Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Sally Vix wrote:

They care about babies.

They do not. If they cared about babies, they would support universal daycare and extended paid maternity leave, which is what every other developed country has in one form or another.

They would also advocate for and fund comprehensive sex education and make all varieties of birth control easily available to mitigate the chances of unwanted pregnancies from occurring.

No, the opposition to abortion rights is political, not religious in origin. Quote from W. A. Criswell, former president of the Southern Baptist Convention on the subject of abortion

I have always felt that it was only after a child was born and had a life separate from its mother that it became an individual person and it has always, therefore, seemed to me that what is best for the mother and for the future should be allowed.

It wasn't until the Carter administration that the Religious Right began to rally around abortion as an issue. If you're interested, you can read about it here:

Sally Vix wrote:

I am not and it boils my blood thinking you guys are fine and dandy with infanticide.

Be honest Sally. Do you think I am for killing babies?

L L wrote:

People like Sally drool over Trump's effortless ability to lie and repeat false claims over and over to use misdirection.

They want to be like Trump.

Deluded people such as yourself believe Dementia Joe is of sound mind & will be POTUS.

The lib meltdown is coming.

Enjoy your loss.

Sally Vix wrote:

1101 wrote:

You're on step 7 here.

Good job!

That list is pretty accurate and funny IF I was a troll. I am not and it boils my blood thinking you guys are fine and dandy with infanticide. I can sleep at night but not sure how you can.

The list does a pretty fair job of describing your behavior over the history of the thread.

Whether or not you consider yourself to be trolling, you, to all appearances, are not engaging in good faith making it pointless (or worse) to engage with you.

Monkeys typing wrote:

Interesting how the LetsRun right wing noise machine went largely quiet on this thread last week while this week it's running on steroids.

I can't wait to see all you liberal rats abandon LR on election night when the #Trumplandslide is well on the way. I expect all of you libs to stick around take your beating like a man when Dementia Joe loses and I better not hear any more sore loser excuses about collusion or cheating or Electoral College complaints.

KAG2020

facts and reason wrote:

Northeast Republican wrote:

Trump's divisiveness feeds the unrest.

https://deepclips.com/clip/3271/trump-signs-the-future-act-restoring-funding-for-black-colleges-providing-a-minimum-of-255-million-annually/r/c

Show me an example of his "divisiveness". Otherwise, you are a liar.

White Power video he shared recently.

I could go, but that an obvious recent example. Clear cut.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Gina wrote:

The 17 year old murderer knew nothing about that person prior to his death.

Why would you start a gofundme for a dead person? You’re stupidity knows no limits.

You never heard of funerals, idiot.

That would be for his family not him.

You messed up again Biff, you’re stupidity is always on display ??

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Jeff Wigand wrote:

But she’s a radical liberal. Somehow.

"Americans for Democratic Action, a liberal advocacy group that compiles ratings based on major votes, gave her perfect scores in 2017 and 2018."

https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article244908657.html

All radical liberal ideas:

She wants to ban the Electoral College

She wants free healthcare for illegal aliens

She wants the Green New Deal

She wants federal funding for sanctuary cities

She wants a mandatory buyback of all assault weapons (extremist gun control)

Those are all great ideas!!!

I especially like her radical Christian ideas like showing hospitality to illegal aliens.

“When a stranger resides with you in your land, you shall not wrong him. The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens; you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt” (Lev. 19:33-34)

"Love your neighbor as you would love yourself." (Mark 12:31)

Sally Vix wrote:

1101 wrote:

You're on step 7 here.

Good job!

That list is pretty accurate and funny IF I was a troll. I am not and it boils my blood thinking you guys are fine and dandy with infanticide. I can sleep at night but not sure how you can.

I agree with you that you are not a troll. You are just outrageously stupid (I mean, stupid AF) and a really bad person on top of that.

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

That list is pretty accurate and funny IF I was a troll. I am not and it boils my blood thinking you guys are fine and dandy with infanticide. I can sleep at night but not sure how you can.

I agree with you that you are not a troll. You are just outrageously stupid (I mean, stupid AF) and a really bad person on top of that.

So Flagpole - as a Christian would you provide aid to that baby or do your radical liberal dogma Trump your human decency leanings?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

You again ignore the context and get it wrong.

Pelosi says clearly that the campaign does not see things the way she does. She says, "Now, I know that the Biden campaign thinks in a different way about this."

So do you agree with Pelosi that Dementia Joe should skip out of the debates?

No. I don't think it really matters one way or the other.

But also note that Biden has already agreed to the debates. As far as I can tell, Trump has not.

Would you live in a roach-infested house of a million roaches for one year for a $1 million dollars?

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I agree with you that you are not a troll. You are just outrageously stupid (I mean, stupid AF) and a really bad person on top of that.

So Flagpole - as a Christian would you provide aid to that baby or do your radical liberal dogma Trump your human decency leanings?

As has been pointed out to you, it is fruitless to engage with you (even though you are not a troll, just stupid AF), so I will just TELL you what you are when I feel like it, but I have no interest in answering any of your stupid questions.

aunt judy wrote:

Would you live in a roach-infested house of a million roaches for one year for a $1 million dollars?

Nope. Why would I do that? If you want to have enough money that a million dollars is nothing, just live below your means and invest a ton for 30+ years. I have done that. No need to go do something unpleasant for a year for a measly one million dollars.

I love when Rigged shares articles and videos that completely undermine what he’s trying to portray.

Thankfully it happens a lot.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I agree with you that you are not a troll. You are just outrageously stupid (I mean, stupid AF) and a really bad person on top of that.

So Flagpole - as a Christian would you provide aid to that baby or do your radical liberal dogma Trump your human decency leanings?

Is it gratifying trolling Flagpole, or does the ease and predictability of it all make it somehow less than satisfying?

What I mean is that we've all seen this script a dozen times before and could pretty much cut and paste the next two pages of the exchange. Is it really worth it?

One vote, one person. Actual democracy.

Paid for by the taxes those aliens are paying. Would you rather they go to the emergency room at greater costs or receive preventative health care that would save money?

So do I. Fossil fuels won't be around forever. Their use is raising the temperature of the planet to untenable levels. I'm all for investing in an infrastructure that's stainable beyond the limited lifespan of the internal combustion engine.

The government shouldn't be expending valuable resources in extricating non-violent persons who are productive members of society, particularly those who arrived to the United States through no choice of their own.

She should know from her experience as a successful prosecutor. The single biggest factor separating the United States from all other western countries in its excessive gun deaths every year is the availability of guns. More guns available means more gun deaths.

I'm still waiting to hear of an extreme position of hers.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

That's because those federal troops don't know what they are doing.

The federal troops in Portland showed up in unmarked uniforms and unmarked vans. They kidnapped people off the streets with no probable cause and no due process.

That led to even more fear and retaliation.

These untrained federal troops just make things worse.

When people are out in the streets violating curfew, that IS probable cause. Try again.

Wrong as always. There was no curfew in Portland. Look it up.

U.S. Attorney Billy J. Williams, the DOJ’s chief law enforcement official in the state, released a statement in which he called for an inspector general investigation into DHS agents’ practices in Portland “based on news accounts circulating that allege federal law enforcement detained two protestors without probable cause.”

Furthermore, no arrest documents were ever provided by the anonymous federal troops. With no explanation of the arrest, then by definition, there was no probable cause. This was kidnapping.

Try again.

Let’s Run, where Biff comes to get owned on a daily basis ?