Anything that begins "funny how . . . " never works.
Clinton was the last conservative president this country will ever see. That's why he's remembered as a great president. He was followed by America's first and (hopefully) only socialist president, then two duds and a felon criminal compulsive liar. So Clinton is always going to look good in his surroundings as well.
You know all this. Go have a beer and enjoy one of life's better qualities, and quit being so uptight, ffs.
The evidence suggests Clinton had sex with underage sex slaves on Epstein's island. All of Trump's dirt has been exposed and shoved down our throat by an establishment that fears change. Trump was an okay president and he'll be okay again. Clinton was the president at the absolute height of the US empire, he was okay, not great. Just lucky to be at the right place at the right time.
I'm not aware of any evidence suggesting Clinton had underage sex slaves on an island. Neither are you.
But I AM aware of evidence conclusively proving that Trump stole Top Secret classified documents, stored the classified documents in his house, lied to the government about possessing the classified documents, submitted a false affidavit saying he did not possess the classified documents, schemed with his lawyer about how to lie about possessing the classified documents, and ordered his employees to delete security video showing that he possessed the classified documents. YOU are aware of that conclusive evidence too.
Clinton was the last conservative president this country will EVER see. So, go drink a beer and toast your bad qualities like a normal man.
If an ounce of this is true it's crazy that he's the way he is without substance abuse. Crazy he can't even blame alcohol/drugs for all of his sexual assault allegations.
If an ounce of this is true it's crazy that he's the way he is without substance abuse. Crazy he can't even blame alcohol/drugs for all of his sexual assault allegations.
No...Those are phony accusations by money grubbing democrat Women trying to make an easy buck...
I agree the left didn’t see how messianic trump was because they underestimated him.
The left did not underestimate him; rather, they (yet again!) overestimated the intelligence of the electorate.
Trump knows how to connect viscerally with low-info [no-info / mis-info] voters. He acieved massive turnout from folks who have never voted before in their lives, and know nothing about how government works.
The way government works is corrupt. They are not true friends with the people. They backstab them and all relationships are transactions and business-like. Otherwise they would have terminated all harmful cellphone service worldwide and return to the Stone Age without regressing other technological advancement.
instead America has woken up to the scam of its own government even Elon Musk knows that which is why he backed Trump and bankrolled his campaign.
This post was edited 32 seconds after it was posted.
The topic is ambiguous. A bland statement of a "fact" that has no context or point of view. You might as well say "Trump wears red ties and blue suits." So what? He might also not hunt or fish. No relevance to anything, just what is called colloquially a factoid. Says nothing about his character or worth as a citizen or human being. If you have a case to make about the moral or professional value of a non-drinker or smoker, make it. Churchill enjoyed many a glass and cigar. Mark Twain made signatures snd material out of his personal pleasures. Lincoln ordered barrels of whiskey sent to his generals because Grant was an epic imbiber. Too many cases to cite. There is no special merit in tea-totaling or non-smoking outside the medical and gossip circles. Cheers!🍷
trump was convicted of 34 counts of falsifying business records, pending sentencing.
trump organization was convicted of financial/tax fraud and has a $354m penalty on it.
trump was held liable for defaming jean carroll and owes her $88.3m in damages. the defamation finding was that he lied by denying he sexually abused her.
you can do better with your parsed crap.
So Trump is easily the most persecuted politician in history, by the most corrupt political machine in U.S. history.
Yet rebounds for the greatest political comeback ever. Even Biden clearly voted for him. There is hope for the crumbling wreckage that is America and the Free West.
tell yourself that all you want. the man was getting sued by EEOC (for housing discrimination) and everyone else (for not paying contracts), and going bankrupt with his businesses, long before he got into politics. ever consider he's just someone with little concern for the law? that decided to keep acting that way under the harsh spotlight of the press as president, which is a good way to end up impeached, in jail, convicted, in trouble some more?
he was sent to military school as a kid when he was in prep school. his dad was on the board of a prep school. how disobedient a kid do you have to be to get kicked out of your dad's own prep school?
The topic is ambiguous. A bland statement of a "fact" that has no context or point of view. You might as well say "Trump wears red ties and blue suits." So what? He might also not hunt or fish. No relevance to anything, just what is called colloquially a factoid. Says nothing about his character or worth as a citizen or human being. If you have a case to make about the moral or professional value of a non-drinker or smoker, make it. Churchill enjoyed many a glass and cigar. Mark Twain made signatures snd material out of his personal pleasures. Lincoln ordered barrels of whiskey sent to his generals because Grant was an epic imbiber. Too many cases to cite. There is no special merit in tea-totaling or non-smoking outside the medical and gossip circles. Cheers!🍷
and you're ignoring that if the family dynamic was that dad wanted a sober but obnoxious son to take over the family business, and his first son wanted to fly and became a drunk, trump being a teetotaler is actually him buying into dad's aggression.
dad was such an obnoxious slumlord woody guthrie wrote a folk song about him.
i mean you're trying to make this into some sort of valueless stew, he drinks, he doesn't, so what. on planet morality he wanted to mimic his jerk slumlord dad who once got arrested at a KKK rally. and was trying deliberately to not be like his brother who got badgered for being a pilot and not taking up the family empire, and eventually found solace in drinking, to the point he ended up unable to fly, stuck in the empire, and drinking himself to death.
i don't know how one can one hand other hand that into oh well one choice is as good as the next.
The topic is ambiguous. A bland statement of a "fact" that has no context or point of view. You might as well say "Trump wears red ties and blue suits." So what? He might also not hunt or fish. No relevance to anything, just what is called colloquially a factoid. Says nothing about his character or worth as a citizen or human being. If you have a case to make about the moral or professional value of a non-drinker or smoker, make it. Churchill enjoyed many a glass and cigar. Mark Twain made signatures snd material out of his personal pleasures. Lincoln ordered barrels of whiskey sent to his generals because Grant was an epic imbiber. Too many cases to cite. There is no special merit in tea-totaling or non-smoking outside the medical and gossip circles. Cheers!🍷
All true and well stated. You see a lot of political threads and posts like that here -- a typical one is posters like Newname or Jamin post a video with little or no comment, essentially saying to the readers "Here. There is stuff in here I think proves some thing I'm upset about." -- as if them being upset was some kind of point in and of itself.
What you have to do, if you find anything they post to be of possible interest, is guess at what they are trying to argue based on other outside factors. Like the OP here is presumably an uptight Evangelical Carrie Nation type with a bit of a persecution complex regarding the media. So you can frame any responses to that particular mentality, if you feel it's worth the time.
The topic is ambiguous. A bland statement of a "fact" that has no context or point of view. You might as well say "Trump wears red ties and blue suits." So what? He might also not hunt or fish. No relevance to anything, just what is called colloquially a factoid. Says nothing about his character or worth as a citizen or human being. If you have a case to make about the moral or professional value of a non-drinker or smoker, make it. Churchill enjoyed many a glass and cigar. Mark Twain made signatures snd material out of his personal pleasures. Lincoln ordered barrels of whiskey sent to his generals because Grant was an epic imbiber. Too many cases to cite. There is no special merit in tea-totaling or non-smoking outside the medical and gossip circles. Cheers!🍷
and you're ignoring that if the family dynamic was that dad wanted a sober but obnoxious son to take over the family business, and his first son wanted to fly and became a drunk, trump being a teetotaler is actually him buying into dad's aggression.
dad was such an obnoxious slumlord woody guthrie wrote a folk song about him.
i mean you're trying to make this into some sort of valueless stew, he drinks, he doesn't, so what. on planet morality he wanted to mimic his jerk slumlord dad who once got arrested at a KKK rally. and was trying deliberately to not be like his brother who got badgered for being a pilot and not taking up the family empire, and eventually found solace in drinking, to the point he ended up unable to fly, stuck in the empire, and drinking himself to death.
i don't know how one can one hand other hand that into oh well one choice is as good as the next.
We have to "ignore" whatever doesnt suit the theme--like all that quasi-biographical material you piled on. Colorful dross. But the plain fact that Trump doesnt drink or smoke may have conjured up all that unrelated story material for you, but the topic didnt generate all that--that was your stuff! Spin. I said the topic as stated did no more than state a "fact" that was meaningless without point of view or expanded context. Im sorry if you thought I was dissing your guy--however much I might want to😏--by not bringing in gratuitous life history. But it was not waranted; a flat fact of a man's couple of behaviors evoked no response from me, and I dont hitchhike on other people's facts and dress them up to go to press.
This post was edited 4 minutes after it was posted.
Reason provided:
Sp
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.