Trumper Question: Since you guys have now been told by Donny to pretend to feel really bad about the lives lost in Ukraine, are you EXTRA pissed that he lied to you and told you that he could easily end it on the first day with a single phone call?
-
52
-
Nnonequals wrote:
Trumper Question: Since you guys have now been told by Donny to pretend to feel really bad about the lives lost in Ukraine, are you EXTRA pissed that he lied to you and told you that he could easily end it on the first day with a single phone call?
Also, another question for you: How many Ukranian civilians do you suppose that Vlad is PURPOSELY going to kill with drones in apartment complexes very far from the front lines between now and the end of the war?
51 -
Nnonequals wrote:
How? wrote:
The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, where Russia agreed to "Respect the signatory's (i.e., Ukraine's) independence and sovereignty in the existing borders".
If you don't know these basic facts you should go back to playing with your crayons, because you have no business commenting on geopolitics.
Don't be so hard on him. The mouth-breather bro podcasts and Gary memes have NEVER, EVER mentioned that !!!
Boy, you dems sure are harsh over simple matters you think are complex and intellectual. Typical name calling as well. I know nonequals is a troll, but maybe I can enlighten his ambition to read more.
Yeltsin made the agreement in 1994, not Putin.
The Budapest Memorandum is a political agreement rather than a legally binding treaty. It lacks mechanisms for enforcement or penalties for violations. It does not provide guarantees of military intervention or specific measures to ensure Ukraine's security in case of aggression.
Lastly, plenty of dems have commented on the outdated agreement and many agree the times have changed so much since its inception, it is hard to justify its continuation or validation due to the lack of an enforcement mechanism.
If Russia violated the agreement back in 2014, why was Biden only interested in making large, formal moves moments before the end of his tenure? POLITICS. And you Dems took a huge bite out of it.
Even Clinton, the one who made the agreement (prior to impeachment and adultery) showed regrets in the ineffectiveness of how the agreement was written in 2023, acknowledging that subsequent events, particularly Russia's aggression, have undermined the security assurances provided by the agreement.
I hope you dems will stop referencing this goofy, outdated agreement made over 30 years ago. We didn't even have internet back then!!!
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.13 -
gnarlysheen wrote:
Nnonequals wrote:
Don't be so hard on him. The mouth-breather bro podcasts and Gary memes have NEVER, EVER mentioned that !!!
Boy, you dems sure are harsh over simple matters you think are complex and intellectual. Typical name calling as well. I know nonequals is a troll, but maybe I can enlighten his ambition to read more.
Yeltsin made the agreement in 1994, not Putin.
The Budapest Memorandum is a political agreement rather than a legally binding treaty. It lacks mechanisms for enforcement or penalties for violations. It does not provide guarantees of military intervention or specific measures to ensure Ukraine's security in case of aggression.
Lastly, plenty of dems have commented on the outdated agreement and many agree the times have changed so much since its inception, it is hard to justify its continuation or validation due to the lack of an enforcement mechanism.
If Russia violated the agreement back in 2014, why was Biden only interested in making large, formal moves moments before the end of his tenure? POLITICS. And you Dems took a huge bite out of it.
Even Clinton, the one who made the agreement (prior to impeachment and adultery) showed regrets in the ineffectiveness of how the agreement was written in 2023, acknowledging that subsequent events, particularly Russia's aggression, have undermined the security assurances provided by the agreement.
I hope you dems will stop referencing this goofy, outdated agreement made over 30 years ago. We didn't even have internet back then!!!
I'm obviously not going to bother to read what you wrote above. But not because I don't care, but just because it's not necessary. I saw how North Korea voted in the UN yesterday, and as long as we're on their side regarding Ukraine, I'm good. One shouldn't ever apologize for taking an easy, but effective, route.
But thanks for the effort, nonetheless.
21 -
AHHHHH!!! The Dems are controlled by oligarchs!!!! 😂
43 -
Whelp, here we go.
Consumer confidence is crashing. The DJIA is down again, erasing gains made in the past months.
Inflation is up. Unemployment will be up as more Fed workers are terminated. Egg prices reach record highs. There is no sign of prices lowering, or even any work to lower prices.
DOGE terminates crucial employees because the 20-something Tech Bros don't even understand what some employees do. Then they backtrack.
Executive orders that ostensibly violate the Constitution are being challenged in many courts, good business if you are a lawyer...
Congressional town halls are full of angry people who don't believe they voted for the incompetence that is on full display.
Trump has allied us with Russia, North Korea, Belarus, and other despots.
That's a small slice of the first month of Trump 2.0.
63 -
Nnonequals wrote:
gnarlysheen wrote:
Boy, you dems sure are harsh over simple matters you think are complex and intellectual. Typical name calling as well. I know nonequals is a troll, but maybe I can enlighten his ambition to read more.
Yeltsin made the agreement in 1994, not Putin.
The Budapest Memorandum is a political agreement rather than a legally binding treaty. It lacks mechanisms for enforcement or penalties for violations. It does not provide guarantees of military intervention or specific measures to ensure Ukraine's security in case of aggression.
Lastly, plenty of dems have commented on the outdated agreement and many agree the times have changed so much since its inception, it is hard to justify its continuation or validation due to the lack of an enforcement mechanism.
If Russia violated the agreement back in 2014, why was Biden only interested in making large, formal moves moments before the end of his tenure? POLITICS. And you Dems took a huge bite out of it.
Even Clinton, the one who made the agreement (prior to impeachment and adultery) showed regrets in the ineffectiveness of how the agreement was written in 2023, acknowledging that subsequent events, particularly Russia's aggression, have undermined the security assurances provided by the agreement.
I hope you dems will stop referencing this goofy, outdated agreement made over 30 years ago. We didn't even have internet back then!!!
I'm obviously not going to bother to read what you wrote above. But not because I don't care, but just because it's not necessary. I saw how North Korea voted in the UN yesterday, and as long as we're on their side regarding Ukraine, I'm good. One shouldn't ever apologize for taking an easy, but effective, route.
But thanks for the effort, nonetheless.
Wow, dude. You aren't even going to read it? But you took time to respond anyway? SMH.
23 -
Nnonequals wrote:
gnarlysheen wrote:
Boy, you dems sure are harsh over simple matters you think are complex and intellectual. Typical name calling as well. I know nonequals is a troll, but maybe I can enlighten his ambition to read more.
Yeltsin made the agreement in 1994, not Putin.
The Budapest Memorandum is a political agreement rather than a legally binding treaty. It lacks mechanisms for enforcement or penalties for violations. It does not provide guarantees of military intervention or specific measures to ensure Ukraine's security in case of aggression.
Lastly, plenty of dems have commented on the outdated agreement and many agree the times have changed so much since its inception, it is hard to justify its continuation or validation due to the lack of an enforcement mechanism.
If Russia violated the agreement back in 2014, why was Biden only interested in making large, formal moves moments before the end of his tenure? POLITICS. And you Dems took a huge bite out of it.
Even Clinton, the one who made the agreement (prior to impeachment and adultery) showed regrets in the ineffectiveness of how the agreement was written in 2023, acknowledging that subsequent events, particularly Russia's aggression, have undermined the security assurances provided by the agreement.
I hope you dems will stop referencing this goofy, outdated agreement made over 30 years ago. We didn't even have internet back then!!!
I'm obviously not going to bother to read what you wrote above. But not because I don't care, but just because it's not necessary. I saw how North Korea voted in the UN yesterday, and as long as we're on their side regarding Ukraine, I'm good. One shouldn't ever apologize for taking an easy, but effective, route.
But thanks for the effort, nonetheless.
Oh, and since N. Korea now has skin in the game, I hope that Trump and his sycophant "negotiators" give Zelensky's seat to The Shorter Fat One. He's earned it.
01 -
JohnSu2 wrote:
AHHHHH!!! The Dems are controlled by oligarchs!!!! 😂
Is that George Soros? Boy, I can name a ton of great American companies he strip mined.
32 -
Nnonequals wrote:
hunter wheres the blow wrote:
I kind of respect JD Vance. Lower middle class upbringing. Did what he had to do to get ahead. Beefs with the Pope on twitter. I get the sense that he doesn’t really believe the majority of what he’s saying. He’s just really smart and knows how to work for the right people.
Regarding the highlighted above....wow.
I get the impression that you might be a reasonably principled person. But wow, your tolerance of MASSIVELY unprincipled people (and including one who is one heartbeat away from being the most powerful person on earth) is REALLY.....uh, unprincipled ?
If you tolerate the Democrats, you’re guilty of the same thing. I prefer the Democrat version to the Republican version but they’re all the basically the same.
02 -
Nnonequals wrote:
Trumper Question: Since you guys have now been told by Donny to pretend to feel really bad about the lives lost in Ukraine, are you EXTRA pissed that he lied to you and told you that he could easily end it on the first day with a single phone call?
Newsflash, most (if not all of us), have consistently lamented on your efforts to kill Ukrainian and Russian kids. long before Trump pounded the table. soon you will get it, but gonna take you more time. MAGA running the show. Trump brilliantly understands this concept. if you were ever to take a deep breath while hyperventilating over Trump, you would realize that he’s not giving an inch on the Sevond Amendment either. It’s why he is smart and you and your people are not.
We the People…
34 -
gnarlysheen wrote:
Nnonequals wrote:
I'm obviously not going to bother to read what you wrote above. But not because I don't care, but just because it's not necessary. I saw how North Korea voted in the UN yesterday, and as long as we're on their side regarding Ukraine, I'm good. One shouldn't ever apologize for taking an easy, but effective, route.
But thanks for the effort, nonetheless.
Wow, dude. You aren't even going to read it? But you took time to respond anyway? SMH.
Why would I read something from you?
21 -
hunter wheres the blow wrote:
Nnonequals wrote:
Regarding the highlighted above....wow.
I get the impression that you might be a reasonably principled person. But wow, your tolerance of MASSIVELY unprincipled people (and including one who is one heartbeat away from being the most powerful person on earth) is REALLY.....uh, unprincipled ?
If you tolerate the Democrats, you’re guilty of the same thing. I prefer the Democrat version to the Republican version but they’re all the basically the same.
OK, I'm afraid that I gave you too much credit. There is NO equivalency between the behavior of R and D politicians in the Trump Era. Zilch.
And that is coming from a reasonably conservative middle-aged person who's default voting position was R prior to Trump.
31 -
Nnonequals wrote:
gnarlysheen wrote:
Wow, dude. You aren't even going to read it? But you took time to respond anyway? SMH.
Why would I read something from you?
Because I'm smarter than you.
25 -
Nnonequals wrote:
gnarlysheen wrote:
Wow, dude. You aren't even going to read it? But you took time to respond anyway? SMH.
Why would I read something from you?
You're such a fu%cking troll. You contribute nothing.
24 -
Nnonequals wrote:
Women for Trump ' wrote:
Hard to stay wet, there.
Daily reminder: "Nnonequals" is an uneducated troll.
He doesn't read the literature he responds to. What a joke.
31 -
Nnonequals wrote:
hunter wheres the blow wrote:
If you tolerate the Democrats, you’re guilty of the same thing. I prefer the Democrat version to the Republican version but they’re all the basically the same.
OK, I'm afraid that I gave you too much credit. There is NO equivalency between the behavior of R and D politicians in the Trump Era. Zilch.
And that is coming from a reasonably conservative middle-aged person who's default voting position was R prior to Trump.
More troll barf from you.
20 -
Does anyone know what Russian asset and Trump stooge Paul Manafort is doing these days? In the fall there were reports that Trump brought him back into the fold in an unnamed capacity.
I am going to make a prediction that we will be hearing more about him in short order as Trump sells Ukraine down the river. Ukraine betrayal to Russia is his field of expertise.
12 -
gnarlysheen wrote:
Nnonequals wrote:
Why would I read something from you?
Because I'm smarter than you.
You’re not even smarter than the turd I just dropped in the sh*tter. But, thanks for agreeing that Russia signed a memorandum saying “we’ll respect Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty” and then didn’t. You can try and spin that fact any way you want, but every time you do you just look dumber and more pathetic.
21 -
gnarlysheen wrote:
Nnonequals wrote:
Why would I read something from you?
You're such a fu%cking troll. You contribute nothing.
Looks like the toddler is throwing a tantrum because he got called out for being f*cking stupid.
21
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.