Pete Carroll is apparently a 9/11 truther

Larry Silverstein wrote:

I didn't say that. But, since you're so sure of your stance, provide one video that shows an airplane hitting the Pent.

Seriously, with all of the cameras around the Pentagon (80+), including the surrounding businesses, gas stations etc., you should be able to give us one video that clearly shows an airplane striking the building.

Video, please...

Well I've already posted pictures of the debris that the plane left, but ok. If you freeze frame the official video you can see the plane. At 25 seconds you can see it in the official video:

If it wasn't a plane, then I guess all of those people were just made up, right?

abandon hope wrote:

i have been posting evidence all day - acknowledge it.

and how exactly are you NOT a troofer?

In 2014, saying "I don't know...I'm just asking questions" about the fundamental truth of what happened that day is exactly the same as trooferism.

exactly the same.

you are a troofer. deal with it.

You trolled well in the beginning but you seem to have run out of gas.

5/10 for having me reply to you several times.

fzdbhfdb wrote:

So you actually believe a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon?

I saw the plane hit the Pentagon. That morning I had just left the Navy Annex for a meeting at the Pentagon. The shuttle bus was late and it was a nice morning, so I decided to walk it down the hill. It's about a 15-20 minute brisk walk. As I came out from under the Rte 27 ovepass I heard the plane coming. It was off to my left. I instantly thought " what kind of crazy approach is he making to Reagan?" And then a few seconds later I realized it was way too low and was going to crash. I thought the pilot must have had a heart attack or something because I hadn't yet heard what happened in NY.

It was. 757.

1/10 this time.. I would have given you 3/10 but your poor attempt at sophisticated grammar killed it

A Truthful guy wrote:

A successful guy wrote:

0.5/10 ~ this doesn't even merit further comment but I must say you are an awful troller... maybe I shouldn't say awful, I see people falling for poor quality trolling all the time.[

So, in other words you acknowledge that you are a liar and you up the ante by adding in coward as well.

Your words were shown to be lies. Unless of course you care to demonstrate how being in Manhattan that day somehow conveys upon you inside knowledge of how events were planned and carried out. This I would love to hear.

Oh, and one missing bolt would be enough for conspiracy theorists? Sorry, but that does not even pass the laugh test.

Your posts are so stupid that they do not even rise to the level of being wrong.

A successful guy wrote:

1/10 this time.. I would have given you 3/10 but your poor attempt at sophisticated grammar killed it

-4/10 for having submitted the reply without writing and needing a second attempt.

1/10 for not paying attention - the initial reply had writing but I knew you'd be too stupid to see it so had to repost

fzdbhfdb wrote:

A successful guy wrote:

1/10 this time.. I would have given you 3/10 but your poor attempt at sophisticated grammar killed it

-4/10 for having submitted the reply without writing and needing a second attempt.

The reason everyone keeps it a "secret" is because it is in PLAIN SITE! I studied the JFK murder for over 30 years! I read many many books and studied a ton of theories and suspects but NONE of them made sense! Then just recently I watched a high resolution video of the JFK shooting and it is OBVIOUS (check it out) that Jackie SHOOTS HIM IN THE HEAD! She climbs onto the trunk to get the EMPTY SHELL! Plain as day! The thing is people only see what they want too! That is how they get away with these things.

A successful guy wrote:

1/10 for not paying attention - the initial reply had writing but I knew you'd be too stupid to see it so had to repost

I am not even paying attention to your drivel anymore...

Both you and successful guy are morons

fzdbhfdb wrote:

A successful guy wrote:

1/10 for not paying attention - the initial reply had writing but I knew you'd be too stupid to see it so had to repost

I am not even paying attention to your drivel anymore...

Just came to say hello wrote:

Both you and successful guy are morons

Thank you for your input.

O'Donnell wrote:

If that number is more than ahalf dozen, it's a safe bet the purported conspiracy never happened.

What if it did only take 6-8 manipulative, psychopathic, able-bodied geniuses? Highly intelligent people can get less intelligent people to do all sorts of things and as long as the pieces are kept far enough apart, no one is able to put it together.

Again, I don't buy the conspiracy theories but I have yet to hear a comprehensive answer to their questions... and with that said, as a balance, I can poke holes in some of the conspiracy theories I hear as well.

Regarding Building 7: has anyone considered the possibility that it might have been a business-sound real estate decision to bring the building down? What was the pay-out for a completely destroyed building versus a heavily damaged building? In the fog-of-war that was Sept.11, a crafty-enough real estate owner with the right resources in place, might have just said, "alright, get everyone out, we'll just bring it down and build a new one". This kind of thing happens in small-town America when a business isn't doing great, the owner burns down the building/factory and collects the insurance; it's called insurance-fraud but, if executed correctly, they can get away with it.

See - now that was an example of brilliant trolling. I post a stinger under another name and there you go falling for it like it's your first time on the boards. Clearly an amateur... next!

Just came to say hello wrote:

Both you and successful guy are morons

fzdbhfdb wrote:

I am not even paying attention to your drivel anymore...

so....the planes hit. The owner of bldg 7 says holy crap, this is a business opportunity. He goes to the hardware store and buys a couple thousand pounds of c4, puts it in a a backpack, runs into the burning building, sets the charges and whammo!

seriously - I have no idea what the scenario you are describing is. How does the bldg owner blow up the building during the attacks?

Exactly! No planes hit the building, the building lease-owner states multiple times that he and the fire chief decided to "pull it" and then "we watched the building collapse."

"Pull it" is a term that is used in demolition circles, despite whatever de-bunking websites may claim.

So, how is it that these line of events can all happen in such a coincidental fashion?

pearls before swine.

methane gas go boom!

I could have sworn I saw a big thing with wings fly in to the second tower with my own eyes.

abandon hope wrote:

[

so....the planes hit. The owner of bldg 7 says holy crap, this is a business opportunity. He goes to the hardware store and buys a couple thousand pounds of c4, puts it in a a backpack, runs into the burning building, sets the charges and whammo!

?

Now you are getting silly. All the Jewy real estate guys already have the C4 in place in case they get this opportunity. Duh.