Jefe in the CO wrote:
I really like having internationals racing in the NCAA...to a point. I've often wondered why a State supported university, funded by taxpayers, allow for the recruitment of older, pro runners and still seem to get some satisfaction out of it when they dominate.
Last year there was this feel good story of LSU recruiting a 29 year old pro 1500 runner from Kenya and how it implied that he had to overcome his age in competing with 20 year olds. The current Iowa State roster is evidence that no one has a clue as to what's going on in cross country.
Cudos to Rojo, I busted out laughing at the concept of a high school draft. That would be epic. Draft positions/scholarships could be meted out by their finish at NCAA champs, after that Regions, Conference, XC majors like Nuttycomb/Pre Nats etc. Could you imagine being XC's version of Mr/Ms Irrelevant...and Chase Pack selected by the University of Phoenix!
Sports are not academics. What do universities get out of letting people who run a 4.3 40 and a 1000 sat play football? I mean track and XC aint football, but for some schools they see these decisions as fair game. The athletics program is not the university.