gh wrote:
Trythy is a stupid, "thou art dumber than me" elitist ala coming onto a thread where probably about of half the posters say they thought the movie was funny and whose "slobberdness" is exposed by such an "educated, well informed" human being. Apparently you cannot achieve two ends for a mass market--create a popular comedy that meanwhile presents a respectable satire of the people who unquestionably support Bush ideology.
Dumb and Dumber poked fun at, generally speaking, the poor socioeconomic community and their "naivety". Yet since Jim Carrey and Arach-dude--cute, cuddly, noncontroversial extensions of generally prosperous white America--portray these characters, we ignore this simple fact. Funny--hell yes! But its social implications are hid beneath slapstick humor and "safe" actors.
Whereas on the other hand it is much easier for us to conceive of "Borat" in a questionable light, particularly the efficacy and of its political message. The character Borat and Cohen's acting in themselves would make this movie hysterically funny, in my opinion. He shits in a bag and brings it to a dinner table of elitist white southerners, asking them what he should do with it. Is that not similar to the Dumb and Dumber duo showing up to a charity dinner party in ridiculously unacceptable suits? You're right, the former is funnier. But its controversial aspects make you say it is stupid?
I guess I'm a slobbering idiot for appreciating the movie, especially as it is released to coincide with the midterm election (that's just smart marketing). This, one would think, would make moderates in America want to swing even moreso to the left. Did we know people like this existed? Yes. Do we know that Bush is an f'ing moron? Yes. But he seems to do a pretty good job of covering his tracks, now doesn't he?
There. Is this "the thread to end the thread"? So ridiculous how one person can be the decisive word simply based upon his elitist stance.