proud liberal wrote:
I have spent TIME a lot of TIME helping a lot of people.
In the end, money is what gets things done. A check for a few thousand dollars does a HELL OF A LOT more for the homeless than your sorry ass ladling lentil soup.
Volunteers are not needed, they are actually in excess in most places. What is needed is money and resources.
C'mon Really wrote:
Hahahaha. Okay, now it is obvious that you are a troll. It was fun while it lasted.
I told you! It was obvious a long time ago.
Ahem wrote:
I told you! It was obvious a long time ago.
Okay, okay, sorry. I had not even read her posts prior to the one about "hating" rich people (It was her delueze, not me).
Clearwater Mile wrote:
In the end, money is what gets things done. A check for a few thousand dollars does a HELL OF A LOT more for the homeless than your sorry ass ladling lentil soup.
Volunteers are not needed, they are actually in excess in most places. What is needed is money and resources.
The point is that rich people can easily write checks. And they typically write them for amounts that are a drop in the bucket for them. And then they brag about how much they have given and fight Democrats for wanting the government to make sure that people do not go without basic needs.
I'd say take your stupid checks, keep them in the bank, save them to pay taxes, and stop fighting to make sure the government doesn't take your money to make sure needs are actually met. That would seem to be a win-win for everyone. Why give money to charity then bitch about taxes? Just save the charity money for taxes and we can all go on our merry way.
The bottom line is that Obama will win the next election by portraying Republicans in their true light, which is defenders are the extremely wealthy, and the Republicans are point blank absolutely stupid to be fighting health care after it has already passed. This one decision alone will be their undoing. And good riddance.
proud liberal wrote:
The point is that rich people can easily write checks. And they typically write them for amounts that are a drop in the bucket for them. And then they brag about how much they have given and fight Democrats for wanting the government to make sure that people do not go without basic needs.
I'd say take your stupid checks, keep them in the bank, save them to pay taxes, and stop fighting to make sure the government doesn't take your money to make sure needs are actually met. That would seem to be a win-win for everyone. Why give money to charity then bitch about taxes? Just save the charity money for taxes and we can all go on our merry way.
The bottom line is that Obama will win the next election by portraying Republicans in their true light, which is defenders are the extremely wealthy, and the Republicans are point blank absolutely stupid to be fighting health care after it has already passed. This one decision alone will be their undoing. And good riddance.
You stopped being funny a page or two ago, but in the event that you are a whacked out reality...
...you are implying that the government will dispense of the money better than a charity.
That in itself is f***ing laughable. You lose a turn.
The point is that rich people can easily write checks. And they typically write them for amounts that are a drop in the bucket for them. And then they brag about how much they have given and fight Democrats for wanting the government to make sure that people do not go without basic needs.
I'd say take your stupid checks, keep them in the bank, save them to pay taxes, and stop fighting to make sure the government doesn't take your money to make sure needs are actually met. That would seem to be a win-win for everyone. Why give money to charity then bitch about taxes? Just save the charity money for taxes and we can all go on our merry way.
The bottom line is that Obama will win the next election by portraying Republicans in their true light, which is defenders are the extremely wealthy, and the Republicans are point blank absolutely stupid to be fighting health care after it has already passed. This one decision alone will be their undoing. And good riddance.
Hate to knock you off your moral pedestal, but donating money and "helping" people doesn't make you a good person and doesn't give you the moral high ground. You brag about how charitable you are because you don't have any other virtues such as intelligence, honesty or success to show for, so you try to establish superiority over others in more malicious ways, such as by feigning humanitarianism. But all self-professed humanitarians are either fools or liars or, in your case, both. Nothing you wrote suggests even the slightest concern for anyone else. It's all about you, your need for approval, and above all else, your need to degrade others.
As for your tirades against the rich, and your notion that all rich people are bunch of greedy Republicans, one could only wish that half of the utter bullshit you spout were true. In reality, it's an unfortunate fact that most rich people today are Democrats, not Republicans. They've sadly bought into the guilt that degenerate parasites like you have thrust on them. But, being the utterly worthless hippie that you are, you are so stupid and malicious that each concession made by the rich only emboldens you to feign more victimhood at their hands, hurl more accusations at them and make more demands of them. Hopefully, the rich will start acting the way you accuse them of acting currently, and become greedy Republicans rather than generous Democrats, or simply withdraw altogether and leave people like you to die without the benefits of their work.
Fast Track Runner Man wrote:
You stopped being funny a page or two ago, but in the event that you are a whacked out reality...
...you are implying that the government will dispense of the money better than a charity.
That in itself is f***ing laughable. You lose a turn.
If you are a Republican, will you please stop pandering to retards like "proud liberal" by discussing charity as if the goal of life is to serve the poor? It isn't, and you're inadvertently giving your enemies the moral high ground by suggesting as much. It doesn't matter whether charities are better than government at dispensing money, because the goal of political life isn't the betterment of the poor.
the f***ing idiots wrote:
Hate to knock you off your moral pedestal, but donating money and "helping" people doesn't make you a good person and doesn't give you the moral high ground. You brag about how charitable you are because you don't have any other virtues such as intelligence, honesty or success to show for, so you try to establish superiority over others in more malicious ways, such as by feigning humanitarianism. But all self-professed humanitarians are either fools or liars or, in your case, both. Nothing you wrote suggests even the slightest concern for anyone else. It's all about you, your need for approval, and above all else, your need to degrade others.
As for your tirades against the rich, and your notion that all rich people are bunch of greedy Republicans, one could only wish that half of the utter bullshit you spout were true. In reality, it's an unfortunate fact that most rich people today are Democrats, not Republicans. They've sadly bought into the guilt that degenerate parasites like you have thrust on them. But, being the utterly worthless hippie that you are, you are so stupid and malicious that each concession made by the rich only emboldens you to feign more victimhood at their hands, hurl more accusations at them and make more demands of them. Hopefully, the rich will start acting the way you accuse them of acting currently, and become greedy Republicans rather than generous Democrats, or simply withdraw altogether and leave people like you to die without the benefits of their work.
You know nothing about my intelligence, honesty or success. Your baseless assumptions by themselves prove that you are a complete and hopeless idiot.
And I don't know whether "most" Democrats are rich or poor. I certainly am not poor and probably have a much more impressive career and education than yourself, if your ridiculous logic is any indication. My point is that I think the extremely rich have hoodwinked a large group of poor rednecks, gun-toters, regligious extremists, and other similarly situated less educated individuals, to believe that Republicans are on their side, and thus the Republican party--which primarily benefits the richest of the rich--continues to exist, despite their despicable policy decisions and fraudulent rhetoric.
I generally hate the extremely rich--at least in theory--with a few exceptions to include those unique and rare individuals who genuinely recognize that they have been blessed. Plain and simple. And if I ever fall into the category of the extremely-uber rich, I am certain that I will not turn my back on my childhood community and heritage. *And*, many (I would say most) other people with my kind of background feel the same way, whether they admit those feelings or not. As a matter of fact, this is probably the first time in my life (aside from discussions with my spouse) when I have openly stated my opinion on the subject of rich people and Republicans. I've never even once discussed this issue on an anonymous discussion board. Usually I am kind enough to listen to Republicans spew their bullshit while thinking privately that their opinions are ridiculous and they have no idea just spoiled and fortunate they really are.