Rekbot I can now feel your anxiety as I also have been just now repeatedly called many names by nefarious and dark doping sympathisers. Like you I live in privacy focused Europe. After calling out a few dudes from NAZ elite for cheating the next thing I know I was harassed for being somebody else which was kinda weird.
If you felt anxiety, and can now feel my anxiety, and consider it "weird" and "harassment", how about calling me "rekrunner" then, instead of "rekbot"?
It’s different with you. You have never explicitly mentioned you felt harassed or weird when Coevett and Armstrongliv calls you a rekbot. In fact you seem to be vaguely entertained by it if I may say. While as for me I’m very straight to the point even with potential dopers and when I get the first chance to say something I would.
I wonder what the doping rekbot would jest in reply to Canova. Canova himself seems surprised at the amount of improvement in the WR. He was only expecting 2:11 tops but 2:09? That’s outer planetary in a country with very low morals.
While you are self-reflecting, you might also consider stopping calling me "doping rekbot".
Assuming for argument my alleged effective message is that "no doping works for anyone ever", this can only be construed as an argument discouraging doping: i.e. "don't dope -- it is all risk and no reward". There is no hidden reverse psychology argument in my expressed doubts, my requests for supporting data, and other related questions testing popular beliefs.
It’s different with you. We can feel the satire of it all but when people call me actual birth names of persons I am not it feels like goosebumps, not funny and not satire.
It’s different with you. We can feel the satire of it all but when people call me actual birth names of persons I am not it feels like goosebumps, not funny and not satire.
Rekrunner and Coevett do that all the time. They are unable to discuss any other way.
For them, half of the other posters are either Army or Hoadie.
If you felt anxiety, and can now feel my anxiety, and consider it "weird" and "harassment", how about calling me "rekrunner" then, instead of "rekbot"?
It’s different with you. You have never explicitly mentioned you felt harassed or weird when Coevett and Armstrongliv calls you a rekbot. In fact you seem to be vaguely entertained by it if I may say. While as for me I’m very straight to the point even with potential dopers and when I get the first chance to say something I would.
So I am anxious, and also entertained? You do have a heightened sense of imagination.
You called it weird and harassment. Are you unfamiliar with Matthew (7:12)?
It’s different with you. We can feel the satire of it all but when people call me actual birth names of persons I am not it feels like goosebumps, not funny and not satire.
Rekrunner and Coevett do that all the time. They are unable to discuss any other way.
For them, half of the other posters are either Army or Hoadie.
???
I've seen Coevett call posters Hoadie, but I do not ever call any posters Hoadie or Army.
As far as I know these are also not anyone's "actual birth names of persons".
Why would women get a bigger advantage from super shoes from men?
1. Maybe when counting in min, but in terms of percentage, it would be the same
2. The fact that there are only two (!) exceptional performances (Ruth and Assefa) speaks otherwise. Third best is 4 minutes down. Maybe supershoes work better than on men but only on two women? Mind you, for men, there are 40 (!) performances within the WR and were run in super shoes.
Maybe Renato doesn't want to see the elephant in the room?
Yeah, we’re supposed to pretend she’d beat Hassan by nearly a mile? Clown show of EPO
While you are self-reflecting, you might also consider stopping calling me "doping rekbot".
Assuming for argument my alleged effective message is that "no doping works for anyone ever", this can only be construed as an argument discouraging doping: i.e. "don't dope -- it is all risk and no reward". There is no hidden reverse psychology argument in my expressed doubts, my requests for supporting data, and other related questions testing popular beliefs.
It’s different with you. We can feel the satire of it all but when people call me actual birth names of persons I am not it feels like goosebumps, not funny and not satire.
You call yourself The King of Physics, is that supposed to be satiriical?
It’s different with you. We can feel the satire of it all but when people call me actual birth names of persons I am not it feels like goosebumps, not funny and not satire.
Rekrunner and Coevett do that all the time. They are unable to discuss any other way.
For them, half of the other posters are either Army or Hoadie.
It’s different with you. You have never explicitly mentioned you felt harassed or weird when Coevett and Armstrongliv calls you a rekbot. In fact you seem to be vaguely entertained by it if I may say. While as for me I’m very straight to the point even with potential dopers and when I get the first chance to say something I would.
So I am anxious, and also entertained? You do have a heightened sense of imagination.
You called it weird and harassment. Are you unfamiliar with Matthew (7:12)?
Look I’m new to the forum. It’s only been a month and half. The scant information i gather about you comes mostly from loyal long time LRC gurus like Armstrongliv and Coevett. I remembered seeing multiple posts of them calling you a rekbot with not so much of an offense from you. You just went about business like it’s another day at the office. You spurned so many chances to address the anxiety if you had one so I guessed it might have turned into some sick pleasure for you?
It’s different for me. My name is KOP and I’m a European citizen just like Coevett. But I’m called ‘Mark Gan aka Joe KS’, a 2 in 1 combinant name by some doping rascal I don’t even know from Singapore 🇸🇬!!
It’s different with you. We can feel the satire of it all but when people call me actual birth names of persons I am not it feels like goosebumps, not funny and not satire.
You call yourself The King of Physics, is that supposed to be satiriical?
Aren’t I the King of Physics? Don’t I reason and think like one in space and time. And don’t I don’t I espouse moral purity in word and deed as required for the spiritual perfection of the study and practice of real Physics?
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Look I’m new to the forum. It’s only been a month and half. The scant information i gather about you comes mostly from loyal long time LRC gurus like Armstrongliv and Coevett. I remembered seeing multiple posts of them calling you a rekbot with not so much of an offense from you. You just went about business like it’s another day at the office. You spurned so many chances to address the anxiety if you had one so I guessed it might have turned into some sick pleasure for you?
It’s different for me. My name is KOP and I’m a European citizen just like Coevett. But I’m called ‘Mark Gan aka Joe KS’, a 2 in 1 combinant name by some doping rascal I don’t even know from Singapore 🇸🇬!!
So you have a tendency to draw conclusions on scant information, from relative newbies to the forum like Armstronglivs and Coevett.
I don't recall Armstronglivs calling me "rekbot" either -- his vocabulary tends to be more derogatory -- a reflection of his moral purity. I cannot patrol every post in every thread, nor do I want to, but I have clarified many times I am not "rekbot" and that "rekbot" posts seem meant primarily to parody my posts and/or troll me.
I'm actually not offended nor anxious, but want to clarify that this is a childish game that others play, and apparently even Kings of Physics are not discriminating enough and fall for it.
... don’t I espouse moral purity in word and deed as required for the spiritual perfection of the study and practice of real Physics?
Are you familiar with Matthew (7:12)?
Very familiar. But if you are not that offended then it simply means I can continue calling you the rekbot? It’s different than ‘Mark Gan aka Joe KS’ as it’s completely out of turn and without recent precedent. Whereas rekbot was closely socially developed and acknowledged in space and time from multiple consenting players. The subject in question which is you is also present in the forum and the rek in rek-bot is at least easily inferred to be from or about rekrunner.
but ‘Mark Gan aka Joe KS’ has no such semantical or syntactical relationship with ‘El Rey del Fisica’! 😅
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.