If there was then is there a case in criminal law for perverting justice?
Would Edwards get round to visiting the justice perverters in prison.
Would it be a women’s or a men’s prison?
Leading BBC programme, Newsnight, has a main story about the prosecution not handing evidence over.
Yet it the same in the Edwards case.
But only silence from the Letsrun editors.
From what I recall wrote:
Seemingly UKA, Kings College and UKSport were all asked for the hidden evidence and they all refused.
I am still left wondering if there was any one entity that was driving this hiding of evidence.
If there was then is there a case in criminal law for perverting justice?
Seems no justice or fairness just covering up!
Unbelieveble wrote:
From what I recall wrote:
Seemingly UKA, Kings College and UKSport were all asked for the hidden evidence and they all refused.
I am still left wondering if there was any one entity that was driving this hiding of evidence.
If there was then is there a case in criminal law for perverting justice?
Seems no justice or fairness just covering up!
Surely Letsrun can’t be part of this cover up and continuing injustice.
Newsnight wrote:
Unbelieveble wrote:
Seems no justice or fairness just covering up!
Surely Letsrun can’t be part of this cover up and continuing injustice.
Yes, the NCAA are on but still silence on the Edwards misjustice .
Newsnight wrote:
Surely Letsrun can’t be part of this cover up and continuing injustice.
If Letsrun wanted to be part of a cover up all they would need to do is take this thread down, which they have not done. Please stop insisting this is somehow Letsrun's fault.
That doesn't make sense wrote:
Newsnight wrote:
Surely Letsrun can’t be part of this cover up and continuing injustice.
If Letsrun wanted to be part of a cover up all they would need to do is take this thread down, which they have not done. Please stop insisting this is somehow Letsrun's fault.
But they have banned prominent supporters of Edwards.
Publically taking the thread down would be counterproductive and great publicity for Edwards esp as Letsrun champions investigative journalism.
Newsnight wrote:
That doesn't make sense wrote:
If Letsrun wanted to be part of a cover up all they would need to do is take this thread down, which they have not done. Please stop insisting this is somehow Letsrun's fault.
But they have banned prominent supporters of Edwards.
Publically taking the thread down would be counterproductive and great publicity for Edwards esp as Letsrun champions investigative journalism.
Who specifically have they banned that is a supporter of Edwards?
What banned for supporting Edwards!
What is Letsrun upto?
Hiding evidence is ok;pointing out that evidence has been hidden is not.
Liz Armitstead , goldmedal cyclist accuses UKAD of lack of transparency in doping matters.
Not surprising at all when they played a significant part in hiding evidence and outright refusal to discus such in the Edwards case.
Who controls the doping police industry ?
Truly terrible wrote:
Liz Armitstead , goldmedal cyclist accuses UKAD of lack of transparency in doping matters.
Not surprising at all when they played a significant part in hiding evidence and outright refusal to discus such in the Edwards case.
Who controls the doping police industry ?
Seems it is the doping police who controls itself.
No wonder they got away with hiding the evidence in the Edwards case.
I see UKAD are in Kenya giving advise , the irony !
Letsrun has an article on the USA possible criminalizing sports doping.
How can this happen when the anti doping police hide evidence as they did in the Edwards case and nothing , I repeat, nothing happens.
UKAD watcher wrote:
I see UKAD are in Kenya giving advise , the irony !
It is not possible for anyone who was involved in hiding evidence in the Edwards case is involved in helping Kenya; just not possible.
UKAD watcher wrote:
UKAD watcher wrote:
I see UKAD are in Kenya giving advise , the irony !
It is not possible for anyone who was involved in hiding evidence in the Edwards case is involved in helping Kenya; just not possible.
I repeat the above just in case someone out there wants to contradict me.
It is just not possible that anyone who was involved in hiding the evidence in the Edwards case could be involved in teaching Kenya the correct moral stance on doping control.
What do the experts think of this wrote:
Dr Davis report wrote:
This person thinks that the Davis report is devastating in its exposure of very very poor science at Kings College and thus is compounded by it all being hidden from the hearings.
It is obvious that the wrong ion was being monitored and there was contamination of the water blank.
Appalling.
But more interesting is the effort by all prosecution parties to hide this evidence.