BREAKING - WADA TO INVESTIGATE ALL NOP ATHLETES

NOPe wrote:

casual obsever wrote:

No, for he is protected by the Lord because of Nike and Mo. No worries.

There is no need to protect Galen - LITERALLY NO ONE outside of this website knows, or cares, who he is. If he has broken the rules it will come to light.

Mo on the other hand is a British icon and generates significant sales/marketing $$. He will likely be protected.

I disagree...Rupp qualifies as too big to fail status. He's a household name in the U.S. and idolized by many over the years. Definitely Mo is too big to fail - not only marketing power but an athlete Knighted by the British Monarchy would never be banned - it's would be the biggest embarrassment in the history of the British Crown.

More embarrassing than Princess Di? Or losing America? Or Seb Coe?

Come on.

NOPe wrote:

casual obsever wrote:

No, for he is protected by the Lord because of Nike and Mo. No worries.

There is no need to protect Galen - LITERALLY NO ONE outside of this website knows, or cares, who he is. If he has broken the rules it will come to light.

Mo on the other hand is a British icon and generates significant sales/marketing $$. He will likely be protected.

Yes, I meant Galen and NOP are indirectly protected in order to keep Mo safe. Just recall how Cram and Off-Score-Paula, and to a smaller extent the Lord with his "very murky deal", already came out openly to defend Drug Cheat Salazar.

Too Big To Fail wrote:

NOPe wrote:

There is no need to protect Galen - LITERALLY NO ONE outside of this website knows, or cares, who he is. If he has broken the rules it will come to light.

Mo on the other hand is a British icon and generates significant sales/marketing $$. He will likely be protected.

I disagree...Rupp qualifies as too big to fail status. He's a household name in the U.S. and idolized by many over the years. Definitely Mo is too big to fail - not only marketing power but an athlete Knighted by the British Monarchy would never be banned - it's would be the biggest embarrassment in the history of the British Crown.

This thread is a collection of the biggest morans on this website. Glad I could join the partay!

The End.

Dril wrote:

Too Big To Fail wrote:

I disagree...Rupp qualifies as too big to fail status. He's a household name in the U.S. and idolized by many over the years. Definitely Mo is too big to fail - not only marketing power but an athlete Knighted by the British Monarchy would never be banned - it's would be the biggest embarrassment in the history of the British Crown.

This thread is a collection of the biggest morans on this website. Glad I could join the partay!

Yeah...coming from a Nike paid troll of course you're going to say that. ?

Baltsu wrote:

practical questions wrote:

Hello,

I have a practical question, which is, "What resources, expertise, and ability to thoroughly investigate athletes does WADA have that surpasses what USADA has?

WADA can re-test the samples. Those samples are good for 8 years and they have done that kind of tests for example regarding the medalists in Peking 2008. So WADA can re-test all the samples of the NOP athletes that are still available.

Is that something that USADA couldn't request? Does WADA have physical control over these samples?

For some reason I thought the IOC had jurisdiction, but I admit I get confused about these issues sometimes.

I get who you are wrote:

Dril wrote:

This thread is a collection of the biggest morans on this website. Glad I could join the partay!

Yeah...coming from a Nike paid troll of course you're going to say that. ?

I wish Nike paid me. I wouldn’t be living in my moms basement.

rekrunner wrote:

It seems like I've already answered this question in at least two other threads.

I'm not aware of any IAAF "most likely to dope" list, and the "most at risk of doping" list does not factor at all into any of my thinking.

My views on the likelihood of any NOP athlete doping are based on the complete totality of all publicly known information, culminating in the recent addition of the findings of the AAA Panel report, except the IAAF "most at risk of doping" list.

Please go away. We don't need more threads rekrunnered on here and you have nothing to add to the conversation. Your every thought is already overwhelmingly documented on this site.

Zurich. wrote:

Supposedly, there is a test for an ingredient (?) only seen in blood that has been transferred from a bag. So there is a way. Apologise for my English.

I don't think so. There was an announcement that they could test for plasticizers, but it was kind of a false alarm. Turns out we all have a lot of plastic in our blood and here is nothing special about the kinds of plastics that are in blood bags. So there is no way to filter out that specific use.

Dril wrote:

I get who you are wrote:

Yeah...coming from a Nike paid troll of course you're going to say that. ?

I wish Nike paid me. I wouldn’t be living in my moms basement.

Are you rooming with rekrunner? ?

LLEL wrote:

More embarrassing than Princess Di? Or losing America? Or Seb Coe?

Come on.

It could be very embarrassing: Sir Farah received the 3rd highest Order of Knighthood: Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE). That's a huge honor within the Order of Knighthood. Sir Coe was Knighted one step higher with the Knight/Dame Commander (KBE/DBE). Bradley Wiggins was also Knighted as a CBE while both Paul McCartney & Ringo Starr were knighted with lowest order; MBE. So, Sir Farah has one of highest honors in the Order of the British Empire. And doesn't he run around with his "Sir Mo" bib when he's racing?

practical questions wrote:

Please go away. We don't need more threads rekrunnered on here and you have nothing to add to the conversation. Your every thought is already overwhelmingly documented on this site.

Both of his thoughts, yes indeed, namely: "these runners are clean" and "doping doesn't work".

practical questions wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

It seems like I've already answered this question in at least two other threads.

I'm not aware of any IAAF "most likely to dope" list, and the "most at risk of doping" list does not factor at all into any of my thinking.

My views on the likelihood of any NOP athlete doping are based on the complete totality of all publicly known information, culminating in the recent addition of the findings of the AAA Panel report, except the IAAF "most at risk of doping" list.

Please go away. We don't need more threads rekrunnered on here and you have nothing to add to the conversation. Your every thought is already overwhelmingly documented on this site.

+1

Please stay out. Add coevett and that banned I got poster. They totally ruin threads. They spout the same information and insults over and over.

I could be persuaded to stop responding, but this depends completely on the good behavior of others. As you can go back and see, through absolutely no provocation on my part, Armstronglivs insulted me. Since your post, two others have directly insulted me.

practical questions wrote:

Please go away. We don't need more threads rekrunnered on here and you have nothing to add to the conversation. Your every thought is already overwhelmingly documented on this site.

Mark my words, "No NOP athlete will come up dirty".

NOP did it own testing which was more comprehensive than USADA. I don't understand WADA's purpose behind this, it will actual weaken their battle against Alberto when NOP athletes come up clean.

Too Big To Fail wrote:

NOPe wrote:

There is no need to protect Galen - LITERALLY NO ONE outside of this website knows, or cares, who he is. If he has broken the rules it will come to light.

Mo on the other hand is a British icon and generates significant sales/marketing $$. He will likely be protected.

I disagree...Rupp qualifies as too big to fail status. He's a household name in the U.S. and idolized by many over the years. Definitely Mo is too big to fail - not only marketing power but an athlete Knighted by the British Monarchy would never be banned - it's would be the biggest embarrassment in the history of the British Crown.

Galen is a household name for who? NO ONE outside of this website. Do you realize the WNBA has higher ratings than Athletics? Let that sink in.....

Also, I live in Portland - obviously Galen's hometown and place of residence. About .0000000000000001% of the city population knows who he is, and that's being generous.

The FBI needs to be involved at this point. Nike, Alberto and the NOP have passed every test because they did all the preliminary testing on the campus.

But if this is a federal investigation then they can get access to Nike’s blood testing. And it would help insure athletes will not lie because of fear of jail time.

Rowbury, Mo, Engles etc etc can all say what they want on social media, but they would tell a different story if their lie was perjury.

not really wrote:

Hateraid wrote:

I feel like they were probably already investigated during the Salazar investigation.

Not really.

USADA has a history of being soft on our athletes; they just wanted a scalp to pretend to be against doping.

No one wants to catch Mo or Galen, mark my words. We are watching another cover-up in the making.

But wouldn't they have to investigate the athletes to figure out how dirty Salazar is/was?