The Harvard Crimson puts a bow on it.
Harvard president plagiarized her PhD thesis
Non-Running
Current Events
-
84
-
the poor thing how will she (does she identify as a she?) go on with only $900k salary !
73 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
breit leit wrote:
And yet you’ve said they were better under slavery.
I never said that. I said Democrats managed to do more harm to blacks in the last 60 years than they managed to do to them with slavery as evidenced by the fact that the black family was intact in 1960 and today it's been destroyed by Democrat policies.
Only a complete weak ass racist POS would even say some BS like that. Even your pasty daddy knows you are a liar.
If blacks are so privileged then why don't you trade places and see how privileged you will be.
214 -
Black people in the US are the most privileged group at present. Even a mildly 8ntellogent black person will be handed a hilarious no white kid could touch. Then they get a DEI hire they don't even have to try for. After that they are unfirable because they will lodge an EEOC complaint. Good for them and all but why deny how great they have it. This lady, not qualified to rean 3rd grage, managed to be president of Harvard.
113 -
Lol. Here we go again
122 -
Harvard has learned nothing. This DEI cheerleader is leading the search for the new president. Face palm.
84 -
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
Harvard has learned nothing. This DEI cheerleader is leading the search for the new president. Face palm.
If you want to go after people who are careless and sloppy, have at it. That’s mostly the case here, although some of it clearly descends into disingenuousness, and some of it is a bit tough to identify (on the careless/disengenuous front). You don’t seem all that concerned about those failings and breaches of ethics among people on these boards who share your political views, but you’re not alone in that level of hypocrisy, so I suppose you can enjoy the succor of your normalcy in that regard.
My experience is that an incredibly high percentage of people get careless and sloppy about details because these things seldom matter, the transgressors are almost never called on it, and the culture by and large gives it a free pass. I don’t excuse it wherever it occurs, and certainly not among academics, so if any of you are consistently on the right side of this, fine. I just see this as an issue rife with hypocrisy.
45 -
Cool for you wrote:
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
Harvard has learned nothing. This DEI cheerleader is leading the search for the new president. Face palm.
If you want to go after people who are careless and sloppy, have at it. That’s mostly the case here, although some of it clearly descends into disingenuousness, and some of it is a bit tough to identify (on the careless/disengenuous front). You don’t seem all that concerned about those failings and breaches of ethics among people on these boards who share your political views, but you’re not alone in that level of hypocrisy, so I suppose you can enjoy the succor of your normalcy in that regard.
My experience is that an incredibly high percentage of people get careless and sloppy about details because these things seldom matter, the transgressors are almost never called on it, and the culture by and large gives it a free pass. I don’t excuse it wherever it occurs, and certainly not among academics, so if any of you are consistently on the right side of this, fine. I just see this as an issue rife with hypocrisy.
I mean, you've encapsulated the entire nature of this board. It's literally just distilled bitterness that found company.
So now all of these guys like kobbs and glitter bomb, etc etc can be in good company when they express hateful opinions against others that they don't like - nearly always black Americans, Democrats, the poor, women in running, Jews (newname), and specifically Nikki Hiltz.
Then there are the attempts to pass off that their strong opinions are driven, not by bigotry, but by valid concerns. Like public education being brought up in Baltimore, or trans women in running (but don't forget they still degrade all women so it's not really that they're defending women's sports).
The part that really exposes them is Nikki Hiltz. they're literally racing with women - isn't that what y'all are pretending to care about? But you'll say they're forcing their ideology down your throat as you follow them on Twitter and watch their interviews.
Anywho, what were we talking about again? I think that weed hit.
64 -
I forgot to fill this out wrote:
Cool for you wrote:
If you want to go after people who are careless and sloppy, have at it. That’s mostly the case here, although some of it clearly descends into disingenuousness, and some of it is a bit tough to identify (on the careless/disengenuous front). You don’t seem all that concerned about those failings and breaches of ethics among people on these boards who share your political views, but you’re not alone in that level of hypocrisy, so I suppose you can enjoy the succor of your normalcy in that regard.
My experience is that an incredibly high percentage of people get careless and sloppy about details because these things seldom matter, the transgressors are almost never called on it, and the culture by and large gives it a free pass. I don’t excuse it wherever it occurs, and certainly not among academics, so if any of you are consistently on the right side of this, fine. I just see this as an issue rife with hypocrisy.
I mean, you've encapsulated the entire nature of this board. It's literally just distilled bitterness that found company.
So now all of these guys like kobbs and glitter bomb, etc etc can be in good company when they express hateful opinions against others that they don't like - nearly always black Americans, Democrats, the poor, women in running, Jews (newname), and specifically Nikki Hiltz.
Then there are the attempts to pass off that their strong opinions are driven, not by bigotry, but by valid concerns. Like public education being brought up in Baltimore, or trans women in running (but don't forget they still degrade all women so it's not really that they're defending women's sports).
The part that really exposes them is Nikki Hiltz. they're literally racing with women - isn't that what y'all are pretending to care about? But you'll say they're forcing their ideology down your throat as you follow them on Twitter and watch their interviews.
Anywho, what were we talking about again? I think that weed hit.
Bill Ackman
12 -
#1030
This post was removed.
-
vsueyey wrote:
Black people in the US are the most privileged group at present.
Wow.
35 -
She'll be teaching a course titled "Reading and Research" in the fall. How ironic.
73 -
fjb wrote:
She'll be teaching a course titled "Reading and Research" in the fall. How ironic.
Now that's irony
21 -
fjb wrote:
She'll be teaching a course titled "Reading and Research" in the fall. How ironic.
That really is hilarious. You can't make this stuff up.
41 -
"Six of the seven major appointments at the university since its first Black president resigned in January have gone to white people...Four of these new appointments are Jewish"
32 -
#1037
This post was removed.
-
This quoted post has been removed.
Shafik is out. As I opined.
Garber is in.
12
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.