No, just made note that he had been arrested/charged with an offense, had a link to an article that gave limited info, then a couple run of the mill juvenile remarks that were about the offense in general. Most of the posts said to wait until the trial before judging. Some expressed concern for exposing the identity of the minor (age) victim, yet that victim was never ID-ed in the story or in the thread (as it should be).
Just curious why it was deleted. Threads on boob-jobs, hand jobs, calling a 16-yr old a c--t carry on, but this one concerning an actual news article was nixed. I guess it is easier to just delete/remove anything controversal instead of actually allowing dicussion of something real.
Any reply from the moderator?