I have been bullied, lied to, cheated and defrauded by the evil rekrunner since 3 weeks ago on various other threads. He had been playing around with me like I'm his cheap slut, using me for his advantage and then ditching me once he has taken all pleasure out of my mind/soul/heart!!!!!!!!!!
When I tried to expose his modus operandi, he uses some other anonymous names to call me derogatory sexual names intended to slander my dignity, self-respect and my love for God. At one point he even blasphemously questioned whether Jesus or the bible was real when I kindly asked him to repent from his evil nature!!!!
None of that happened.
I asked you who among the RF-Kings made any objective observations about sports performance. You said many other things, like a mix of objectivity-subjectivity was superior and that objective reality is not reality at all but an ILLUSION, but you also conceded that no RK-King has yet looked at sports performance.
I don't think I ever doubted the reality of Jesus or the bible. I'm pretty sure Jesus existed, and certainly the bible exists.
Sorry none of that happened too.
You use blasphemous names like 'Jebus Christ' in combination with obscene and vulgar/profane comments and posts about my private parts and how so homosexual they have been sullied. These comments have a trend and pattern of succeeding consecutively your rekrunner comments so as not to be mistaken by me about your culpability in space and time!!!!!!
I also completely made irrelevant the school of objectivity and objective facts about sport performance by teaching you that actually the metaphysical substrata electromagnetic energetic nature that prefaces, inhabits, substantiates hence gives illusion in the first place to the very objective observations means that all the very objective observations you are beseeching me about are themselves in actual actuality electromagnetic and energetic-based observations, and hence my RF and/or electromagnetic proof to you established, signed, sealed and delivered yooohoooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hence if I ever conceded no RF Kings looked at sport performance, it's because said RF Kings look upon sport performance or the realm of scientific research in sport performance with condescending and forlorn eyes for being so far backward and ancient in space and time for being so childish and babe-like still arguing about primordial concepts of temperature, humidity, footwear, altitude, drugs what else (?) while electromagnetic or energetic-based research about WiFi, 2G/3G/4G/5G harming sport performance and human health gallops ahead of its time and leaves behind frankly hare-brained sport performance researchers like rekrunner behind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You also implied and intended to the fullest extent that Jesus was a fake (should not exist) because fallible men like you spun that story to you!!! And that the bible about Jesus was written by so many different fallible men and women as well to be fake.
This post was edited 8 minutes after it was posted.
Nothing like silencing your critics by missing tests and getting slapped by whereabouts violations … BYEEeeeee
What's with all the theatrical denial we see from bonafide cheaters like Houlihan and now Katie? It's plain as day they were cheating and they got caught, but all the while, we saw Lance Armstrong levels of performance art. The self righteous indignation and acrid verbal attacks on the criticism, all the while they know full well they are indeed cheaters. What causes this?
Shelby and Katir both still have their defenders, so all that acting kind of works in the court of public opinion.
I still think all sprinters juice, and Christian Coleman is just that dumb about missing tests tho.
Looks like he admitted to the three whereabouts failures.
You are welcome to believe your ILLUSIONS.
I don’t side with you here, although you factually are correct, as you almost always are, and also are at the same page as Wada and AIU (three whereabouts failures: 2 years ban)…
But facts are one thing, context another. -And the context here seems to be, if the AIU report is correct (seems to have been accepted by Katir), that his whereabouts failures are of a so serious character that maybe a civil or criminal court would consider them as proof of illegal drug use / doping…
I myself have no problem to accept Wada / AIU general codex of two years ban for three whereabouts failures. But I miss a stronger reaction when the failures are of this magnitude and documentation. -At least four year ban, and losing medals and records…
I will not launch an unnecessary argument whether Katir’s whereabouts failures are a proof of doping (with illegal drugs). I guess you know current rules better than I do, but I pretty much like to propose the following changes: 3 whereabouts failures which AIU investigation reveals as deception and probably masking drug doping give the same ban and reaction as a positive sample in a drug test. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the athlete thus is a proven drug doper, but only that he has broken rules in a way that is so severe that he cannot have racing as a profession -that this violation is regarded as equally severe as drug doping giving its undermining effect on the sport (ruining of the sport’s reputation, costs, masking of drug doping, ruining the possibility / effect of anti doping efforts).
This post was edited 15 minutes after it was posted.
I’ve always wondered what would happen if doping control came to you while you were out for a long run: You set your overnight address to your home and start running (outside of the 1h-window). Shortly after departing, Anti doping rings at your door. They try to call you repeatedly. You didn’t bring your phone on the run. 2h later you come back. The Doping control has already left, assuming you made a filling error. What happens now?
i'd say that's straightforward. It's a miss.
This seems strange -surely it can’t be this strict outside of the one hour window?
Looks like he admitted to the three whereabouts failures.
You are welcome to believe your ILLUSIONS.
I don’t side with you here, although you factually are correct, as you almost always are, and also are at the same page as Wada and AIU (three whereabouts failures: 2 years ban)…
But facts are one thing, context another. -And the context here seems to be, if the AIU report is correct (seems to have been accepted by Katir), that his whereabouts failures are of a so serious character that maybe a civil or criminal court would consider them as proof of illegal drug use / doping…
I myself have no problem to accept Wada / AIU general codex of two years ban for three whereabouts failures. But I miss a stronger reaction when the failures are of this magnitude and documentation. -At least four year ban, and losing medals and records…
I will not launch an unnecessary argument whether Katir’s whereabouts failures are a poof of doping (with illegal drugs). I guess you know current rules better than I do, but I pretty much like to propose the following changes: 3 whereabouts failures which AIU investigation reveals as deception and probably masking drug doping give the same ban and reaction as a positive sample in a drug test. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the athlete thus is a proven drug doper, but only that he has broken rules in a way that is so severe that he cannot have racing as a profession -that this violation is regarded as equally severe as drug doping giving its undermining effect on the sport (ruining of the sport’s reputation, costs, masking of drug doping, ruining the possibility / effect of anti doping efforts).
Look I upvoted you but I wanted you to know that this is precisely what I don't want!!!!
I don't want the rules re-written to indicate that 3 whereabouts failure is equal to a positive drugs test because if it really must be written this way then it must go for broke and be written as 3 whereabouts failure is PROVEN DOPING UNEQUIVOCALLY and not just merely equal in percentage to proven doping!!!
I don't want no equality, I want INTEGRITY, I WANT FAITHFULNESS, I WANT TRUSTWORTHINESS, I WANT DIGNITY AND HOLINESS OF HEART AND SOUL!!!!!!!
Thank you :)
This post was edited 44 seconds after it was posted.
It amazes me how freakin' stupid people can be. Katir has literally DESTROYED his career. As if there wasn't enough suspicion about his performances, he now officially joins the elite club of drug cheats. Egregiously ditching drug tests is the same as jamming a big juicy needle of EPO in your arm, A$$, and or belly.
It amazes me how freakin' stupid people can be. Katir has literally DESTROYED his career. As if there wasn't enough suspicion about his performances, he now officially joins the elite club of drug cheats. Egregiously ditching drug tests is the same as jamming a big juicy needle of EPO in your arm, A$, and or belly.
See Ya LOSER!
He wouldn't have had a career if he didn't dope though. It was probably still worth it to him since he likely came out ahead financially. That's all crooks really care about anyways. Now he'll start his next gig as a con artist in business or something.
Very much worth it. 100% correct. The same goes for Coleman, Gay, Gatlin and Houlihan. Not mention Salazar!
Even if the doper is caught early in the career, they come back and get embraced by Nike and USATF or equivalent. It's even worse in Kenya: one great year can set up you for life.
Sure, and rightly so. How many athletes know these regulations, accept them and follow them? Thousands, I think. If you still spontaneously think you have to do a long run within the 60 minute window, then that at least shows a disregard for the rules and also a lack of professionalism compared to others. But if you have to be away due to an emergency, you can obviously always send a quick email and then make well-founded, credible statements (according to the AIU press release), which will be checked. If that happens once, it's not a problem. I think the system is fair.
This is why you put the window at a time when you know you won't be spontaneously running.
It's not difficult
Yep. In more than 40 years of running, I haven't met a single person who didn't know when they wanted to train. Every Joe Schmoe from a sleepy one-cow village knows, looking at the following days, that there is a huge difference whether the long run takes place in the morning or in the evening.
Seems relevant that in January the director of Spain's antidoping agency was fired and criminal investigations were started about his management - he is accused if things like hiding positive tests. It's not gotten much coverage in the press.
José Luis Terreros, responsable desde 2017 de la CELAD, fue destituido el pasado 26 de enero tras la denuncia de irregularidades por parte de una funcionaria.
You use blasphemous names like 'Jebus Christ' in combination with obscene and vulgar/profane comments and posts about my private parts and how so homosexual they have been sullied. These comments have a trend and pattern of succeeding consecutively your rekrunner comments so as not to be mistaken by me about your culpability in space and time!!!!!!
I also completely made irrelevant the school of objectivity and objective facts about sport performance by teaching you that actually the metaphysical substrata electromagnetic energetic nature that prefaces, inhabits, substantiates hence gives illusion in the first place to the very objective observations means that all the very objective observations you are beseeching me about are themselves in actual actuality electromagnetic and energetic-based observations, and hence my RF and/or electromagnetic proof to you established, signed, sealed and delivered yooohoooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hence if I ever conceded no RF Kings looked at sport performance, it's because said RF Kings look upon sport performance or the realm of scientific research in sport performance with condescending and forlorn eyes for being so far backward and ancient in space and time for being so childish and babe-like still arguing about primordial concepts of temperature, humidity, footwear, altitude, drugs what else (?) while electromagnetic or energetic-based research about WiFi, 2G/3G/4G/5G harming sport performance and human health gallops ahead of its time and leaves behind frankly hare-brained sport performance researchers like rekrunner behind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You also implied and intended to the fullest extent that Jesus was a fake (should not exist) because fallible men like you spun that story to you!!! And that the bible about Jesus was written by so many different fallible men and women as well to be fake.
Sorry, I don't make such obscene or vulgar posts using any handles. You should reconsider your error and direct your reactions appropriately elsewhere. This only further illustrates how your subjective approach is fundamentally inherently inferior, leading you to jump to wrong conclusions.
I reconfirm that I believe Jesus existed historically, and that the bible exists, in many versions and languages. Did you know that the first English translations didn't exist until the late 1300's?
I think I did ask you which Jesus I should believe in -- the one described by the Jewish people, the one described by John, the one described by Mark, Luke, and Matthew, or the one described elsewhere. You did not answer.
I also said that everything I know about Jesus to date was told to me by mortal men.
You use blasphemous names like 'Jebus Christ' in combination with obscene and vulgar/profane comments and posts about my private parts and how so homosexual they have been sullied. These comments have a trend and pattern of succeeding consecutively your rekrunner comments so as not to be mistaken by me about your culpability in space and time!!!!!!
I also completely made irrelevant the school of objectivity and objective facts about sport performance by teaching you that actually the metaphysical substrata electromagnetic energetic nature that prefaces, inhabits, substantiates hence gives illusion in the first place to the very objective observations means that all the very objective observations you are beseeching me about are themselves in actual actuality electromagnetic and energetic-based observations, and hence my RF and/or electromagnetic proof to you established, signed, sealed and delivered yooohoooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hence if I ever conceded no RF Kings looked at sport performance, it's because said RF Kings look upon sport performance or the realm of scientific research in sport performance with condescending and forlorn eyes for being so far backward and ancient in space and time for being so childish and babe-like still arguing about primordial concepts of temperature, humidity, footwear, altitude, drugs what else (?) while electromagnetic or energetic-based research about WiFi, 2G/3G/4G/5G harming sport performance and human health gallops ahead of its time and leaves behind frankly hare-brained sport performance researchers like rekrunner behind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You also implied and intended to the fullest extent that Jesus was a fake (should not exist) because fallible men like you spun that story to you!!! And that the bible about Jesus was written by so many different fallible men and women as well to be fake.
Sorry, I don't make such obscene or vulgar posts using any handles. You should reconsider your error and direct your reactions appropriately elsewhere. This only further illustrates how your subjective approach is fundamentally inherently inferior, leading you to jump to wrong conclusions.
I reconfirm that I believe Jesus existed historically, and that the bible exists, in many versions and languages. Did you know that the first English translations didn't exist until the late 1300's?
I think I did ask you which Jesus I should believe in -- the one described by the Jewish people, the one described by John, the one described by Mark, Luke, and Matthew, or the one described elsewhere. You did not answer.
I also said that everything I know about Jesus to date was told to me by mortal men.
Sorry, you should rather reconsider your lying to me that you don't make obscene and vulgar posts almost consecutively in space and time with your rekrunner posts!!! You should also reconsider that my 'feeling-based' approach can be superior in space and time, side by side with 'objective' approach also in space and time since the cruz of existence and consciousness isn't about feelings or about objective facts but about TIMING, AND, SPACING of these!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I repeat again you pervert: consciousness is not about feelings nor facts per se, or subjectivity or objectivity per se, but about the TIMING OF THE OBJECTIVITY OR SUBJECTIVITY, and, THE SPACING OF THE SAME!!!!
It's about the SUSCEPTIBILTIY OF SPACE, AND, SUSCEPTIBILITY OF TIME!!!
Hence if feelings are the more susceptible one in space and time, that's the one you go with and believe in and vice versa!!!!
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Sorry, I don't make such obscene or vulgar posts using any handles. You should reconsider your error and direct your reactions appropriately elsewhere. This only further illustrates how your subjective approach is fundamentally inherently inferior, leading you to jump to wrong conclusions.
I reconfirm that I believe Jesus existed historically, and that the bible exists, in many versions and languages. Did you know that the first English translations didn't exist until the late 1300's?
I think I did ask you which Jesus I should believe in -- the one described by the Jewish people, the one described by John, the one described by Mark, Luke, and Matthew, or the one described elsewhere. You did not answer.
I also said that everything I know about Jesus to date was told to me by mortal men.
Sorry, you should rather reconsider your lying to me that you don't make obscene and vulgar posts almost consecutively in space and time with your rekrunner posts!!! You should also reconsider that my 'feeling-based' approach can be superior in space and time, side by side with 'objective' approach also in space and time since the cruz of existence and consciousness isn't about feelings or about objective facts but about TIMING, AND, SPACING of these!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I repeat again you pervert: consciousness is not about feelings nor facts per se, or subjectivity or objectivity per se, but about the TIMING OF THE OBJECTIVITY OR SUBJECTIVITY, and, THE SPACING OF THE SAME!!!!
It's about the SUSCEPTIBILTIY OF SPACE, AND, SUSCEPTIBILITY OF TIME!!!
Hence if feelings are the more susceptible one in space and time, that's the one you go with and believe in and vice versa!!!!
Sorry, you should rather reconsider your lying to me that you don't make obscene and vulgar posts almost consecutively in space and time with your rekrunner posts!!! You should also reconsider that my 'feeling-based' approach can be superior in space and time, side by side with 'objective' approach also in space and time since the cruz of existence and consciousness isn't about feelings or about objective facts but about TIMING, AND, SPACING of these!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I repeat again you pervert: consciousness is not about feelings nor facts per se, or subjectivity or objectivity per se, but about the TIMING OF THE OBJECTIVITY OR SUBJECTIVITY, and, THE SPACING OF THE SAME!!!!
It's about the SUSCEPTIBILTIY OF SPACE, AND, SUSCEPTIBILITY OF TIME!!!
Hence if feelings are the more susceptible one in space and time, that's the one you go with and believe in and vice versa!!!!
"Will you shut up, man"
Sorry, but you sound very rude sir!!!
I'm trying to show or better yet prove using metaphysical basis that objectivity IS NOT ANY GUARANTEE PER SE OF MORALITY OR ETHICS!!!!
I'm trying to teach indeed guarantee to people using metaphysical indeed moral/spiritual basis that subjectivity can and shall have the upper hand in space and time if they can and will be the more susceptible one, do you understand sir???? It's all about SPACING, AND TIMING!!!!
I'm trying to erase the entire fallen or fallacious indoctrination in LRC, schools, colleges, government and judiciary that objective knowledge beats subjective knowledge when at best or to be tedious objective and subjective knowledge are just different, neither inferior nor superior to one another, ways and aspects of knowing and understanding something, period!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Indeed, I wanna simply erase rekrunner amen!
I also want to triple emphasize this because 'feelings' which are subjective hence demeaned are getting a bad rep everywhere in the world including on forums like LRC!!!!!
I want to embolden 'feelings', I want to validate it, I want to give it power, authority, prestige, honor and integrity, indeed if possible I want to give it OBJECTIVITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Whoever claims 'feelings' hence subjectivity is or must be inferior to objectivity or objective facts have either lacked a relationship with a real dad or real mum, or, was denied one from childhood and thus had a troubled childhood!!!!!!!!!! These would be the people who would defend 'objectivity' and 'objective facts' aimlessly or blindly without solid METAPHYSICAL moral foundation and backing.
Question isn't whether rekrunner had a troubled childhood, rather it's a guarantee he had one without any voluntarily or otherwise confession from him!!!! Some things don't need objective facts or spoken out of mouth, it can be subjectively yet accurately triangulated due to metaphysical basis of existence and consciousness which is synchronized in all space and time!!!
People entered in this category have either: Been suspended by a sporting body (an international governing body, a national federation, or a professional league) for illegal performance-enhancing drug, and/or banned drug, use...
Assume Moroccans are cheating until proven otherwise. They did this to themselves. Them and Algerians were the worst.
Again again again, pls read all my metaphysically superior posts and comments pls I'm urging you!!!
It's metaphysically indelicate to assume all Moroccans are cheating until proven otherwise. It's only metaphysically delicate hence refined to assume sport performance is 1) electromagetically rendered, and 2) negatively and positively affected by electromagnetic fields and forces!!! Yes this is the only assumption in the universe that is metaphysically inviolable and invincible hence true eternally!!!
But Hicham El Guerrouj and Said Aouita and Noreddine Morceli are definitely clean as clean can be!!! These 3 are angels and examples of the sport, untouchable, and cannot be sullied!!!! Their metaphysical behavior, their demeanor, their body language, their tone, their running techniques are all seamlessly agreeable or synchronized in space and time with top notch moral ethics!!!
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Morocco and Nigeria have been added to a list of countries considered to have the highest doping risk to athletics, the Athletics Integrity Unit has a...
