said88 wrote:
It's the site
http://www.thegreatdistancerunners.deIt's my own site and the ranking is just my own list which I have done a few years back (but with a lot of thinking about it). Unfortunately the site isn't updated a lot over the last years. Maybe I find the time for this in near future.
do you make people pay for the career records of those athletes who you can't click on?
Deanouk wrote:A great contribution to the actual real performances of athletes.
stoopid comment
do you expect him to list times which athletes didn't run ???
ventolin^3 wrote:
Deanouk wrote:A great contribution to the actual real performances of athletes.stoopid comment
do you expect him to list times which athletes didn't run ???
Why not, you put more credence in those times then what they actually ran.
GoldenMiles wrote:I assume you guys think 3:26.00 is superior to 12:39?
it's not even close
tables i use have
3'26.00 = 12'34.25
never ever make cardinal mistake of assumming all wrs are =...
ventolin^3 wrote:
Deanouk wrote:A great contribution to the actual real performances of athletes.stoopid comment
do you expect him to list times which athletes didn't run ???
No, we leave YOU to do that!
a concept which is lot more useful than believing hicham's
1'47pb was an accurate indication of his 800 ability on 3'26.00 day
So based on your own definition mentioned above, you admit you are "stooped"? ;)
ventolin^3 wrote:
ISBN wrote:I have no idea if Aouita doped, but if he did, then it is even more likely that EL G and his era were also doping toomore nonsense
if aouita was doping, then it's more likely guys of his era, coe/ovett/cram were doping NOT a guy running in the following decade
No stooped, its more likely that a runner from the same country with the same poor record of doping offences was also doping.
OOS testing only carried out from 89 by IAAF, so Aouita would have been tested sparingly from then on. When did Moroccan Athletics Federation start randomly testing their athletes? Have they ever tested their athletes training abroad?
UK athletes were being tested randomly and out of season from early 80's.
Deanouk wrote:So based on your own definition mentioned above, you admit you are "stooped"? ;)
how stoopid do you have to be to conclude that ?
ventolin^3 wrote:
Deanouk wrote:A great contribution to the actual real performances of athletes.stoopid comment
do you expect him to list times which athletes didn't run ???
The subtleties and nuances of the English language are lost on you aren't they! Lol.
You said it was "stoopid" to suggest that someone collate lists of times athletes never actually run. Well that's exactly what YOU DO, stoopid.
The irony of your comment has gone completely over your head, which shouldn't come as much of a surprise tbh.
Deanouk wrote:No stooped, its more likely that a runner from the same country with the same poor record of doping offences was also doping
utter drivel
what poor doping record for morocco in '80s are you talking about idiot ???
OOS testing only carried out from 89 by IAAF, so Aouita would have been tested sparingly from then on
same then as ovett/coe/cram
oh wait...
they virtually all quit by '90...
When did Moroccan Athletics Federation start randomly testing their athletes?
whenever iaaf requirements came in
same OOC as US/cccp/ddr/fdr/western europe/asia/antartica...
Have they ever tested their athletes training abroad?
it's time to put this drivel to death
"proper" OOC requires large number of unannounced tests in 12+ hour window/day, any day of the week, anywhere in the world for months
it doesn't mean a pathetic 1 test at a well known training camp known long in advance & that is end of effort
UK athletes were being tested randomly and out of season from early 80's
utterly pathetic
don't ever dare to compare the 1-off, well known beforehand OOC tests those brits maya had, to the huge number of unannounced tests guys had increasingly from '89 when conveniently all top brits had essentially quit
Deanouk wrote:The subtleties and nuances of the English language are lost on you aren't they! Lol
eh ?
all you have posted is drivel
You said it was "stoopid" to suggest that someone collate lists of times athletes never actually run
yes
only an idiot woud put that on a stats list
only an idiot woud ask why they didn't ?!
Well that's exactly what YOU DO, stoopid
moron
where ?
The irony of your comment has gone completely over your head, which shouldn't come as much of a surprise tbh.
more nonsense