Musk is a citizen, so your dumb argument is invalid.
And Rubio isn’t able to revoke visas by himself dummy.
Rubio stated it and the executive believes it. So he has power to do what he wants. And even if woke, USAID-funded NGOs sue, he can do it until he’s stopped by the courts …or if it’s an egregious woke ruling then the DoJ may defy them.
Show me an example of someone who wasn't already a criminal that was sent to prison in El Salvador.
ICE itself has stated that many of the people that were deported to Salvador did not have any previous conviction. So they were not criminals. They just "believed" that they may pose a threat, which may be true or not, we will never know, because they were not allowed due process
Not the act you quoted. Try again. I'll give you one more chance to correct yourself and admit you were wrong, before publicly embarrassing you.
"Transcription of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 An Act Respecting Alien Enemies SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That whenever there shall be a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government, and the President of the United States shall make public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being males of the age of fourteen years and upwards, who shall be within the United States, and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured and removed, as alien enemies."
The only way you could embarrass me is if you could prove we were related.
Okay, great. Now that you managed to quote the relevant act instead of one that expired in 1800, you forgot to bold the important part:
Whenever there shall be a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government...
Only people in the cult of stupidity believe this to be the case. Since we're not in a declared war, or being invaded by a foreign nation or government, the rest of the act doesn't matter.
Learn how a simple if-then statement works. When the "if" statement isn't true, the "then" statement doesn't matter.
Show me an example of someone who wasn't already a criminal that was sent to prison in El Salvador.
ICE itself has stated that many of the people that were deported to Salvador did not have any previous conviction. So they were not criminals. They just "believed" that they may pose a threat, which may be true or not, we will never know, because they were not allowed due process
"Transcription of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 An Act Respecting Alien Enemies SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That whenever there shall be a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government, and the President of the United States shall make public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being males of the age of fourteen years and upwards, who shall be within the United States, and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured and removed, as alien enemies."
The only way you could embarrass me is if you could prove we were related.
Okay, great. Now that you managed to quote the relevant act instead of one that expired in 1800, you forgot to bold the important part:
Whenever there shall be a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government...
Only people in the cult of stupidity believe this to be the case. Since we're not in a declared war, or being invaded by a foreign nation or government, the rest of the act doesn't matter.
Learn how a simple if-then statement works. When the "if" statement isn't true, the "then" statement doesn't matter.
Biden's DHS confirmed that Maduro was releasing Tren de Aragua gang members from prison into the US.
I know you don't know where Venezuela is or who Maduro is... but the bolded part of the act applies to them.
You're still too stupid to understand what the word "OR" means...
Rubio stated it and the executive believes it. So he has power to do what he wants.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
How clueless can you be
Liberal judges have issued unconstitutional injunctions because of their politics. The time will come when Trump will defy them and they only have themselves to blame.
Show me an example of someone who wasn't already a criminal that was sent to prison in El Salvador.
ICE itself has stated that many of the people that were deported to Salvador did not have any previous conviction. So they were not criminals. They just "believed" that they may pose a threat, which may be true or not, we will never know, because they were not allowed due process
The constitution was written for American citizens.
It begins "We the People of the United States..."
Not "We the People of the world or any *sshole who can get inside the borders.."
As always you're 100% wrong and completely unaware of it.
How do you determine who is an American citizen? By the way they look? Their accent? Or might there be some due process that applies to everyone to establish whether they are an American citizen? In this way, the constitution applies to everyone, even if the consequences might be different dependant on citizenship.
(all this aside from the fact that the 'we the people...' part of the constitution and is just part of the preamble - but as a scholar of the constitution I'm sure you know that already).
Oh well if the NYT and nameless immigration lawyers who profit directly from illegal immigration say so it just must be true...
The article quotes a sworn declaration of ICE Acting Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations Robert Cerna: "While it is true that many of the members removed under the AEA do not have criminal records in the United States, that is because they have only been in the United States for a short period of time. The lack of a criminal record does not indicate they pose a limited threat,"
The declaration is in the motion filed by the Trump administration itself. I have to concede, though, that I have some difficulty trusting anything that comes out of this administration. So, yeah, it may not be true.
Trump should cite exclusion rules of the Immigration Act of 1891 and move to deport every Democrat in the country.
"All idiots, insane persons, paupers or persons likely to become a public charge, persons suffering from a loathsome or a dangerous contagious disease, persons who have been convicted of a felony or other infamous crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude..."
Oh well if the NYT and nameless immigration lawyers who profit directly from illegal immigration say so it just must be true...
The article quotes a sworn declaration of ICE Acting Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations Robert Cerna: "While it is true that many of the members removed under the AEA do not have criminal records in the United States, that is because they have only been in the United States for a short period of time. The lack of a criminal record does not indicate they pose a limited threat,"
The declaration is in the motion filed by the Trump administration itself. I have to concede, though, that I have some difficulty trusting anything that comes out of this administration. So, yeah, it may not be true.
A murderer who is released from a Venezuelan prison and shows up in America does not have a criminal record in the United States.
This may surprise you, but no, entering in the US illegally or overstaying you visa is not a criminal offense. It is a civil offense, like a parking ticket.
Okay, great. Now that you managed to quote the relevant act instead of one that expired in 1800, you forgot to bold the important part:
Whenever there shall be a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government...
Only people in the cult of stupidity believe this to be the case. Since we're not in a declared war, or being invaded by a foreign nation or government, the rest of the act doesn't matter.
Learn how a simple if-then statement works. When the "if" statement isn't true, the "then" statement doesn't matter.
Biden's DHS confirmed that Maduro was releasing Tren de Aragua gang members from prison into the US.
I know you don't know where Venezuela is or who Maduro is... but the bolded part of the act applies to them.
You're still too stupid to understand what the word "OR" means...
Can you link to a copy of that DHS report? Please highlight the part that demonstrates your claim. I can't find any such report.
So, are you a moron or a bigot or a moron and a bigot?
Show me an example of someone who wasn't already a criminal that was sent to prison in El Salvador.
ICE itself has stated that many of the people that were deported to Salvador did not have any previous conviction. So they were not criminals. They just "believed" that they may pose a threat, which may be true or not, we will never know, because they were not allowed due process
Trump should cite exclusion rules of the Immigration Act of 1891 and move to deport every Democrat in the country.
"All idiots, insane persons, paupers or persons likely to become a public charge, persons suffering from a loathsome or a dangerous contagious disease, persons who have been convicted of a felony or other infamous crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude..."
persons who have been convicted of a felony -- BYE BYE TRUMP!
Liberal judges have issued unconstitutional injunctions because of their politics. The time will come when Trump will defy them and they only have themselves to blame.
He isn’t a king, buddy.
Do yourself a favor and go talk to one of your school’s civics professors.
