Yet another alias? Kiprop has run 46 in a 4x400 and 48 on a dirt track at altitude. Your ignorance is evident.
Yet another alias? Kiprop has run 46 in a 4x400 and 48 on a dirt track at altitude. Your ignorance is evident.
coach d wrote:
He did NOT run 10.40 as a Mid D guy, and not as a 400h guy either. He ran it in high school in the Texas Relays as a sprinter. And he's not the only UCLA guy (Brian Theriot) to move up from sprints to 800 because he wasn't fast enough to make the traveling squad as a sprinter.
The flaw in your logic is that you think moving up in distance in order to have more success means you weren't successful at shorter distances. By this logic, if the #2 sprinter in the world wasn't content with being #2 and as a result trained for the 400 and became #1 at that distance, he would be "too slow for the 100/200".
Y Kawauchi wrote:
Yet another alias? Kiprop has run 46 in a 4x400 and 48 on a dirt track at altitude. Your ignorance is evident.
You are actually an idiot.
Y Kawauchi wrote:
Yet another alias? Kiprop has run 46 in a 4x400 and 48 on a dirt track at altitude. Your ignorance is evident.
Legs are always faster in 2008 Rooney ran a 43.73 leg yet his PB his 44.45 and his SB in 2008 was 44.6
Do you have a link for Kiprop's relay split?
Also was the timing legit for that 400m drit track race (You seemed to have such reservations over Farah's 100m race)? Looked like the race was started by some guy banging two pieces of wood together, also I'm not sure if that track is IAAF regulated, who is to say it is actually 400m long.
This guy is just making things up. He doesn't even have a link to the 48. Not to mention altitude helps the 400m. This guy is clueless.
Y Kawauchi wrote:
Yet another alias? Kiprop has run 46 in a 4x400 and 48 on a dirt track at altitude. Your ignorance is evident.
Nonsense.
Kiprop has never split a 46 relay leg. Provide a source or link.
The 48 was on a training track. No certificate for actual length, no FAT.
If he is talking about this race:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LvwP8oCmq6I
I cannot find an official time and the meet itself is very er ghetto. If you time it yourself he ran 48 high. Also altitude so quicker than at sea level. A strong performance but clearly not an 11 flat 100m indicator.
This thread has been exhausted now anyway.