chet wrote:
JimJamesrunner wrote:(This is for all "haters"/"trolls" on these boards.)
Deleuze, you're obviously one of the morons I was referring to. It must be humiliating for you to have attempted to correct me, and then found yourself so utterly exposed as an ignoramus.
Oh damn! I am an ignoramus! I bow down to your intellectual superiority.
(Damn you JimJames!!)
whoops. I really am an idiot.
Anyone who says it is impossible for him to get the world record is lying. How can you say it is impossible? That itself is statistically impossible.
I really, really would love to see him break it. Then I'll come back and dig up this old thread and rub it in all of these no-name loser's faces.
Like all those famous people that told Bannister he couldn't break 4 -- oh wait -- I don't think anyone remembers who they are.
47 wrote:
Anyone who says it is impossible for him to get the world record is lying. How can you say it is impossible? That itself is statistically impossible.
I really, really would love to see him break it. Then I'll come back and dig up this old thread and rub it in all of these no-name loser's faces.
Like all those famous people that told Bannister he couldn't break 4 -- oh wait -- I don't think anyone remembers who they are.
You are really stupid, and I don't mean maybe. You're so stupid that you would argue that it is not impossible for Solinsky to run a sub 10 minute 10,000m because to say it is impossible is "statistically impossible," whatever that means. You would "really really love to see him break it." Well, good for you, I imagine you'd really really love to get laid tonight, but here you are typing gibberish on Lets Run. I am not saying it is impossible. It simply won't happen. It is not impossible for you to say something intelligent, but I am not holding my breath...
I'm stupid huh? ;) Haha, if you knew who I was...
And I know what you'll probably ask -- and no I'm not telling you. That's the point of anonymity.
who are you 47? if you want to back up your argument, tell us who you are
and chet, you come across as more idiotic than him:
-you're stupid
-you're so ignorant blah blah blah
-well you're a moron!
[chet crys a little]
Drop the name calling already.
Let's get back to how Solinsky inspired all of us this year with an AR performance that Running USA ranked as the No. 1 moment in US distance running for 2010:
You just copied what was said by at least 3 other posters. Back to back 13:08's was already brought up. How about bowing to those before you or coming up with something original? 26:30's is a stretch, but it ain't no 26:17. Just where does Chris find those extra seconds? He doesn't. The Geb comparison is retarded. It took him four years and he's............GEB, not Solinsky. Apples to apples, not legends to dreamers.
U must be new here. A little advice. When u say something that makes sense, no one will pat u on the back or agree. Sagarin is the worst. Then your thoughts will be reguritated a page later. Welcome to LR. Only certain posters get the red carpet, the rest are on their own. Happy New Years Capt.
In Beijing KB closed in 53.4, Sihine 55, Kogo 55.5 in a 27min 10k. Hardly 3 guys closing in 52-53. Solinsky at least has a shot to medal.
Capt. repeat lives!!! wrote:
You just copied what was said by at least 3 other posters. Back to back 13:08's was already brought up. How about bowing to those before you or coming up with something original? 26:30's is a stretch, but it ain't no 26:17. Just where does Chris find those extra seconds? He doesn't. The Geb comparison is retarded. It took him four years and he's............GEB, not Solinsky. Apples to apples, not legends to dreamers.
First of all I never mentioned Geb. As for mentioning the back to back to back 13:08s, I'm not so much copying as mentioning the obvious any good student of track would mention. Its just a comment on the difficulty of the feat. I was merely stating my opinion. It happens to agree with others who posted before me. Where is the problem in that? As far as bowing to people who came before me? What are you even talking about man? Are you being a credit starved bitch? I will say again when he hits the 26:30s I'd talk about the WR chance. I think he can run 12:45 right now. I don't think anyone would be surprised if he did. I'm out.
007run wrote:I think he can run 12:45 right now. I don't think anyone would be surprised if he did. I'm out.
????
I'd be surprised. I'm not saying it's impossible, but I'd be very surprised. You realize that there are only three men, ever, in history, who have run 12:45. That's just about as unlikely as 26:30. It's certainly possible, but it's also not likely, and it'd certainly be surprising. A pleasant surprise, but a surprise nonetheless.
We're glad you're out. He ran 12:55 on his best day ever and suddenly YOU believe he can drop 10 seconds. He's not on drugs, you are. Almost 4 seconds faster per mile....you're brilliant, not! Please, stay out and don't come back.
Relax. He's just another 007 know-it-all on Letsrun. They are a dime a dozen. Sure, he thinks no one would be surprised if Chris Solinsky ran 12:45, really? I am a decent college runner and train hard, yet not one runner on our team believes he'll do that. Dropping 10 seconds at that pace is a BIG DEAL. I happen to think Chris is a nice guy, but I'd bet the farm that he isn't running 12:45 within the next 2 years. 007 is wrong, many people would be surprised because 007 has no clue as to what it would take. Back to your basement James Bond.
I will acknowledge that it is no easy task to suffer fools such as yourself, Thwomp...and occasionally I may appear rather insolent due to the exasperation triggered by the aforementioned.
As for 47, why would knowing who you are alter one iota the fact that you're not very bright? In case you don't recognize this, this is a rhetorical question.
From Chris Solinsky's Twitter:
The original poster got carried away with me playing along with a radio host getting carried away. I have a long (cont)
4:08 PM Dec 29th via ÜberTwitter
In Reply to those questioning me about WR goal in 10K this year, not a goal to set WR. Goals are to win medals!! I run to compete not 4 time
4:05 PM Dec 29th via ÜberTwitter
chet wrote:
From Chris Solinsky's Twitter:
The original poster got carried away with me playing along with a radio host getting carried away. I have a long (cont)
http://tl.gd/7q0grb4:08 PM Dec 29th via ÜberTwitter
In Reply to those questioning me about WR goal in 10K this year, not a goal to set WR. Goals are to win medals!! I run to compete not 4 time
4:05 PM Dec 29th via ÜberTwitter
You left out a crucial part, chet:
"I have a long way to go to get down to 26:17. The immediate goal is running for a world championship medal!!"
He's not ruling it out, just saying that the immediate goal is a medal.
I didn't leave it out...it was linked.
chet wrote:
I didn't leave it out...it was linked.
For some reason the part of the tweet that directly contradicts your assertions just happened not to show up in your post.
Ready to call Solinsky a moron and an idiot because he didn't rule out 26:17?