Seriously! I remain surprised that so many Trump supporters seem to think they're heading for a fair election against a confused old man instead of another rigged event against a nearly omnipotent criminal mastermind. He's the ultimate gangster. I'd think a track record like his should at the very least should be worthy of fear if not respect.
After combing several discussion boards, I have arrived at this conclusion:
After years of screaming that Hunter is a criminal and should be locked up, right wingers changed their tune and hoped he would be found not guilty because they believed it would bolster their claims that the DOJ has been weaponized, the system is fixed, and so on.
Hunter's conviction makes it harder to defend Trump by attacking the system, and that has them BIG MAD.
Democrats, on the other hand, believe in the rule of law, so they had no dog in this fight, didn't care if he was found guilty, are happy that it shows the system works, and are ABSOLUTELY DRINKING CONSERVATIVE TEARS right now.
If you need to ask, you’re even dumber than everyone here knows you are.
That's always the answer. "I can't be bothered telling you what the crime was". Either the libs don't know or they're too embarrassed to say it was a bookkeeping dispute.
I have a MBA from a M7. Trump's trial was a sham - who cares that his records were slightly sloppy?
The jury didn't find that his records were "slightly sloppy." They found that he made a payment to cover up a negative story to avoid it coming out prior to election, intentionally falsified the payments to make it look like legal payments rather than payments for an NDA.
I think we can quibble about how bad that really is, but it wasn't sloppy bookkeeping. I think the connection to "fraud on the public" is a bit overwrought because many people try to hide stories and pay to do it in politics, but that is the same reason that John Edwards was tried by a jury for similar payments.
America would be a much better place if no politician felt they could cover up payments to cover up news stories. If you want to run for public office, your life should be more or less an open book. Paying people off to kill stories or keep things from public eye really shouldn't be allowed.
The real crimes occurred in Georgia and in trying to overturn an election. That's what I want to see him convicted of, because the dumb white collar crimes that every rich person does are less critical to maintaining a democracy for my children to live in than a sitting president calling GA officials and pressuring them to flip the results for him, which scares the crap out of me and should scare the crap out of you, too.
So Trump had Cohen on the payroll. One month he was supposed to say to his bookkeeping department "Don't forget to call this month's legal expense "hush money campaign contribution. I don't want any misdemeanors in my organization!!!"
If you need to ask, you’re even dumber than everyone here knows you are.
That's always the answer. "I can't be bothered telling you what the crime was". Either the libs don't know or they're too embarrassed to say it was a bookkeeping dispute.
34 counts of falsifying business records to cover another crime. That's it. That's the crime. Your refusal to recognize it doesn't make it go away.
After combing several discussion boards, I have arrived at this conclusion:
After years of screaming that Hunter is a criminal and should be locked up, right wingers changed their tune and hoped he would be found not guilty because they believed it would bolster their claims that the DOJ has been weaponized, the system is fixed, and so on.
Hunter's conviction makes it harder to defend Trump by attacking the system, and that has them BIG MAD.
Democrats, on the other hand, believe in the rule of law, so they had no dog in this fight, didn't care if he was found guilty, are happy that it shows the system works, and are ABSOLUTELY DRINKING CONSERVATIVE TEARS right now.
That is all.
Many examples of Right wingers being the barking dog that caught the car.
They like to rail on things for political fundraising. But then they learn that their policies are widely unpopular with the country. And sometimes when their rantings come to fruition it winds up kicking them in the nutz politically.
I think Joe Biden is helped by this Hunter conviction. If you aren't a dumb Trumper you can see clearly that he is being charged with something no other citizen would be. And the general public can see that Hunter Biden is a grown fucquing man that makes his own decisions. Yet he is paying the price because of his last name. Even though he isn't involved in politics. And the charge is a gun charge and this country loves guns more than their firstborn.
And Joe could pardon him but he is the opposite of Trump.
After combing several discussion boards, I have arrived at this conclusion:
After years of screaming that Hunter is a criminal and should be locked up, right wingers changed their tune and hoped he would be found not guilty because they believed it would bolster their claims that the DOJ has been weaponized, the system is fixed, and so on.
Hunter's conviction makes it harder to defend Trump by attacking the system, and that has them BIG MAD.
Democrats, on the other hand, believe in the rule of law, so they had no dog in this fight, didn't care if he was found guilty, are happy that it shows the system works, and are ABSOLUTELY DRINKING CONSERVATIVE TEARS right now.
That is all.
Many examples of Right wingers being the barking dog that caught the car.
They like to rail on things for political fundraising. But then they learn that their policies are widely unpopular with the country. And sometimes when their rantings come to fruition it winds up kicking them in the nutz politically.
I think Joe Biden is helped by this Hunter conviction. If you aren't a dumb Trumper you can see clearly that he is being charged with something no other citizen would be. And the general public can see that Hunter Biden is a grown fucquing man that makes his own decisions. Yet he is paying the price because of his last name. Even though he isn't involved in politics. And the charge is a gun charge and this country loves guns more than their firstborn.
And Joe could pardon him but he is the opposite of Trump.
To your point, Hunter Biden went to trial for a thing that most citizens would never see trial over and Trump won't see prison time for a thing that any other businessperson would go to jail for 20 years over.
After combing several discussion boards, I have arrived at this conclusion:
After years of screaming that Hunter is a criminal and should be locked up, right wingers changed their tune and hoped he would be found not guilty because they believed it would bolster their claims that the DOJ has been weaponized, the system is fixed, and so on.
Hunter's conviction makes it harder to defend Trump by attacking the system, and that has them BIG MAD.
Democrats, on the other hand, believe in the rule of law, so they had no dog in this fight, didn't care if he was found guilty, are happy that it shows the system works, and are ABSOLUTELY DRINKING CONSERVATIVE TEARS right now.
That is all.
This gun charge is the least criminal thing Hunter has done in the last 20 years.
Democrats do not give a damn about the rule of law.
No rational human being actually thinks the "defund the police" party cares about the rule of law.
No rational human being thinks the party that threatens to kill SCOTUS every time they made a ruling they don't like gives a damn about the rule of law.
No rational human being thinks the party that demands SCOTUS be packed so it only rules the way that suits them politically gives a damn about the rule of law.
Hunter will be pardoned.
Democrats don't care what happens to Hunter because he isn't a politician.
Conservatives aren't crying about this verdict. The evidence was absolutely overwhelming you idiots didn't have any choice but to convict.
The real fun begins with Hunter's tax cheat trial.
Will he flip on his corrupt father to save himself?
Many examples of Right wingers being the barking dog that caught the car.
They like to rail on things for political fundraising. But then they learn that their policies are widely unpopular with the country. And sometimes when their rantings come to fruition it winds up kicking them in the nutz politically.
I think Joe Biden is helped by this Hunter conviction. If you aren't a dumb Trumper you can see clearly that he is being charged with something no other citizen would be. And the general public can see that Hunter Biden is a grown fucquing man that makes his own decisions. Yet he is paying the price because of his last name. Even though he isn't involved in politics. And the charge is a gun charge and this country loves guns more than their firstborn.
And Joe could pardon him but he is the opposite of Trump.
To your point, Hunter Biden went to trial for a thing that most citizens would never see trial over and Trump won't see prison time for a thing that any other businessperson would go to jail for 20 years over.
And why? Because the DoJ offered him the most absurdly corrupt plea deal in human history and ran into a judge who wasn't equally corrupt.
If a judge as corrupt as Merchan gets Hunter's plea deal Hunter doesn't even get probation.
And all this AFTER the DoJ intentionally let more serious charges statute of limitations expire.
"Mr. Shapley says that in late 2021 IRS investigators prepared a document covering tax years 2014-2019, in which it recommended the charges against Hunter that Mr. Weiss finally brought this week. When Mr. Weiss attempted to bring those charges last year, he was blocked by U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada of Central California. Only after the whistleblowers went public did Attorney General Merrick Garland give Mr. Weiss special-counsel standing with the authority to bring the indictments regardless of jurisdiction. The political interference allowed the statute of limitations to lapse on Hunter’s 2014 and 2015 tax returns, which Mr. Shapley says contained the most egregious conduct, including a possible Foreign Agents Registration Act violation."
Biden's DoJ has been bending over backwards to protect Hunter notable because those FARA violations will implicate Joe Biden.
If you don't know the law - just don't say anything. He is not a felon.
Explain how he's not a felon. You made the claim, now back it up.
Convicted on 34 felony counts.
Don't just talk out of your ass. Enlighten everyone.
Explain how one false book-keeping entry -- and that's what it was, shown in a few places on the financial statement month after month -- becomes 34 felonies.
After combing several discussion boards, I have arrived at this conclusion:
After years of screaming that Hunter is a criminal and should be locked up, right wingers changed their tune and hoped he would be found not guilty because they believed it would bolster their claims that the DOJ has been weaponized, the system is fixed, and so on.
Hunter's conviction makes it harder to defend Trump by attacking the system, and that has them BIG MAD.
Democrats, on the other hand, believe in the rule of law, so they had no dog in this fight, didn't care if he was found guilty, are happy that it shows the system works, and are ABSOLUTELY DRINKING CONSERVATIVE TEARS right now.
That is all.
Simone Biles is that you?? The mental gymnastics here get a gold medal 😂 seek professional help
Yes Hunter’s attorneys were greedy in the sense that they were in essence looking out for Joe Biden’s career by burying with the prosecution’s acquiescence a very broad grant of immunity in a sentencing document (which the judge doesn’t often review). Contrary to assertions above, if federal prosecutors give immunity at all it is strictly limited to the extant charges. A broad grant of immunity is unheard of. So once the prosecution was embarrassed it made it much harder to agree to reduced gun charges with a minimal sentence like probation. This should have been a minor case without a trial. Note I don’t agree that Hunter did something benign - his own sister was worried (justifiably) and threw the gun away - it is just that it was a minor crime in the scheme of things. Hunter’s new lawyer essentially adopted this strategy in the hope of jury nullification, but from what I can tell the prosecution was very disciplined as they had the evidence of the elements of the crime to submit.
Explain how he's not a felon. You made the claim, now back it up.
Convicted on 34 felony counts.
Don't just talk out of your ass. Enlighten everyone.
Explain how one false book-keeping entry -- and that's what it was, shown in a few places on the financial statement month after month -- becomes 34 felonies.
Yes Hunter’s attorneys were greedy in the sense that they were in essence looking out for Joe Biden’s career by burying with the prosecution’s acquiescence a very broad grant of immunity in a sentencing document (which the judge doesn’t often review). Contrary to assertions above, if federal prosecutors give immunity at all it is strictly limited to the extant charges. A broad grant of immunity is unheard of. So once the prosecution was embarrassed it made it much harder to agree to reduced gun charges with a minimal sentence like probation. This should have been a minor case without a trial. Note I don’t agree that Hunter did something benign - his own sister was worried (justifiably) and threw the gun away - it is just that it was a minor crime in the scheme of things. Hunter’s new lawyer essentially adopted this strategy in the hope of jury nullification, but from what I can tell the prosecution was very disciplined as they had the evidence of the elements of the crime to submit.
this is a quality post and appreciated. Very rare that someone has looked into the evidence and specifics fully before giving their hot takes.
After combing several discussion boards, I have arrived at this conclusion:
After years of screaming that Hunter is a criminal and should be locked up, right wingers changed their tune and hoped he would be found not guilty because they believed it would bolster their claims that the DOJ has been weaponized, the system is fixed, and so on.
Hunter's conviction makes it harder to defend Trump by attacking the system, and that has them BIG MAD.
Democrats, on the other hand, believe in the rule of law, so they had no dog in this fight, didn't care if he was found guilty, are happy that it shows the system works, and are ABSOLUTELY DRINKING CONSERVATIVE TEARS right now.
That is all.
This gun charge is the least criminal thing Hunter has done in the last 20 years.
Democrats do not give a damn about the rule of law.
No rational human being actually thinks the "defund the police" party cares about the rule of law.
No rational human being thinks the party that threatens to kill SCOTUS every time they made a ruling they don't like gives a damn about the rule of law.
No rational human being thinks the party that demands SCOTUS be packed so it only rules the way that suits them politically gives a damn about the rule of law.
Hunter will be pardoned.
Democrats don't care what happens to Hunter because he isn't a politician.
Conservatives aren't crying about this verdict. The evidence was absolutely overwhelming you idiots didn't have any choice but to convict.
The real fun begins with Hunter's tax cheat trial.
Will he flip on his corrupt father to save himself?
imagine coming to your computer on a RUNNING website DURING THE WORK DAY and typing out whatever drivel you read from anonymous Instagram accounts feeding you this stuff and thinking "I did it! I owned the Libs again." This is mental illness man. The anger you most carry in your heart on a daily basis is immense. Get help. Seriously. Good god.
This gun charge is the least criminal thing Hunter has done in the last 20 years.
Democrats do not give a damn about the rule of law.
No rational human being actually thinks the "defund the police" party cares about the rule of law.
No rational human being thinks the party that threatens to kill SCOTUS every time they made a ruling they don't like gives a damn about the rule of law.
No rational human being thinks the party that demands SCOTUS be packed so it only rules the way that suits them politically gives a damn about the rule of law.
Hunter will be pardoned.
Democrats don't care what happens to Hunter because he isn't a politician.
Conservatives aren't crying about this verdict. The evidence was absolutely overwhelming you idiots didn't have any choice but to convict.
The real fun begins with Hunter's tax cheat trial.
Will he flip on his corrupt father to save himself?
imagine coming to your computer on a RUNNING website DURING THE WORK DAY and typing out whatever drivel you read from anonymous Instagram accounts feeding you this stuff and thinking "I did it! I owned the Libs again." This is mental illness man. The anger you most carry in your heart on a daily basis is immense. Get help. Seriously. Good god.
Yes Hunter’s attorneys were greedy in the sense that they were in essence looking out for Joe Biden’s career by burying with the prosecution’s acquiescence a very broad grant of immunity in a sentencing document (which the judge doesn’t often review). Contrary to assertions above, if federal prosecutors give immunity at all it is strictly limited to the extant charges. A broad grant of immunity is unheard of. So once the prosecution was embarrassed it made it much harder to agree to reduced gun charges with a minimal sentence like probation. This should have been a minor case without a trial. Note I don’t agree that Hunter did something benign - his own sister was worried (justifiably) and threw the gun away - it is just that it was a minor crime in the scheme of things. Hunter’s new lawyer essentially adopted this strategy in the hope of jury nullification, but from what I can tell the prosecution was very disciplined as they had the evidence of the elements of the crime to submit.
this is a quality post and appreciated. Very rare that someone has looked into the evidence and specifics fully before giving their hot takes.
Except he obviously didn't look into that good. It wasn't his sister that disposed of the gun.
This post was edited 31 seconds after it was posted.
Explain how he's not a felon. You made the claim, now back it up.
Convicted on 34 felony counts.
Don't just talk out of your ass. Enlighten everyone.
Explain how one false book-keeping entry -- and that's what it was, shown in a few places on the financial statement month after month -- becomes 34 felonies.
Can't believe you guys are falling for that
It was 34 false entries, that's 34 felonies. This isn't hard.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
